Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control
Download PDF

Alterations in the expression of certain midgut genes of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae and midgut histopathology in response to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C toxin

Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 31, Article number: 29 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) utilization as a biological control agent is highly recommended due to its safety, specificity, and efficiency. Importance of the entomocidal Cry proteins secreted by Bt is dramatically increased subsequent Cry genes transformation into a number of economic crops, rendering them protection against insect attack. In the last decade, insect resistance against transgenic Bt crops is gradually raised in several lepidopteran pests. A better understanding of the processing of Bt Cry1C toxin in the larval midgut of the lepidopteran pest species, the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), is very important to characterize the main regulatory elements of Bt tolerance.

Results

The present study aimed to define factors that are involved in insect tolerance toward Bt Cry1C through evaluating the mRNA level of trypsin (Try), aminopeptidase N (APN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), cadherin (Cad), and cytochrome P450 (CYP) in both susceptible and cry1C tolerant strains of S. littoralis. Total RNAs were extracted from susceptible and tolerant strains to construct cDNAs. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) showed a significant upregulation of CYP gene in tolerant strain. In contrast, the levels of expression of Try, ALP, and Cad were significantly downregulated in tolerant strain. APN relative mRNA expression did not show significant differences between susceptible and tolerant strains. Histologically, the midgut of late third-instar larvae of tolerant population S. littoralis showed vacuolization of the epithelium and disruption of both the peritrophic membrane and the striated boarder compared to the susceptible strain.

Conclusions

Obtained data indicated a relationship between exposing to Bt Cry1C toxin and alteration of CYP, Try, ALP, and Cad expression in midgut of S. littoralis. These results may be an evidence for the important roles of CYP, Try, ALP, and Cad in the resistance development and toxicity to Bt Cry1C. The results are useful for further illustrating of Bt Cry1C processing and S. littoralis tolerance.

Background

The Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a polyphagous pest in subtropical and tropical regions. The long-term applications of conventional pesticides to control pests, including S. littoralis, have led to the developments of resistance, negative impacts on the ecosystems, and unhealthy hazards to human and natural enemies. These problems are incentives to search for alternative safe and effective control measures with different modes of action. Biological control agents can be used where chemical pesticides are banned or where pests have developed resistance to standard chemicals and play an important role in integrated pest management (IPM) programs (Abdelhadi et al. 2016 and van Lenteren et al. 2018). Among these approaches is the use of the entomopathogenic bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) that provides a valuable alternative to chemical insecticides. (Dingha et al. 2004). Bt synthesizes delta-endotoxin protein crystals (Cry) that belong to a class of bacterial toxins are known as pore-forming toxins that specifically affect cell permeability and disrupting cellular integrity of insect-midgut cells. Cry toxins have a potent and specific insecticidal activity and can kill their insect larval hosts through a complex multi-step process resulting in the formation of a pore in the membrane of midgut epithelial cells (Soberón et al. 2018). Differences in the degree of solubilization possibly cause variability in the level of toxicity among Cry proteins. Solubilization is followed by proteolytic activation of the Cry protoxin by midgut digestive enzymes; the activated toxin crosses the peritrophic membrane, reaches the brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs) of the midgut epithelium, and binds to the primary receptor cadherin in the microvilli (Pigott and Ellar 2007), which undergoes proteolytic cleavages that induce toxin oligomerization. After oligomers insertion, sequentially osmotic lysis of midgut epithelial cells occurs, followed by the creation of cytolytic pores in the membrane of midgut epithelial cells, septicemia, and ultimately insect death (Pardo-López et al. 2013).

Development of transgenic crops that express cry toxins was a remarkable breakthrough in pest control instead of the use of chemical insecticides (ISAAA 2017). The expression of certain Cry toxins in transgenic crops providing a more targeted and effective way to control insect pests in agriculture (James 2009). The expression of Cry protein in transgenic plants protects the insecticidal toxin from UV degradation and precisely targets chewing and boring insects. Nevertheless, the continuous expression of cry toxins in transgenic crops results in a gradual resistance development (Xiao and Wu 2019). Extensive studies have established that alteration of genes for toxins activation, and toxin-binding receptors confers high levels of Bt resistance in insects and subsequently threatens the sustained success of transgenic Bt crops (Fabrick et al. 2019). During attempts to unwind the complexity of Bt toxicity, other mechanisms associated with Cry toxins mode of action such as detoxication enzyme activities or innate immunity response were proposed (Boyer et al. 2012). Recently, alteration in CYP expression and activity due to exposure to cry toxins has been reported (Dhania et al. 2019). Thus, the correlation between CYP enzymatic activity and mechanism of Bt resistance is implied (Shabbir et al. 2019). A better understanding of the mode of action of Bt toxins and the mechanism of resistance at the molecular level is essential to improve strategies for monitoring and coping with the development of insect resistance, which assists in designing insect control strategies and extending the efficacy of Bt toxins as a control agent (Jin et al. 2018). Due to the existence of limited genetic information for S. littoralis, thus, the present study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of Bt Cry1C tolerance, as a step to delay resistance development and guarantee a long-term efficacy of Bt in biological control.

