- Open Access
Impact of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), invasion on maize and the native Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in East Java, Indonesia, and evaluation of the virulence of some indigenous entomopathogenic fungus isolates for controlling the pest
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 32, Article number: 48 (2022)
The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is an invasive alien species in Indonesia. This study aimed to assess the impact of its invasion in Indonesia by measuring the damaged area caused by the pest in maize fields located across East Java and simultaneously determine whether S. frugiperda outcompetes the native Asian armyworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Secondly, the virulence of 14 entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) isolates against S. frugiperda larvae was evaluated in an effort to find effective biocontrol agent candidates.
The damaged area caused by S. frugiperda was generally higher than that caused by S. litura during the survey period from August 2019 to December 2021. It indicated that S. frugiperda may have dominated the native armyworm and become the primary key pest of maize in Indonesia. Based on a single-concentration assay (106 conidia ml−1), the tested EPF isolates displayed varying degrees of virulence against S. frugiperda larvae, causing larval mortality of 3.5 to 71% at 10-day post-treatment, with the highest mortality rates provided by Beauveria bassiana sensu lato and Trichoderma asperellum sensu lato. At a concentration of 108 conidia ml−1, B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. elicited high larval mortality of 76 and 81%, respectively, at 10-day post-treatment. Nevertheless, the probit analysis based on a concentration–response assay revealed that T. asperellum s.l. had lower LC50 and LC90 values than B. bassiana s.l.
The attack and invasion of S. frugiperda seem to be a continual threat to the maize agro-ecosystem in Indonesia. As a consequence, Indonesia should mitigate and be well-prepared for future outbreaks of S. frugiperda. Indigenous EPF isolates used in this study may act as promising biocontrol agents of S. frugiperda, especially T. asperellum s.l. This study also serves as the first report documenting the direct lethality of Trichoderma fungus on S. frugiperda larvae.
The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a notorious crop pest native to tropical and sub-tropical America (Sparks 1979). However, S. frugiperda has successfully invaded and established its colonies in more than 70 countries across Africa, Asia, and Australia (CABI 2022). Adaptive strategies (migration and high reproduction potential) facilitate S. frugiperda spread to various regions outside its native range (Sharanabasappa et al. 2018).
In most invaded countries where maize (Zea mays L.) is an important staple food crop, outbreaks of S. frugiperda have caused huge economic losses and may endanger the food security and livelihoods of smallholder farmers (De Groote et al. 2020). In Indonesia, S. frugiperda was first detected in West Sumatra in March 2019 (Sartiami et al. 2020), and in the same year, the pest quickly invaded other provinces on Sumatra Island (Hutasoit et al. 2020), as well as Java (Rizali et al. 2021) and Bali Islands (Supartha et al. 2021). Since its establishment in Indonesia, S. frugiperda has wreaked havoc and caused substantial economic damage to maize fields.
Being subsidized by governments, massive application of synthetic insecticides has become the emergency control strategy for S. frugiperda in invaded countries (Huesing et al. 2018), including Indonesia (personal communication, Crop and Horticultural Plant Protection Agency of East Java, Indonesia). However, the excessive use of synthetic insecticides may trigger the rapid build-up of resistance of S. frugiperda. Gutiérrez-Moreno et al. (2019) reported that S. frugiperda had developed resistance to at least 29 active ingredients of insecticides in six mode-of-action categories. In addition, considering the unwanted negative impacts of synthetic insecticide application on the environment and human health, it is necessary to develop a more sustainable management strategy for controlling S. frugiperda. Among several eco-friendly options, the utilization of biocontrol agents, particularly indigenous entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), is of great interest. For instance, Afandhi et al. (2020) demonstrated that several indigenous soil-inhabiting EPF had a high virulence against insect pests, thus may keeping the pests’ population at a non-injurious level under natural conditions. Recently, much research has also been focused on assessing the bio-efficacy of indigenous EPF against S. frugiperda, and they proved to be effective in controlling the pest based on laboratory and field trials (Ullah et al. 2022).
