Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control
Download PDF

Genetic diversity among different geographical isolates of the gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV)

Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 29, Article number: 61 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

The gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is infected by nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV), which is the most promising microbial biocontrol agent of the pest. A genetic diversity analysis of geographically distinct isolates of HearNPV was done, using the polyhedrin (polh) gene of the viruses that encodes a major structural protein of the occlusion bodies. The gene was amplified and isolated from eight Indian isolates, using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These sequences were compared with the polh genes of other HearNPV from different geographical regions of the world. A phylogenetic tree was constructed, using polh nucleotide/deduced amino acid sequences to know their genetic relatedness. The polh gene of isolates originating from nearby locations clustered together with the gene of isolates in the present study; however, some showed relatedness with gene isolate from other geographically distinct isolates, with respect to the genetic distances among them. The Indian isolate (Ban-PDBC-In) shared lower genetic distance of 0.0020 to 0.0040 substitutions per site with the Spanish isolates SP1A-Sp and SP1B-Sp and clustered in one group based on nucleotide sequences. The isolates showed different a clustering pattern in phylogenetic tree based on deduced amino acid sequences than that of the nucleotide sequences. The overall genetic distances between polh nucleotides ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0203 substitutions per site, while it was 0.0000 to 0.0121 between deduced amino acid sequences. Among different geographical groups of isolates, the Indian group showed the highest genetic diversity based on both polh nucleotide (0.0070 ± 0.0002 substitutions per site) and deduced amino acid (0.0057 ± 0.0003 substitutions per site) sequences among different groups of geographical isolates. A diversity analysis of virus isolates can aid in the selection and identification of virulent virus isolates for the development of a virus-based bio-pesticide formulation.

Background

The gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a cosmopolitan and polyphagous insect pest (Fitt 1989). It has been reported to feeding on 60 cultivated and 67 wild host plants in 36 families (Reed and Pawar 1982). The pest is known to cause an estimated loss of more than US $2 billion annually in semi-arid tropics (Sharma et al. 2005). Several entomopathogenic microbes were exploited for the management of this pest (Swami et al. 2012; Pugalenthi et al. 2013; Bajya et al. 2015). Among these, H. armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV) has attracted much attention because of its host specificity and safety to non-target organisms (Moore et al. 2004; Gupta et al. 2010). However, HearNPV isolates collected from different geographical regions showed considerable variations both in genetics and in virulence (Ogembo et al. 2007; Mehrvar et al. 2008; Figueiredo et al. 2009). Thus, the study of the diversity among geographical isolates of HearNPV, at molecular level, is a key research area to generate information on molecular fingerprinting for selecting virulent virus isolates (Kaur et al. 2014).

HearNPV belongs to the family baculoviridae of the insect viruses. They have rod-shaped virions, enveloped in proteinaceous occlusion bodies with supercoiled double-stranded circular DNA genome ranging from 90 to 160 kb (Blissard and Rohrmann 1990; Zhang et al. 2005). In earlier studies, the baculoviruses were differentiated based on restriction enzyme analysis of whole genome (Gettig and McCarthy 1982; Takatsuka et al. 2003). Highly conserved genes such as polyhedrin (polh) (Rohrmann 1986), late expression factors (Hefferon 2004), and chitinase (Wang et al. 2004) have been identified in baculoviruses. Polyhedrin gene among these encodes major matrix protein of occlusion bodies of baculoviruses (Blissard and Rohrmann 1990). PCR-based amplified sequence of these genes have been used for diversity studies by many scientific groups (Jakubowska et al. 2005; Arrizubi et al. 2013; Kaur et al. 2014) and classification of baculoviruses (Lange et al. 2004; Jehle et al. 2006).

