- Open Access
Development, biology, and life table parameters of the predatory species, Clitostethus brachylobus Peng, Ren & Pang 1998 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), when fed on the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 30, Article number: 115 (2020)
The predatory species, Clitostethus brachylobus Peng, Ren & Pang 1998 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), native to China, has been reported as a predator of the whitefly species, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). Present study describes the development and biological characteristics of C. brachylobus. Developmental periods of different immature stages showed significant differences, when fed on different life stages of B. tabaci. Prey consumption capacity was reduced by the increase in prey age. Female longevity was 193.5 days, whereas fecundity was 154.70 eggs/female. Net reproductive rate was 53.60, whereas the mean generation time was 102.64 days. The daily adult survival rates gradually decreased 120 h post-adult emergence.
The whitefly species, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.), is well known as an economic pest on crops, vegetables, and fruits. It prevails across whole China with a tendency for annual outbreaks (Qiu et al. 2011). B. tabaci exists in 31 provinces or municipalities of China, causing economic losses to different crops (Qiu et al. 2011). Agrochemicals are mostly used for whitefly management throughout the world. They affect natural environment in many harmful ways (Liang et al. 2012; He et al. 2013). This has necessitated requiring alternate control measures and applications of biocontrol agents, as safe options for environmentally sustainable whitefly management (Hernandez et al. 2013). Previously, many workers have successfully used coccinellid predators (Serangium parcesetosum Sicard, Nephaspis oculatus Blatchley, Delphastus catalinae Leconte, and Axinoscymnus cardilobus Ren and Pang) for whitefly management (Liu and Stansly 1999; Gerling et al. 2001; Simmons and Legaspi 2004; Huang et al. 2006; Huang et al. 2008).
Different species of tribe Clitostethus have been proved as specialized predators of whiteflies under laboratory and field conditions (Yazdani and Zarabi 2011). C. brachylobus was identified, on the basis of its adult morphology by Poprawski et al. (1998), as a new species and an indigenous potential whitefly predator in China. To date, majority of information regarding predatory potential of this beetle has been restricted to their feeding capacity. Very little information is available on the morphology of immature stages, biology, and life history of C. brachylobus. Biological studies and life table variables can be used to determine the predatory potential as an insect predator in terms of a detailed analysis of age-specific deaths in the population (Luck et al. 1988). When data are available on insect fecundity and age-specific mortality, the influence of the predator can be shown based on population growth rate (Sang et al. 2018).
The present study was designed to explain the morphological characteristics of different life stages of C. brachylobus and to record the growth parameters, reproduction, life table, and functional response of C. brachylobus, when fed on various stages of B. tabaci.
Materials and methods
C. brachylobus and B. tabaci from a greenhouse colony were maintained on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. plants at Provincial Key Laboratory of Biopesticides, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, following the methods of Huang et al. (2008).
Morphology of different life stages of C. brachylobus
Description and illustration of all C. brachylobus developmental stages were based on fresh specimens collected from the Xishuang Banana National Nature Reserve, Yunnan Province, China. A stereoscope (Stereo Discovery V20) was used to describe the external morphology. Photos were taken, using a digital camera (AxioCam HRc) that was attached to the dissecting microscope. Axio Vision Rel Apps. 4.8 was used to capture camera images. Measurements were carried out, using a micrometer connected to a microscope for dissection. In this paper, the use of morphological terminology follows that of Ślipiński (2007) and Ślipiński and Tomaszewska (2010).
Life history and predatory potentials of C. brachylobus immatures
Adult beetles collected from the stock culture in the greenhouse were fed on B. tabaci and maintained on H. rosa-sinensis plants for egg oviposition following Huang et al. (2006). Leaves bearing beetle eggs less than 12 h old were then confined in clear plastic Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) lined with a moist filter paper (8 cm diameter) to prevent desiccation of the eggs. Beetle eggs were divided into two batches, and each batch was divided into three replicates of 50 eggs. The eggs were closely monitored for hatching. The newly hatched neonates were isolated in a plastic Petri dish containing a 10–15-cm2 leaf disc of H. rosa-sinensis bearing B. tabaci and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, and 16:8 (light: dark) photoperiod. The neonates in two batches mentioned above maintained on individual leaf disc were then exposed to two different diet treatments namely eggs and assorted immature for consumption. The number of eggs and immatures consumed was recorded daily. The different developmental stages to adult emergence of the beetle and the survival rates of the immatures were also recorded.
Longevity and fecundity
Twenty-four pairs of newly emerged adults less than 12 h old divided into four groups in two treatments, with two replicates in each treatment, were provided with whitefly eggs and immatures on H. rosa-sinensis leaf in Petri dishes, respectively. The daily number of eggs laid, the number of adults surviving each day, and the longevity of the adults were recorded. The sex was determined by dissecting dead adults.