Methods

Insect culture

Two strains of S. littoralis larvae were used in the present study: a susceptible strain and a Cry1C-tolerant strain. A susceptible strain was provided by Insect Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Unit, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt, and fed on castor bean leaves, Ricinus communis, under the laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 70–80% RH and 14-h light:10-h dark photoperiod) for several years according to El-Defrawi et al. (1964). A Cry1C-tolerant strain was generated by selection pressure of a field-strain collected from Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt. Selection pressure was carried out by exposing newly hatched neonates to a semi-artificial diet (Rajagopal et al. 2009), mixed with partially purified Bt Cry1C toxin isolated from Bt entomocidus strain. Bt entomocidus strain was provided by Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, ARC, Egypt. The toxin dose increased gradually with the successive generations depending on the mortality percentage in each generation. Survived larvae were then shifted to castor bean leaves until pupation and adult emergence (Moussa et al. 2020). This process was repeated every generation to rise up Cry1C-tolerant strain. Ten generations were accomplished.

Bt Cry1C toxin preparation

The methods described by Moussa et al. (2016) were followed for Bt Cry1C toxin purification. Briefly, the bacterial cells were cultured for 3 to 5 days in T3 medium (per liter: 1.5 g yeast extract, 0.005 g of MnCl2, 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 3.0 g tryptone, and 2.0 g tryptose) at 30 °C/150 rpm. The spores and crystals were harvested at 5500 rpm/10 min at 4 °C and then washed six times with 50 mM EDTA at 9500 rpm/10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris HCl, 5 mM EDTA (pH 7), and preserved in −20 °C until solubilization. Resuspension was centrifuged at 9500 rpm/10 min at 4 °C and supernatant was removed. Two milliliters of solubilization buffer (50 mM Na2CO3, 10 mM DTT, pH 10.5) was added and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C/200 rpm, and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm/30 min at 4 °C. Supernatant was aliquoted and kept at −20 °C for further use. Toxin concentration was obtained by Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) and toxin integrity was checked on 10% SDS PAGE.

Bioassay

Newly hatched neonates of a susceptible and a Cry1C-tolerant strains of S. littoralis were fed separately on a semi-artificial diet mixed with five concentrations of purified Bt Cry1C toxin: 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 μg/g for susceptible strain and 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0, and 32.0 μg/g for Cry1C-tolerant strain, following the techniques described by Rajagopal et al. (2009) and Moussa et al. (2016). Mortality percentage was recorded daily till the 7th day. Each concentration was replicated 3 times with 10 larvae each. A parallel control of 10 untreated larvae was also run. Each control was replicated 3 times. Treatments were conducted at different times, using different larval batches. Mortality percentage of each treatment was corrected using Abbott’s formula (Abbott 1925). The 50% lethal concentration (LC50) for each strain was estimated with the probit analysis. Resistance ratio (RR) was calculated as the LC50 for the tolerant strain divided by the LC50 for the susceptible strain.

Histopathological studies

Biopsy samples of the middle portion of the midgut of Cry1C-tolerant strain of S. littoralis late third-instar larvae were taken. Parallel controls of untreated susceptible strain larvae were also run. For light microscopy, the midgut was fixed in Bouin’s solution. After dehydration in a graded ethanol series, the midgut was embedded in paraffin wax and cut 5 μ thick using a rotary microtome. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and photographed with an Axiophot (Zeiss) light microscope according to Bancroft and Gamble (2008).

