- Open Access
Endophytic fungi from South Sumatra (Indonesia) in seed-treated corn seedlings Affecting development of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 32, Article number: 103 (2022)
Topical application of the entomopathogenic fungi (EPFs) against Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae is less effective due to larvae hiding in the corn midribs in the field. To control the larvae, the fungi colonize in plant tissues or endophytic fungi are needed. There is no information on the pathogenicity of the endophytic fungi from Indonesia on the development of S. frugiperda. The endophytic fungi isolated from infected-host cadavers from South Sumatra (Indonesia) were identified morphologically and molecularly, and the effect of seed-treated corn seedlings with the fungi on S. frugiperda development was evaluated. The fungal identification was based on morphological and molecular characteristics. Bioassay of the endophytic fungal species in seed-treated young maize was performed against the neonate larvae (hatching within 24 h.) of first instar, and their development was observed.
The results of molecular identification showed that the fungal species were Beauveria bassiana of five fungal isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) and Metarhizium anisopliae of an isolate (WTTJC260521B). The life span of S. frugiperda fed on leaves of fungal-colonized maize was significantly longer than those fed on leaves of non-colonized maize. The fungal-colonized young maize significantly increased mortality rate of all larval instars than non-colonized one. The last instar larvae mortality treated with B. bassiana (JGTP240521A isolates) (51.33%) was the highest among other treatments and did not significantly differ from each of B. bassiana of WTTJC260521A and WTTJC290521A isolates 45.33% and 44.67%, respectively. Feeding on leaves of fungal-colonized maize significantly decreased the percentage of the last instar larvae development to the pupal stage, the adult emergence, the eggs laid, and the percentage of hatched eggs. This is the first report that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae from South Sumatra (Indonesia) in seed-treated corn seedlings had negative effects on development of S. frugiperda.
Finally, these results highlight the potential of endophytic EPFs to protect corn plants against S. frugiperda.
Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) or fall armyworm (FAW) is one of the most important noctuid pests of corn in the world. The FAW is a migratory and polyphagous pest that can attack 353 host plant species from 76 plant families (Montezano et al. 2018). The pest is native to the neotropics of the Americas and has spread throughout the world (Otim et al. 2018). More recently, the FAW becomes a new invasive pest in many parts of Africa (Niassy et al. 2021) and Asia (Lamsal et al. 2020), including Indonesia (Herlinda et al. 2021). This pest is commonly controlled using synthetic insecticides (Kumela et al. 2018); however, the resistances of the FAW to many insecticides, such as pyrethroid, spinosad, and organophosphorus insecticides have occurred (Zhang et al. 2021). In addition, the insecticide application negatively affects the human health and the environment (Harrison et al. 2019). An alternative more sustainable and eco-friendly control methods against S. frugiperda is urgently needed.
Biological control based on utilizing EPFs is the preferred control option for FAW (Mantzoukas and Eliopoulos 2020). Topical application (direct contact) of the EPF, Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes), killed more than 80% of S. frugiperda larvae (Ramanujam et al. 2020). Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) could kill 75% of S. frugiperda larvae (Ramos et al. 2020). However, in the field, the larvae occurred on the surface of leaves or maize stalks only in the morning, but at daylight up to night, they hide in the corn midribs (Herlinda et al. 2021). So, topical application of the fungus against the S. frugiperda larvae is less effective (Gustianingtyas et al. 2021). To control such hiding larvae in the field, the fungi colonizing in plant tissues or endophytic fungi are needed (Ramos et al. 2020). The endophytic fungi associate mutually with their host plants (Lira et al. 2020) and can stimulate the plant growth but suppress the insect pest growth (Russo et al. 2020).