In the present study, genetic diversity of HearNPV from different geographical regions (HearNPV isolates) was studied based on the variations in the sequence of polh gene sequence.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing

H. armigera was reared on a semisynthetic chickpea diet at 25 °C and 16-h photoperiod (Wakil et al. 2011).

Multiplication of virus isolates

The crude extracts of polyhedral inclusion bodies (PIBs) were obtained from various institutions located in different regions of India as listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV) isolates from various geographical locations in India
Full size table

The virus isolates were multiplied in fourth-instar larvae of H. armigera. The larvae were fed on a semisynthetic diet mixed with polyhedral suspension (6.5 × 109 PIBs/ml) of virus and incubated at 25 °C. The infected larvae were collected based on typical disease symptom and homogenized in distilled water. The mixture was filtered through a clean muslin cloth, and the polyhedra were ultrapurified on a 40 to 60% sucrose gradient in a Beckmann centrifuge at 32000 rpm. The isolated polyhedral were stored in distilled water at − 20 °C. The concentration of polyhedra in each virus suspension was determined, using Neubauer Haemocytometer under phase contrast light microscope at × 400 (Grzywacz et al. 2004).

DNA isolation

The DNA was extracted from different isolates according to the protocol of Figueiredo et al. (1999) with slight modifications. The purified polyhedra were re-suspended in 0.1 M sodium carbonate solution [0.1 M sodium carbonate, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5 M EDTA (pH 10.5)] and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Subsequently, 0.5 mg/ml of proteinase K and 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The digested solution was further extracted by phenol and then by phenol to chloroform to isomyl alcohol (25:24:1) solution. The DNA was precipitated by ethanol and re-suspended in 0.1 X TE buffer (pH 8.0).

PCR amplification of polyhedrin (polh) gene

Primers for the specific amplification of polh from HearNPV isolates were designed based on polh sequence of the Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore (PDBC) isolate (GenBank acc. no. FJ 157293.1), using Primer3 (Version 0.4.0) software. The reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 15 ng DNA template, 3 U Taq DNA polymerase, 10 pmol/μl forward primer (5′-ATGTATACTCGTTACAGTTACAGCCCT-3′), 10 pmol/μl reverse primer (5′-TTAATATGCAGGACCAGTGTATAGC-3′), 2 mM dNTPs, and 10X PCR buffer with 15 mM MgCl2.

The gene amplification was performed, using a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad), with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min followed by another denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, and then annealing at 57 °C for 45 s, followed by extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min, and the amplified polh gene was subsequently stored at 4 °C until used. There were 35 amplification cycles. The amplified PCR product was electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gel and visualized in a UV gel documentation system.

Sequencing of amplified product

The agarose gel bands with polh gene amplimers were eluted from the agarose block and purified, using GeneJET gel extraction kit (Thermo Scientific). The purified DNA fragments were ligated to pTZ57R/T easy cloning plasmid vector, using “InsTAclone™ PCR Cloning Kit” (Fermentas Life Sciences) and sequenced by using M13 forward and reverse primers from AgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., India. The resulting sequences were extracted, using BioEdit 7.2.1 software. Homology searches were performed, using BLAST program (Altschul et al. 1990) of NCBI website. The polh gene sequences were translated to protein, using protein translation tool ExPASy (Expert Protein Analysis System).

Genetic diversity analysis

The polh sequences amplified from eight isolates were compared with those from other geographical isolates to infer the genetic diversity. The polh sequences belonging to different geographical regions were obtained from the GenBank database (Table 2). Phylogenetic tree was constructed from the aligned polh nucleotide/deduced amino sequences with maximum likelihood method by following bootstrap method (replications = 1000) for variance estimation. The granulin sequence (PlxyGV-001-gran-SA) (AN: KJ939451.1) was used as an out-group. The pairwise genetic distance, which estimates number of nucleotide/amino acid substitutions per site between a pair of sequences, was determined. The analyses were carried out with MEGA 6.0 software (Tamura et al. 2013). The genetic diversity among different continents was estimated using DIVEIN software, which measures the mean genetic distances between groups of sequences (Deng et al. 2010). Kimura-2-parameter (Kimura 1980) and Jones-Taylor-Thornton substitution models (Jones et al. 1992) estimation were used for nucleotide and amino acid sequences comparison, respectively.

