Skip to main content

Management of the grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), using entomopathogenic fungi and botanical oils: a laboratory study

Abstract

Background

Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy and cumulative effect of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), viz., Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimmermann) Zare and Gams, and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and different botanical oils against grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green). M. hirsutus infestation during berry formation has left no option other than chemical management. However, the pesticide application during this stage leads to residues. Thus, safer and sustainable biological need was tested for their effectiveness against M. hirsutus.

Results

Dipping bioassay technique was used to determine the cumulative mortality. When L. lecanii was used as sole (at 6 and 4 g/l), significant mortality was observed (51.63 and 50.18%). However, the maximum cumulative nymphal mortality was achieved when the combination of EPF formulations was used, i.e., 57.64% with B. bassiana + L. lecanii (6 g/l + 6 g/l). Their effectiveness was at par with the same combination but with minimal concentration, i.e., 4 g/l + 4 g/l (56.29%). Concerning the botanical oils evaluated, neem oil at 15 ml/l achieved a higher mortality of 81.36%. Consecutive effective treatment was a combination of neem oil and pongamia oil (at 10 + 10 ml/l) with 79.65% mortality. However, the standard dosage of neem oil (at 10 ml/l) and IIHR neem soap (at 10 g/l) also recorded the significant mortality of 78.09 and 77.67%, respectively. When compared, the neem oil was found significantly superior in sole and compatible combination than pongamia oil.

Conclusions

Lecanicillium lecanii and neem oil (sole and in combination with other compatible bioagents) proved significantly better for the management against M. hirsutus with an efficacy of 90.21 and 96.67 % mortality, respectively against the standard chemical control (more than 97%).

Background

India is one of the top ten countries in the world in the production of grapes. The area under grape cultivation is 1.2% of the total area of fruit crops in the country. Production is 2.8% of total fruits produced in the country (Anonymous 2018). In wet and warm climates like India, grapevine cultivation is being challenged by several biotic factors like insect pests and diseases. As many as 100 insect and mite pests have been reported to infest and cause damage to grapevine in India. Among 26 insect pests recorded, grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), was recorded as a major, dreaded, and regular pest of grapes. In recent years, the infestation of grape mealy bug, M. hirsutus, has become very severe, making the fruits unfit for consumption and raisin making.

Hot and dry climatic conditions are highly favorable for sucking insects like M. hirsutus. It is present throughout the year but found to be active from June to August and again from November to March. Infestation starts from pruning to the harvest of fruit bunches and was difficult to manage thus also referred to as “hard to kill pest of fruit trees.” Grape mealy bug alone reported to cause around 50–100% yield loss in field conditions (Manjunath 1985) because of direct and indirect damage. They cause indirect damage by excreting honeydew leading to sooty mold encrustation, loss of photosynthetic ability, and ultimately impairing the quality and quantity of yield.

The management of grape mealy bug is very complicated because of several factors like lack of in-time mealy bug detection and availability of proper monitoring tools and cryptic behavior of the insect. The protective waxy covering over the body of the mealy bug prevents the insecticides from gaining entry into the body of the insect (Geiger et al. 2001). The present mealy bug management strategies in grapevine rely solely upon the use of insecticides. The over-dependence on pesticides, particularly during the fruiting stages of crop results in residues in the harvestable produce apart from numerous other drawbacks like pollution, toxicity to non-target animals and plants, and insecticide resistance (Aktar et al. 2009). There is an overwhelming need to develop non-chemical, ecofriendly, and sustainable management strategies against mealy bug.

Botanical oils are widely used in insect management because of their repellent property, antifeedant nature, growth-inhibiting activity, easy biodegradability, and safety to non-target insects (Oparaeke et al. 2005). Similarly, entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) are relatively broader in the mode of entry (both contact and systemic) and target group compared to other biological options. Integration of selected strains of EPF with selective botanical or insecticides can improve the control efficiency, besides decrease, the amount of insecticides required, minimize the risks of environmental contamination, and can delay the expression of insecticide resistance in insect pests. However, the botanical oils and EPF, when used alone were proven less effective under field conditions leading to low adaptability.

