Skip to main content

Temperature dependent virulence of the entomopathogenic nematodes against immatures of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract

Fruit flies have a great influence on fruit and vegetable industry of Pakistan. Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Tephritidae) is a polyphagous pest in large number of fruit and vegetable crops worldwide. Virulence of 4 entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) species, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, H. indica, Steinernema carpocapsae, and S. asiaticum, was evaluated at different temperature degrees (15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C) against the immature stages of fruit fly species, B. dorsalis. The tested EPNs species showed a temperature dependent virulence against the fruit fly immatures. All EPNs showed a poor infectivity at the lowest temperature (15 °C) and a high infectivity at the highest temperature (35 °C). In overall, H. bacteriophora performed the best against the fruit fly larvae and pupae at all temperature degrees. At 35 °C, all the EPNs caused more than 95% mortality in fruit fly maggots, but H. bacteriophora and S. carpocapsae performed better than the others. The EPNs infectivity increased with increasing the temperature and exposure time. Similar results were recorded in case of pupae. H. bacteriophora and S. carpocapsae caused more than 70% pupal mortality rates at 35 °C.

Background

Fruit flies are economically important insect pests responsible for attacking a wide range of fruits and fleshy vegetables in the tropical and subtropical zones of the world (Roger et al. 2015). The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae), is a highly polyphagous species with wide dispersals. It is the most damaging pest of more than 170 commercial fruits and vegetable varieties in tropical and sub-tropical zones of the world (Ye and Liu 2005).

Fruit flies control options mainly occupied by using synthetic chemicals and pheromone traps. Insecticide resistance is becoming a big issue due to their frequent utilization. Therefore, fruit fly control is difficult (Pereira et al. 2009). Biopesticides, comprised of certain living entities (natural enemies) or their products (phyto- and microbial chemicals), are used to manage the injurious insect pests. Entomopathogens like fungi, bacteria, viruses and nematodes are commercially used to develop many biopesticides (Hussain et al. 2019). Several biological control options which have shown potential results for the effective biological control of fruit flies were evaluated. Few entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) such as Metarhizium spp. and Beauveria bassiana and their lethal metabolites are also helpful to reduce the fruit fly damages in different fruit crops (Yousef et al. 2013). EPNs have a great potential for the control of large numbers of different insect pests of economically important crops. An efficient and workable method for the management of B. dorsalis could be the use of EPNs, when applied on soil-borne phases of the B. dorsalis life cycle. The 3rd instar larvae of B. dorsalis usually escape from the infested fruits and tends to hide in the top 4 cm layer of soil ahead of pupating (Hou et al. 2006). Numerous studies have reported the association of EPNs and environment as they are well adapted to the prevailing environmental conditions and consequently regarded as one of the best biological control agents of insect pests (Zadji et al. 2014).

Among climatic factors, temperature is the most vital factor regulating the growth and development of EPNs. Heat stress can impose enough impact on the pathogenicity and reproductive capacity of EPNs (Chen et al. 2003). It directly impacts host finding ability (Susurluk 2008), infectivity (Pervez et al. 2008), and persistence of EPNs (Ali et al. 2010). Temperature can affect the adhesion, invasion, infectivity, and reproducibility of several isolates of infective juveniles (IJs) of EPNs to greater extent (Ali et al. 2010). Influence of temperature on EPN fluctuates with the species and isolates because they can acclimatize with the prevailing environmental conditions (Pervez et al. 2008). Extreme temperature degrees, 0 and 40 °C, could be fatal to EPNs, as temperature below 10 °C can reduce their agility, while above 40 °C induce diapause. However, some isolates and species exhibit improved adaptability to temperature variation, which can help them to survive and infect the hosts (Berry et al. 1997).

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate different EPN strains at different temperature degrees to find out the favorable one for their application as a control measure against fruit flies under laboratory conditions.

Materials and methods

Nematodes cultures

EPN strains, obtained from the Nematology Lab (Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan), Steinernema asiaticum, S. carpocapsae, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and H. indica were reared using last instar larvae of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at 25 °C as described by Aatif et al. (2019). G. mellonella larvae, treated by EPNs, were placed on a white trap, and the infective juveniles (IJs) emerged from the cadavers were collected and stored at 10 °C in tissue culture flasks. IJs were used within 2 weeks for the experiments.

Insect cultures

Adults of B. dorsalis were collected from guava orchard at College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bahadur Sub-Campus, Layyah, Pakistan (latitude of 30.9, longitude of 70.9, and altitude of 143 m above sea level) and reared in aerial plastic rearing cages (60 × 60 × 60 cm) at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and 12 h photoperiod provided with sterilized sand according to Aatif et al. (2019) for maggots and pupae provision for further studies.