Table 2 Geographical isolates of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV) used to compare with the eight isolates from present study
Full size table

Results and discussion

Amplification with polh-specific primers gave an amplimer of approximately of 740 bp from all the eight HearNPV isolates (Fig. 1). BLAST results of sequenced DNA fragments showed 99 to 100 % similarity with the previously deposited polh sequences in the GenBank database. This confirmed the identity of the gene in the eight isolates used in the present study as polh. The resulting sequences were submitted to the GenBank database, with accession number as, MH029111, MH029112, MH029113, MH029114, MH029115, MH029116, MH029117, and MH029118 for Rajanukunte, Chandapura, Gulbarga, Dhule, Akola, Hyderabad, Udaipur, and Hosur isolates, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure1

Electrophoretic profile of polyhedrin gene amplified from total DNA of different geographical isolates of HearNPV (M: Marker: 100bp ladder (Thermoscientific); Lane 1: Rke-In; 2: Chan-In; 3: Gul-In; 4: Dhl-In; 5: Akl-In; 6: Hyd-In; 7: Udr-In; 8: Hor-In; 9: Non template control

Full size image

The genetic relatedness of different geographical isolates was determined by phylogenetic analysis of their polh sequences. The isolates were clustered into two clades (Clade1and Clade2) based on their polh nucleotide sequences (Fig. 2a). Clade2 was further divided into subclades. Most of the isolates were clustered with related geographical isolates, however, some with geographically distant isolates too. The two Indian isolates (2588-Neg-In and 1113-Neg-In) formed a cluster with Australian isolate (H25EA1-Aus). Likewise, another Indian isolate (Far-1-In) showed relatedness with isolates from Sudan, Poland, and China. The isolates clustered with respect to the genetic distances among them. The Indian isolate (Ban-PDBC-In) shared a lower genetic distance of 0.0020 to 0.0040 substitutions per site (Table 3) with the Spanish isolates SP1A-Sp and SP1B-Sp and clustered in Clade1. It had genetic distance of 0.0040 to 0.0141 substitutions per site with other isolates.

Fig. 2
figure2

Phylogenetic tree based on polyhedrin nucleotide (a)/ deduced amino acid sequences (b) of HearNPV isolates from different geographical regions

Full size image
Table 3 Pairwise genetic distance between the polyhedrin nucleotide/deduced amino acid sequences of HearNPV isolates from different geographical regions (the numbers above the diagonal line indicate the amino acid genetic distance, while numbers below the diagonal line indicate nucleotide genetic distance)
Full size table

Phylogenetic tree of deduced amino acid sequences showed a different clustering pattern than nucleotide sequences (Fig. 2b). The isolate (Ban-PDBC-In) clustered with geographically related Indian isolates. In contrast, it was placed with Spanish isolates (SP1A-Sp and SP1B-Sp), when analyzed based on nucleotide sequences. The overall genetic distances between polh nucleotide sequences ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0203 substitutions per site, while it ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0121 substitutions per site between deduced amino acid sequences (Table 3). This showed that polh protein is relatively conserved in the isolates, although there was a slightly higher variation in the nucleotide sequences.

The highest genetic diversity was reported in a group of isolates from India based on both polh nucleotide (0.0070 ± 0.0002 substitutions per site) and deduced amino acid (0.0057 ± 0.0003 substitutions per site) sequences (Table 4, Fig. 3). The groups of isolates from other continents showed zero diversity in amino acid sequences, although with some diversity in their nucleotide sequences.

Table 4 Pairwise genetic diversity of groups of HearNPV isolates from different continents
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure3

Pairwise genetic diversity of HearNPV isolates from different geographical regions

Full size image

The present findings showed genetic variations in geographically unrelated HearNPV isolates. Similar kinds of results were reported by many scientific groups, in different nucleopolyhedrosis viruses infecting different insects. Kaur et al. (2014) observed that the HearNPV isolates originating from closer locations were placed in one cluster in a phylogenetic tree. However, one Indian isolate (Bangalore) showed that it was closely related with isolates from Kenya, Israel, and South Africa. According to Rowley et al. (2011), some Indian and Chinese isolates were phylogenetically related with geographically distinct isolates. Many studies have reported genetic variation in geographically distinct baculoviruses based on the restriction fragment analysis of whole genomes. HearNPV isolates collected from Spain and Portugal showed genetic variations based on their restriction fragment profile (Figueiredo et al. 1999). Similar kinds of results were found in restriction endonuclease analysis of Spodoptera litura NPV and S. littoralis NPV from Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia, India, and Egypt (Takatsuka et al. 2003) also revealed similar findings. The regional isolates of HearNPV from India (Patel et al. 2009) and S. frugiperda NPV from Brazil (Barreto et al. 2005) showed differences in their RAPD profiling. The HearNPV samples collected from South Africa, Zimbabwe, Thailand, and Kenya were identified as variants of the same baculovirus (Ogembo et al. 2007).