Previous studies have demonstrated that the endophytic fungal B. bassiana from corn root from Indonesia applied topically caused 29.33% of the FAW larval mortality (Gustianingtyas et al. 2021). The endophytic fungal B. bassiana used as seed treatment caused up to 22.67% of the FAW larval mortality (Herlinda et al. 2021). An experiment has previously also reported that endophytic B. bassiana sprayed on leaves has a high ability to colonize corn plants and the fungus caused significant reductions in the growth and development of S. frugiperda (Russo et al. 2020). There is no information on the pathogenicity of the endophytic fungi from Indonesia on the development of S. frugiperda. In addition, the potential of the fungi isolated from the infected-host cadaver as endophytic entomopathogens needs to be investigated. In this study, the fungi isolated from infected-host cadavers from South Sumatra (Indonesia) were identified morphologically and molecularly and the effect of seed-treated corn seedlings with the fungi on S. frugiperda development was evaluated.
Exploration of the fungi was performed by collecting infected-host insect cadavers from crops in South Sumatra, Indonesia, from May until June 2021. Purification and isolation of the fungi were carried out from June to July 2021. The morphological identification was carried out in the Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya, in July 2021, and the molecular identification was performed from August to December 2021 at the Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology (accredited according to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard), Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia. Experimental design used for bioassay was a completely randomized block designs consisted of seven treatments (six fungal isolates and control), and the experiment was repeated three times.
Fungal exploration, isolation, and purification
Fungal exploration from the infected-host cadavers using the method of Ab Majid et al. (2015) by collecting infected-host insects or cadaver infected with the fungi from the fields. The exploration was carried out in Tanjung Pering, Ogan Ilir, South Sumatra (3°13′23″S104°38′27″E), Tanjung Cermin, Pagar Alam, South Sumatra (4°02′23″S103°13″14″E), and Nendagung, Pagar Alam, South Sumatra (3°56′22″S103°12′15″E) (Table 1). The infected insects or cadavers were first surface-sterilized with 70% EtOH (Ethyl alcohol) and 1% NaOCl (Sodium hypochlorite), then rinsed 3 times (Elfita et al. 2019). After that, the sample cadavers were cultured aseptically onto SDA (Sabouraud Dextrose Agar) medium (Russo et al. 2020). The fungal culture was purified to make an isolate per sample. The fungal macroscopic and microscopic characteristics, such as the colonial color and shape, the conidial shape and size, and the conidiophores were observed (Herlinda et al. 2021), and then, molecular identification was performed.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
DNA was extracted according to the method of Swibawa et al. (2020) and carried out on fungal conidia of 7-day-old fungus. As much as 10 ml of conidia suspension was centrifuged using CF15RXII for 10 min at a speed of 14,000 rpm. Then, 1 ml of 70% ethanol was added to the centrifuge tube and centrifuged again for 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and 1 ml of extraction buffer (0.5 ml Tris HCl, 1 mL SDS 1% + 2.8 mL NaCl, 0.2 ml mercaptoethanol, 2 ml EDTA, 3.5 ml sterile water) was added. The suspension was incubated at -40 °C for 24 h. The frozen suspension was crushed until pulverized. A total of 500 µl of pellet suspension was put into a 1.5 ml tube, and 400 µl of 2% CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) was added, homogenized, and heated at 65 °C for an hour using a water bath (Brookfield TC 550 MX-230, USA). After the incubation, 500 µl of PCI (phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol) (25:24:1) was added, homogenized, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. A total of 600 μl supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml tube, and 600 μl chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added, homogenized, and centrifuged (Microspin12; Biosan, Latvia) again at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. A total of 400 µl of supernatant was then put into to a new 1.5 ml tube, and 400 µl of cold isopropanol was homogenized and incubated at − 40 °C for 20 min. Then, the suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the pellet was added with 500 µl of 70% cold ethanol and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the pellets obtained were incubated at room temperature for 24 h to dry. After drying, the pellets were added as much as 50 µl 1 × Tris–HCL EDTA (TE) pH 8.0 (1st Base Malaysia).