Life table analysis
Collected data (on survival and fecundity of C. brachylobus) was used to estimate different life table parameters of C. brachylobus feeding on B. tabaci. The life table calculation was carried out by using the following formula (Mutlu and Sertkaya 2016):
where x is the age of C. brachylobus in days, lx implies the age-specific survival at time x, and mx is the number of eggs (sex ratio dependent) laid by a single female each day. The data was analyzed based on theory of the age-stage, two-sex life table (Chi 1988) and using the program TWOSEX-MSChart (Chi 2015).
Developmental period, survivorship percentage, ovipositional period, and fecundity per female were analyzed, using analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD test, to derive mean values when the F value was lower than 0.05 (SAS 1988).
Results and discussion
Morphology of Clitostethus brachylobus
The eggs are appearing reticulate oval, white, elongate chorion except for ventral surface. After hatching, the reticulation becomes more distinct. Sometimes in tandem with whitefly eggs, eggs laid singly on the leaf surface (Fig. 1a).
They are fusiform, elongated, white, and widest around the metathorax. Morphological characteristics were not distinctly different for each instance, except for the body size. Head is broader than long, widest near to ocelli, and every side of the head has 3 ocelli; the mandible is apically flat, and maxillary palpus has 3 palpomers and palpiper; there are 2–3 pairs of small collar setae above the mouthpieces on the front. Antenna comprised of 3 antennomers. The second antennomers are longer and more slender than the first one, with a minute spine-like sensory process and many sensory acute processes on the terminal side, and 1 long hair process; the third indistinct antennomers have a broad, acute conical sensory process. Both segments of the body are wider than the long. The pronotum has 2 pairs of elongated setae close to the front margin, 3 pairs along the rear margin, and 1 pair in the middle; there are 6–10 pairs of chalazae on each side of the dorsolateral region. The mesothorax is as wide as the metathorax, and the metanotum has 1 pair of elongated main setae next to midline and 1 pair on each side of submedium area; there are 8–10 dorsolateral chalazae. Setae are on mesonotum-like metanotum. Abdominal tergites I–VIII are with strumae, each bearing a small chalazae, 70–10, and a few long, slender collars. Ninth segment tergite is with rear edge truncate to slightly emarginated; there are 2 pairs of elongated setae next to midline, 2 pairs along rear edge, 4 pairs of chalazae on each side’s dorsolateral region, and 1 pair of collar setae on each side’s posterolateral area. There is one extremely long chalaza on each side of the metathorax to abdominal segments I–VIII. The legs moderately elongate with few setae; the tibia is lacking terminal setae.
Growing larval head (capsule) width and body length are well associated although the head (capsule) width is less variable than the length of the body.
There were 4 distinct larval instars found. The neonate is thin, and the body gets bigger and whiter with each molt. When looking for prey, larvae move slowly, stop periodically, and move the body from side to side using uropodes in the caudal segment for processing on the surface of the leaf. Debris also builds up on the body from whiteflies, including eggshells, wax and exuviae, and exuviae from the previous larval installation.
Newly formed pupa white had long dark setae. A tiny, clear droplet of liquid was seen adhering to the tip of each seta when the relative humidity was high. Pupa covered by whitefly debris, attached to the exuvia of the previous instar at posterior side.
Developmental periods of C. brachylobus
The developmental period of C. brachylobus immatures stages, when fed on B. tabaci immatures, differed significantly (Table 1). The developmental period of the 1st larval instar of C. brachylobus differed significantly, when fed on different life stages of B. tabaci (F = 23.21; d.f = 6; P < 0.001). The longest developmental period of the 1st larval instar of C. brachylobus (2.14 ± 0.09 days) was observed, while feeding on the 1st instar of B. tabaci nymphs, whereas the shortest developmental period (1.43 ± 0.11 days) was recorded, while feeding on B. tabaci eggs (Table 1).
The developmental period of the 2nd larval instar of C. brachylobus differed significantly while feeding on different life stages of B. tabaci (F = 19.64; d.f = 6; P < 0.001). The longest developmental period of the 2nd larval instar of C. brachylobus (2.31 ± 0.11 days) was observed, while feeding on the 1st instar of B. tabaci nymphs, whereas the shortest developmental period (1.31 ± 0.09 days) was observed, while feeding on the 4th nymphal instar of B. tabaci (Table 1).
The developmental period of the 3rd larval instar of C. brachylobus differed significantly, while feeding on different life stages of B. tabaci (F = 19.64; d.f = 6; P < 0.001). The longest developmental period (2.54 ± 0.12 days) for the 3rd larval instar of C. brachylobus was observed, while feeding on the 1st instar of B. tabaci nymphs, whereas the shortest developmental period (1.29 ± 0.09 days) was observed, while feeding on the 4th instar nymphs of B. tabaci (Table 1).
