Skip to main content

Studies on mycosis of Metarhizium (Nomuraea) rileyi on Spodoptera frugiperda infesting maize in Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Background

Mycosis on the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), infecting maize was observed in research farm of Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalli from October 2019 to February 2020.

Main body

High relative humidity (94.87%), low temperature (24.11 °C), and high rainfall (376.1 mm) received during the month of September 2019 predisposed the larval instars for fungal infection and subsequent high relative humidity and low temperatures sustained the infection till February 2020. An entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) was isolated from the infected larval instars as per standard protocol on Sabouraud’s maltose yeast extract agar and characterized based on morphological and molecular analysis. The fungus was identified as Metarhizium (Nomuraea) rileyi based on ITS sequence homology and the strain was designated as AKP-Nr-1. The pathogenicity of M. rileyi AKP-Nr-1 on S. frugiperda was visualized, using a light and electron microscopy at the host-pathogen interface. Microscopic studies revealed that all the body parts of larval instars were completely overgrown by white mycelial threads of M. rileyi, except the head capsule, thoracic shield, setae, and crotchets. The cadavers of larval instars of S. frugiperda turned green on sporulation and mummified with progress in infection. In vitro pathogenicity tests revealed the potential of AKP-Nr-1 strain of M. rileyi in management of S. frugiperda.

Short conclusion

The results indicated the potential of M. rileyi AKP-Nr-1 as biocontrol agent for management of the fall armyworm. This AKP-Nr-1 strain of M. rileyi needs further evaluation under field conditions to evaluate its efficacy against S. frugiperda and its effects on other hosts.

Background

Fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a serious polyphagous pest of voracious nature with a wide host range and causes significant losses to agricultural crops. Damage due to the pest larval instars was reported on foliage, leaf whorls, tassel, and cobs based on the stage of infection (Goergen et al. 2016). FAW attack on maize has the potential to cause yield losses in a range from 8.3 to 20.6 million tons per annum, in the absence of any control measure. This is a nightmare to maize farmers and poses a major threat to food security and agricultural trade in Africa (Igyuve et al. 2018).

Various control approaches like cultural methods and use of chemical pesticides and natural plant products are in vogue for the management of the FAW in maize. However, overuse of chemical insecticides had witnessed deleterious effects on soil health and the environment as well as beneficial flora and fauna like earthworms, natural predators, and parasites (FAO 2018). Use of biocontrol agents in sustainable management of insect pests is “oflate” gaining importance in view of environmental safety. Fungal bioagents infecting insects can provide an effective alternative for ecofriendly management of insect pests.

Mycosis of entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) on various insect pests was reported worldwide under favourable environmental conditions for fungal growth and multiplication (Vimala et al. 2003; Meyling and Eilenberg 2007; Ingle 2014; and Patil and Abhilash 2014). Prevalence, distribution, and mycosis of entomo-fungal pathogens were found influenced by weather parameters like temperature, rainfall, and humidity (Maurya et al. 2013). Some of these fungi were isolated in pure form, evaluated and identified as potential biocontrol agents for pest management owing to their specificity and ease of multiplication.

Among various EPF, Metarhizium (Nomuraea) rileyi (Farlow) Samson was reported to infect several lepidopteran pests and found highly effective against noctuid defoliators like Spodoptera litura Fabricius, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hubner), and Trichoplusia ni Hubner (Keller and Zimmermann 1989) for their ecofriendly management. M. rileyi is a dimorphic, ubiquitous fungus with yeast-like hyphal bodies and true mycelial filaments and named initially as Botrytis rileyi (Farlow) and later as Spicaria rileyi (Farlow) Charles. The fungus was re-described and placed in the genus, Nomuraea by Kish et al. (1974). Based on molecular analysis, using RAPD, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence analysis, amplified length polymorphism (AFLP), and telomeric finger printing methods, Boucias et al. (2000) stated that N. rileyi isolates were more closely related to Metarhizium anisopliae and M. flavoviride than to N. atypicola and N. anemonoides. More recently, N. rileyi has been changed to M. rileyi based on its morphological and molecular characterization by Kepler et al. (2014).

