Skip to main content

Evaluation of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Emamectin Benzoate against Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Abstract

The Oriental leaf worm moth, Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is among the most voracious insect pests in a variety of economically important crops, particularly cotton. It has developed resistance against conventional chemical insecticides. Therefore, it is vital to evaluate an integrated application of bio- and synthetic pesticide against this pest. Nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) can be a potent alternative to control this pest. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of NPV and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim® 19EC) against three geographically distinct populations of S. litura in vitro conditions. Second and fourth larval instars were treated by three different concentrations of NPV (NPV-1 2 × 109, NPV-2 3 × 109, and NPV-3 4 × 109 POB ml−1) and emamectin benzoate (EB 0.1 ppm) alone and in combination. The results showed that the highest mortality rate (83.28%) was recorded for NPV-3 + EB, followed by NPV-2 + EB, NPV-1 + EB, EB, NPV-3, NPV-2, and NPV-3 at all the tests. Moreover, Faisalabad (FSD) population was found more susceptible, followed by Layyah (LY) and Multan (ML) populations. Reduction in pupation, adult emergence and egg eclosion was found directly related to the pathogenicity of the applied pathogens. The results of this study revealed that biorational control of S. litura with combined application of NPV + emamectin benzoate was an effective tool.

Background

The Oriental leaf worm moth, Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a serious polyphagous and cosmopolitan insect pest of cash crops, vegetable and ornamentals (Senthil-Nathan and Kalaivani, 2005). In Pakistan, S. litura causes heavy losses in various regions such as the northern and southern districts of Punjab (Ahmad et al. 2007). The increase in area under cultivation of succulent crops like soybean, cotton, mung bean, cabbage, and vegetables provide ideal conditions for its vigorous reproduction, resulting in a rapid increase of generations and population size (Gao et al. 2004). Mainstay of the farming community to combat this pest is the use of synthetic chemical insecticides which not only cause serious harm to environment and human health but also develop resistance against these agents (Aydin and Gurkan, 2006). Indiscriminate use of these chemical has also led to resistance in S. litura population in different geographical areas of the Punjab (Pakistan) (Shad et al. 2012; Ahmad and Mehmood, 2015). This situation demands to evaluate safer eco-friendly alternatives.

Nucleopolyhedrosis viruses (NPVs) can be potent alternatives to the synthetic insecticides against S. litura (Ahmad et al. 2018). NPVs belong to family baculoviruses (BV), which is specific against a variety of insect pests of forests and economically important crops (Tang et al. 2011). This family comprises 600 viruses, including two genera, NPV and Granuloviruses (GV) (Hu et al. 2003). NPVs have great potentials against many lepidopterous pests (Tang et al. 2011 and Zhang et al. 2015).

Emamectin benzoate is a semi-synthetic derivative of abamectin which has been developed for the purpose of controlling variety of lepidopterous pests worldwide (Jansson et al. 1997). Moreover, new chemical insecticides have been established from natural sources; disturb the normal physiological functions of the targeted species (Thompson et al. 2000). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified emamectin benzoate as a reduced-risk compound due to environmentally benign characteristics (Saunders and Bret, 1997). It has both stomach and contact mode of actions, primarily acting on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and subsequently on butyric acid receptors. Emamectin benzoate in contrast to synthetic insecticides, has low mammalian toxicity and exerts no toxic effect on non-target organisms. Due to strong mode of action, it is widely used against lepidopterous and dipterous insect pest (Stanley et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2013). In Pakistan, emamectin benzoate has been registered for the control of several species of Lepidoptera in field crops and vegetables.

Integration of synthetic insecticides with baculovirus enhances the efficacy of baculovirus, especially against S. litura (Arti and Yogita, 2014; Shaurub et al. 2014; Ayyub et al. 2019 Nawaz et al.,2019). Keeping in view the importance of low input based crop production and reduction of pesticides’ load on the vegetable crops, the present study aimed to assess the efficacy of NPV alone and in combination with emamectin benzoate against 2nd and 4th larval instars of S. litura from various localities of Punjab (Pakistan) under laboratory conditions.