In Indonesia, East Java Province is one of the main contributors to national maize production, with annual production reaching more than 6 million tonnes (BPS-Statistics Indonesia 2021). In this study, the first objective was to measure damaged areas of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda across 38 municipalities in East Java. It was also studied if S. frugiperda has dominated the native lepidopteran pests by measuring damaged areas caused by the Asian armyworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Secondly, the virulence of some indigenous EPF isolates against S. frugiperda larvae was evaluated. The findings reported in this study may be valuable to project the long-time risk of S. frugiperda invasion in Indonesia and subsequently provide an insight into the effectiveness of indigenous EPF as biocontrol agents of the pest.
Survey of damaged areas of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda and S. litura in East Java
The survey of damaged areas of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda and S. litura was conducted from the beginning of the S. frugiperda invasion in East Java in August 2019 to December 2021, with the help of the Crop and Horticultural Plant Protection Agency of East Java, Indonesia. The survey was carried out in 38 municipalities in East Java by implementing the method described by the Directorate of Food Crops Protection of Indonesia (2018) and performed fortnightly. However, the data were displayed as the total damaged area per month in each municipality. The damaged area caused by S. frugiperda and S. litura was distinguished based on the pests’ presence and the distinct morphological damage caused by each species on maize plants.
Source and preparation of entomopathogenic fungus isolates
Fourteen indigenous EPF isolates used in this study were part of biocontrol agent collections of the Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia. All isolates were baited from soils taken from various plant rhizospheres, using larvae of Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) (Table 1). All isolates were initially recovered on a potato dextrose agar medium amended with 1% w/v chloramphenicol to hinder bacterial contamination (Puspitarini et al. 2021a). Cultures’ plates were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C in complete darkness for 2 weeks.
Conidial viability assay
Each isolate was sub-cultured into five culture plates as replications. After 2 weeks of incubation, the conidia of each isolate were harvested from each culture plate by surface scraping method using an inoculation needle. The conidia were then mixed with 10 ml of sterile distilled water containing 0.02% v/v Tween 80. After that, each conidia suspension was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and the resulting conidia pellet was suspended in 5 ml of potato dextrose broth containing chloramphenicol (Puspitarini et al. 2021a). After being left overnight at room temperature, an aliquot of 0.1 ml of each conidia suspension was dropped into a microscope slide. The conidial viability of each isolate was then expressed in percentage by counting the number of germinated and non-germinated spores under a light microscope. The number of observed spores for each replicate was at least 100 (Ali-Shtayeh et al. 2002).
Before being used for further assays, all isolates were subjected to Koch’s postulate to ascertain their entomopathogenicity. Initially, the conidia of each isolate were harvested by the aforementioned method. However, following centrifugation, the remaining conidia pellet was suspended in 5 ml of sterile distilled water (Puspitarini et al. 2021a). The conidia concentration of the suspension was then estimated using a hemocytometer. A suspension with a concentration of 106 conidia ml−1 was prepared for each isolate.
For Koch’s postulate, each isolate was repeated 10 times, and each replication used 20 of last instar larvae of T. molitor. All larvae were firstly surface-sterilized with 0.5% v/v NaOCl and rinsed three times with sterile distilled water (Anand and Tiwary 2009). After they were dried with sterile filter paper, the larvae were dipped into each isolate suspension for about 30 s, while the larvae in control were dipped in sterile distilled water containing 0.02% v/v Tween 80. Thereafter, the larvae were placed in a Petri dish and fed on oatmeal. The number of dead larvae was counted at 10-day post-treatment, and the mortality was expressed in percent. Larvae with a mycelial mass growing in their cuticle were assumed to have died due to fungal infection.
Virulence of entomopathogenic fungus isolates to S. frugiperda
A preliminary assay based on a single concentration (106 conidia ml−1) was conducted to find isolates that might have a higher virulence against S. frugiperda larvae. The larvae (2nd instar) were obtained from the Indonesian Sweetener and Fibre Crops Research Institute, Malang, Indonesia. After being surface-sterilized, 20 larvae were dipped in a conidia suspension of each isolate for 30 s, placed in a Petri dish, and fed with surface-sterilized young maize leaves. This assay was replicated 10 times. The larval mortality was expressed in a percentage at 10-day post-treatment.