M. rileyi produces conidia on conidiophores, which are airborne and the infective propagules that will initiate the pathogenesis. The conidia adhere to the host surfaces, germinate and produce germ tube that penetrates the host cuticle, and colonizes the haemocoel of the insect leading to death of the insect (Srisukchayakul et al. 2005).

Previous studies revealed a marked variability among the isolates of various EPF, collected from different geographical locations and their efficacy against insect pests (Vimala et al. 2003). Therefore, it is important to exploit native EPF and to test their potential against target pests for developing a myco-insecticide for specific geographic locations.

Hence, the present study was taken up to characterize the EPF, naturally infecting S. frugiperda on maize and to visualize host colonization through light and electron microscopy. Further, pathogenicity tests were also conducted to study the efficacy of the native strain of the fungus on FAW in maize.

Main text

Materials and methods

The present study was carried out at the Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Anakapalli (17° 40′ 48″ N, 83° 01′ 12″ E), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, during 2019–2020 crop seasons. The maize hybrid, Syngenta S6668, was sown in the first fortnight of August 2019 in 6 blocks of 27 m2 each. Maize cultivation was carried out as per the regular cultural practices and data on FAW incidence was recorded on first appearance of the pest.

Correlation of weather parameters with mycosis on fall armyworm in maize

Observations on FAW incidence in maize were recorded at fortnightly intervals from September 2019 to February 2020. Data on weather parameters, viz., temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall, were recorded during this period and correlated with M. rileyi natural infection. The data were analysed statistically (Panse and Sukatme 1985). The data was subjected to stepdown regression by Efroymson (1960) was followed for generation a prediction system, using XLSTAT software version 2016.03.30882.

Isolation of entomopathogenic fungus (EPF)

Larval instars of S. frugiperda infected with EPF were collected from the maize field in the research farm of Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Anakapalli, during October 2019 and the pathogen was isolated on Sabouraud’s maltose yeast extract agar (SMYA) by standard protocol of Vimala et al. (2002). The dead larvae collected from the field were surface sterilized by immersing in 4% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min, followed by rinsing in 3 changes of sterile distilled water. The surface sterilized diseased specimens were cut in a sterile watch glass and a small portion of the infected tissue was transferred to a sterile culture plate containing Sabouraud’s maltose agar media fortified with 2% yeast extract. The plates were incubated at 26 + 1 °C for 8 days and the colonies formed were further purified by subculture on SMYA medium.

Pathogenicity test

Pathogenicity of the isolated fungus was carried out as per the method of Dutta et al. (2014) with slight modification. Laboratory reared 3rd instar larvae of S. frugiperda (N = 30 in 3 replications) were inoculated by spraying with conidial suspension of M. rileyi containing 2 × 108spores/ml. The inoculated larvae were kept in plastic beakers covered with muslin cloth. Thoroughly washed maize leaf bits were provided as food for FAW larvae in the beakers. Similarly, 30 individuals of 3rd instar larvae were sprayed by sterile distilled water, which served as a control. The progress of larval infection and mortality by the fungus was monitored at 24-h interval.

Morphological and molecular characterization of EPF

Morphological features of the isolated fungus were studied using compound microscope (NIKON Eclipse E 200) and the images captured digitally using V-image 2013 software. Molecular identity of the test fungus was established through homology analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The genomic DNA was isolated according to the standard protocol of Sambrook and Russell (2001). The ITS region of the test fungus was amplified in a PCR, using ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS2 (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) primers. Thermocyclic conditions included initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 38 amplification cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR amplified products were resolved in 1% agarose gel in 1X Tris-acetate EDTA, run for 90 min at 100 V, and the amplified products were excised and outsourced (Bioserve Biotechnologies (India) Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad) for partial sequencing. Similarity of ITS region was aligned using BLAST Program of GenBank database (NCBI) and phylogenetic tree was constructed, using MEGA software version 10.0. The sequences obtained from the NCBI database were mentioned in the Table 1.