RNA extraction

The midguts of newly molted 3rd instar larvae of susceptible and Cry1C-tolerant strains of S. littoralis were dissected prior to RNA extraction. Triple biological replicates were conducted with five larval midguts each. Gene JET RNA Purification Kit (cat # K0731) was used for total RNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and was quantified by absorbance at 260 nm. One percentage agarose gel electrophoresis was utilized for RNA integrity determination. Extracted RNAs were treated with DNase I, RNase-free (cat # EN0521), then reverse transcribed using an oligo (dT)15 primer with GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (cat # A5000) as per manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

qPCR was conducted on the Stratagene Mx3005P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies Germany GmbH & Co.KG, Waldbronn, Germany) using the SybrGreen method with Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (2×) (cat # K0251). Primers were designed based on conserved regions of the targeted genes isolated from other lepidopteran insects and deposited in the GenBank database (Table 1). MultAlin (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/) was used for nucleotide sequence alignment for each gene (Corpet 1988). Primers were designed using GenScript Primer Design tool and expected to amplify about 100-150 bp fragment (Table 2). A 28S rRNA gene served as a reference gene. The selected genes were amplified under the following conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by forty cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The melting curve analysis was utilized to analyze the specificity of the qPCR product. Relative expression fold changes were calculated by using formula 2−ΔΔCT, which was proposed by Livak and Schmittgen (2001). The comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) was measured by subtracting ΔCt of calibrator from ΔCt of treated samples.

Table 1 Genes name, sequence, and GenBank accession number
Full size table
Table 2 PCR primer sequences
Full size table

Statistical analysis

EPA Probit analysis program (version 1.5) (kindly provided by Dr. Gujar G.T., New Delhi, India) was utilized to estimate the 50% lethal concentration (LC50), 95% fiducial limits (FL), and the slope for results of the bioassay by probit analysis. The real-time polymerase chain reaction was done in three wells (replicates) for all genes. To determine the significance (P ≤ 0.05) among the mean differences of the groups, the independent unpaired Student’s t test was used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23 (SPSS, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). All data were analyzed with a significance level of 5%.

Results

Tolerance level of S. littoralis larvae to Bt Cry1C toxin

In this study, the field S. littoralis strain underwent selection pressure for 10 generations to rise up Cry1C-tolerant strain. Bt Cry1C toxin was partially purified and used for S. littoralis treatment. The SDS-PAGE showed the presence of the Bt Cry1C toxin at ~ 135 kDa protein (Fig. 1). After 10 generations, the tolerant strain showed 76.67% mortality rate at 32.0 μg toxin per gram diet, while it was 70.00% at 3.2 μg/g in susceptible strain (Table 3). As a result of the subsequent selection pressure for 10 generations, the LC50 of the tolerant strain reached 12.263 μg/gm compared to 1.895 μg/gm LC50 of the susceptible strain. Therefore, the resistance ratio reached up to 6.5-fold the susceptible strain (Table 4). The difference between the LC50 values of susceptible and tolerant strains was significant (P < 0.05), where the respective 95% fiducial limits were not overlapped.

Fig. 1
figure1

10% SDS-PAGE of Bt Cry1C toxin

Full size image
Table 3 Mortality of susceptible and Bt Cry1C—tolerant strains of S. littoralis larvae
Full size table
Table 4 Susceptibility of susceptible and Bt Cry1C—tolerant strains (10th generation) of S. littoralis larvae
Full size table

Histopathological studies

Briefly, the midgut of the 3rd instar larvae of S. littoralis is made up of a single layer of epithelium resting on a basement membrane, surrounded by a layer of circular muscle fibers and an outer longitudinal muscle coat. The epithelium consists of 3 types of cells: columnar cells, goblet cells, and regenerative cells. The apical surface of each columnar cell bordering with the gut lumen is covered with microvilli. The gut lumen is lined with the peritrophic membrane (Fig. 2a). Light microscopy revealed that the midgut of late 3rd instar larvae of Cry1C-tolerant population of S. littoralis showed vacuolization of the epithelium and disruption of both the peritrophic membrane and the striated boarder (Fig. 2b). The lumen was collapsed and globular bodies and cytoplasmic fragments were observed pinching off from the tip of some of the epithelial cells within the lumen vicinal to the deteriorated peritrophic membrane.