PCR amplification was carried out using the Sensoquest Thermal Cycler (Germany) PCR machine on ITS (the Internal Transcribed Spacer) using ITS1 and ITS4 primers (White et al. 1990). The DNA amplification stage consisted of 1 initiation cycle at 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, primer attachment at 52 °C for 1 min, primer extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and 1 elongation cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. Then, the PCR results were electrophoresed, using 0.5% agarose in 20 ml of 1 × Tris/Boric Acid/EDTA (TBE) buffer (1st Base Malaysia) and added 1 µl of ethidium bromide (EtBr 10 mg/ml). The electrophoresis was under taken in 1 × TBE buffer solution at 50 V for 70 min, and the results were visualized using a DigiDoc UV transilluminator (UVP, USA).
The PCR results were sent to 1st Base Malaysia for a sequencing process. The results of the sequencing were analyzed, using Bio Edit ver. 7.2.6 for windows. The results were submitted to BLAST (the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to obtain the genus or species that had the greatest homology or similarity and molecularly. The phylogeny tree was developed using the Mega 7 for Windows program (Kumar et al. 2016), using the method of UPGMA (jukes and cantor model). The ITS region sequences for several strains used as a reference in this study were obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Mass-rearing of Spodoptera frugiperda
The mass-rearing of S. frugiperda was performed using the method of Herlinda et al. (2020a, b). The eggs of S. frugiperda were obtained from the Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya. They were reared in laboratory for more than 5 generations at 28–29 °C temperature, and 82–83% RH and the lighting set to photoperiod 12:12 (L:D) hrs. In the laboratory, the larvae of S. frugiperda were maintained individually due to cannibal behaviors and reared using fresh maize leaves. The prepupae and pupae were replaced in a wire mesh cage (30 × 30 × 30 cm3) and inside this cage placed also fresh maize leaves for the adults to lay eggs. Emerged adults were used for bioassays.
Assessing endophytic fungal colonization
Fungal inoculation for maize seeds treated was carried out to assess the ability of the fungal colonization into the maize seedling tissue and to ensure that the fungi used in this experiment were truly endophytic. All the isolates used were grown in SDA medium incubated for 14 days, and then, the SDA fungal culture was transferred to the broth medium (SDB, Sabouraud Dextrose Broth) following the method of Gustianingtyas et al. (2020) and incubated for 7 days on the shaker and 7 days unshaken position. The 45 corn seeds for an isolate were surface-sterilized by using (Russo et al. 2020) method. The seeds were immersed in 10 ml of fungal suspension (1 × 1010 conidia ml−1) for 24 h, while for the control only 10 ml of sterilized water was treated for the seeds. Then, the seeds were grown in the hydroponic medium, following the method of Novianti et al. (2020) and incubated for 14 days, and this treatment was repeated 3 times for each isolate. The tip leaves of 14-day-old maize seedlings (young maize) were cut of 5 × 5 mm2 to be grown onto the SDA medium to detect the mycelia of the endophytic fungi. The leaf materials were first surface-sterilized by using method of (Russo et al. 2020) before grown onto the SDA medium. The leaf material surface-sterilized was carried out by immersion in 70% ethanol, then followed by sodium hypochlorite for 2 min, and rinsed twice in sterile distilled water, and the final rinse water was grown onto SDA and incubated for 10 days. The rest or remaining leaves were used for bioassays as described below.
Bioassay for assessing effect of corn seed treatment on S. frugiperda development
The bioassay for assessing the effect of corn seed treatment on S. frugiperda growth and development followed the method of Russo et al. (2020). The 14-day-old maize seedlings already inoculated with the endophytic fungi as described above were given to be consumed to the first instar neonate larvae of S. frugiperda, while for control treatment, the larvae were provided the non-inoculated young maize and this experiment was repeated three times. The 50 neonate larvae (hatching within 24 h) of first larvae instar were allowed to feed on the treated young maize and untreated ones (control) for 6 h or until the leaves eaten up, and this treatment was replicated three times for each isolate and the control. Then, the larvae were individually kept in a porous plastic cup (Ø 6.5 cm, height 4.6 cm) and were fed on healthy non-inoculated leaves measuring 2 cm × 5 cm per day per larvae and replaced with a fresh new one every day. The treatments of this experiment consisted of the six fungal isolates and the control (water) and used the completely randomized block designs. The variables recorded were development time of each stage (egg, larval, pupal, and adult) and mortality of each stage. The larval and pupal mortality were recorded daily, and the adults emerging were observed every day. The sex of adults emerged was recorded, and the adults were placed in the wire mesh cage for copulation with fresh maize leaves inside to allow egg-laying. Egg collection and 10% honey bee solution replacement for adults were carried out every day. The adult longevity was also observed until the adult death.