The total developmental period (egg-adult) differed significantly, while feeding on different life stages of B. tabaci (F = 43.62; d.f = 6; P < 0.001). Total larval developmental period was longest (11.9 ± 0.06 days), when C. brachylobus larvae were fed on the 1st instar of B. tabaci nymphs, whereas the shortest period (7.43 ± 0.07 days) was observed when larvae were fed on the 4th instar of B. tabaci nymphs (Table 1).
Obtained results regarding the developmental period of C. brachylobus feeding on B. tabaci immatures were different from the findings of Yazdani and Zarabi (2009). They showed that developmental periods of Clitostethus arcuatus fed on eggs; 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th nymphal instars; and pupa of Trialeurodicus vaporarium (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) were 2.75, 4.75, 7.25, 9.5, and 4.25 days, respectively. Similar results have also been obtained by Yazdani and Zarabi (2011) for C. arcuatus feeding on ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae. The said variations in results might be related to different predator or prey species.
Prey consumption of C. brachylobus immatures and adults
The average prey consumption by C. brachylobus immatures varied significantly among different treatments (Table 2). Total prey consumption by C. brachylobus larvae was highest (498.36 ± 80.57 individuals) when B. tabaci eggs were supplied as food, and the lowest (58.80 ± 16.43 individuals) when C. brachylobus larvae were fed on B. tabaci pupae. The consumption of B. tabaci eggs by C. brachylobus larval instars was 7–10 times higher than the consumption of pupae (Table 2).
The total prey consumption by C. brachylobus adults decreased as the whitefly immature grew in size. The C. brachylobus female consumed 165.08 ± 47.80 eggs, 84.29 ± 15.30 1st instar nymphs, 55.38 ± 17.01 2nd instar nymphs, 22.22 ± 6.14 3rd instar nymphs, 13.24 ± 2.21 4th instar nymphs, and 9.89 ± 1.51 pupae when different B. tabaci stages were supplied as food (Table 3).
C. brachylobus larvae consumed more eggs than other life stages of B. tabaci, and whitefly egg consumption by females was higher than males. The present study reveals that C. brachylobus shares many characteristics, a preference for whitefly eggs over nymphs, with N. oculatus and Delphastus pusillus (Hoelmer et al. 1993; Liu and Stansly 1999). This was similar with the results of Bathon and Pietrzik (1986). The differences in prey consumption may be related to the characteristics of the beetle population which can vary depending on the insect prey (Yazdani and Zarabi 2011).
Survival of C. brachylobus immatures
Percent survivorship of C. brachylobus immatures differed significantly among different treatments (F = 32.17; d.f = 5; P < 0.001). Highest percent survivorship (100%) was observed at 3rd instar larva and pupa whereas the lowest survival percentage was observed at eggs, having an average survival of 88%. The survivorship for 3rd instar larva and pupa was statistically at par with each other (Fig. 2). These results are different from the findings of Huang et al. (2006) who showed that diet of eggs or nymphs of B. tabaci does not influence survivorship of Axinoscymnus cardilobus larvae; however, second instars proved to be an exception as their survival rate was significantly higher on a diet of eggs. The differences in survival may be related to the characteristics of the beetle population which can vary depending on the insect prey (Huang et al. 2006).
Life history of C. brachylobus
Biological characteristics of C. brachylobus are presented in Table 4 and Fig. 3. The adult beetle ovipositional and daily survival rate data showed that survival rates steadily dropped from the 120th day of adult emergence. The line shows a triangular pattern for egg laying period (Fig. 3). The average female longevity was 193.5 days whereas the pre-ovipositional period of C. brachylobus female was 20.30. The average female fecundity was 154.70 eggs/female. The net reproductive rate (R0) calculated through the life table analysis was 53.60, whereas the mean generation time (T) was 102.64 days (Table 4).
The average longevity of C. brachylobus adults (male and female) observed was statistically at par with Mesbah (2000) who reported male and female longevity of 192.2 and 207 days, respectively, of C. arcuatus fed on B. tabaci. Obtained findings generally agree with other data of Mesbah (2001), who found females lived longer than males.
Life table parameters of C. brachylobus were different from those observed for C. arcuatus by Yazdani and Samih (2012). It is well known that decrease in intrinsic rate of increase can result in large changes in pest population. Obtained results suggest the release of large numbers of C. brachylobus for whitefly management to obtain information on development C. brachylobus population in a specific period of time.
C. brachylobus showed an efficient prey consumption against B. tabaci suggesting the usage of C. brachylobus in integrated B. tabaci management programs. However, further work on the potential of C. brachylobus under natural conditions and studies on the compatibility of this ladybird beetle with other biocontrol agents are still required.
