Skip to main content

Use of Neem leaves as soil amendment for the control of collar rot disease of chickpea

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume that is attacked by the fungal pathogen, Sclerotium rolfsii, responsible for collar rot disease. In the present study, the pathogen was isolated from diseased chickpea seedlings and identified on molecular basis using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and β-tubulin markers. To control this pathogen, an in vivo study was carried out, using Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) leaf dry biomass (1, 2, and 3%) as soil amendment. A broad-spectrum fungicide mancozeb was selected as a reference and the data regarding plant growth and mortality rates were calculated. In positive control, the highest seedling mortality (56%) was recorded in comparison to negative control (0%) after 30 days of sowing. In 1, 2, and 3% concentrations of A. indica dry leaf biomass, the seedling mortalities were 49, 38, and 38%, respectively. On the other hand, the mancozeb-treated seedlings showed the lowest plant mortality rate (28%). Soil treatments with mancozeb as well as with 1 and 2% leaf biomass concentrations showed marked differences in root and shoot dry biomasses over positive control. In a laboratory bioassay, methanolic leaf extract of Neem of 0.5 to 3.5% concentrations reduced biomass of S. rolfsii by 86–90% over control. The present study concluded that 2% A. indica leaf amendment was the most useful concentration for management of collar rot disease of chickpea.

Background

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume providing an enormous source of minerals, fibers, and proteins both for humans and animals (Varol et al. 2020). It is considered as the drought resistant winter season annual crop grown widely in Pakistani and Indian subcontinent regions (Ilyas et al. 2007). In Pakistan, the total area under chickpea cultivation is 978,000 ha with an annual production of 340,000 t (Pakistan Economic Survey 2017-18). Also, the production of chickpea is very low due to many factors like pathogenic attacks and environmental stresses such as heat, cold, and salinity. A number of pathogens have been reported to attack the crop. Among these, a soil-borne fungal pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii is responsible for collar rot disease of chickpea. It was reported that the pathogen attacks the crop at seedling stage causing severe yield losses in tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world (Javaid and Khan 2016 and Tarafdar et al. 2018). Seedling mortality due to this disease ranges from 55 to 95% (Kokub et al. 2007). The pathogen was reported from Asia, South East Asia, Indian subcontinent, Australia, and America (Maurya et al. 2007). It can cause diseases in 500 host plant species belonging to 100 families (Remesal et al. 2013). It forms appreciable number of sclerotia, which can remain in soil for several years (Farr et al. 2007).

For the control of collar rot disease, generally chemical control is considered the most practical strategy (Javaid and Khan 2016). However, synthetic agrochemicals besides controlling pathogens also have toxic effects in soil, water, and food products; thus, their substantial use should be discouraged (Bundschuh et al. 2016). These are also detrimental to many non-target organisms. In addition, use of fungicides also leads to the emergence of many new fungicide resistant strains, resulting in disturbance in ecological balance (Weber et al. 2018). There is a need to replace synthetic agrochemicals with alternative environment friendly methods. In the recent years, many successful attempts have been made in this regard and scientists have reported that use of plant dry biomasses of Chenopodium album, C. murale, Coronopus didymus, Eucalyptus citriodora, Eruca sativa, and Sisymbrium irio as soil amendment can effectively control soil-borne pathogens namely, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani, and Macrophomina phaseolina (Javaid et al. 2017a,b; Bajwa et al. 2019; Hadi et al. 2019; Naqvi et al. 2019 and Javaid et al. 2020).

The present study aimed to control collar rot disease of chickpea by practicing Neem leaf dry biomass as soil amendment.

Materials and methods

Molecular characterization of S. rolfsii

S. rolfsii was isolated from diseased seedlings of chickpea. Molecular characterization was done to confirm its identity with internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and beta tubulin markers through PCR amplification (Table 1). Pure culture of S. rolfsii was scratched from 2-week-old malt extract agar (MEA) plates and DNA was isolated by CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1990), using the fungal DNA extraction kit of GeneAll Biotechnology Co., Ltd. PCR was performed in a 30-μl reaction system with ITS and beta tubulin primer pairs for rDNA amplification. Amplified PCR products were got sequenced from 1st Base Sequencing Singapore Co., Ltd.