The differences in the length of different stages (egg, larval, pupal, and adult), mortality of each stage, adult longevity, eggs laid, and sex ratio of each treatment were analyzed by analysis variance (ANOVA). Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test (Tukey's test) was employed to test for the significant differences among the treatments (isolates) at P = 0.05. All data were calculated using software of SAS University Edition 2.7 9.4 M5.
Identification of the endophytic fungal isolates
Five fungal isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) had the same macroscopic and microscopic characteristics, while the isolate (WTTJC260521B) had different characteristics (Fig. 1). The WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A isolates had a white colonial, hyphal, and mycelia color, and non-septate and globose conidia or spores. These characteristics were placed the isolates within the group of B. bassiana (Fig. 2). The isolates were deposited in the GenBank with the accession number ON631784 (JGTP240521A isolate), ON631780 (WTTJC260521A isolate), ON631783 (WTTJC290521A isolate), ON631782 (WTTJC290521B isolate), ON631778 (JGNT300521 isolate) (Table 1). The isolate of WTTJC260521B had a white young colony, then the older colony turned greenish white to dark green, and the isolate had the green hyphae and mycelia, and the isolate had the non-septation, clear, and cylindrical conidia. The isolate was placed within the group of M. anisopliae (Fig. 2). The WTTJC260521B isolate was deposited in the GenBank with the accession number ON631793 (WTTJC260521B isolate) (Table 1).
The result of BLAST search revealed that five fungal isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) shared 100% of similarity each other as well as with JgSPK (Acc. No. MZ356494.1). All the isolates shared 99.80% of similarity with JGNT300521 as well as with BSwTd4 (Acc. No. MT448732.1). JGNT300521 isolate shared 99.61% of similarity with BSwTd4. All the isolates shared 98.83% of similarity with B1 UNILA (= NKPT) (Acc. No. LC413808.1) and type strain on B. bassiana (ARSEF1564.T., Acc. No. HQ880761.1). Isolate of WTTJC260521B shared 99.992% of similarity with reference isolate of IPPM010202 (Acc. No. KY437678.1), 99.994% of similarity with strain MSwTp3 (Acc. No. MT448733.1), and 99.985% of similarity with the type strain of M. anisopliae ARSEF 7487.T (Acc. No. HQ331446.1). So, there were two 2 species from the 6 investigated isolates of the endophytic fungi found in this study. The five isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) were in the group of B. bassiana, and one isolate (WTTJC260521B) was in the group of M. anisopliae.
Development of Spodoptera frugiperda fed on young maize colonized and non-colonized by fungi
Six fungal isolates found and used in this experiment were able to colonize young maize (seedling) when inoculated by seed immersion treatment, and a percentage of leaves colonized by endophytic entomopathogenic fungi was high at 14 days than at 7 days after inoculation (Table 2). They were confirmed as endophytic fungi. The seed immersion treatment resulted leaves of treated young maize grown on to the SDA medium were overgrown with the fungal isolates (Fig. 3). No fungal growth was found on the leaves of untreated maize on the last rinse water. This confirmed that the fungal isolates used in this study were endophytic fungi and it also showed that the surface sterilization of maize tissues eliminated the epiphytic microorganisms and the fungi growing out of the leaf surface were the endophytic fungi originating from within the maize tissues.