Therefore, the present experimentation objective was to evaluate the enhanced efficacy of the combination of EPF, viz., Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium lecanii, and botanical oils, viz., neem oil and pongamia oil against M. hirsutus under laboratory conditions.

Methods

Test insect (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) culture

Ripened red pumpkins of medium size with ridges and grooves with a small stalk were used. Minor wounds on the pumpkins were plugged with paraffin wax. To prevent rotting, the pumpkins were treated with 0.1% carbendazim 50 WP at 1 g/l of water for 10 s and shade dried for 4 h. A simple roping technique has been adopted with 2–4 mm cotton thread tied over the pumpkin both vertically and horizontally (Babu and David 1999). The egg sacs of mealy bugs were collected from grape orchards and released on pumpkins. The inoculated pumpkins were kept in wooden cages (30 × 30 × 33 cm) with sliding glass in the front and mesh cage on all other sides for population buildup (Katake and Balikai 2008). Fully matured mealy bugs developed within 30 to 40 days. The subsequent culture was maintained by periodic transfers of mealy bugs to fresh pumpkins under laboratory conditions.

Preparation of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) solutions

Local strains of EPF, viz., B. bassiana (WP with 2 × 108 cfu/g) and L. lecanii (WP with 2 × 108 cfu/g), and their combinations were used as treatments (Table 1). The cultures of EPF, viz., B. bassiana and L. lecanii, were obtained from biocontrol laboratory, UHS, Bagalkote, India. The formulations of 80% WP containing 2 × 108 cfu/g were utilized for the treatment. The formulated products were kept under normal room temperature and RH (30–35 °C and 90–95%, respectively). The silicon-based agricultural adjuvant (Sure shot®) was obtained from local market, used a wax dissolving agent.

Table 1 Treatment details for the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi against Maconellicoccus hirsutus

Preparation of botanical oil solution

In total, 16 treatments were carried out, comprising neem oil, pongamia oil, fish oil rosin soap (FORS) ,and their combinations along with azadirachtin, IIHR neem soap, standard checks, and untreated control. Treatments were replicated thrice and laid out in CRD. Treatment solution of five liters was prepared in a plastic container distilled with water along with the wetting agent, Sure shot® (0.25 ml/l) for tuber dip treatment. The locally available neem and pongamia oils were obtained (extracted from plants) from the market and are used as such along with adjuvant (Sure shot). The adjuvant acts as a surfactant, and it dissolves the wax coating. It helps in uniform spread of oils and their easy dissolve in the water.

Culturing on potato tubers

Good quality, medium-sized potato tubers with robin eyes were placed in plastic trays (45 × 30 × 10 cm) filled 3/4th with sterilized river sand. Carbendazim (Bavistin®) was added at 5 g/kg of sterilized sand and mixed well to avoid fungal infection to the tubers and to avoid rotting of potato sprouts. These trays were kept in a separate darkroom to facilitate quick sprouting. After 7 days tubers containing 4–5 sprouts were removed carefully to avoid damage. The potato sprouts were inoculated with mealy bug crawlers (30–35 crawlers/sprout), using a hair brush. The inoculated sprouts were kept in the rearing room for their establishment. After 5 days, only around 20 numbers of 2nd instar crawlers were retained on sprouts.

Tuber dip bioassay

The established potato sprouts with 20 numbers of 2nd instar crawlers were dipped in treatment solution (5 lit) for 30 s and shade dried. The treated sprouts were then rearranged in sand-filled trays at equidistance and maintained at 25 ± 5 °C and 75 ± 5 RH (Mohamed 2016). Three replications with 8 such mealy bug colonized sprouts per each replication were dipped in a chemical solution, thus ~ 480 mealy bugs per treatment were tested.