Material and methods

Insect culture

Larvae of S. litura were collected from three different localities viz. Faisalabad (FSD), Multan (ML), and Layyah (LY), Pakistan and shifted to the Microbial Control Laboratory, Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. S. litura was mass cultured under the laboratory conditions at 26 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% relative humidity (R.H.) and a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) h on a semi artificial diet, following the method of Saljoqi et al. (2015). Adults of S. litura were fed on 10.0% honey solution and provided with a coarse surface of tissue as nappy liner to lay eggs.

Insecticide used

The commercial liquid formulation of Proclaim® (Emamectin benzoate, 19 g l−1, 19EC; Syngenta Pakistan, Ltd., Karachi, Pakistan) was used in the experiment. The insecticide was applied at 0.1 ppm.

Viral isolation and suspension preparation

NPV isolates were obtained from NPV-infected larvae stored in the Microbial Control Laboratory. The presence of NPV was confirmed by inverted microscope (× 40) with Giemsa staining (Yaman et al. 2001). Virus isolation and propagation were carried out in vivo as described by Monobrullah and Nagata (2000). Purified occlusion bodies (POBs ml−1) were counted five times, using a hemocytometer under inverted microscope. A dilution of various concentrations (2 × 109; 3 × 109; and 4 × 109 POBs ml−1) was prepared in distilled water from stock suspension (Cory and Myers, 2003).

Bioassay

Efficiency of emamectin benzoate and NPV was evaluated against 2nd and 4th larval instars. Both pathogens were applied, using a diet incorporation method. A diet piece of 0.5 g was offered to the larvae placed in glass vials (7 cm height, 3 cm in diameter) (Qayyum et al. 2015). The artificial diet, mixed with the three concentrations of NPV (2 × 109, 3×109, and 4 × 109 POB ml−1) and emamectin benzoate (0.1 ppm) or a combined suspension of these was used. Each treatment contained 15 larvae (as a replicate), and was repeated thrice. Larvae were fed on the treated artificial diets for 48 h. After 48 h, survivors were transferred into new vials containing non-treated fresh diet. Bioassay were conducted at 25 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5% R.H. and a photoperiod of 14:10 (D:L) h in an incubator. Mortality rate was recorded every 24 h and the last count was recorded till pupation of both larval instars. The larvae were poked with a blunt needle and those unable to move in a coordinated manner were considered as dead (Ma et al. 2008; Qayyum et al. 2015). Pupation and adult emergence data were also recorded hereafter. The emerged adults were allowed to mate freely at each treatment and egg hatching percentage was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Mortality means were corrected using Abbott’s formula (Abbott, 1925) and the data was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), using Minitab software (Minitab, 2002) and significance of means were separated by Tukey’s HSD test at 1.0% significance level (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995).

Results and discussion

Efficacy of NPV and emamectin benzoate was challenged against 2nd and 4th larval instars of S. litura on the artificial diet and all treatments were found significant. Highest mortality was recorded for NPV-3 + EB, followed by NPV-2 + EB, NPV-1 + EB, EB, NPV-3, NPV-2, and NPV-3 at all the tests. For 2nd instar larvae, the highest larval mortality rate (49.52%) was recorded for emamectin benzoate in FSD population (F7,71 = 118.0, p ≤ 0.01), followed by LY (F7,71 = 97.7, p ≤ 0.01) and then ML (F7,71 = 112, p ≤ 0.01) populations (Table 1). In the combined treatments, maximum larval mortality (100.0%) was recorded at the highest concentration of NPV (4 × 109 POB ml−1) and emamectin benzoate (0.1 ppm) (Table 1). In case of 4th instar larvae, significant differences were found among all the treatments. In individual applications, the highest larval mortality (44.42%) was recorded for emamectin benzoate in FSD population (F7,71 = 128.0; p ≤ 0.01), followed by LY (F7,71 = 87.6; p ≤ 0.01) and then ML (F7,71 = 121; p ≤ 0.01). Similarly, the highest mortality (96.19%) was recorded in FSD population, followed by LY and ML populations for a high concentration of NPV (4 × 109 POB ml−1) with emamectin benzoate (0.01 ppm) (Table 1). With regard to proportion of insects succeeded to pupate (Table 2), the interaction of NPV and emamectin benzoate varied greatly and significantly.