Table 1 List of oligonucleotide primers used for the characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii at molecular level

In vitro antifungal activity of methanolic leaf extract

For preparation of extract and antifungal bioassays, protocol given by Ali et al. (2017a) was adopted with little modifications. A. indica leaves were collected from Lahore, Pakistan, dried and crushed. Finely crushed material (200 g) was used for extraction in 1.0 l of methanol for 10 days and filtered subsequently through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Next, the filtrate was undergone to a rotary evaporator at 45 °C to get 20 g of thick gummy material.

For the preparation of stock solution, 11.2 g of crude methanolic extract was dissolved in 6 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and raised the volume up to 14 ml by adding distilled water. A control solution was prepared simultaneously with the same amount of DMSO and water, but without the addition of plant extract. Seven concentrations viz. 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0 g 100 ml−1 were formulated by the addition of 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, and 0 ml of stock solution and 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 ml control solution, respectively, to different flasks having 76.5 ml of malt extract broth then mixed well and poured into 4 equal aliquots in 100 ml flasks, each was run simultaneously as a replicate. Mycelial plugs (5 mm) of 7-day-old S. rolfsii culture were added in each conical flask and left to stand for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C. Thereafter, the fungal biomass was filtered and dried in an electric oven at 60 °C (Javaid et al. 2017c).

Pot trial

S. rolfsii inoculum was prepared on 1.0 kg boiled and autoclaved seeds of pearl millet in three 500 ml of conical flasks and kept for 15 days in an incubator at 25 ± 2 °C until profuse sporulation occurred. Freshly prepared 15 g of fungal inoculum was then mixed in 1 kg of fumigated sandy loam soil in 10-cm deep and 15-cm diameter plastic pots, except in negative treatment which was supplied only by 15 g of boiled pearl millet and left for 10 days. After that, the soils of the respective pots were amended with A. indica dry leaf powder at different concentrations viz. 1, 2, and 3% (w/w) and irrigated. The pots were left for 1 week for leaching of soil (Javaid and Saddique 2011). Mancozeb fungicide concentration of 150 ppm was prepared and applied (0.5 l pot−1) to pots of respective treatment.

The following 6 treatments, with 5 replicates each were arranged in a completely randomized design:

T1 Negative control (without S. rolfsii or dry leaf biomass)

T2 Positive control [inoculated with S. rolfsii (SR)]

T3 SR + mancozeb

T4 SR + 1% dry leaf biomass (DLB) of A. indica

T5 SR + 2% DLB of A. indica

T6 SR + 3% DLB of A. indica

Chickpea variety CMS-2118-2508 was obtained from National Agriculture Research Centre (NARC) Islamabad, Pakistan. Seeds were surface sterilized for 3 min in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by consecutive washings in autoclaved distilled water. Eight seeds were sown in each plastic pot and irrigated on regular basis. The pots were monitored regularly for the development of collar rot symptoms, which were confirmed later on 30th day after the seed sowing. Then the plants were uprooted to measure shoot and root lengths and fresh and dry weights. Data regarding plant mortality were recorded carefully after 15 and 30 days of seed sowing by applying the following formula:

\( \mathrm{Mortality}\kern0.5em \left(\%\right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{\ \mathrm{No}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{plants}\ \mathrm{died}\ \mathrm{due}\ \mathrm{to}\ \mathrm{disease}}{\mathrm{Total}\ \mathrm{No}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{plants}}\kern0.5em \times 100 \)

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test (P ≤ 0.05), using computer software Statistix 8.1.

Results and discussion

Identification based on rDNA sequence analysis

Nucleotide sequence analyses of ITS and beta tubulin regions of rDNA were carried out to characterize the S. rolfsii genetically. PCR amplified products of ITS and beta tubulin rDNA yielded approximately 527 and 448 bp amplicon sizes, respectively, when visualized at 1% agarose gel (Fig. 1). Nucleotide sequences of ITS and beta tubulin amplified rDNA were deposited in GenBank under the accession No. MT573510 and MN736404, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure1

Sclerotium rolfsii (M), 1 kb DNA standard marker; (1), Genomic DNA; (2), ITS1/ITS4 amplified PCR product; (3), Bt2a/Bt2b amplified PCR product

In vitro antifungal bioassays

In vitro effect of methanolic leaf extract against the growth of S. rolfsii was illustrated in Fig. 2. It clearly indicated that all the concentrations significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the fungal biomass than the control. Different concentrations were found to reduce the fungal biomass by 86–90% over control treatment. These findings are in the favor of work of Obongoya et al. (2010) who evaluated the antifungal efficacy of Neem extract against Fusarium oxysporum with promising results. Generally, plant extract efficacy was influenced by the level of concentrations used in experimental work; however, in the present study, the increase in concentration did not result in a parallel decline in mycelial growth of the pathogen. Likewise, Akaeze and Aduramigba-Modupe (2017) checked in vitro efficacy of Neem plant extracts against F. oxysporum, where all the concentrations of methanolic extract were found almost equally effective against F. oxysporum.

Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of different concentrations of methanol leaf extract of Azadirachta indica on biomass of Sclerotium rolfsii. Vertical bars show standard errors of means of five replicates. Values with different letters at their top show significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by Tukey HSD test

Pot trial

After 15 days of sowing, the highest seedling mortality (42%) was recorded in positive control, which increased to 56% after 30 days of sowing. Mancozeb application was highly effective in reducing plant mortality. In this fungicidal treatment, the plant mortality was just 3% after 15 days of sowing that was increased to 28% after 30 days of sowing. The lowest concentration (1%) of dry leaf biomass (DLB) did not show any remarkable effect as there were 33 and 49% disease incidences after 15 and 30 days of sowing, respectively. However, 2 and 3% DLB significantly reduced disease incidences over positive control both after 15 and 30 days of sowing (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Effect of mancozeb and Azadirachta indica leaves on mortality of chickpea plants due to Sclerotium rolfsii inoculation. Vertical bars show standard errors of means of five replicates. Values with different letters at their top show significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by Tukey HSD test

In pot trials, the collar rot of chickpea was managed through the use of a fungicide namely, mancozeb and Neem dry leaf biomass. Disease highly occurred in positive control, whereas negative control was disease free. The disease incidence was reduced significantly in Neem dry leaf biomass and mancozeb-treated soils. The fungicide gave better results than the dry leaf biomass. There are reports that fungicides are highly effective for the control of target fungus S. rolfsii (Shirsole et al. 2019). Mancozeb proved to be a broad-spectrum fungicide effective against downy mildew, collar rot, foot rot, damping-off, stem rot, root rot, southern blight, bulb rot, and wilt diseases caused by Lagenaria siceraria, Alternaria solani, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, R. bataticola, and F. oxysporum (Majumder et al. 2016; Gowari et al. 2017; Bagri et al. 2019; Michel-Aceves et al. 2019 and Vani et al. 2019). Rather et al. (2012) concluded that many fungicides like tebuconazole, penconazole, vitavax, hexaconazole, thiophanate methyl, and mancozeb were effective against S. rolfsii. Similarly, Madhavi and Bhattiprolu (2011) reported that in field experiments, mancozeb was highly effective for the control of S. rolfsii responsible of dry root rot in chilies. In a previous study, it was also reported that F. oxysporum isolated from the cucumber-infected seeds was completely inhibited even at lower concentrations of mancozeb (Sultana and Ghaffar 2013).

All the concentrations of Neem dry leaf biomass significantly reduced the pathogen growth and disease incidence over control. In a previous study, Obongoya et al. (2010) revealed that F. oxysporum, the pathogen of yellow disease, can effectively be managed through the botanicals isolated from Neem plant. In their study, soil amendment with Neem was also observed to be effective in enhancing the plant size and seed germination with minimum seedling mortality by F. oxysporum. Ezeonu et al. (2018) also gave similar report regarding the effectiveness of Neem seed, bark, and leaf ethanolic extracts against fungal pathogens namely, Aspergillus oryzae, A. niger, Rhizopus stolonifer, A. ochraceus, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae responsible for rot diseases in cocoyam and yam plants. Obtained results agree with the findings of Ali et al. (2017b) who discovered that nano emulsions of Neem represent excellent antifungal activity against many phytopathogenic fungi such as follows: S. rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani that cause collar rot, damping-off, wilting, and dry root rot under field conditions.

The effect of A. indica DLB and fungicide on the shoot growth of chickpea is shown in Fig. 4. There was insignificant difference in shoot length between positive and negative control treatments. Applications of 1, 2, and 3% DLB of A. indica and mancozeb significantly reduced shoot length over negative and positive controls. In contrast, shoot fresh weight at 1 and 2% DLB amended treatments showed significant increases over positive control, whereas in mancozeb treatment, it was significantly lower than negative control. Shoot dry biomass in 1% amendment was at par with negative control. However, as the concentration of DLB was increased, it adversely affected the production of shoot biomass.