The larvae that consumed leaves of colonized maize exhibited distinctive symptoms, namely smaller body, shrivels, hardens like a mummy, but the healthy larvae of the control were longer and bigger than treated larvae. The cadavers were covered by mycelia and conidia and their colors depending of the fungal species (Fig. 4). The color of cadavers from the larvae that consumed leaves colonized by B. bassiana and M. anisopliae was white and green, respectively. Re-isolation of the fungus from the cadavers showed the same fungal isolates found from the larvae that died after feeding on the leaves of the plants where seed treatment was given (Fig. 4).
Feeding on leaves of fungal-colonized maize significantly increased developmental time of the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth larval instars (P < 0.0001) (Table 3). However, there was non-significant difference in the developmental time of first instar larvae of treated and untreated maize (control). This fungal-colonized maize also increased egg and pupal development time, but decreased female and male adult longevity. The life span of S. frugiperda fed on leaves of fungal-colonized maize was significantly longer than those fed on leaves of non-colonized maize (Table 4). The longest life span of S. frugiperda occurred on the individuals fed on leaves of B. bassiana-colonized maize.
The fungal-colonized young maize significantly increased mortality of all larval instars than the non-colonized one (Table 5). The mortality of last instar larvae treated with B. bassiana (JGTP240521A isolates) (51.33%) was the highest among other treatments and did not significantly differ from each of the B. bassiana (WTTJC260521A and WTTJC290521A isolates) (45.33 and 44.67%, respectively). Feeding on leaves of fungal-colonized maize significantly decreased the percentage of the last larval instar becoming pupal stage and adult emergence (Table 6). The young maize colonized with fungi significantly reduced eggs laid by the adults (fecundity), but did not affect the sex ratio of S. frugiperda. Percentage of hatched eggs significantly decreased on the treatment of B. bassiana (JGTP240521A, WTTJC260521A, WTTJC290521A, and WTTJC290521B isolates) (Table 6).
The results of identification based on the morphological characteristics of five isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) showed that they had similar morphology of the colony, hypha, and mycelia and the conidial shape. All belong to species of B. bassiana. These characteristics matched to B. bassiana described by Herlinda et al. (2021). The isolate of WTTJC260521B belonged to the species, M. anisopliae. The isolate morphology of the colony and the hyphal, mycelia, and conidial of shape matched to M. anisopliae described by Herlinda et al. (2020a, b).
The five fungal isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) found in this study had an rDNA sequence similarity value of 100% to the reference species (BLAST), JgSPK (Acc. No. MZ356494.1) an endophytic fungi isolated from maize (Herlinda et al. 2021), except one isolate (JGNT300521). If the similarity value is 100%, it means that they are the same strain (Henry et al. 2000). These isolates shared 99.80% of similarity with JGNT300521 as well as with BSwTd4 (Acc. No. MT448732.1) which was isolated from oil palm rhizosphere (Herlinda et al. 2020a, b). JGNT300521 isolate shared 99.61% of similarity with BSwTd4. All the isolates shared 98.83% of similarity with B1 UNILA (= NKPT) (Acc. No. LC413808.1) which was isolated from maize rhizosphere (Fitriana et al. 2021) and type strain on B. bassiana (ARSEF 1564.T., Acc. No. HQ880761.1). The isolate of WTTJC260521B had an rDNA sequence similarity value of more than 99% to the BLAST (reference species). The similarity value of 99–100% indicated that the isolates were the same species (Henry et al. 2000). An organism is declared the same species when the difference in DNA sequences is between 0.2 and 1% (Shenoy et al. 2007). If the similarity value of the isolates is 89–99%, it means that the isolates are of the same genus (Henry et al. 2000).