Table 1 Mean mortality (%±SE) of second and fourth larval instars of Spodoptera litura from three different field populations treated with nucleopolyhedrosis virus and emamectin benzoate (NPV-1 2 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-2 3 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-3 3 × 109 POBs ml−1, EM 0.1 ppm)
Table 2 Mean pupation (%±SE) of second and fourth larval instars of Spodoptera litura from three different field populations treated with nucleopolyhedrosis virus and emamectin benzoate. (NPV-1 2 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-2 3 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-3 4 × 109 POBs ml−1, EM 0.1 ppm)

The combined applications of microbial pathogens may enhance their pathogenicity, persistence and infection rate (Ali et al. 2016). Moreover, the issue of insecticide resistance can also be minimized as they exhibit novel modes of actions, which is lacking in conventional chemical insecticides (Qayyum et al. 2015 and Bala et al. 2018).

Combined action of both the two pathogens was proved to be more fatal than their sole application and lower proportion of pupation was observed for all populations (2nd instar: FSD 0.00 ± 0.00, LY 2.96 ± 0.27, ML 7.40 ± 0.73; 4th instar: FSD 3.70 ± 0.37, LY 8.88 ± 0.71, ML 13.33 ± 0.96) than the control treatment (˃ 94.0%). Larval mortality increased as the numbers of polyhedral occlusion bodies (POBs) were increased in individual or combined applications. Similar findings were reported by Nawaz et al. (2019) who reported a high mortality of Helicoverpa armigera (H.) larvae with the increase of POBs number. Obtained results are also parallel to the findings of Arrizubieta et al. (2016), who reported the highest effectiveness of NPV and insecticides mixture against H. armigera. This might be attributed to the fact that the polyhedral bodies of NPV attach to the midget of host and multiply, thereby destroying the gut cells. The midgut is the first binding site of POBs, where they multiply and then infection transfer from cell to cell, causing the death of the host (Arif et al. 2018). In the present study, a high mortality rate was recorded in the combined treatments than in the sole application of NPV or emamectin benzoate. Additive or synergistic effects can be resulted by dual action of both pathogens, which may broaden the action spectrum. Similar findings were also reported (Qayyum et al. 2015; Ayyub et al. 2019 and Nawaz et al. 2019; Maqsood et al. 2019). Contrarily, Trang et al. (2002) reported antagonistic effects of NPV and imidacloprid. Antagonism may be caused due to reducing feeding or changing in pH of gut (El-Helaly and El-bendary 2013).

Apart from untreated larvae, the highest level of pupation (2nd instar: FSD 71.85 ± 2.89, LY 79.25 ± 2.59, ML 85.18 ± 2.42; 4th instar: FSD 78.51 ± 1.85, LY 85.18 ± 2.67, ML 91.11 ± 3.22) was observed in NPV1 treatment for both 2nd and 4th larval instars respectively (Table 2). Adult emergence and egg eclosion of both instars were found inversely related to pathogenicity of NPV and emamectin benzoate. Significant differences were observed at individual and combined treatments for all populations. Lowest adult emergence (2nd instar: FSD 0.00 ± 0.00, LY 1.48 ± 0.17, ML 4.44 ± 0.21; 4th instar: FSD 0.00 ± 0.00, LY 6.66 ± 0.13, ML 9.62 ± 039) and egg hatchability (2nd instar: FSD 0.00 ± 0.00, LY 0.00 ± 0.00, ML 2.93 ± 0.09; 4th instar: FSD 4.85 ± 0.08, LY 10.42 ± 0.47, ML 16.19 ± 0.92) was recorded in larvae treated with NPV-3 and EMB in 2nd and 4th instars, respectively, whereas the highest level was recorded in larvae treated with NPV-1. Overall, combined application exerted more hazardous effect on adult emergence and egg eclosion than the individual applications and was inversely proportional to the pathogenicity dependent manners (Tables 3 and 4). Similar findings were also observed by Qayyum et al. (2015) with Bacillus thuringiensis and NPV against H. armigera. Different susceptibility levels were observed in various populations. This might show the level of resistance in insects towards insecticides to which they have been exposed frequently and successively. Resistant populations (ML), frequently exposed to the insecticides, attained cross resistance against emamectin benzoate and vice versa.