Observations

The mortality of nymphs was recorded at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 15 days after tuber dip bioassay treatment. The immobilized crawlers were recorded as dead and further confirmed by observing under the microscope for spores. Cadavers of dead mealy bugs were kept in a humid chamber for 2 days or inoculated on to Petri plates containing PDA to observe the hyphal growth, for further confirmation.

Statistical analysis

The number of mealy bugs found dead per mealy bugs released or recorded initially (pre-treatment count of 20) on the sprouts was used to calculate mortality. The percent mortality of mealy bugs was worked out by using Abbott’s formula for each treatment in all replications. Before statistical analysis, data on corrected percent mortality was subjected to arcsine transformation and performed one-way ANOVA by adopting the “Fisher’s analysis of variance technique.” The means were compared at 5% CD using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).

No. in T after treatment

$$ \mathrm{Corrected}\ \mathrm{mortality}\ \left(\%\right)=\left(1----------------------\right)\times 100 $$

No. in Co after treatment

where n is the number of insect or population, T is treated, and Co is control

Results

The experimental results by dipping bioassay indicated the superiority of all the treatments over water spray (UTC) throughout the experimental period. Nymphs infected with the EPF were turned relatively hard and mummified. After 24 h of the death of the nymphs, germination of the conidia and penetration of hyphae through the integuments of nymphs were observed. Later, the entire body surface was covered with mycelial growth.

Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi

The data regarding the average cumulative mortality of nymphs of mealy bug caused by different treatments after dipping bioassay experiments were found statistically significant at every interval of observations, i.e., 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 15 DAT (Table 2). The data indicated that combinations of fungal pathogens (B. bassiana and L. lecanii) at different doses recorded significantly higher per cent mortality of nymphs than the sole treatments. Combination of B. bassiana at 6 g/l + L. lecanii at 6 g/l recorded the highest mortality of 90.21% at 15 days after treatment and was at par with B. bassiana at 4 g/l + L. lecanii at 4 g/l (88.96%). The next promising treatments in recording moderate percent mortality of nymphs were L. lecanii at 6 and 4 g/l (82.30 and 83.96% at 15 DAT, respectively).

Table 2 Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi against Maconellicoccus hirsutus under laboratory condition

Considering the overall performance of the different treatments, the significantly highest mean mortality of mealy bug nymphs was registered in chemical check, imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 0.25 ml/l (87.61%). Among the fungal bioagents, combinations of B. bassiana (6 g) + L. lecanii (6 g) recorded numerically the highest mean nymphal mortality (57.64%), and it was statistically at par with its next concentration, B. bassiana (4 g) + L. lecanii (4 g) (56.29%) and were significantly superior over rest of treatments and found most effective in causing mortality of mealy bugs. Among the sole treatments L. lecanii at 6 g/l (51.63%), followed by L. lecanii at 4 g/l (50.18%) found best. On the contrary, B. bassiana treatments recorded relatively lower percent mortality of mealy bugs than L. lecanii. The treatment, B. bassiana at 6 g, recorded only 30.97% mortality almost equal to B. bassiana at 4 g (30.56%).

Efficacy of botanical oils against M. hirsutus

The experimental results by dipping bioassay indicated the superiority of all the treatments over water spray (UTC) throughout the experimental period (Table 3). Among the botanicals, neem oil at 15 ml/l recorded significantly highest % mortality of mealy bugs (60.00, 71.46, and 78.13% at 3, 5, and 7 DAT, respectively) and was statistically at par with neem oil at 10 ml/l (76.88%) at 7 DAT and were significantly superior over, pongamia oil at 15 ml/l (32.71%) and fish oil rosin soap at 15 ml/l (63.55%). However, the chemical check imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 0.25 ml/l was obviously superior to other treatments by recording mortality of 91.88%.