Fig. 2
figure2

Midgut of late third-instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis (× 400). Susceptible strain (a), Cry1C -tolerant strain (b). cc, columnar cell; mv, microvilli; rc, regenerative cell; cml, circular muscle layer; lml, longitudinal muscle layer; gc, goblet cell; pm, peritrophic membrane

Full size image

qPCR gene expression

Understanding the mode of action of Bt toxins and the mechanism of tolerance is a critical point to identify the effective way to use these toxins in S. littoralis control. In order to investigate genes that might be involved in the insect’s tolerance, a total RNAs were isolated from both susceptible and tolerant strains. The cDNAs were constructed, and qPCR was applied to assess the relative transcript abundance of cadherin (Cad), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), trypsin (Try), aminopeptidase N (APN), and cytochrome P450 (CYP) in susceptible and tolerant strains. The results reported here provided evidence about midgut receptors, proteases, and detoxification enzymes that associated with the processing of Bt Cry1C toxin.

qPCR results showed about (72%) reduction (P < 0.05) of Cad transcripts in tolerant strain than the susceptible one (Fig. 3). Abundance of ALP as a secondary receptor promoting the localization of toxin in the midgut was evaluated. Reduction of ALP transcripts in tolerant strain compared to susceptible strain was detected. In this study, APN transcript abundance did not differ significantly between susceptible and tolerant strains. About 49% reduction of Try transcripts in tolerant strain was revealed. Cytochrome P450 (CYP6AB14) was significantly over-transcribed in tolerant strain (Fig. 3 and Table 5).

Fig. 3
figure3

qPCR analysis: Relative fold change expression of Cad (cadherin), ALP (alkaline phosphatase), APN (aminopeptidase N), Try (trypsin) and CYP (cytochrome P450) in midgut of susceptible (Sus.), and Cry1C -tolerant (Tol.) strain of Spodoptera littoralis. Asterisks indicate significant difference (P < 0.05). Bars represent standard error

Full size image
Table 5 qPCR analysis: Relative fold change expression of Cad (cadherin), ALP (alkaline phosphatase), APN (aminopeptidase N), Try (trypsin), and CYP (cytochrome P450) in midgut of susceptible (Sus.), and Bt Cry1C tolerant (Tol.) strain of S. littoralis
Full size table

Discussion

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a soil bacterium, is the extreme successfully utilized biopesticide in agriculture. Bt contained insecticidal protein genes that are primary utilized for insect control in transgenic crops. Insect resistance to Bt, it was a great challenge to sustainable success of the most extensively utilized transgenic crops (Tabashnik et al. 2013). There were many types of proteins that present in the midgut epithelial cells were either reported as transporters, which facilitate the toxicity functions or digestive proteases. For example, Cad (Walsh et al. 2018) and ALPs (Ren et al. 2018) that were shown to interact with Cry toxin(s) produced by different Bt strains and were described as Cry toxin functional receptors in midgut epithelium of insects. Bt was known to cause changes in the cell membrane, a common appearance of midgut degeneration (Cavados et al. 2004). In the present study, tolerant strain showed some disruptions in the gut lumen. However, of these disruptions, the gut functions were not affected and larvae can survive. This may indicated the regeneration of the tissues affected by Cry1C toxin. Forcada et al. (1999) proposed that enhanced gut healing response was a mechanism that involves Bt resistance. Castagnola and Jurat-Fuentes (2016) suggested that the increased production of new midgut growth factors cause an enhanced midgut regenerative response in resistant insects. This may be another way for the insect to tolerate Bt toxicity.