Table 1 The sequences along with accession numbers used from the NCBI database for the purpose of phylogenetic tree construction

Ultrastructure of mycosis on fall armyworm

Infected larvae, which are white in growth, were taken to the laboratory and placed in sterile Petri dishes containing moist filter papers and then incubated at 26 °C with 70% relative humidity (RH) for 3 days to induce sporulation of the fungus. The infected larvae with olive green spores and the sporulating cultures of EPF on SMYA were used to study the mycosis on S. frugiperda. The mycosis of FAW was captured, using a stereo binocular microscope (Magnus MSZ-TR).

Colonization of EPF on larvae of the fall armyworm was visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Samples were fixed in 2.5% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 24 h at 4 °C and post fixed 1% in aqueous osmium tetroxide for 4 h. Dehydrated in series of graded alcohols and dried to critical point drying with critical point drying (CPD) (EMS 850) unit/vacuum desiccation for 35–45 min for complete drying of specimens. The dried samples were mounted over the stubs with double-sided carbon conductivity tape, and a thin layer of heavy metal (gold) was coated over the samples by using an automated sputter coater (Model JEOL JFC-1600) for 3 min and scanned under SEM (Model JOEL-JSM 5600) at required magnifications as per the standard procedures at RUSKA Lab’s College of Veterinary Science, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.

Results and discussion

Incidence of fall armyworm in maize crop and correlation studies

Initial infestation of FAW in maize was recorded during1st week of September 2019 and sustained till harvest of the crop, i.e., up to February 2020 (Table 2). The FAW incidence ranged from 11.02 to 46.88%. High infestation of FAW was recorded from 2nd fortnight of October to December 1st fortnight with minimum temperatures of 19.63–24.39 °C and high RH (90–98%).

Table 2 Natural incidence of Metarhizium rileyi infection on maize fall armyworm in relation to weather variables during 2019–2020

Mycosis of M. rileyi on S. frugiperda was noticed as insect cadavers on maize leaf, leaf sheath, silk, and cobs (Fig. 1). M. rileyi infection started from 1st fortnight of October (5.61%) and reached the maximum (38.02%) during November 1st fortnight and reduced from December 2nd fortnight onwards. High rainfall received during the 2nd fortnight of September (239.7 mm) and 2nd fortnight of October (236.7 mm) with a high RH (> 95%) was found supportive for mycosis initiation and further progress.

Fig. 1
figure1

Metarhizium rileyi natural infection on fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda larvae on Maize leaf, leaf sheath, silk, and cob

Similar findings by Vimala et al. (2002) were reported in a study where severe outbreak of N. rileyi infection on Spodoptera litura larvae was reported under favourable weather conditions. High relative humidity (90.8%) and high rainfall (84 mm) with a minimum temperature of 23.67 °C were found conducive for natural mycosis of N. rileyi on S. litura. The high humidity and rainfall favour primary infection of the insects by EPF and subsequent invasion of various tissues of the host. Further, these conditions also support growth and sporulation of EPF leading to dispersal of propagules onto plant surfaces, which initiate fresh infections and progress of mycoses. Allen and Buren (1974) discussed the role of biotic and abiotic factors in the occurrence and outbreaks of M. rileyi on insect pests. Temperatures of around 25 °C with high RH (70–75%) prevailing in tropical regions like India, Brazil, and Sub-Saharan Africa were found highly favourable for M. rileyi development (Edelstein et al. 2005).

Correlation studies revealed a high positive correlation between the incidence of FAW and natural incidence of N. rileyi (0.854) (Table 3). Further, the studies revealed that minimum temperature (Tmin) had positive correlation with the incidence of N. rileyi as well as with FAW incidence but the influence is low as indicated by the values (0.075 and 0.233, respectively). All the other weather factors showed negative correlation with low values. Thus, the studies revealed that the factors which are favourable for the FAW incidence are also favourable for the natural incidence of M. rileyi. Further, FAW incidence will favour the natural incidence of M. rileyi under field conditions, which indicates the highest adoptability of the present strain of M. rileyi, which can be used as a potential biocontrol agent against FAW under field conditions.