All fungal isolates of the B. bassiana and M. anisopliae tested in this study were able to colonize leaves of young maize when inoculated by seed immersion treatment. The leaves of young maize treated by the fungi were overgrown with the fungal mycelia, but no fungal mycelia were found on the leaves of untreated seeds. The finding showed that both species of fungi from seed treatment were able to colonize the leaves. In addition, the fungi of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae not only can colonize maize by seed treatment, but they also can colonize maize by foliar spray and root dipping and the fungi can systemically colonize leaves, stems, and roots of plants (Russo et al. 2020). B. bassiana inoculated by foliar spray can penetrate the leaf surface and move within the maize vascular (Wagner and Lewis 2000). M. anisopliae was often reported to be restricted to plant roots (Russo et al. 2020); however, the present study reported that the strain of M. anisopliae was able to colonize the leaves of young maize. The extent and persistence of plant colonization by the fungi were influenced by fungal species/strain, inoculation method, and host plant species (Russo et al. 2020). The fungi used for seed treatment in this study are easier to be applied by soaking the seeds in fungal suspension before planting, or when the seeds stored, dry conidia of the fungi can be covered on the seeds.
Obtained findings reported that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae from South Sumatra (Indonesia) in seed-treated corn seedlings had negative effects on development of S. frugiperda. This is the first report that the fungi as an endophyte could decrease the female and male adult longevity of S. frugiperda and increased the larval mortality. The young maize colonized with the B. bassiana and M. anisopliae also reduced the percentage of the last instar becoming pupal stage and adult emergence and decreased the eggs laid by the adults and the percentage of hatched eggs. Previous study reported that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae in foliar treated caused adverse effects on S. frugiperda development and survival (Russo et al. 2020). These adverse effects of endophytic fungi against S. frugiperda were caused by fungal production of secondary metabolites and mycosis (Vidal and Jaber 2015). The fungal secondary metabolites are produced by blastospores in insect hemolymph and disrupted the normal cell metabolism (Mancillas-Paredes et al. 2019), and then, the toxins produced by the metabolites kill the insects (El-Ghany 2015). Our previous study showed that the endophytic fungi could decrease the leaf consumption by the S. frugiperda larvae resulting in larval weight loss and low survival (Gustianingtyas et al. 2021). The reduction in leaf area consumed by the larvae treated with the endophytes is caused by antifeedant or deterrent properties of in planta-produced B. bassiana metabolites (Russo et al. 2020). The corn plants colonized with B. bassiana may enhance levels of terpenoid defense compounds against S. frugiperda (Russo et al. 2020). The endophytic fungi could produce secondary metabolites in planta resulting in antibiosis and feeding deterrence for the insects (Jaber and Ownley 2018).
These adverse effects of endophytic fungi against S. frugiperda were also caused by mycosis (Vidal and Jaber 2015). The present study found the mycosis found on the cadavers of S. frugiperda treated with the fungi. The mycosis was evidenced by fungal mycelia and spores emerging from the cadavers of treated insects. However, no fungal mycelia and spores were found on the cadavers of untreated insects. Some previous studies have similar reported insect mycosis feeding on fungal-endophytically colonized plants by S. frugiperda (Herlinda et al. 2021).
This study also showed that the fungal-colonized young maize increased eggs, larvae, pupal developmental time, and life span of S. frugiperda. In contrast to the previous study of Russo et al. (2020), these fungal species could decrease the development time of S. frugiperda. However, obtained findings are in agreement with previous study of Hussain et al. (2009) which showed that the lepidopteran, Ocinara varians treated with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae, extended the developmental time of treated insects as compared to untreated ones (control) and the conversion of digested food and ingested food declined in treated insects compared to untreated insects and stimulated the larvae to develop more slowly.