Fig. 4
figure4

Effect of mancozeb and Azadirachta indica leaves on shoot growth of chickpea under biotic stress of Sclerotium rolfsii. Vertical bars show standard errors of means of five replicates. Values with different letters at their top show significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by Tukey HSD test

The effect of DLB and fungicide on the root growth is shown in Fig. 5. Significant reductions in positive and negative control root lengths with enhanced dry root weights were recorded in comparison to mancozeb application. The root lengths and dry biomasses increased significantly in 1, 2, and 3% concentrations of DLB over positive control. The effect of 1% DLB was more pronounced than the effect of higher concentrations of 2 and 3%. In general, increase in DLB dose resulted in reduction of root growth parameters.

Fig. 5
figure5

Effect of mancozeb and Azadirachta indica leaves on root growth of chickpea under biotic stress of Sclerotium rolfsii. Vertical bars show standard errors of means of five replicates. Values with different letters at their top show significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by Tukey HSD test

Conclusion

The present findings clearly indicated that Neem leaf extract and soil amendment with leaf dry biomass were highly effective in controlling in vitro and in vivo growth of S. rolfsii.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ITS:

Internal transcribed spacer

MEA:

Malt extract agar

CTAB:

Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

DLB:

Dry leaf biomass

References

  1. Akaeze OO, Aduramigba-Modupe AO (2017) Fusarium wilt disease of tomato: screening for resistance and in-vitro evaluation of botanicals for control; the Nigeria case. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 7:32–36

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali A, Javaid A, Shoaib A (2017a) GC-MS analysis and antifungal activity of methanolic root extract of Chenopodium album against Sclerotium rolfsii. Planta Daninha. 35: Article No. e017164713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582017350100046.

  3. Ali EOM, Shakil NA, Rana VS, Sarkar DJ, Majumder S, Kaushik P, Singh BB, Kumar J (2017b) Antifungal activity of nano emulsions of neem and citronella oils against phytopathogenic fungi, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii. Ind Crop Prod 108:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagri RK, Singh J, Goyal SK, Chawla N, Kumari M (2019) Integrated disease management of downy mildew in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Stand). J Entomol Zool Stud 7:315–317

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bajwa AA, Zulfiqar U, Sadia S, Bhowmik P, Chauhan BS (2019) A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:5357–5371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundschuh M, Elsaesser D, Stang C, Schulz R (2016) Mitigation of fungicide pollution in detention ponds and vegetated ditches within a vine-growing area in Germany. Ecol Eng 89:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:39–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ezeonu CS, Imo C, Agwaranze DI, Iruka A, Joseph A (2018) Antifungal effect of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of neem leaves, stem, bark and seeds on fungal rot diseases of yam and cocoyam. Chem Biol Technol Agric 5:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farr D, Rossman A, Palm M, Cray E (2007) Fungal databases. Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases.

  10. Gowari JL, Dhutraj DN, Kadam VA, Pawar DV (2017) Integrated management of foot rot of betelvine caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. J Plant Dis Sci 12:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadi S, Hameed S, Ali S, Al-Karkhi IHT (2019) Evaluation Eruca Sativa aqueous and alcoholic extract on Fusarium oxysporum growth. Ind J Public Health Res Dev 10:1933–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilyas MB, Chaudhry MA, Javed N, Ghazanfar MU, Khan MA (2007) Sources of resistance in chickpea germplasm against Ascochyta blight. Pak J Bot 39:1843–1847

    Google Scholar 

  13. Javaid A, Afzal L, Shoaib A (2017a) Biological control of charcoal rot of mungbean by Trichoderma harzianum and shoot dry biomass of Sisymbrium irio. Planta Daninha 35:e017165756

    Google Scholar 

  14. Javaid A, Afzal R, Shoaib A (2020) Biological management of southern blight of chili by Penicillium oxalicum and leaves of Eucalyptus citriodora. Int J Agric Biol 23:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  15. Javaid A, Khan IH (2016) Management of collar rot disease of chickpea by extracts and soil amendment with dry leaf biomass of Melia azedarach L. Phil Agric Sci 99:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  16. Javaid A, Niaz L, Shoaib A (2017b) Effect of incorporation of leaf biomass of Coronopus didymus on management of basal rot disease of onion and plant physiology. Int J Agric Biol 19:445–452