Four concentrations of conidia suspension were prepared for each selected isolate, i.e., 102, 104, 106, and 108 conidia ml−1. The assay was done using a protocol as described earlier in the single-concentration assay. This assay also had 10 replications. The two selected isolates were further identified as Beauveria bassiana and Trichoderma asperellum. However, the isolates were defined sensu lato (abbreviation “s.l.”) since the identification was based on morphological characteristics alone. Therefore, from this point forward, the isolates were referred to as B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. The taxonomic keys followed were that illustrated by Humber (1997) for Beauveria, while keys illustrated by Kubicek and Harman (1998) and Samuels et al. (1999) for Trichoderma.
Data on conidial viability of EPF isolates, mortality of T. molitor larvae, and mortality of S. frugiperda larvae had a normal distribution based on the Shapiro–Wilk test. The data were then subjected to a one-way analysis of variance, and the means were compared by applying Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at P < 0.05. In addition, all mortality data were not corrected by Abbot’s formula as the mean mortality in control was less than 5% (WHO 2016). Additionally, average values of mortality of S. frugiperda larvae from the concentration–response assay were submitted to probit analysis for calculating LC50 and LC90. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Corp 2019).
Damaged area of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda and S. litura
At the beginning of the invasion of S. frugiperda (i.e., in September 2019), the damaged area of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda was relatively comparable to that caused by S. litura, or even lower. However, the damaged area caused by S. frugiperda was drastically increased in the subsequent months, reaching a total of 16202.10 ha in January 2020, while the damaged area caused by S. litura in the same month was only 3216.90 ha (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the damaged area caused by both pests decreased considerably in February 2020. In the following months until the end of the survey period, the damaged area caused by S. frugiperda and S. litura fluctuated. However, the damaged area caused by S. frugiperda was generally higher than that caused by S. litura.
Conidial viability of the entomopathogenic fungus isolates
The conidial viability among the isolates was varied greatly (F13,56 = 23.0; P < 0.0001). The conidial viability ranged from 43.2 to 77.2%, with the lowest and highest amount observed on Aspergillus sp. 5 and Nomuraea sp. 1, respectively (Table 2).
Entomopathogenicity of the fungal isolates and their virulence against T. molitor larvae
Koch’s postulate confirmed that all isolates were indeed entomopathogens since they were capable to infect T. molitor larvae. Nevertheless, their virulence against the larvae differed significantly, with the lowest and highest value of larval mortality being 8.5 to 61.5%, respectively (F14,135 = 22.3; P < 0.0001). Only Aspergillus sp. 1 caused insignificant mortality to T. molitor larvae compared to the control (Table 2).
Virulence of the entomopathogenic fungus isolates against S. frugiperda larvae
Based on the single-concentration assay, the virulence among the isolates against S. frugiperda larvae was significantly varied (F14,135 = 70.1; P < 0.0001). The larval mortality caused by Aspergillus sp. 1, Aspergillus sp. 2, Lecanicillium sp. 4, and Nomuraea sp. 1 was not statistically different from control. Isolates that showed the highest mortality rates were T. asperellum s.l., followed by B. bassiana s.l., corresponded to larval mortality of 71 and 62%, respectively (Table 2).
The concentration–response assay indicated that low concentration (102 conidia ml−1) of B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. was ineffective on S. frugiperda larvae. However, significant larval mortality compared to control was observed in higher concentrations (F8,81 = 209.7; P < 0.0001). At the highest concentration used (108 conidia ml−1), B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. yielded higher mortality of S. frugiperda larvae (76 and 81%, respectively), which was not statistically different among each other (Table 3). However, the probit analysis based on conidia concentration and mortality response at 10-day post-treatment showed that T. asperellum s.l. had lower LC50 and LC90 values than B. bassiana s.l. (Table 4).
The damaged area of maize fields due to the fall armyworm S. frugiperda infestation from 2019 to 2021 was generally found higher than that caused by the Asian armyworm S. litura. It indicated that S. frugiperda may have outcompeted the native lepidopteran pest. In concordance, Rizali et al. (2021) found that the attack intensity of S. frugiperda in maize fields located across three municipalities in East Java was significantly higher than the attack intensity of several native pests, notably the Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and the corn earworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Similarly, in Africa (Kuate et al. 2019) and India (Navik et al. 2021), S. frugiperda had become the dominant pest species in maize fields, revealed by the low co-occurrence of S. frugiperda with native lepidopteran pests. For example, Navik et al. (2021) recorded that more than 90% of maize plants were infested by S. frugiperda alone, whereas the co-occurrence of S. frugiperda and native lepidopteran pests was observed in less than 5% of maize plants. It is known that S. frugiperda has a high competitive capacity to dominate interspecific rivals when they inhabit the same feeding niche area through its predatory behavior (Ntiri et al. 2019). Arguably, S. frugiperda has arisen as the most important pest of maize in Indonesia, especially in East Java. Therefore, Indonesia should anticipate and be well-prepared for future outbreaks of S. frugiperda.