The results reported in the present study showed also the downregulation of cadherin (Cad) gene in tolerant strain than in the susceptible one. Downregulation of Cad and the subsequent reduction of Bt Cry1C binding and toxin oligomerization indicated the essential role of Cad gene in toxicity of Bt Cry1C toxin and tolerance selection. Recent studies have reported that at least two receptors on the insect midgut membrane interact with Bt toxins (Pigott and Ellar 2007). The midgut Cad (the first receptor) binds to activate Bt toxins with high affinity, and the interaction with Cad helped oligomerization of the toxins through a proteolytic process (Soberón et al. 2009). Therefore, the Cad gene low expression could lead to loose of oligomerization of the Bt Cry1C toxin, which in turn reflected the toxicity process. This result was consistent with earlier studies. For instances, downregulation of Cad has been reported in lepidopteran species including Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Wang et al. 2005), Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius) (Yang et al. 2011), Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée) (Jin et al. 2014), Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Fabrick et al. 2019), and also in dipteran species as Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Bonin et al. 2009). Literature proposed that downregulation of Cad was associated with Cry toxin resistance. Xu et al. (2005) observed a completely disruption of the Cad gene by a premature stop codon in a Cry1Ac resistant strain of H. armigera. Jurat-Fuentes et al. (2004) also reported a retrotransposon-mediated disruption of the gene encoding Cad-like protein (HevCaLP) in a Cry1Ac—resistant strain of Heliothis virescens (Fabricius). Cad gene was suggested to be a biomarker for B. thuringiensis resistance screening in field populations of lepidopteran pests (Jurat-Fuentes et al. 2004). In addition, the results showed that aminopeptidase N (APN) transcript abundance did not differ significantly between susceptible and tolerant strains. This may refer that APN did not associate with Bt Cry1C tolerance in S. littoralis. In contrast, previous studies showed that alterations in expression of APN have been associated with Bt resistance in several species of insect pests (Zhang et al. 2017). The Bt oligomers had a high binding affinity to APN or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (a secondary receptor), which finally led to oligomers insertion into the midgut cell membrane, with resulting cell lysis. It also has been proposed that binding of Bt toxins to the Cad may activate a cellular signaling pathway leading to cell death without the involvement of APN (Zhang et al. 2006). This may explain obtained results and supports the unchanged expression level of APN between the two strains. Thus, APN might not be a core receptor for Bt Cry1C in S. littoralis and did not involve in toxicity. Further experiments are needed to test this hypothesis.

In the Bt Cry1C-tolerant strain, ALP expression level was significantly reduced than the susceptible one. This lack of expression showed the crucial role of ALP in toxin insertion through the midgut and pore formation. The role of ALP in the susceptibility of insects to Cry toxins has been demonstrated in several studies (JuratFuentes and Adang, 2004 and Qiu et al. 2018). Knockdown of ALP gene in the rice borer, Chilo suppressalis, exhibited decreased susceptibility to transgenic Cry1A rice (Qiu et al. 2018). Also, other transcripts, which were downregulated in this study in the tolerant strain that was previously documented as remarkable Bt genes/proteins involved in insecticide resistance in many insects, which is trypsin-like serine protease. Thus, downregulation of trypsin will be resulted in improper and insufficient activation of Bt Cry1C protoxin, which may be a key factor in tolerance development. Cis-mutations identified in the promoter region of a trypsin gene conferred high resistance to Cry1Ac in H. armigera (Liu et al. 2014). However, the most reports indicated that variations in toxin activation were commonly not a main mechanism of resistance to Bt proteins (Wei et al. 2016). Cytochrome P450 (CYP6AB14) was significantly over-transcribed in the present investigation. This induction may reveal the relation between detoxification activity and tolerance. Expression and activity of P450 enzyme was different through resistant insect populations, some studies reported upregulation and others reported downregulation (Vellichirammal et al. 2015). In previous studies, P450 gene was reported to confer resistance and was involved in detoxifications of xenobiotics (Pavlidi et al. 2018), as well as trypsin, which is considered the essential protein involved in Bt toxin activation and detoxification (Liu et al. 2014). Therefore, further studies are needed to be conducted to identify the major and precise role of cytochrome P450 in detoxification and tolerance of Bt.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that toxin activation, binding, and detoxification were critical procedures of Bt Cry1C toxification in S. littoralis. Trypsin, aminopeptidase N, alkaline phosphatase, cadherin, and cytochrome P450 are among different proteins that involved in Bt resistance and toxicity. Further studies are required to better understand how these proteins are regulated and their role in Bt tolerance.

Availability of data and materials

All data of the study have been presented in the manuscript, and high quality and grade materials were used in this study.

Abbreviations

S. littoralis :

Spodoptera littoralis

Bt :

Bacillus thuringiensis

Try:

Trypsin

APN:

Aminopeptidase N

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

Cad:

Cadherin

CYP:

Cytochrome P450

cDNAs:

Complementary deoxyribonucleic acids

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

BBMVs:

Brush border membrane vesicles

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

SDS PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

DTT:

Dithiothreitol

LC50 :

Lethal concentration

RR:

Resistance ratio

cat #:

Catalog number

MultAlin:

Multiple alignment

Δ:

Delta

≤:

Less than or equal

~ 135 kDa:

About 135 kilo Dalton

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

MSA:

Multiple sequence alignment

References

  1. Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelhadi AA, Elarabi NI, Salim RG, Sharaf AN, Abosereh NA (2016) Identification, characterization and genetic improvement of bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnology 15(3-4):76–85. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2016.76.85

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2008) Theory and practice of histological techniques, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, China

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonin A, Paris M, Tetreau G, David JP, Després L (2009) Candidate genes revealed by a genome scan for mosquito resistance to a bacterial insecticide: sequence and gene expression variations. BMC Genomics 10:551. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-551

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer S, Paris M, Jego S, Lempérière G, Ravanel P (2012) Influence of insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis treatments on resistance and enzyme activities in Aedes rusticus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Biol Control 62:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Castagnola A, Jurat-fuentes JL (2016) Intestinal regeneration as an insect resistance mechanism to entomopathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Insect Sci 15:104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.04.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavados C, Majerowicz S, Chaves J, Araújo-coutinho C, Rabinovitch L (2004) Histopathological and ultrastructural effects of delta-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis Serovar israelensis in the Midgut of Simulium pertinax Larvae (Diptera, Simuliidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99:493–498. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762004000500006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhania NK, Chauhan VK, Chaitanya RK, Dutta-gupta A (2019) Midgut de novo transcriptome analysis and gene expression profiling of Achaea janata larvae exposed with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)-based biopesticide formulation. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D 30:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2019.02.005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dingha BN, Moar WJ, Appel AG (2004) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C toxin on the metabolic rate of Bt Cry1C resistant and susceptible Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Physiol Entomol 29:409–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00409.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El-defrawi M, Toppozada A, Mansour N, Zeid M (1964) Toxicological studies on the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Prodenia litura. I. Susceptibility of Different Larval Instars of Prodenia to Insecticides. J Econ Entomol 57:591–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/57.4.591

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fabrick JA, Mathew LG, Leroy DM, Hull JJ, Unnithan GC, Yelich AJ, Carrière Y, Li X, Tabashnik BE (2019) Reduced cadherin expression associated with resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Acin pink bollworm. Pest Manag Sci 76:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5496

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forcada C, Alcácer E, Garcerá MD, Tato A, Martínez R (1999) Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin in three strains of Heliothis virescens: proteolytic and SEM study of the larval midgut. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 42:51–63 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(199909)42:1<51::AID-ARCH6>3.0.CO;2-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ISAAA (2017) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years. ISAAA Briefs ISAAA, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  16. James C (2009) Brief 41: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2009. ISAAA Brief, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jin L, Wang J, Guan F, Zhang J, Yu S, Liu S, Xue Y, Li L, Wu S, Wang X, Yang Y, Abdelgaffar H, Jurat-fuentes JL, Tabashnik BE, Wu Y (2018) Dominant point mutation in a tetraspanin gene associated with field-evolved resistance of cotton bollworm to transgenic Bt cotton. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:11760–11765. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812138115

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin T, Chang X, Gatehouse AMR, Wang Z, Edwards MG, He K (2014) Down regulation and mutation of a cadherin gene associated with Cry1Ac resistance in the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée). Toxins 6:2676–2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6092676

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jurat-fuentes JL, Gahan LJ, Gould FL, Heckel DG, Adang MJ (2004) The HevCaLP protein mediates binding specificity of the Cry1A class of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in Heliothis virescens. Biochemistry 43:14299–14305. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi048500i

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu C, Xiao Y, Li X, Oppert B, Tabashnik BE, Wu K (2014) Cis-mediated down-regulation of a trypsin gene associated with Bt resistance in cotton bollworm. Sci Rep 4:7219. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07219

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moussa S, Biaomy F, Aiad K, Khalil H, Abd El-latif AO (2020) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C resistance development and its processing pattern in Egyptian cotton leaf worm: Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00237-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moussa S, Kamel E, Ismail IM, Mohammed A (2016) Inheritance of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C resistance in Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomol Res 46:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12148

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pardo-lópez L, Soberón M, Bravo A (2013) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00341.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlidi N, Vontas J, Van LT (2018) The role of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in insecticide resistance in crop pests and disease vectors. Curr Opin Insect Sci 27:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pigott CR, Ellar DJ (2007) Role of receptors in Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin activity. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71:255–281. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00034-06

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qiu L, Wang P, Wu T, Li B, Wang X, Lei C, Lin Y, Zhao J, Ma W (2018) Down regulation of Chilo suppressalis alkaline phosphatase genes associated with resistance to three transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis rice lines. Insect Mol Biol 27:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12349