Table 3 Efficacy of botanical oils against Maconellicoccus hirsutus under laboratory condition

Among the botanicals, maximum mean nymphal mortality was noticed in neem oil at 15 ml (81.36%). The next best order of effectiveness was neem oil (10 ml) + pongamia oil (10 ml) (79.65%), neem oil at 10 ml (78.09%), and IIHR neem soap at 10 g (77.67%). However, FORS at 10 ml recorded moderate mortality of 63.38% and was statistically on par with its high concentration at 15 ml (60.74%). The treatments, pongamia oil at 15 ml and 10 ml, were found very less effective and recorded moderate mealy bug mortality with 36.63 and 35.11%, respectively. The mean mealy bug mortality registered in chemical check, imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 0.25 ml was significantly the highest (89.69%).

Discussion

The fungal pathogens act primarily by cuticular degradation, followed by the development of fungal hyphae and spores on the insect body. The cuticular degradation may be due to the secretion of hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases, lipases, and chitinases which play an important role in the infection process (Banu et al. 2010).

Among the sole and combinational treatments of EPF, the combination of L. lecanii with B. bassiana was found superior over the sole treatments (Fig. 1). When these biopesticides used in sole, L. lecanii was found significantly superior to B. bassiana at the tested doses (4 and 6 g/l). These bioagents were found effective in reducing the mealy bug population by causing mortality at the range of 42.71% to more than 90% at 15 DAT. The maximum mortality in the combination of both B. bassiana and L. lecanii may be attributed to potentiation but with limited synergetic action of both the entomopathogens. When used in sole, the L. lecanii recorded 83.96% mortality at the highest concentration and was almost 2 times significant than B. bassiana that recorded only 56.67% mortality at the same concentration. Of the two EPF, L. lecanii showed a high mortality on all stages of mealy bugs, which is in agreement with the results of Russell and Paterson (2006). The highest efficacy on mealy bugs could be because of production of mycotoxins, viz., helvolic acid, bassianolide, cytochalasin C and D, destruxins, and faster mycelial growth to penetrate into the body of the host which caused septicemia to the mealy bug, leading to early death as compared to other entomopathogens like Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinkoff) Sorokin and B. bassiana (Banu et al. 2010).

Fig. 1
figure1

Comparatice efficacy of Lecanicillium lecanii and Beauveria bassiana against Maconellicoccus hirsutus under laboratory condition

The treatments with B. bassiana recorded lower nymphal mortality (around 20–30%) on grape mealy bug than to L. lecanii. Similarly, Amala et al. (2014) reported that B. bassiana was less effective against grape mealy bug than L. lecanii with LC50 and LT50 values of 1.5 × 106 and 3.04 days, respectively. Jeyarani et al. (2011) also reported that B. bassiana could cause 50% mortality of cotton mealy bug, Planococcus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) at 3.6 × 107 spore/ml concentration and is in conformity with present findings, wherein the present trial the spore concentration used was 2 × 108 cfu/ml. Kanitkar et al. (2020) revealed that application of Brigade-BL (B. bassiana) at 5.0 ml/l with 2 sprayings resulted in reduction of mealy bug colonies up to 67.82 and 75.68% in foundation and fruiting pruning, respectively. Similarly, it has not resulted in any abnormality and phytotoxic effects like leaf chlorosis, tip burning, necrosis, epinasty, and rusting on grapevines and were found compatible with Buprofezin 25 SC chemical insecticide.

Treatment with insecticide, imidacloprid at 0.25 ml/l significantly affected the mealy bug population by recording mortality of more than 90%. The systemic nature of imidacloprid in tuber dip bioassay, resulted in effective suppression of mealy bugs whereas, the topical application of contact insecticides many times fail to cause mortality in mealy bugs because of the heavy waxy coatings on the body surface. Reports of Meyerdirk et al. (2004) also suggested some biological characteristics of the pest like secretion of wax, waxy ovisac, and the ability to oviposit on foreign substrates which led to difficulty in control of mealy bugs. Perhaps, this difficulty could be quite evident especially in contact insecticides compared to systemic insecticides.