Table 3 Correlation matrix of natural incidence of Metarhizium rileyi under field conditions during study period

The data was subjected to step down regression and a model was developed for the prediction of M. rileyi natural incidence under field conditions as given below:

$$ M. rileyi\ \mathrm{natural}\ \mathrm{incidence}\ \left(\%\right)=91.8173+0.57\times \mathrm{FAW}\ \left(\%\right)-3.99{\mathrm{E}}^{-02}\times \mathrm{Rainfall}-2.03\times {T}_{\mathrm{max}}+1.26\times {T}_{\mathrm{min}}-0.62\times \mathrm{RH}\ \mathrm{I}-4.{7\mathrm{E}}^{-02}\times \mathrm{RH}\ \mathrm{I}\mathrm{I} $$

The prediction equation clearly suggests the natural incidence of M. riley was highly positive with the incidence of FAW and can be effectively utilized for the prediction of the chance of natural incidence of M. rileyi under field conditions as suggested by its high adjusted R2 values of 0.923. The same can be ascertained from the graph (Fig. 2) as the predicted vs. actual natural incidence values of M. rileyi falling close to the axis. Thus, from the present study it can be deciphered that the developed prediction model based on step down regression method can be effectively utilized for assessing the natural incidence of M. rileyi under field conditions based on weather factors and FAW incidence after validation.

Fig. 2
figure2

Predicted vs. actual natural incidence values of Metarhizium rileyi

Isolation of entomopathogenic fungus

The fungus was isolated from infected larvae on SMYA. It is a slow-growing fungus with white to dull white colony was produced on SMYA which subsequently transformed into olive green to malachite green in colour with onset of speculation (Fig. 3). Sporulation was noticed 8 days after inoculation. Ingle (2014) also reported a high radial growth of M. rileyi on SMYA medium with sporulation period less than 9.53 days.

Fig. 3
figure3

In vitro growth of Nomuraea rileyi on SMYAmedium. a Growth of fungal hyphae (white in colour) and b spore production (green in colour)

Pathogenicity of M. rileyi on S. frugiperda

Inoculated larvae were found less active from the 3rd day of inoculation, feeding was stopped, body colour changed to straw colour, and gradually larvae remain immotile and died subsequently (Fig. 4). Ninety percent of the larvae inoculated were dead within 1 week of inoculation. Sparse growth of mycelium of the fungus was noticed on the surface of larval integument from fourth day and the white growth of the fungus was conspicuous from 8 day after inoculation. The whitish mycelial growth of the fungus turned olive green in colour with initiation of sporulation from the 10th day onwards. Similar observations were reported by Dutta et al. (2014) on S. litura invaded by M. rileyi. Grain formulation of M. rileyi was tested against 3rd instar larvae of S. litura by Krishnaveni et al. (2016) and observed 80% mortality.

Fig 4
figure4

Development of mycosis of Metarhizium rileyi on larval instars of Spodoptera frugiperda: colour of the larval instars turned straw in colour and were killed 4 days after topical application with M. rileyi (ac), progress of infection (df), flocullent whitish growth of fungus on larval instars 8 days after inoculation (gi), and sporulation of M. rileyi on S. frugiperda 10 days after inoculation (jl)

Morphological and molecular characterization of entomopathogenic fungus

The isolated fungus was identified as Metarhizium rileyi based on morphological characters. The fungus has produced septate hyaline mycelium with erect conidiophores produced on short conidiogenous cells. Whorls of aseptate round to ovoid conidia are formed on phialides produced on smooth, erect, single/synnematous conidiophores (Fig. 5). Similar results were reported in previous reports on S. litura (Dutta et al. 2014), H. armigera (Nandish et al. 2016), and S. frugiperda (Alvarez et al. 2018).