Maggots bioassay

To evaluate the impact of temperature on EPNs’ infectivity, the EPNs (100 IJs/μl) were tested against the fruit fly maggots at 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C. Twenty grams of sterilized and air-dried sandy soil (60 sand, 20 clay, and 20% silt) were added to Petri dishes. The moisture level in soil was maintained at 10% (v/w) by addition of distilled water. The Petri dishes were placed for overnight at the required temperature ranges to have uniform temperature before the addition of nematodes. In each Petri dish, 12 individuals of the 3rd instar fruit fly maggots were placed, and 0.5 ml of a prepared concentration of all tested EPNs were added. Petri dishes with no EPNs served as control. All treatments were maintained at environmental chambers under controlled temperature degrees of 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and 12 h photoperiod for 10 days.

Pupal bioassay

Effect of temperature on pathogenicity of EPNs against the pupal stage of B. dorsalis under the same tested conditions was studied, using the concentration of 150 IJs/μl. Twelve-day-old fully sclerotized pupae were placed in Petri dishes, and 0.5 ml of prepared EPNs’ concentrations were added. The died maggots and pupae, recovered from soils, were placed on a sieve (710 μm) and gently sprayed with distilled water to eliminate the soil particles and nematodes on their cuticle. Afterwards, they were placed on White traps for microscopic examination of emerging IJs (Heve et al. 2018).

Data analyses

Treatments were replicated 4 times. Maggot mortality was noted at 3rd, 6th, and 9th days post-exposure to EPNs. The pupal mortality rate was recorded daily for 10 days. The corrected percent mortalities, obtained using Abbott’s formula (Abbott 1925), were subjected to factorial ANOVA, and means were compared with Tukey’s HSD test at 5% significance level. The data analyses were performed using the standard statistical software (Minitab 17 2010).

Results and discussion

Infectivity of the 4 EPN species significantly varied against the fruit fly maggots at different temperature degrees. The highest mortalities were reported at 35 °C after 3rd, 6th, and 9th days of exposure to all the EPN strains. The highest mortality rate was recorded by H. bacteriophora at all temperature degrees. H. bacteriophora caused 72, 87, and 97% mortality rates after 3, 6, and 9 days of EPN treatments, respectively. S. asiaticum, H. indica, and S. carpocapsae also recorded similar mortalities at 35 °C. It was noted that the EPN infectivity was increased by increasing temperature and time of exposure. At the highest degrees of temperature (35 °C), the difference between the EPN infectivity was non-significant but at the lowest ones (15, 20, and 25 °C); EPNs showed significant variations in their infectivity after 3, 6, and 9 days of exposures. Temperature can cause significant variations in EPN infectivity (Trdan et al. 2009). The exposure time was also an important factor of causing maggot mortality. H. bacteriophora and S. asiaticum caused the fastest casualties, at the highest temperature, in maggots after 3 days of exposure, which was 72% in both cases. The fruit fly maggot mortality rate attained 87% post 6 days after exposure to all EPNs, while (more than 95%) was recorded after 9 days of exposure at all EPNs at 35 °C (Table 1).

Table 1 Corrected percent mortality (mean ± SE) in Bactrocera dorsalis maggots (3rd instar) exposed to different EPNs at different temperature degrees and time periods (DF = 24, F = 6.20, P = 0.00)

Similarly, at different temperature degrees, the efficacy of the 4 EPN species significantly varied against the pupae of B. dorsalis. At the lowest temperature of 15 °C, all EPN species caused the least pupal mortality (less than 20%), with the highest mortality rate (21.58%) shown by S. carpocapsae. As the temperature increased, infectivity of all the EPN strains was improved leading towards high pupal mortalities. H. bacteriophora caused the highest mortality rates (39, 53, 67, and 72%) at 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C, respectively, which were higher than all other EPN given mortalities. S. carpocapsae was the second effective candidate to cause pupal deaths in B. dorsalis (50, 60, and 71% pupal mortality at 25, 30, and 35 °C). H. indica and S. asiaticum resulted moderate pupal mortalities at all the temperature degrees. Overall, temperature was positively linked with pupal mortality because EPN infectivity was increased at high temperature degrees (Fig. 1). Similarly, the adult emergence was around 95% in control treatments, while it was reciprocal to their mortality values in treated pupae. These data were used to calculate the corrected percent pupal mortality.