Table 3 Mean adult emergence (%±SE) of second and fourth larval instars of Spodoptera litura from three different field populations treated with nucleopolyhedrosis virus and emamectin benzoate. (NPV-1 2 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-2 3 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-3 4 × 109 POBs ml−1, EM 0.1 ppm)
Table 4 Mean egg eclosion (%±SE) of second and fourth larval instars of Spodoptera litura from three different field populations treated with nucleopolyhedrosis virus and emamectin benzoate. (NPV-1 2 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-2 3 × 109 POBs ml−1, NPV-3 4 × 109 POBs ml−1, EM 0.1 ppm)

Conclusion

Integration of NPV and emamectin benzoate could be effectively used against the notorious pest (S. litura). Both of the two pathogens represented better tools to combat resistance related issues. Further evaluations under field conditions is needed for further validation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on request.

References

  1. Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad JN, Mushtaq R, Ahmad SJN, Maqsood S, Ahuja I, Bones AM (2018) Molecular identification and pathological characteristics of NPV isolated from Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in Pakistan. Pak J Zool 50:2229–2237

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad M, Arif MI, Ahmad M (2007) Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Prot 26:809–817

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad M, Mehmood R (2015) Monitoring of resistance to new chemistry insecticides in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. J Econ Entomol 108(3):1279–1288

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali H, Hou Y, Tang B, Shi Z, Muhammad A, Sanda NB (2016) A way of reproductive manipulation and biology of Wolbachia pipientis. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 4(2):156–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arif M, Islam SU, Adnan M, Anwar M, Ali H, Wu Z (2018) Recent progress on gene silencing/suppression by virus-derived small interfering RNAs in rice viruses especially Rice grassy stunt virus. Microb Pathog 125:210–218

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arrizubieta M, Simón O, Torres-Vila LM, Figueiredo E, Mendiola J, Mexia A, Caballero P, Williams T (2016) Insecticidal efficacy and persistence of a co-occluded binary mixture of Helicoverpa armigera n0ucleopolyhedro virus (Hear NPV) variants in protected and field-grown tomato crops on the Iberian Peninsula. Pest Manag Sci 72(4):660–670

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arti P, Yogita W (2014) Field compatibility of microbial pesticide SL NPV with synthetic pesticide Roket, Cypermethrin + Profenofos] against tobacco caterpillar Spodoptera litura [Fabricus]. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci (2)4:767

  9. Aydin MH, Gurkan MO (2006) The efficacy of Spinosad on different strains of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Turkish J Biol 30:5–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayyub MB, Nawaz A, Arif MJ, Amrao L (2019) Individual and combined impact of nuclear polyhedrosis virus and spinosad to control the tropical armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in cotton in Pakistan. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29(67):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bala NS, Muhammad A, Ali H, Hou Y (2018) Entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae surpasses the cellular immune responses of the hispid beetle, Octodonta nipae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Microb Pathog 124:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cory JS, Myers JH (2003) The ecology and evolution of insect baculoviruses. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:239–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Helaly AA, El-bendary HM (2013) Impact of Spinosad and Nucleopolyhedrosis virus alone and in combination against the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis under laboratory. App Sci Rep 2(1):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao C, Bei Y, Chen T, Gu X (2004) On factors causing outbreak of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Acta Agri Zhejiangensis 16:332–335

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Z, Chen X, Sun X (2003) Molecular Biology of Insect Viruses. A review. Adv Microb Control Insect Pests:83–107

  16. Jansson RK, Peterson RF, Mookerjee PK, Halliday WR, Argentine JA, Dybas RA (1997) Development of a novel soluble granule formulation of emamectin benzoate for control of Lepidopterous pests. Flo Entomol 80:425–442