There are several hypotheses for pathogen genotypic variations, including host immune response specificity, trade-offs between pathogen fitness components, interactions between pathogen genotypes within hosts, and differential selection of pathogen genotypes. Pathogen genotypes with low fitness in some hosts may be sustained in populations by having relatively high fitness under different ecological conditions. In other words, genotypic variation in pathogen populations may be promoted by genotype (G), environment (E), and (G*E) interactions acting at the level of the pathogen genotype (Hodgson et al. 2002). The other reasons for these variations could be due to the insertion of host DNA into the viral genome, duplication of virus sequences, insertions, deletions, and point mutations in the viral DNA.

These whole genome or gene-specific genotypic variations can be used as a genetic marker for understanding of the biodiversity of the viruses, their evolution patterns, and recombination. This understanding combined with bioassay studies could lead to develop or engineer potent biological control agents (BCAs) suitable for pests distributed over wide geographical areas or integrate such BCAs with management strategies to make them more efficient, economical, and environmentally safe.

Conclusion

The present study revealed genetic variations among the HearNPV isolates belonging to different geographical regions. This information can be further validated by studying other highly conserved genes. The genetic variations coupled with bioassay studies can be used for the selection of most virulent isolates for the designing commercial formulations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GenBank database [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide].

Abbreviations

HearNPV:

Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus

polh :

polyhedrin

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Bio 215:403–410

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrizubi M, Williams T, Caballero P, Simon O (2013) Selection of a nucleopolyhedrosis isolate from Helicoverpa armigera as the basis for a biological insecticide. Pest Manag Sci 70:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajya DR, Ranjith M, Raza SK (2015) Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana against chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and its safety to natural enemies. Indian JAgr Sci 85(3):378–381

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barreto MR, Guimaraes CT, Teixeira FF, Paiva E, Valicente FH (2005) Effect of baculovirus Spodoptera isolates in Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae and their characterization by RAPD. Neotrop Entomol 34:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blissard GW, Rohrmann GF (1990) Baculovirus diversity and molecular biology. Annu Rev Entomol 35:127–155

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng W, Maust BS, Nickle DC, Learn GH, Liu Y, Heath L, Kosakovskypond SL, Mullins JI (2010) DIVEIN: a web server to analyze phylogenies, sequence divergence, diversity, and informative sites. Bio Techniques 48:405–408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Figueiredo E, Munoz D, Escribano A, Mexia A, Vlak JM, Caballero P (1999) Biochemical identification and comparative insecticidal activity of nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates pathogenic for Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J Appl Ent 123:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueiredo E, Muñoz D, Murillo R, Mexia A, Caballero P (2009) Diversity of Iberian nucleopolyhedrovirus wild-type isolates infecting Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control 50:4–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitt GP (1989) The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agro-ecosystems. Ann Rev Entomol 34:17–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gettig RR, McCarthy WJ (1982) Genotypic variation among wild isolates of Heliothis spp. nuclear polyhedrosis viruses from different geographical regions. Virol 117:245–252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grzywacz D, Rabindra RJ, Brown M, Jones KA, Parnell M (2004) The Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus production manual, natural resources institute, http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/agrotech/2011/hanpvmanual-pt1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta RK, Raina JC, Arora RK, Bali K (2010) Selection and field effectiveness of nucleopolyhedrosis virus isolates against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Int J Virol 6(3):164–178

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hefferon KL (2004) Baculovirus late expression factors. Review: J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 7:89–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodgson DJ, Vandergen AJ, Hartley SE, Hails RS, Cory JS (2002) Differential selection of baculovirus genotypes mediated by different species of host food plant. Ecol Lett 5:512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jakubowska A, Oers MMV, Zeimnicka J, Lipa JJ, Vlak JM (2005) Molecular characterization of Agrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus from Poland. J Invertebr Pathol 90:64–68