Fig. 5
figure5

Light microscopic observations of conidia and conidiophores of Metarhizium rileyi grown on SMYA medium (× 400)

The fungus provisionally identified as Metarhizium based on morphology was further characterized to species level by amplification of ITS region using PCR. The NCBI-BLAST analysis of partial genome sequence amplified by ITS1 and ITS2 has confirmed the EPF as Metarhizium rileyi. The ITS generated sequence was deposited in NCBI Gene Bank database and obtained with accession number (MN 960559). Using maximum parsimony method in MEGA software (Ver. 10.0.5), a phylogenetic tree was constructed by considering most relevant sequences from the NCBI database along with sequence data of M. rileyi obtained in this investigation. The phylogeny was depicted (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

Phylogenetic tree based on the nucleotide sequences of ITS region of isolated fungus (RARS, Anakapalle) with relevant sequences of Nomuraea rileyi from NCBI database

The phylogenetic tree analysis resulted into 2 major clusters. The species belonging to Chennai formed a separate cluster and rest of the species formed a cluster including the isolate in investigation. Within this major cluster, 3subgroups were observed. All the species of Bengaluru, Ludhiana, and Jaipur formed into one subgroup. Similarly, isolates from Thailand, the Netherlands, and Brazil grouped into other subgroup, whereas Tirupati isolates and RARS-Anakapalle isolate (AKP-Nr-1) were grouped into other subgroup. This probably suggests that the isolate of M. rileyi from the RARS-Anakapalle in the study might have evolved from the same ecological niche as that of Tirupathi isolates.

Lee et al. (2012) used ITS region along with β-tubulin and EF-1α for molecular identification of N. rileyi. Among the three regions, the ITS region have shown best resolution for the molecular identification of the N. rileyi in comparison to β-tubulin and EF-1α. Further, to study the evolutionary pattern of N. rileyi, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the most relevant sequences of NCBI of closely related genera using neighbour joining method. In their study, they found that all the Nomuraea grouped together. These results were highly concurrent and matched with the present study. In contrast to ITS region, analysis of the partial beta-tubulin gene based on neighbour joining and 1000 bootstrap, N. atypicola failed to form a monophyletic grouping with the other two species of Nomuraea (Han et al. 2002). This strongly suggests that ITS was the effective region for species identification and grouping as well as to study the evolutionary pattern of the Nomuraea spp.

Description of mycosis on maize fall armyworm

The fungus Nomuraea infection was observed on few larvae of S. frugiperda in early October and by November 1st fortnight; it had nearly infected 38% of the larval instars of S. frugiperda. Stereomicroscopic observations of mycosis have showed a complete colonization of the prothorax, mesothorax, metathorax, and all abdominal segments by whitish mycelial growth of the fungus, except at the head capsules, thoracic shield, setae, and crotchets (Fig. 7). Though head capsule and thoracic shield were not colonized, the mycelium and conidia were found emerging from the neck region between the head and the black thoracic shield. This reveals that in the initial stages, larvae of fall armyworm were found to be superficially colonized by the mycelial growth of the fungus and subsequently invaded the tissues of the insect and produced numerous conidia under humid conditions. The infected larvae were killed and often did not reach adulthood. Various types of setae and proleg crotchests were found free of M. rileyi.

Fig. 7
figure7

Mycosis of Metarhizium rileyi on various body parts of Spodoptera frugiperda

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) showed a dense network of M. rileyi with abundant conidia on surface of S. frugiperda larva (Fig. 8). The mycelium had further penetrated into the insect cuticle and other orifices and invaded all the tissues of the host. Most of the isolates of M. rileyi were reported to produce chitinolytic and proteolytic enzymes, which help in penetration of the cuticle and further invasion of internal tissues of the host (Vargas et al. 2003). In the present study, head capsules, thoracic shield, setae, and proleg crotchets were found not colonized by the fungus which could be clearly distinguished from the colonized areas. These observations agree with the SEM study of M. anisopliae on Agrotis ipsilon larva (Gabarty et al. 2014). Infection of insects by EPF requires adhesion, penetration into the insect (St. Leger 2008), and establishment of pathogen in the host (Charnley 1984). Further, proliferation of the fungus in the haemocoel or other tissues of the insect body collapse the insect immune system making the host sluggish and moribund finally leading to death.