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajagopal R, Arora N, Sivakumar S, Rao NGV, Nimbalkar SA, Bhatnagar RK (2009) Resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to Cry1Ac toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is due to improper processing of the protoxin. Biochem J 419:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20081152

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren XL, Hu HY, Jiang WL, Ma XY, Ma YJ, Li GQ, Ma Y (2018) Three GPI anchored alkaline phosphatases are involved in the intoxication of Cry1Ca a toxin to Spodoptera exigua larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 151:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.10.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shabbir MZ, Zhang T, Wang Z, He K (2019) Transcriptome and proteome alternation with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ah toxin in Ostrinia furnacalis. Front Physiol 10:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Soberón M, Gill SS, Bravo A (2009) Signaling versus punching hole: how do Bacillus thuringiensis toxins kill insect midgut cells? Cell Mol Life Sci 66:1337–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8330-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Soberón M, Monnerat R, Bravo A (2018) Mode of action of Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis and resistance mechanisms. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Stiles B, Alape-girón A, Dubreuil JD, Mandal M (eds.) Microbial Toxins. 1 ed Springer Netherlands.

  33. Tabashnik BE, Bre´vault T, Carrie`re Y (2013) Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the Þrst billion acres. Nat Biotechnol 31:510–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2597

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köhl J, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A (2018) Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl. 63(1):39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vellichirammal NN, Wang H, Eyun SI, Moriyama EN, Coates BS, Miller NJ, Siegfried BD (2015) Transcriptional analysis of susceptible and resistant European corn borer strains and their response to Cry1F protoxin. BMC Genomics 16:558. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1751-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Walsh J, Clucas G, MacManes M, Thomas K, Kovach A (2018) Divergent selection and drift shape the genomes of two avian sister species spanning a saline-freshwater ecotone. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/344614

  37. Wang G, Wu K, Liang G, Guo Y (2005) Gene cloning and expression of cadherin in midgut of Helicoverpa armigera and its Cry1A binding region. Sci China C Life Sci 48:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1360/03yc0273

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei J, Liang G, Wang B, Zhong F, Chen L, Khaing MM, Zhang J, Guo Y, Wu K, Tabashnik BE (2016) Activation of Bt protoxin Cry1Ac in resistant and susceptible cotton bollworm. PLoS One 11:e0156560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156560

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao Y, Wu K (2019) Recent progress on the interaction between insects and Bacillus thuringiensis crops. Philos Trans R Soc B 374:20180316. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0316

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu X, Yu L, Wu Y (2005) Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:948–954. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.2.948-954.2005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang Y, Zhu YC, Ottea J, Husseneder C, Leonard BR, Abel C, Luttrell R, Huang F (2011) Down regulation of a gene for cadherin, but not alkaline phosphatase, associated with Cry1Ab resistance in the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis. PLoS One 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025783

  42. Zhang T, Coates BS, Wang Y, Wang Y, Bai S, Wang Z, He K (2017) Down-regulation of aminopeptidase N and ABC transporter subfamily G transcripts in Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac resistant Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Int J Biol Sci 13:835–851. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.18868

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang X, Candas M, Griko NB, Taussig R, Bulla LA (2006) A mechanism of cell death involving an adenylyl cyclase/PKA signaling pathway is induced by the Cry1Ab toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(26):9897–9902 https://doi.org/.1073/pnas.0604017103

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Plant Protection Research Institute (PPRI), Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

    Hager Khalil & Saad Moussa

  2. Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt

    Haggag S. Zein, Dalia S. Ahmed & Nagwa I. Elarabi

  3. Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt

    El-Sayed H. Shaurub

Authors
  1. Hager Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saad Moussa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haggag S. Zein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dalia S. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. El-Sayed H. Shaurub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nagwa I. Elarabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NIE, HSZ, and SM conceived and designed the study; HK, NIE, DSA, HSZ, EHS, and SM performed experiments, drafted, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagwa I. Elarabi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalil, H., Moussa, S., Zein, H.S. et al. Alterations in the expression of certain midgut genes of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae and midgut histopathology in response to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C toxin. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31, 29 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00370-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spodoptera littoralis
  • Bacillus thuringiensis
  • Bt Cry1C toxin
  • Tolerance
  • qPCR