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jehle JA, Blissard GW, Bonning BC, Cory JS, Herniou EA, Rohrmann GF, Theilmann DA, Thiems SM, Vlak JM (2006) On the classification and nomenclature of baculoviruses: a proposal for revision. Arch Virol 151:1257–1266

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8:275–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaur B, Gupta VK, Jindal V (2014) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Indian strains Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus (HearNPV). Indian J Biotechnol 13:186–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lange M, Wang H, Zhihong H, Jehle JA (2004) Towards a molecular identification and classification system of lepidopteran specific baculoviruses. Virol 325:36–47

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehrvar A, Rabindra RJ, Veenakumari K, Narabenchi GB (2008) Molecular and biological characteristics of some geographic isolates of nucleopolyhedrovirus of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Entomol Soc Iran 28:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore SD, Bouwer G, Pittway TM (2004) Evaluation of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV) for control of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on citrus in South Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 14:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogembo JG, Chaeychomsri S, Kamiya K, Ishikawa H, Katou Y, Ikeda M, Kobayashi M (2007) Cloning and comparative characterization of nucleopolyhedrosis virus isolated from African bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in different geographic region. J Insect Biotechnol Sericol 76:39–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel CS, Jani JJ, Parekh VB, Darji VB, Vaishnav PR (2009) Genetic diversity and differentiation of Helicoverpa armigera nuclear polyhedrosis virus isolates from India. Phytoparasitica 37:407–413

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pugalenthi P, Dhanasekaran S, Elumali K, Krishnappa K (2013) Bio-efficacy of NPV tested against American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and protection of cotton boll damage. Int J Renew Environ Sci 1(3):22–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reed W, Pawar CS (1982) Heliothis: a global problem. Int. In: Workshop Heliothis Management, Patancheru, India, 1981.Patanchern, India: ICRISAT, pp 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rohrmann GF (1986) Polyhedrin sutructure. Review: J Gene Virus 67:1499–1513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rowley DL, Popham HJR, Harrison RL (2011) Genetic variation and virulence of nucleopolyhedrosis virus isolated worldwide from the heliothine pests Helicoverpa armigera, Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens. J Invertebr Patho l107:112–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma HC, Pampapathy G, Dhillon MK, Smith JTR (2005) Detached leaf assay to screen for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera. J Econ Entomol 98(2):568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Swami D, Paul B, Kumar R (2012) Efficacy of new formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (HD-1) against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Biol Control 26(1):29–33

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takatsuka J, Okuno S, Nakai M, Kunimi Y (2003) Genetic and biological comparisons of ten geographical isolates of a nucleopolyhedrosis virus that infects Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control 26:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecuar evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wakil W, Ghazanfar MU, Sahi ST, Kwon YJ, Qayyum MA (2011) Effect of modified meridic diet on the development and growth of tomato fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ent Res 41:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H, Wu D, Deng F, Peng H, Chen X, Lauzon H, Arif BM, Jehle JA, Hu Z (2004) Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the chitinase gene from the Helicoverpa armigera single nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrosis virus. Virus Res 100:179–189

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang CX, Ma XC, Guo ZJ (2005) Comparison of the complete genome sequence between C1 and G4 isolates of the Helicoverpa armigera single nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virol 333:190–199

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author are very grateful to National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR), Bengaluru, Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, M/s Agri Life Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, College of Agriculture and Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Dhule for providing HearNPV isolates for this investigation. ICAR-Senior Research Fellowship for the first author is also gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560065, India

    Ranvir Singh & K. S. Jagadish

  2. Department of Plant Biotechnology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560065, India

    Kheta Ram Tak & Anitha Peter

Authors
  1. Ranvir Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. S. Jagadish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kheta Ram Tak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anitha Peter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KSJ and AP planned and directed the experiment. RS and KRT conducted the experiment and prepared the manuscript draft. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranvir Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, R., Jagadish, K.S., Tak, K.R. et al. Genetic diversity among different geographical isolates of the gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) nucleopolyhedrosis virus (HearNPV). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29, 61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0164-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Helicoverpa armigera
  • nucleopolyhedrosis virus
  • isolates
  • phylogeny
  • polyhedrin