Fig. 8
figure8

Scanning electron microscopy of Metarhizium rileyi mycosis on larval instars of Spodoptera frugiperda. a, b Mycelium and conidia of M. rileyi on integument of S. frugiperda. c, d Hyphal penetration into the integument of S. frugiperda. e, f Non-colonization of M. rileyi on thoracic shield and setae

Conclusion

In the present study, the initiation and development of mycosis of M. rileyi was found to be influenced by host density, rainfall, humidity, and minimum temperatures. The weather from October 1st fortnight to November 2019 was found highly conducive for the growth, sporulation, and spread of M. rileyi. The native strain of N. rileyi, Akp-Nr-1, had a great potential in reducing the population and damage caused by FAW and hence might be utilized as one of the components of integrated pest management module in maize. However, the isolate needs to be tested for its efficacy against FAW at different concentrations on S. frugiperda, survival at various temperatures, humidity levels, time to colonize its host (incubation period) under controlled and field conditions, multiplication and survival in different substrates, effect on other organisms, etc., prior to commercial utilization.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the article and the materials used in this work are of high quality and grade.

Abbreviations

RARS:

Regional Agricultural Research Station

SMYA:

Sabouraud’s maltose yeast extract agar

EPF:

Entomopathogenic fungus

CPD:

Critical point drying

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

FAW:

Fall armyworm

ITS:

Internal transcribed spacer

AKP-Nr:

Anakapalli-Nomuraea rileyi

RAPD:

Random amplified polymorphic DNA

AFLP:

Amplified length Polymorphic DNA

XLSTAT:

Excel Statistics

MEGA:

Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis

BLAST:

Basic local alignment sequence tool

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

NCBI:

National Centre for Biotechnology Information

T max :

Temperature maximum

T min :

Temperature minimum

RH:

Relative humidity

References

  1. Allen GE, Buren WF (1974) Microsporidian and fungal diseases of Solenopsis invicta Buren in Brazil. J New York Entomol Soc 82:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez SP, Guerrero AM, Duarte BND, Tapia MAM, Medina JAC, Dominguez Rodriguez Y (2018) First report of a new isolate of Metarhizium rileyi from maize fields of Quivican, Cuba. Indian J Microbiol 58(2):222–226

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boucias DG, Tigano MS, Sosa-Gomez DR, Glare TR, Inglis PW (2000) Genotypic properties of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Biol Control 19:124–138

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnley AK (1984) Physiological aspects of destructive pathogenesis in insects by fungi: a speculative review. Symposium series- British Mycological Society, pp 229–70

  5. Dutta P, Patgiri P, Pegu J, Kaushik H, Boruah S (2014) First record of Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson on Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Assam, India. Curr Biotica 8:187–190

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edelstein JD, Trumper EV, Lecuona RE (2005) Temperature-dependent development of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson in Antacarsia gemmatalis (Hubner) larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Neotrop Entomol 34(4):593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Efroymson MA (1960) In: Ralston A, Wilf HS (eds) "Multiple regression analysis," Mathematical methods for digital computers. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. FAO (2018) Integrated management of the fall armyworm on maize: a guide for farmer field schools in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gabarty A, Salem HM, Fouda MA, Abas AA, Ibrahim AA (2014) Pathogenicity induced by the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in Agrotis ipsilon (Hufn.). J Radiation Res and Appl Sci 7:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goergen G, Lava Kumar P, Sankung SB, Togola A, Tamo M (2016) First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in west and Central Africa. PLoS One 11(10):e0165632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165632

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Han Q, Inglis GD, Hausner G (2002) Phylogenetic relationships among strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi, as revealed by partial β-tubulin sequences and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis. Lett Appl Microbiol 34(5):376–383

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Igyuve MM, Ojo G, Ochigbo AE, Ugbaa M (2018) Fall army worm (Spodoptera frugiperda); it's biology, impact and control on maize production in Nigeria, vol 5, pp 70–79