The results of molecular identification showed that the fungal species found were B. bassiana of five fungal isolates (WTTJC290521B, WTTJC290521A, JGTP240521A, JGNT300521, and WTTJC260521A) and M. anisopliae of an isolate (WTTJC260521B). B. bassiana- and M. anisopliae-colonized young maize significantly increased mortality of all larval instars of FAW compared to non-colonized ones. The larval mortality treated with B. bassiana (JGTP240521A isolates) was the highest among other treatments. Feeding on leaves of fungal-colonized maize significantly decreased the percentage of the last larval instar becoming pupal stage and the adult emergence and the eggs laid and the percentage of hatched eggs and increased the larval mortality. This is the first report that the B. bassiana and M. anisopliae from South Sumatra (Indonesia) in seed-treated corn seedlings had negative effects on development of S. frugiperda. Finally, these results highlight the potential of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi to protect corn plants against S. frugiperda.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Analysis of variance
Basic local alignment search tool
Tukey's honestly significant difference
Internal transcribed spacer
The malt extract agar
Sabouraud dextrose agar
Ab Majid AH, Zahran Z, Abd Rahim AH, Ismail NA, Abdul Rahman W, Mohammad Zubairi KS, Dieng H, Satho T (2015) Morphological and molecular characterization of fungus isolated from tropical bed bugs in Northern Peninsular Malaysia, Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 5:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.04.012
de Lira AC, Mascarin GM, Júnior ID (2020) Microsclerotia production of Metarhizium spp. for dual role as plant biostimulant and control of Spodoptera frugiperda through corn seed coating. Fungal Biol 124:689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2020.03.011
El-Ghany TMA (2015) Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in biological control. Biology Department Faculty of Science, Jazan University KSA, Cairo. https://doi.org/10.4172/978-1-63278-065-2-66
Elfita M, Fitrya LJE, Julinar WH (2019) Antibacterial activity of Cordyline fruticosa leaf extracts and its endophytic fungi extracts. Biodiversitas 20:3804–3812. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201245
Fitriana Y, Suharjo R, Swibawa IG, Semenguk B, Pasaribu LT, Hartaman M, Rwandini RA, Indriyati I, Purnomo P, Solikhin S (2021) Aspergillus oryzae and Beauveria bassiana as entomopathogenic fungi of Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) infesting corn in Lampung, Indonesia. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00473-8
Gustianingtyas M, Herlinda S, Suwandi S (2021) The endophytic fungi from South Sumatra (Indonesia) and their pathogenecity against the new invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Biodiversitas 22:1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220262
Gustianingtyas M, Herlinda S, Suwandi S, Hamidson H, Hasbi SA, Verawaty M, Elfita A (2020) Toxicity of entomopathogenic fungal culture filtrate of lowland and highland soil of South Sumatra (Indonesia) against Spodoptera litura larvae. Biodiversitas 21:1839–1849. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210510
Harrison RD, Thierfelder C, Baudron F, Chinwada P, Midega C, Scha U, Van Den BJ (2019) Agro-ecological options for fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) management: providing low-cost, smallholder friendly solutions to an invasive pest. J Environ Manag 243:318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.011
Henry T, Iwen PC, Hinrichs SH (2000) Identification of Aspergillus species using internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2. J Clin Microbiol 38:1510–1515. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.4.1510-1515.2000
Herlinda S, Efendi RA, Suharjo R, Hasbi SA, Elfita VM (2020a) New emerging entomopathogenic fungi isolated from soil in South Sumatra (Indonesia) and their filtrate and conidial insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura. Biodiversitas 21:5102–5113. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d211115
Herlinda S, Octariati N, Suwandi S, Hasbi (2020b) Exploring entomopathogenic fungi from South Sumatra (Indonesia) soil and their pathogenicity against a new invasive maize pest, Spodoptera frugiperda. Biodiversitas 21:2955–2965. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210711
Herlinda S, Gustianingtyas M, Suwandi S, Suharjo R, Sari JMP, Lestari RP (2021) Endophytic fungi confirmed as entomopathogens of the new invasive pest, the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), infesting maize in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00470-x
Hussain A, Tian M-Y, He Y-R, Ahmed S (2009) Entomopathogenic fungi disturbed the larval growth and feeding performance of Ocinara varians (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) larvae. Insect Sci 16:511–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2009.01272.x