The drastic reduction in the damaged area of maize fields in February 2020 was due to the massive synthetic insecticidal application as an immediate response in combating the S. frugiperda invasion. The survey revealed that although the damaged area caused by S. frugiperda fluctuated in the following months, it was still relatively higher than that caused by S. litura. Moreover, two S. frugiperda outbreaks were observed again in August and November 2020, while there was no S. litura outbreak until the end of the survey period. Rizali et al. (2021) suggested that the attack intensity of S. frugiperda in maize fields in East Java was justifiably associated with pesticide application. Hence, it is not advisable to use synthetic insecticides as the sole control method. Consequently, the utilization of indigenous EPF proposed in this study could serve as an ecologically relevant management alternative in controlling S. frugiperda.
Conidial viability is one of the robust predictors determining the role of EPF when applied as biocontrol agents (Faria et al. 2015). Obtained results showed that all isolates had medium to relatively high conidial viability. Conidial viability is an inherent genetic trait (Puspitarini et al. 2021b). Thus, it is not surprising that a variation in conidial viability among the isolates was observed. All isolates used in this study were also found to be capable of retaining their entomopathogenicity based on the result of Koch’s postulate. Additionally, the majority of isolates yielded significant mortality of T. molitor larvae compared to control.
Isolates showed a high virulence against T. molitor did not guarantee similar outcomes when tested against S. frugiperda larvae. For example, Lecanicillium sp. 4 caused high mortality (51.5%) of T. molitor larvae at a concentration of 106 conidia ml−1, but it yielded low mortality (6.5%) of S. frugiperda larvae at the same conidial concentration. The same scenario was detected in other isolates, i.e., Aspergillus sp. 2, Aspergillus sp. 4, Aspergillus sp. 5, Lecanicillium sp. 2, Nomuraea sp. 1, and Nomuraea sp. 2. A variation in virulence among EPF species or strains to different insect pests was abundantly documented in previous studies (Rohrlich et al. 2018).
In this study, B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. were the most virulent indigenous EPF isolates against S. frugiperda larvae. Various species or strains of Beauveria (García-Estrada et al. 2016) and Trichoderma (Ghosh et al. 2021) have been widely utilized or studied as biocontrol agents of insect pests. Nevertheless, although the effectiveness of B. bassiana in causing mortality of S. frugiperda larvae has been well recognized (Dowd 2021), no study has reported the direct killing effect of Trichoderma on S. frugiperda larvae. Only Contreras-Cornejo et al. (2018) and Marcías-Rodríguez et al. (2020) demonstrated that colonization of Trichoderma on the root system enhances foliar herbivory resistance in maize plants against S. frugiperda. However, Batool et al. (2020) found that T. asperellum was highly virulent against larvae of O. furnacalis, and its bio-efficacy was enhanced when the fungus was co-applied with B. bassiana based on their laboratory and field assays. Lastly, the LC50 and LC90 values on S. frugiperda larvae at 10-day post-treatment of T. asperellum s.l. were lower than B. bassiana s.l. It envisages that T. asperellum s.l. isolate may give a high control efficacy against S. frugiperda.