The use of a wetting agent is very important prerequisite to dissolve waxy secretions in mealy bugs for easy deposition and penetration of fungal bodies. Though wetting agent itself caused negligible mortality of mealy bugs, its addition along with EPF is an essential pre-requisite, as the mode of entry of these EPFs is through the cuticle. In addition to the wetting agents, several other additives have also proved promising in recording increased mortality of mealy bug. A similar kind of effort made by Chavan and Kadam (2010) recorded a maximum of 82.50% mortality of M. hirsutus nymphs in formulations containing V. lecanii + glycerol 8% + Tween 80 at 1% and Arachid oil 0.5%.

The early stages of mealy bugs are more susceptible to fungal biopesticides in general and L. lecanii in specific. In the present investigations, the first and second instar nymphs of M. hirsutus were selected and probably are more susceptible to EPF like L. lecanii than the later instars. In addition, EPFs had latent infection periods ranging from 5 to 10 days, which results in the escape of infection in late-stage nymphs. Ten days after EPF treatment, the highest mortality of 65.10 and 58.99% of the first and second nymphal instars of M. hirsutus was recorded, respectively, whereas 45.96 and 30.66% mortality in third instar nymphs and adult mealy bugs, respectively (Makadia et al. 2009).

In addition to these factors, the time required for infection, moribund, and mortality is important and depends on the stage of the pest. So, the present study was found to be in conformity with the finding of Halder et al. (2013), where the % mortality of nymphs increased with the increase in time where, 6 days after the spraying, V. lecanii (at 2 × 109 cfu/g) caused the mortality of 67.11%, followed by B. bassiana (1 × 108 cfu/g) and M. anisopliae (1 × 108 cfu/g) with 62.85 and 56.52% mortality, respectively. Among the 3 tested fungal pathogens, L. lecanii at 1 × 108 spores /ml was proved to be an efficient entomopathogen with increased efficiency as the infection time prolonged. The mean fecundity of adult females treated with L. lecanii was lower (54.20 eggs/female) with a significant reduction in the hatchability of the eggs (25.20). This is reflected clearly in the present studies, indicating greater post pathogenicity and speed of kill in L. lecanii (63.34% in 9 days) than B. bassiana (35.84% in 9 days). Further, the virulence of L. lecanii was maintained even in combination with B. bassiana. L. lecanii recorded 26.00 to 82.28% mortality from first to fourth nymphal instars of mealy bug, M. hirsutus infesting custard apple (Makadia et al. 2009).

Among the botanical oils/formulations, significantly high cumulative nymphal mortality was noticed in neem oil at 15 ml/l (81.36%) and was statistically on par with neem oil + pongamia oil at 10 + 10 ml/l (79.65%), neem oil at 10 ml/l (78.09%), and IIHR neem soap at 10 g/l (77.67%). In general, the formulations made of or extracted from neem proved effective in managing the mealy bug population. Neem oil acts in many ways like insect growth regulator, feeding deterrent, and larvicidal activity. So, multiple modes of action of neem-based botanical oils qualify it as a unique insecticidal product and proved superior compared to pongamia oil. At 15 ml/l dose, neem oil was found significantly superior to all the other botanicals tested.

Verghese (1997) reported 5 and 2.5% neem seed kernel extracts as highly effective in causing mortality of early instar M. hirsutus nymphs after 24 and 48 h, after treatment under laboratory condition, while commercial product, Econeem® (Azadirachtin) 1500 ppm was effective on late instar mealy bugs after 24 and 48 h. of treatment. On the contrary, Banu et al. (2010) reported a moderate mortality in nymphs and adults (42.22 and 55.56%, respectively) of cotton mealy bug, P. solenopsis with NSKE at 5%, while neem oil + Nirma® powder caused 46.67 and 57.78% mortality of nymphs and adults, respectively, after 48 h of treatment. This might be due to thick waxy coating and high body mass of late instar nymphs and adults. However, early instar nymphs were more susceptible to neem oil at high concentrations (15 ml/l) or in combination with pongamia oil at 10 + 10 ml/l. The results are in close agreement with Kumar et al. (1989) on the coffee green scale, Coccus viridis (Green) (Hemiptera: Coccidae), and Manjunath et al. (1992) on mealy bug, M. hirsutus.