Jaber LR, Ownley BH (2018) Can we use entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes for dual biological control of insect pests and plant pathogens? Biol Control 116:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.018
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Kumela T, Simiyu J, Sisay B, Likhayo P, Gohole L, Tefera T (2018) Farmers knowledge, perceptions, and management practices of the new invasive pest, fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Ethiopia and Kenya. Int J Pest Manag 65:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2017.1423129
Lamsal S, Sibi S, Yadav S (2020) Fall armyworm in South Asia: threats and management. Asian J Adv Agric Res 13:21–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2020/v13i330106
Mancillas-Paredes JM, Hernández-Sánchez H, Jaramillo-Flores ME, García-Gutiérrez C (2019) Proteases and chitinases induced in Beauveria bassiana during infection by Zabrotes subfasciatus. Southwestern Entomol 44:125–137. https://doi.org/10.3958/059.044.0114
Mantzoukas S, Eliopoulos PA (2020) Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: a valuable biological control tool against plant pests. Appl Sci 10:1–13
Montezano DG, Specht A, Sosa-gómez DR, De BU (2018) Host plants of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) in the Americas. Afr Entomol 26:286–300. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.026.0286
Niassy S, Agbodzavu MK, Kimathi E, Mutune B, Abdel-Rahma M, Salifu D, Hailu G, Belayneh YT, Felege E, Tonnang HEZ, Ekesi S, Subramanian S (2021) Bioecology of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), its management and potential patterns of seasonal spread in Africa. PLoS ONE 11:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249042
Novianti V, Indradewa D, Rachmawati D (2020) Selection of local swamp rice cultivars from Kalimantan (Indonesia) tolerant to iron stress during vegetative stage. Biodiversitas 21:5650–5661. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d211210
Otim MH, Tay WT, Walsh TK, Kanyesigye D, Adumo S, Abongosi J, Ochen S, Serumaga J, Alibu S, Abalo G, Asea G, Agona A (2018) Detection of sister-species in invasive populations of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) from Uganda. PLoS ONE 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194571
Ramanujam B, Poornesha B, Shylesha AN (2020) Effect of entomopathogenic fungi against invasive pest Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) in maize. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00291-4
Ramos Y, Taibo AD, Jiménez JA, Portal O (2020) Endophytic establishment of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in maize plants and its effect against Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00223-2
Russo ML, Jaber LR, Scorsetti AC, Vianna F, Cabello MN, Pelizza SA (2020) Effect of entomopathogenic fungi introduced as corn endophytes on the development, reproduction, and food preference of the invasive fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. J Pest Sci 93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01302-x
Shenoy BD, Jeewon R, Hyde KD (2007) Impact of DNA sequence-data on the taxonomy of anamorphic fungi. Fungal Divers, pp 1–54. https://fungaldiversity.org/fdp/sfdp/26-1.pdf
Swibawa IG, Fitriana Y, Suharjo R, Susilo FX, Rani EKA (2020) Morpho-molecular identification and pathogenicity test on fungal parasites of guava root-knot nematode eggs in Lampung, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21:1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210334
Vidal S, Jaber LR (2015) Entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes: plant-endophyte–herbivore interactions and prospects for use in biological control. Curr Sci 109:46–54
Wagner BL, Lewis LC (2000) Colonization of corn, Zea mays, by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3468–3473
White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. A Guid. to Methods Appl. (Eds MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White) pp 315–322. Academic Press Inc., New York
Zhang D, Xiao Y, Xu P, Yang X, Wu Q, Wu K (2021) Insecticide resistance monitoring for the invasive populations of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in China. J Integr Agric 20:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63392-5
All authors would like to thank the Rector of Universitas Sriwijaya for funding this research. We would like to thank the Head of the Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya, for laboratory facilities.
This research was funded by DIPA of Public Service Agency of Universitas Sriwijaya 2021. SP DIPA-023.17.2.677515/2021, on November 23, 2020, in accordance with the Rector’s Decree Number: 0014/UN9/SK.LP2M.PT/2021, on May 25, 2021, chaired by Siti Herlinda.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sari, J.M.P., Herlinda, S. & Suwandi, S. Endophytic fungi from South Sumatra (Indonesia) in seed-treated corn seedlings Affecting development of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00605-8
- Spodoptera frugiperda
- Beauveria bassiana
- Metarhizium anisopliae