This study showed that S. frugiperda had dominated the native armyworm S. litura, indicated by the greater damaged area of maize fields caused by S. frugiperda than that caused by S. litura. Conclusively, S. frugiperda may have become the primary key pest of maize in Indonesia, possessing an everlasting threat to the country. Among the evaluated indigenous EPF, B. bassiana s.l. and T. asperellum s.l. yielded the highest mortality of S. frugiperda larvae. However, the latter may be a better candidate as a biocontrol agent for S. frugiperda. This study also serves as the first report documenting the direct lethality of Trichoderma fungus on S. frugiperda larvae.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- s.l. :
Duncan’s multiple range test
Afandhi A, Pertiwi EP, Purba DP, Widjayanti T, Leksono AS (2020) The diversity of entomopathogenic fungi collected from leaves and rhizospheres of rice implementing integrated pest management. Biodiversitas 21(6):2690–2695. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210642
Ali-Shtayeh MS, Mara’I ABBM, Jamous RM (2002) Distribution, occurrence and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi in agricultural soil in the Palestinian area. Mycopathologia 156:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023339103522
Anand R, Tiwary BN (2009) Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi to eggs and larvae of Spodoptera litura, the common cutworm. Biocontrol Sci Technol 19(9):919–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150903205069
Batool R, Umer MJ, Wang Y, He K, Zhang T, Bai S, Zhi Y, Chen J, Wang Z (2020) Synergistic effect of Beauveria bassiana and Trichoderma asperellum to induce maize (Zea mays L.) defense against the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) and larval immune response. Int J Mol Sci 21:8215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218215
BPS-Statistics Indonesia (2021) Analysis of maize and soybean productivity in Indonesia (The result of crop cutting survey). Jakarta, BPS-Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2021/07/27/16e8f4b2ad77dd7de2e53ef2/analisis-produktivitas-jagung-dan-kedelai-di-indonesia-2020--hasil-survei-ubinan-.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2022
CABI (2022) Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm). Invasive species compendium. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/29810. Accessed 11 Jan 2022
Contreras-Cornejo HA, Marcías-Rodríguez L, del-Val E, Larsen J (2018) The root endophytic fungus Trichoderma atroviride induces foliar herbivory resistance in maize plants. Appl Soil Ecol 124:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.004
De Groote H, Kimenju SC, Munyua B, Palmas S, Kassie M, Bruce A (2020) Spread impact of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith) in maize productions areas of Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 292:106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106804
Directorate of Food Crops Protection of Indonesia (2018) Technical guidelines for observing and reporting plant pests and diseases and the impacts of climate change. Directorate of Food Crops Protection of Indonesia, Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia, p. 114. (in Indonesian).
Dowd PF (2021) Enhanced rates of lethality to fall armyworms (Spodoptera frugiperda) after association of Beauveria bassiana strain Ant 03 with sweet corn leaves. Biocontrol Sci Technol 31(8):877–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2021.1895071
Faria M, Lopes RB, Souza DA, Wraight SP (2015) Conidial vigor vs. viability as predictors of virulence of entomopathogenic fungi. J Invertebr Pathol 125:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2014.12.012
García-Estrada C, Cat E, Santamarta I (2016) Beauveria bassiana as biocontrol agent: Formulation and commercialization for pest management. In: Singh H, Sarma B, Keswani C (eds) Agriculturally important microorganisms. Springer, Singapore, pp 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2576-1_5
Ghosh SK, Podder D, Mukherjee A (2021) An insight of anopheline larvicidal mechanism of Trichoderma asperellum (TaspSKGN2). Sci Rep 11:16029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95310-1
Gutiérrez-Moreno R, Mota-Sanchez D, Blanco CA, Whalon ME, Terán-Santofimio H, Rodriguez-Maciel JC, DiFonzo C (2019) Field-evolved resistance of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to synthetic insecticides in Puerto Rico and Mexico. J Econ Entomol 112(2):792–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy372
Huesing JE, Prasanna BM, McGrath D, Chinwada P, Jepson P, Capinera JL (2018) Integrated pest management of fall armyworm in Africa: an introduction. In: Prasanna BM, Huesing JE, Eddy R, Peschke VM (eds) Fall armyworm in Africa: a guide for integrated pest management, first edition. CIMMYT, Mexico, CDMX, pp 1–10.