More than 70% mortality was exhibited by commercial neem products are supported by Shekhar and Sathyaprasad (1998) who reported appreciable mortality of nymphs (95 to 98%) with Rakshak® and Amruthaguard® (0.5%), while their efficacy reduced on adults (around 51%) of M. hirsutus under laboratory conditions.

The time taken for causing more than 50% mortality of second or third instars was shortest (3 days) in case of neem oil at 15 ml/l (60.00% mortality), indicating quicker penetration and action. The results are corroborated with findings of Halder et al. (2013) who reported LT50 for neem oil 5% as 93.71 h, while it is blending with a fungal pathogen like L. lecanii, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae at 1:1 ratio exhibited LT50 of 87.67, 88.34, and 90.82 h, respectively. So, in the present findings, the superiority of neem oil as a sole treatment is quite evident compared to its blends.

The treatments with pongamia oil at 15 ml/l and 10 ml/l were recorded moderate nymphal mortality of 36.63 and 35.11%, respectively. On the contrary, Verghese and Tandon (1987) reported that pongamia oil (2%) was very effective in killing crawlers of M. hirsutus, which could be because of high concentrations compared to present studies.

Fish oil rosin soap (FORS) at 10 ml/l recorded moderate nymphal mortality (63.38%) and was on par with FORS at 15 ml/l (60.74%), followed by FORS at 5 ml/l (44.37%). All the combinations of treatments with FORS gave moderate to high mortality and it could be due to enhancement of botanical penetration into insect body by dissolving the waxy filament layer. Overall, FORS concentrations performed inferior than neem oil at similar concentrations.

Conclusions

In the present study, the virulence of L. lecanii alone and their combinations was higher than that of B. bassiana and among all the different botanicals, neem oil had a different mode of action resulted in causing significantly high mortality of nymphs. The laboratory results of the present study against mealy bug with different EPF and botanicals are useful for further experimental studies under field conditions. Due to the waxy coating on the body, the insecticidal management of mealy bug in the field is quite difficult and in addition, it can create several environmental issues, so encouraging the biopesticide and botanicals oils can be recommended.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

NSKE:

Neem seed kernel extract

LC50 :

Lethal concentration 50%

LT50 :

Lethal time 50%

SL:

Soluble liquid

DAT:

Days after treatment

UTC:

Untreated control

DMRT:

Duncan’s multiple range test

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

PDA:

Potato dextrose agar

CRD:

Completely randomized design

FORS:

Fish Oil Rosin Soap

cfu/g:

Colony-forming units per gram

WP:

Wettable powder

IIHR:

Indian Institute of Horticultural Research

EPF:

Entomopathogenic fungi

DBT:

Days before treatment

References

  1. Aktar W, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol 2(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Amala U, Chinniah C, Sawant IS, Muthukrishnan N, Muthiah C (2014) Bio-efficacy and lethal reproductive effects of three entomopathogenic fungi and botanicals against pink mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) infesting grapes. Green Farming 5(4):697–700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2018) Horticulture statistics at a glance 2018. Indian Horticulture Database, National Horticultural Board. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Horticulture Statistics Division

  4. Babu BG, David PMM (1999) A simple technique for mealy bug multiplication on grooveless pumpkins. J Biol Control 13(1-2):59–63

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banu JG, Surulivelu T, Amutha M, Gopalakrishnan N (2010) Laboratory evaluation of insecticides and biopesticides against Phenococcus solenopsis and Paracoccus marginatus infesting cotton. J Biopesticides 3(1):343–346