Fig. 1
figure1

Pupal corrected percent mortality (mean ± SE) in Bactrocera dorsalis, 10 days post exposure to EPNs at different temperature degrees (DF = 12, F = 9.20, P = 0.00; Tukey’s HSD test, α = 0.05)

To identify the optimum climatic factors required for a high efficacy of EPNs is critical in biological control. EPNs achieve varying levels of insect pest control under variable temperature degrees. S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora showed different mortality rates in Bothynoderes punctiventris for different soil depths at different temperature levels (Susurluk 2008). Langford et al. (2013) also noted the addition of S. feltiae significantly improved the insect mortality after exposure to EPN at 20 and 25 °C than at 15 °C. Significantly, the highest infectivity effects of H. bacteriophora were observed above 30 °C, which led to significantly high mortality rates in maggots and pupae of B. dorsalis. Similarly, the study of Kepenekci et al. (2015) confirmed that the pathogenicity of locally isolated EPN species was highly boosted by temperature and EPN concentration against Rhagoletis cerasi fruit fly maggots, where S. feltiae was the most virulent EPN species at various tested temperatures and IJs concentrations. In contrast, Heterorhabditis species are known for their adaptability to warmer temperature levels (Grewal et al. 1994) and can give considerable insect infections above 30 °C (El Khoury et al. 2018). The used EPN strains gave a promising efficacy at moderate temperature degrees, while their infectivity was greatly lowered below 20 °C.

Heterorhabditis is different than Steinernema in their infectivity levels due to their searching capacity. The majority of Heterorhabditis species are fast moving, while S. carpocapsae is ambusher (Foelkel et al. 2016). Temperature can be an additional possible reasoning factor, since Steinernema species are perceived to be highly effective at 25 °C, whereas at 30 °C Heterorhabditis indicated greater efficacy (Rohde et al. 2010). Furthermore, Steinernema species are appearing to be more adjustable to various soil textures than Heterorhabditis species (Kaya and Stock 1997). Accordingly, Grewal et al. (2002) found that it is common that EPNs from an insect species are found to be less infectious than those isolated from other insect or geographical origin. Additionally, specificity is an important factor for virulence of EPNs than their adaptation to the environment (Foelkel et al. 2016). All the studies dealing with the EPN applications on tephritid flies have concluded that 3rd instar maggots are highly susceptible to EPNs infection (Barbosa-Negrisoli et al. 2009; Langford et al. 2013; and Shaurub et al. 2015).

Pathogenicity of EPNs was shown for the first time against the Bactrocera oleae pupae (Torrini et al. 2017). In the majority of orchards, fruit fly maggots move into the soil after infesting the fruits during late autumn or in winter; then, temperature degrees are relatively low for EPNs application. The significant results achieved in this study, regarding the EPNs capability to kill the pupae of B. dorsalis at various temperature degrees, signified their utilization in controlling the fruit flies in different environments. EPNs can be applied under the canopy fruit trees during early spring, when adult flies emerge from the soil with moderate temperature degrees (Shaurub et al. 2015). However, the pupal mortality was less than attained mortality in maggots due to pupal resistance against EPNs penetration. These results are in agreement with the findings of some researches with limited ability of IJs to permeate into pupal cuticle or spiracles. The virulence of various EPN strains might be unable to cause high infections against pupal stage of different species of fruit flies. Their effectiveness can be enhanced by increasing their concentrations or using them at optimum temperature degrees (Toledo et al. 2005; Aatif et al. 2019), but this fact needs to be further investigated because performance of EPNs and other biological control agents can be affected be the temperature variations (Laznik and Trdan 2015).

Conclusion

EPN species proved effective to manage B. dorsalis populations at 30 to 35 °C. However, further researches are required for assessment of the mechanism for EPNs penetration into the pupae and the possibility of using them to reduce fruit flies population in orchards.

Availability of data and materials

All the study data have been presented in the manuscript, and high-quality analytical grade materials were used in this study.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of Variance

EPNs:

Entomopathogenic nematodes

IJs:

Infective juveniles

References

  1. Aatif HM, Hanif MS, Ferhan M, Raheel M, Shakeel Q, Ashraf W, Ullah MI, Ali S (2019) Assessment of the entomopathogenic nematodes against maggots and pupae of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), under laboratory conditions. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29:51 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0154-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali H, Ahmad S, Safiullah JS (2010) Efficacy of different control methods against oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders). ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 5:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbosa-Negrisoli CRC, Garcia MS, Dolinski C, Negrisoli AS Jr, Bernardi D, Nava DE (2009) Efficacy of indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditidae: Heterorhabditidae, Steinernematidae), from Rio Grande do Sul Brazil, against Anastrepha fraterculus Wied (Diptera: Tephritidae) in peach orchards. J Invertebr Pathol 102:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry RE, Liu J, Groth E (1997) Efficacy and persistence of Heterorhabditis marelatus (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) against root weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in strawberry. Environ Entomol 26:465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen S, Li J, Han X, Moens M (2003) Effect of temperature on the pathogenicity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp.) to Delia radicum. BioControl 48:713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El Khoury Y, Oreste M, Noujeim E, Nemer N, Tarasco E (2018) Effect of temperature on the pathogenicity of Mediterranean native entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) from natural ecosystems. Redia 101:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foelkel E, Monteiro LB, Voss M (2016) Virulence of nematodes against larvae of the south-American fruit fly in laboratory using soil from Porto Amazonas, Paraná, Brazil, as substrate. Cienc Rural 46(3):405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grewal PS, Grewal SK, Malik VS, Klein MG (2002) Differences in susceptibility of introduced and native white grub species to entomopathogenic nematodes from various geographic localities. Biol Control 24:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grewal PS, Lewis EE, Gaugler R, Campbell JF (1994) Host finding behaviour as a predictor of foraging strategy in entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology 108:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heve WK, El-Borai FE, Carrillo D, Duncan LW (2018) Increasing entomopathogenic nematode biodiversity reduces efficacy against the Caribbean fruit fly Anastrepha suspensa: interaction with the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata. J Pest Sci 91:799–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hou B, Xie Q, Zhang R (2006) Depth pupation and survival of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae at selected soil moistures. Appl Entomol Zool 41:515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain A, Rizwan-ul-haq M, Aljabr AM, Al-Ayedh H (2019) Host-pathogen interaction for screening potential of Metarhizium anisopliae isolates against the date-palm dust mite, Oligonychus afrasiaticus (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaya HK, Stock PS (1997) Techniques in insect nematology. In: Lacey LA editor Manual of techniques in insect pathology. 1st ed London UK Academic Press pp. 281–324

  15. Kepenekci İ, Hazir S, Özdem A (2015) Evaluation of native entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae in soil. Turk J Agric For 39:74–79

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Langford EA, Nielsen UN, Johnson SN, Riegler M (2013) Susceptibility of Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae), to entomopathogenic nematodes. Biol Control 96:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laznik Ž, Trdan S (2015) Failure of entomopathogens to control white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Acta Agric Scand Sect B 765(2):95–108

  18. Minitab 17 (2010) Statistical software. Minitab, Inc, State College. www.minitab.com

  19. Pereira JL, Antunes SC, Castro BB, Marques CR, Gonçalves AM, Gonçalves F (2009) Toxicity evaluation of three pesticides on non-target aquatic and soil organisms: commercial formulation versus active ingredient. Ecotoxicol 18:455–463

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pervez R, Ali SS, Ahmad R (2008) Effect of temperatures on the emergence of entomopathogenic nematodes. Int J Nematol 18(1):25–28

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roger IV, Pinero JC, Leblanc L (2015) An overview of pest species of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the integration of bio pesticides with other biological approaches for their management with a focus on the pacific region. J Insects 6:297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohde C, Moino A Jr, MAT S, Carvalho FD, Ferreira CS (2010) Influence of soil temperature and moisture on the infectivity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae, Steinernematidae) against larvae of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Neotrop Entomol 39:608–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaurub EH, Soliman NA, Hashem AG, Abdel-Rahman AM (2015) Infectivity of four entomopathogenic nematodes in relation to environmental factors and their effects on the biochemistry of the Medfly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Neotrop Entomol 44(6):610–618

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Susurluk A (2008) Influence of temperature on the vertical movement of the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiae (TUR-S3) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (TUR-H2), and infectivity of the moving nematodes. Nematology 10(1):137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Toledo J, Ibarra JE, Liedo P, Gómez A, Rasgado MA, Williams T (2005) Infection of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae by Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) under laboratory and field conditions. Biocontrol Sci Tech 15(6):627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Torrini G, Mazza G, Benvenuti C, Roversi PF (2017) Susceptibility of olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae to entomopathogenic nematodes. J Plant Prot Res 57(3):318–320

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trdan S, Vidrih M, Andjus L, Laznik Z (2009) Activity of four entomopathogenic nematode species against different developmental stages of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Helminthologia 46:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye H, Liu JH (2005) Population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Xishuangbanna of Southern Yunnan. Chinese J App Ecol 16:1330–1334

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yousef M, Lozano-Tovar MD, Garrido-Jurado I, Quesada-Moraga E (2013) Biocontrol of Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) with Metarhizium brunneum and its extracts. J Econ Entomol 106(3):1118–1125

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zadji L, Baimey H, Afouda L, Moens M, Decraemer W (2014) Effectiveness of different Heterorhabditis isolates from Benin for biocontrol of the subterranean termite, Macrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera: Macrotermitinae), in laboratory trials. Nematology 16:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Nematology Lab (Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan) for providing EPNs.

Funding

The study was conducted with the available laboratory resources without any aid from any funding agency.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors carried out all the experiments including the bioassay tests, analytical part, and analysis of data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajjad Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

This study does not contain any individual person’s data.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aatif, H.M., Hanif, M.S., Raheel, M. et al. Temperature dependent virulence of the entomopathogenic nematodes against immatures of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00248-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bactrocera dorsalis
  • Entomopathogenic nematodes
  • Virulence
  • Temperature