Humber RA (1997) Fungi: Identification. In: Lacey LA (ed) Manual of techniques in insect pathology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 153–185
Hutasoit RT, Kalqutny SH, Widiarta IN (2020) Spatial distribution pattern, bionomic, and demographic parameters of a new invasive species of armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize of South Sumatra. Indonesia Biodiversitas 21(8):3576–3582. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210821
IBM Corp (2019) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0. IBM Corp, New York
Kuate AF, Hanna R, Doumtsop Fotio ARP, Abang AF, Nanga SN, Ngatat S, Tindo M, Masso C, Ndemah R, Suh C, Fiaboe KKM (2019) Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cameroon: Case study on its distribution, damage, pesticide use, genetic differentiation and host plants. PLoS ONE 14:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215749
Kubicek CP, Harman GE (1998) Trichoderma and Gliocladium volume 1. Basic biology, taxonomy and genetics. Taylor & Francis, London, p 278
Marcías-Rodríguez L, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Adame-Garnica SG, del-Val E, Larsen J (2020) The interactions of Trichoderma at multiple trophic levels: inter-kingdom communication. Microbiol Res 240:126552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126552
Navik O, Shylesha AN, Patil J, Venkatesan T, Lalitha Y, Ashika TR (2021) Damage, distribution and natural enemies of invasive fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) under rainfed maize in Karnataka, India. Crop Prot 143:105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105536
Ntiri ES, Calatayud PA, Van den Berg J, Le Ru BP (2019) Spatio-temporal interactions between maize lepidopteran stemborer communities and possible implications from the recent invasion of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Entomol 48(3):573–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvz024
Puspitarini RD, Afandhi A, Fernando I (2021a) Evaluation of indigenous fungal entomopathogens and aqueous leaf extract of Annona muricata against Polyphagotarsonemus latus infesting Jatropha curcas in Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22(7):2648–2655. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220713
Puspitarini RD, Fernando I, Sianturi YPPA, Rachmawati R (2021b) Compatibility of Jatropha curcas seed extract and entomopathogenic fungus Akanthomyces lecanii against the citrus red mite Panonychus citri. Biocontrol Sci Technol 32(3):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2021.1993134
Rizali A, Oktaviyani PSDPS, Doananda M, Linggani A (2021) Invasion of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, a new invasive pest, alters native herbivore attack intensity and natural enemy diversity. Biodiversitas 22(8):3482–3488. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220847
Rohrlich C, Merle I, Hassani IM, Verger M, Zuin M, Besse S, Robène I, Nilbouche S, Costet L (2018) Variation in physiological host range in three stains of two species of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria. PLoS ONE 13(7):e0199199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199199
Samuels G, Lieckfeldt E, Nirenberg H (1999) Trichoderma asperellum, a new species with warted conidia, and redescription of T. viride. Sydowia 51:71–88
Sartiami D, Dadang HI, Kusumah Y, Anwar R (2020) First record of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Indonesia and its occurence in three provinces. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 468(012021):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/468/1/012021
Sharanabasappa, Kalleshwaraswamy CM, Maruthi MS, Pavithra HB (2018) Biology of invasive fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on maize. Indian J Entomol 80(3):540–543. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00238.9
Sparks AN (1979) A review of the biology of the fall armyworm. Fla Entomol 62:82–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/3494083
Supartha IW, Susila IW, Sunari AAAS, Mahaputra IG, Yudha IKW, Wiradana PA (2021) Damage characteristics and distribution patterns of invasive pest, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on maize crop in Bali, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22(6):3378–3389. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220645
Ullah S, Raza ABM, Alkafafy M, Sayed S, Hamid MI, Majeed MZ, Riaz MA, Gaber NM, Asim M (2022) Isolation, identification and virulence of indigenous entomopathogenic fungal strains against the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00500-8
WHO (2016) Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, p 48
We greatly thank the Crop and Horticultural Plant Protection Agency of East Java, Indonesia. We acknowledge Mrs. Amelia Seftiarini, Mrs. Dewi Anggraini, and Mrs. Fais Nihayatih for their help in tabulating and analyzing the survey data.
The research was fully funded by the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia, within Doctorate Research Program Grant No. 4567 the year 2019.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interest regarding the submission and publication of this manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Afandhi, A., Fernando, I., Widjayanti, T. et al. Impact of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), invasion on maize and the native Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in East Java, Indonesia, and evaluation of the virulence of some indigenous entomopathogenic fungus isolates for controlling the pest. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 48 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00541-7
- Spodoptera frugiperda
- Spodoptera litura
- Biocontrol agents
- Beauveria bassiana
- Trichoderma asperellum