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chavan BP, Kadam JR (2010) Effect of liquid formulations of Pochonia (Verticillium) lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas on viability and virulence against mealy bug. Annals Pl Prot Sci 18(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geiger CA, Daane KM, Bently WJ, Yokota GY, Martin LA (2001) Sampling programme for grape mealy bugs improves pest management. Calif Agric 55(3):19–27. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v055n03p19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Wiley, New York, p 680

  9. Halder J, Rai AB, Kodandaram MH (2013) Compatibility of neem oil and different entomopathogens for the management of major vegetables sucking pests. Nat Acad Sci Lett 36(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0091-1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeyarani S, Banu JG, Ramaraju K (2011) First record of natural occurrence of Cladosporium cladosporoides (Fresenius) and Beauveria bassiana (Bals-Criv) Vuill on cotton mealy bugs from India. J Entomol 6(3):274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanitkar S, Raut VM, Sawant SD, Yadav DS, Kulkarni M, Kadam M (2020) Field bio-efficacy of “Brigade-BL” (Beauveria bassiana) an Entomopathogenic fungi for the management of mealy bugs on Thompson Seedless Grapes. Int J Res Appl Sci Biotechnol 7(5):306–314. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijrasb.7.5.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katake MK, Balikai RA (2008) Comparative biology of grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus on sprouted potato during winter and summer. Indian J Entomol 70(4):395–397

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar MG, Bhat PK, Vijayalakshmi GK (1989) Screening of kerosene and neem extract against coffee green scale. J Coffee Res 19(1):51–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makadia RR, Kabaria BB, Jethva DM, Virani VR (2009) Bio-efficacy and cumulative effect of Verticillium lecanii against Maconellicoccus hirsutus on custard apple. Agric Sci Dig 29(4):300–302

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manjunath D, Kishore R, Satyaprasad K, Vinod K, Pradip K, Datta RK (1992) Biology of mulberry mealy bug and predatory potential of its biocontrol agent. In: Annual Report (1992-93). Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute (CSRTI), Mysore, pp 50–51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manjunath TM (1985) Maconellicoccus hirsutus on grapevine. FAO Pl Prot Bull 33(2):74

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meyerdirk DE, Muniappan R, Warkentin R, Bamba J, Reddy GVP (2004) Biological control of the papaya mealy bug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Guam. Pl Prot Quart 19:110–114

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamed GS (2016) Virulence of entomopathogenic fungi against the vine mealy bug, Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Egyptian J Biol Pest Control 26(1):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oparaeke AM, Dike MC, Amatobi CI (2005) Evaluation of botanical mixtures for insect pests management on cowpea plants. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 106(1):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russell R, Paterson M (2006) Fungi and fungal toxins as weapons. Mycol Res 110:1003–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shekhar MA, Sathyaprasad K (1998) Control of mealy bug using neem based insecticides. In: Annual Report. CSRTI, Mysore, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verghese A (1997) Colony number, size and reproductive potential of the grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) on laboratory host pumpkin. Insect Environ 2(4):139–140

    Google Scholar 

  23. Verghese A, Tandon PL (1987) Pest management in grapevine and guava. In: Annual Report. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, p 61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Department of Entomology, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, and the entire faculty for providing necessary facilities for conducting the investigation and valuable suggestions during the course of the investigation.

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved, prepared, and submitted the final manuscript.

GSG: experimentation, recording observations, and analysis of the data

BV: formulation of the research and guiding the proper work plan and experimentation

NAM: experimentation and analysis of the data

GPN: paper writing and analysis and interpretation of the data

SP: raw material availability, lab culture maintenance, and recording of the observations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. N. Guru.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research paper is written based on the novel work done under laboratory conditions. The authors have understood and formulated the paper in response to research ethics.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopal, G.S., Venkateshalu, B., Nadaf, A.M. et al. Management of the grape mealy bug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), using entomopathogenic fungi and botanical oils: a laboratory study. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31, 100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00444-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Maconellicoccus hirsutus
  • Entomopathogenic fungi
  • Lecanicillium
  • Beauveria
  • Botanicals
  • Neem oil
  • IIHR neem soap