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ingle YV (2014) Effect of different growing media on mass production of Nomuraea rileyi. Int J Environ Sci. 4(5):1006–1014

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller S and Zimmermann G (1989) Mycopathogens of soil insects. Insect-Fungus Interactions. eBook ISBN:9780080984537, Academic Press, pp 239–270

  15. Kepler RM, Humber RA, Bischoff JF, Rehner SA (2014) Clarification of generic “ans” species boundaries for Metarhizium and related fungi through multigene phylogenetics. Mycologia 106(4):824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kish LP, Samson RA, Allen GE (1974) The genus Nomuraea Maublanc. J Invertebr Pathol 24(2):154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnaveni S, Manjula K, Murali Krishna T, Ahammad SK (2016) Preparation of grain formulations of Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson and testing virulence against 3rd instar of Spodoptera litura. Bioscan 11(1):185–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee WW, Tae YS, Seung HK, Jae BC, Sung MB, Soo DW (2012) Characteristics and virulence assay of entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi for the microbial control of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Korean J Microbiol 48(4):284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maurya S, Kumar R, Choudhary JS, Das B, Kumar S (2013) New report of Neozygites sp. infecting red spider mite Tetranychus urticae infesting French bean from Eastern Plateau and Hill region, India. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protection 46:2278–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyling NV, Eilenberg J (2007) Ecology of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in temperate agro ecosystems: Potential for conservation biological control. Biol Control 43:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nandish MS, Suchitha Y, Shivaprakash MK (2016) Collection, characterization and screening of entomopathogenic fungi against field bean pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera, Hubner). Int J Recent Sci Res 7(4):10713–10717

  22. Panse VG, Sukatme PV (1985) Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication, New Delhi, pp 87–89

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patil RH, Abhilash C (2014) Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson: a bio-pesticide IPM component for the management of leaf eating caterpillars in soybean ecosystem. BCEE-2014, pp 131–133 https://doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.C0314069

  24. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, United States

    Google Scholar 

  25. Srisukchayakul P, Wiwat C, Pantuwatana S (2005) Studies on the pathogenesis of the local isolates of Nomuraea rileyi against Spodoptera litura. Sci Asia 31:273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. St. Leger RJ (2008) Studies on adaptations of Metarhizium anisopliae to life in the soil. J Invertebr Pathol 8:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vargas LRB, Rossato M, De Silva RRT, Monteiro BN (2003) Characterization of Nomuraea rileyi strains using polymorphic DNA, virulence and enzyme activity. Brazilian ArchBiol Tech 46(1):13–18

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vimala DPS, Prasad YG, Chowdary A (2002) Effect of drying and formulation of conidia on virulence of the entomo-fungal pathogens N. rileyi (F) Samson. J Biol Control 16:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vimala DPS, Prasad YG, Chowdary DA, Mallikarjuna Rao L, Balakrishnan K (2003) Identification of virulent isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi (F.) Samson for the management of Helicoverpa Armigera and Spodoptera litura. Mycopathol 156:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. B. Ramanujam, Principal Scientist (Pathology), ICAR-NBAIR, Bangalore, for assistance in identification and laboratory production of Metarhizium (Nomuraea) rileyi. The authors are thankful to Dr. M. Lakshman, Professor of Veterinary Pathology, Ruska Lab, College of Veterinary Sciences, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India, for assistance with respect to SEM.

Funding

This work was not supported by any funding body

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The concept and design of the experiments were prepared by all authors. MV designed the research, conducted the study, and performed statistical analysis. PK contributed in morphological identification and ultrastructure of mycosis by SEM. VC contributed in molecular characterization and phylogenetic tree construction. BL analysed the weather data correlation with mycosis. US contributed to the SEM studies. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Visalakshi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental works were approved by Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Visalakshi, M., Varma, P.K., Sekhar, V.C. et al. Studies on mycosis of Metarhizium (Nomuraea) rileyi on Spodoptera frugiperda infesting maize in Andhra Pradesh, India. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00335-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Metarhizium rileyi
  • Spodoptera frugiperda
  • Maize
  • Efficacy
  • Microscopy