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma X, Liu X, Ning X, Zhang B, Han F, Guan X, Tan Y, Zhang Q (2008) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac and Beauveria bassiana on Asiatic corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Invert Pathol 99:123–128

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maqsood S, Afzal M, Haider MS, Khan HAA, Ali M, Ashfaq M, Aqueel MA, Ullah MI (2019) Effectiveness of uuclear polyhedrosis virus and Bacillus thuringiensis alone and in combination against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Pak J Zool 51(2):631–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Minitab (2002) Software Inc. Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Monobrullah M, Nagata M (2000) Effects of larval age on susceptibility of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Spodoptera litura multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Can Entomol 132:337–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nawaz A, Ali H, Sufyan M, Gogi MD, Arif MJ, Ranjha MH, Arshid M, Waseem M, Mustafa T, Qasim M, Rizwan M, Zaynab M, Khan KA, Ghramh HA (2019) Comparative bio-efficacy of nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) and Spinosad against American boll worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Rev Brasil de Entomol 63:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qayyum MA, Wakil W, Arif MJ, Sahi ST (2015) Bacillus thuringiensis and Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus for the Enhanced Bio-control of Helicoverpa armigera. Int J Agric Biol 17(5):1043–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saljoqi A, Haq R, Ehsan-ul-Haq KJ, Ali G (2015) Rearing of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) on different artificial diets and its parasitization with Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii). Pak J Zool 47(1):169–175

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saunders DG, Bret BL (1997) Fate of spinosad in the environment. Down to Earth 52:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  25. Senthil-Nathan S, Kalaivanic K (2005) Efficacy of nucleopolyhedrovirus and Azadiractin on Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control 34(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shad SA, Sayyed AH, Fazal S, Saleem MA, Zaka SM, Ali M (2012) Field evolved resistance to carbamates, organophosphates, pyrethroids, and new chemistry insecticides in Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Pest Sci 85:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaurub EH, El-Meguid AA, Abd El-Aziz NM (2014) Effect of individual and combined treatment with Azadirachtin and Spodoptera littoralis Multicapsid Nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliMNPV, Baculoviridae) on the Egyptian Cotton Leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ecol Balk 6(2):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sokal R, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman and Company, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stanley J, Chandrasekaran S, Regupathy A, Sheeba-Jasmine R (2006) Base line toxicity of emamectin and spinosad to Spodoptera litura. Ann Plant Protect Sci 14:346–349

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tanga XX, Sun XL, Pub GQ, Wang WB, Zhang CX, Zhua J (2011) Expression of a neurotoxin gene improves the insecticidal activity of Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV). Virus Res 159(1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson GD, Dutton R, Sparks TC (2000) Spinosad a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Manag Sci 56:696-702

  32. Trang T, Kieu T, Chaudhari S (2002) Bioassay of nuclear polyhydrosis virus (NPV) and in combination with insecticide on Spodeptera litura (Fab). Omerica 10:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang D, Wang YM, Liu HY, Xin Z, Xue M (2013) Lethal and sublethal effects of Spinosad on Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 106(4):1825–1831

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yaman M, Nalçacioğlu R, Demirbağ Z (2001) Viral control of the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffroy) in Turkey. Turk J Biol 25:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang S, Wu F, Li Z, Lu Z, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Liu X (2015) Effects of nucleopolyhedrovirus infection on the development of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and expression of its 20-hydroxyecdysone and juvenile hormone related genes. Fl Entomol 98(2):682–689

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are obliged to Dr. Ahmad Nawaz (College of Agriculture, BZU Bahadur Sub-Campus, Layyah) for his valuable suggestions in MS.

Funding

N/A

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors equally participated in this study. WW conceived and designed the study. MSQ and MY conducted the research and prepared first draft. MAQ performed statistical analysis and prepared graphs. WW supervised, reviewed and edited MS for final submission. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Yasin or Waqas Wakil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

All authors are agreed to publish this MS and it has not been submitted in any other journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasin, M., Qazi, M.S., Wakil, W. et al. Evaluation of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Emamectin Benzoate against Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00271-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nucleopolyhedrosis virus, Emamectin benzoate
  • Spodoptera litura
  • Efficacy