Availability of data and materials
The data and material used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- R 0 :
Net reproductive rate
- T :
Mean generation time
- r m :
Intrinsic rate of increase
Finite rate of increase
Bathon VH, Pietrzik J (1986) On the food consumption of Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a predator of Aleurodes proletella L. (Hom.: Aleyrodidae). J Appl Entomol 102:321–326
Chi H (1988) Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ Entomol 17:26–34
Chi H (2015) Twosex-MsChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. (http://220.127.116.11/Ecology/Download/TwosexMSChart.zip).
Gerling D, Oscar A, Judit A (2001) Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Prot 20:779–799
He YX, Zhao JW, Zheng Y, Weng QY, Biondi A, Desneux N, Wu KM (2013) Assessment of potential sublethal effects of various insecticides on key biological traits of the tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Int J Biol Sci 9:246–255
Hernandez LM, Otero JT, Manzano MR (2013) Biological control of the greenhouse whitefly by Amitus fuscipennis: understanding the role of extrafloral nectaries from crop and non-crop vegetation. Biol Control 67:227–234
Hoelmer KA, Osborne LS, Yokomi PK (1993) Reproduction and feeding behavior of Delphastus pusillus (Colelptera: Coccinellidae), predators of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J Econ Entomol 86:322–329
Huang Z, Ren SX, Musa PD (2008) Effect of temperature on development, survival, longevity, and fecundity of the Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) predator, Axinoscymus cardilobus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol Control 46:209–215
Huang Z, Ren SX, Yao SL (2006) Life history of Axinoscymnus cardilobus (Col., Coccinellidae), a predator of Bemisia tabaci (Hom., Aleyrodidae). J Appl Entomol 130:437–441
Liang P, Tian YA, Biondi A, Desneux N, Gao XW (2012) Short-term and trans-generational effects of the neonicotinoid nitenpyram on susceptibility to insecticides in two whitefly species. Ecotoxicol 21:889–1898
Liu TX, Stansly PA (1999) Searching and feeding behavior of Nephaspis oculatus and Delphastus catalinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), predators of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ Entomol 28:901–906
Luck RF, Shepard BM, Kenmore PE (1988) Experimental methods for evaluating natural enemies. Annu Rev Entomol 33:367–391
Mesbah AH (2000) Development and efficiency of Clitostethus arcuatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) predated on Siphoninus phillyreae (Hom.: Aleurodidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 10:123–127
Mesbah AH (2001) Biology and efficiency of Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) as a predator of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 11:95–100
Mutlu C, Sertkaya E (2016) Biology of the leafhopper, Zyginidia sohrab Zachvatkin, on corn under laboratory conditions. J Entomol Zool Stud 4(4):401–406
Poprawski JT, Legaspi JC, Parker PE (1998) Influence of entomopathogenic fungi on Serangium parcesetosum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), an important predator of whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ Entomol 27:785–795
Qiu BL, Dang F, Li SJ, Ahmed MZ, Jin FL, Ren SX, Cuthbertson AGS (2011) Comparison of biological parameters between the invasive B biotype and a new defined Cv biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyradidae) in China. J Pest Sci 84:419–427
Sang W, Xu J, Bashir MH, Ali S (2018) Developmental responses of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri to heavy metals transferred across multitrophic food chain. Chemosphere 205:690–697
SAS (1988) Institute SAS User’s Guide. Statistics, Cary
Simmons AM, Legaspi JC (2004) Survival and predation of Delphastus catalinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a predator of whitely (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), after exposure to a range of constant temperatures. Environ Entomol 33:839–843
Ślipiński A (2007) Australian ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): their biology and classification. ABRS, Canberra, p 286
Ślipiński A, Tomaszewska W (2010) Coccinellidae Latreille. In: RAB L, Beutel RG, Lawrence JF (eds) Handbook of Zoology, Coleoptera (Vol. 2). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin; New York, p 786
Yazdani M, Samih MA (2012) Life table attributes of Clitostethus arcuatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Siphoninus phillyreae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). J Asia-Pacific Entomol 15:295–298
Yazdani M, Zarabi M (2009) Study of feeding and life stages of Clitostethus arcuatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Hexapoda 16:61–65
Yazdani M, Zarabi M (2011) The effect of diet on longevity, fecundity, and the sex ratio of Clitostethus arcuatus (Rossi) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J Asia-Pacific Entomol 14:349–352
This research was funded by the grants from the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, P.R. China (201804020070, 201509010023, 151800033); Science and Technology Planning project of Guangdong, P.R. China (2017A020208060); and Special Funds for Agriculture and Rural Work, Guangdong Province (2017-104).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We agree to all concerned regulations.
Consent for publication
We agree to publish this scientific paper in the EJBPC.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Deng, H., Du, C. et al. Development, biology, and life table parameters of the predatory species, Clitostethus brachylobus Peng, Ren & Pang 1998 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), when fed on the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00316-y
- Clitostethus brachylobus
- Bemisia tabaci
- Life table parameters