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Javaid A, Qudsia H, Shoaib A (2017c) Bioassays guided fractionation of Senna occidentalis for identification of natural antifungal constituents against Macrophomina phaseolina. Planta Daninha 35:e017163483

    Google Scholar 

  18. Javaid A, Saddique A (2011) Management of Macrophomina root rot of mungbean using dry leaves manure of Datura metel as soil amendment. Span J Agric Res 9:901–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kokub D, Azam F, Hassan A, Ansar M, Asad MJ, Khanum A (2007) Comparative growth, morphological and molecular characterization of indigenous S. rolfsii strains isolated from different locations of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 39:1849–1866

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madhavi GB, Bhattiprolu SL (2011) Integrated disease management of dry root rot of chilli incited by Sclerotium rolfsii (Sacc.). Int J Plant Ani Environ Sci 1:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  21. Majumder S, Shakil NA, Kumar J, Banerjee T, Sinha P, Singh BB, Garg P (2016) Eco-friendly PEG-based controlled release nano-formulations of Mancozeb: synthesis and bioefficacy evaluation against phytopathogenic fungi Alternaria solani and Sclerotium rolfsii. J Environ Sci Health 51:873–880

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maurya S, Rashmi S, Singh DP, Singh HB, Srivastava JS, Singh UP (2007) Phenolic compounds of Sorghum vulgare in response to Sclerotium rolfsii infection. J Plant Interact 2:25–29

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Michel-Aceves AC, Diaz-Najera JF, Ariza-Flores R, Otero-Sanchez MA, Escobar-Martinez R, Avendano-Arrazate CH (2019) Control alternatives for damping-off in tomato seedling production. Int J Exp Bot 88:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naqvi SF, Javaid A, Qureshi MZ (2019) Evaluation of antifungal potential of leaf extract of Chenopodium murale against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Planta Daninha 37: e019199050

  25. Obongoya BO, Wagai SO, Odhiambo G (2010) Phytotoxic effect of selected crude plant extracts on soil borne fungi of common bean. Afr Crop Sci J 18:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pakistan Economic Survey (2017-18) Chapter 2: agriculture. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.

  27. Rather TR, Razdan VK, Tewari AK, Shanaz E, Bhat ZA, Hassan MG, Wani TA (2012) Integrated management of wilt complex disease in bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.). J Agric Sci 4:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  28. Remesal E, Landa BB, Jimenez MD, Navas JA (2013) Sequence variation in two protein-coding genes correlates with mycelial compatibility groupings in Sclerotium rolfsii. Pak J Phytopathol 103:479–487

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shirsole SS, Khare N, Lakpale N, Kotasthane AS (2019) Evaluation of fungicides against Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. incitant of collar rot of chickpea. Pharma Innov J 8:310–316

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sultana N, Ghaffar A (2013) Effect of fungicides, microbial antagonists and oil cakes in the control of Fusarium oxysporum, the cause of seed rot and root infection of bottle gourd and cucumber. Pak J Bot 45:2149–2156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarafdar A, Rani TS, Chandran USS, Chobe DR, Sharma M (2018) Exploring combined effect of abiotic (soil moisture) and biotic (Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.) stress on collar rot development in chickpea. Front Plant Sci 9: Article Number 1154

  32. Vani MS, Kumar S, Gulya R (2019) In vitro evaluation of fungicides and plant extracts against Fusarium oxysporum causing wilt of mungbean. Pharma Innov 8:297–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Varol IS, Kardes YM, Irik HA, Kirnak H, Kaplan M (2020) Supplementary irrigations at different physiological growth stages of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) change grain nutritional composition. Food Chem 303:Article Number 125402

  34. Weber RWS, Raddatz C, Kutz S (2018) Relative abundance and fungicide resistance patterns of Botrytis cinerea and B. pseudocinerea on apple in Northern Germany. J Plant Dis Prot. 125:501–4.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Miss Iqra Haider Khan conducted the study and wrote a part of the manuscript. Arshad Javaid supervised the work, analyzed the data, and approved the final manuscript. Azher Hameed Al-Taie contributed in paper writing. Dildar Ahmed did GC_MS analysis. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arshad Javaid.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

All authors are agreed to publish this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, I.H., Javaid, A., Al-Taie, A.H. et al. Use of Neem leaves as soil amendment for the control of collar rot disease of chickpea. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00299-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Azadirachta indica
  • Chickpea
  • Collar rot
  • Natural fungicide
  • Soil amendment