Growth kinetics and pathogenicity of Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 29, Article number: 71 (2019)
Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 (Enterobacteriaceae) is a symbiont of the entomopathogenic nematode (EPN), Heterorhabditis indica SL0708 (Nematoda: Rhabditida), used for insect pest biological control. In the present study, P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 growth kinetic was evaluated considering growth and metabolic phases (phase I, intermediate phase, phase II), as well as pathogenicity. The study can be useful in determining bacterium feeding times in H. indica SL0708 production in liquid culture media. The logarithmic phase of the growth of bacterium was from 0 to 24 h, with a specific growth velocity of 0.21 h−1; during this phase, bacterium at metabolic phase I was detected. Maximum bioluminescence was registered at 24 h (3.437 luminescence AU). Finally, it was evidenced that the bacterial metabolic phase had an effect on the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella L., larvae mortality rate. Moreover, biochemical tests were the same for all P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 sampling times. This research is particularly relevant, since no reports are available on this bacterium isolate in Colombia. In the future, this will allow massive H. indica SL0708 production, because when pre-incubated with its symbiont, it provides essential nutrients for the EPNs development and reproduction.
For integrated insect pest management, several investigations have demonstrated that entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) use is an effective alternative, because it controls different pest species and it is friendly with humans and the environment (Devi and Dhrubajyoti 2017). Of all the nematodes studied for insect biological control, Heterorhabditis is one of the most studied genera for EPNs purposes. In Colombia, Heterorhabditis indica SL0708 was isolated from guadua bamboo soils in Valle del Cauca, demonstrating its high efficacy in the management of various pests in crops of economic importance (San-Blas et al. 2019). Given its pest management use, in vitro EPN production has gained importance in recent years; therefore, it is necessary to meet the demands of the biological controller in the field (Abd-Elgawad et al. 2017). This process consists of designing culture media to supply EPNs nutritional requirements. The bacterial symbiont must digest complex compounds in the media, so the nematode can use them to complete its life cycle (Cho et al. 2011). This production strategy presents various advantages in comparison to traditional in vivo EPNs production; it is less laborious and easier to scale-up to industrial levels (Inman et al. 2012), in search of high infective juveniles (IJs) yields to sufficiently supply for their use in different Colombian crops.
Photorhabdus luminescens SL0708 is a symbiotic bacterium presents in the H. indica SL0708 IJs. This bacterium is responsible for EPNs insect host death. P. luminescens is a facultative anaerobe, gram-negative Bacillus belonging to the luminescent Enterobacteriaceae family (Stock et al. 2017). Its life cycle can be divided into three stages: mutualistic association with the IJ, as insect pathogen, and as food source for the nematode (Devi and Dhrubajyoti 2017).
To mass produce H. indica SL0708, its bacterial symbiont P. luminescens SL0708 must be mass produced as well. To grow P. luminescens, it must first grow in a nutrient medium up to the stationary phase. After approximately 24 h, IJs which are suspended in an enriched nutrient broth are inoculated into the bacterial culture. To check the entompathogenicity, the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), was infected by the nematodes along with its symbiont, and its death occurs within 48 h, and the insect pathogenicity of the H. indica-P. luminescens combination is confirmed (Salazar-Gutiérrez et al. 2017).
Culturing P. luminescens in vitro has allowed to identify different phases associated with its metabolism and pathogenicity. Metabolic phase I is associated with the insect and IJ intestines. It is characterized by producing an array of pathogenic factors, toxin complexes (Tc’s), and Photorhabdus insect-related (Pir) toxins and makes caterpillars floppy toxins (Mcf), Photorhabdus virulence cassettes (PVC), and bioluminescence (Hu and Webster 2000; Lang 2010; Nouh and Hussein 2015). Phase II is the other metabolic phase related to in vitro bacterium culture. It is characterized by loss of pathogenicity factors associated with phase I. Similarly, an intermediate phase has been identified between the two phases associated with in vitro culture, where the bacterium starts to lose its pathogenic factors (Han and Ehlers 2001). Change between phase I to intermediate phase and phase II entails nourishment depletion, therefore, a loss of capability to associate with the nematode, when it enters into IJ stage. The latter directly affects pathogenicity, because without bacteria, the nematode cannot kill the insect host (Turlin et al. 2006). In vitro bacterium characterization has been performed by NBTA media (nutrient agar supplemented with bromothymol blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride), where bacteria in phase I are bioluminescent in the dark. Additionally, they grow into blue-green round colonies, as they absorb bromothymol blue stain, with mucous or creamy texture. Phase II bacteria do not present bioluminescence in the dark and has reddish-brown colonies with a sticky texture (Nouh and Hussein 2015). Phases can also be verified by qualitative enzyme activity tests, such as lipolytic activity (tributyrin agar media), proteolytic (egg yolk and gelatin media), and hemolytic activities (media with sheep blood), for which all are positive for phase I and negative for phase II (Salazar-Gutiérrez et al. 2017). Accordingly, to produce nematodes in vitro, bacterium must be at phase I. It is therefore a requirement to establish when the other phases take place, thus, allowing to supply IJ demand for use in the field.
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 growth kinetics and pathogenicity in H. indica SL0708 under in vitro production media.
Materials and methods
The culture media are as follows:
NBTA agar medium: 0.025 g/l bromothymol blue, 0.04 g/l 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride, 20 g/l nutrient agar, pH 7.
LB medium (Luria Bertani): 10 g/l NaCl, 5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l tryptone, 12 g/l agar-agar, pH 7 (Sezonov et al. 2007).
H. indica SL0708 in vitro liquid production media: 10 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l peptone, 3 g/l soy flour, 30 g/l soy oil, 6 egg yolk, 3 g/l glucose, 4 g/l NaCl, 0.3 g/l CaCl2, 0.2 g/l MgSO4, 0.05 g/l FeSO4, 0.35 g/l KCl, pH 7 (Johnigk et al. 2004).
Microorganism and inoculum
The strain of the bacterial symbiont, P. luminescens SL0708, was obtained from the collection of microorganisms of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CMPUJ), conserved in glycerol stocks at − 80 °C. It was suspended in LB and NBTA media and incubated for 8 h at 28 °C, to be inoculated later; 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks were filled with 90 ml H. indica SL0708 in vitro production media. Media was inoculated with 10 ml P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 culture, containing bioluminescent colonies corresponding to approximately 108 cells per ml; Erlenmeyer flasks with inoculum were incubated at 28 °C and 150 rpm for 24 h.
Eighteen milliliters of sterile production media were placed into 100-ml flask and inoculated with 2 ml P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 inoculum. Media was incubated at 28 °C. Flasks were shaken in an orbital shaker incubator (New Brunswick Scientific™ Innova™ 42, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) at 150 rpm for 36 h. Biomass content of each flask was monitored by sampling at 0, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 36 h (it is taken until this time, because the kinetics of P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 allows to establish the time of inoculation of infective juveniles in vitro cultures of H. indica SL0708). Cells were separated from media by centrifugation (Sorvall RC-6 plus Thermo Scientific Co Waltham, MA, USA) at 10,800×g for 20 min at 4 °C. Obtained supernatant was used to evaluate pH and reducing sugar concentration, equivalent to glucose. Reducing sugars concentration was quantified by 3,5-dinitrosalicilic acid (DNS) technique (Miller 1959), employing an Evolution 60 UV–VIS Thermo Scientific Co. spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Values were determined based on 0.5 to 2 g/l glucose standard curve.
Growth and bioluminescence analyses
Due to the presence of microemulsion droplets in the system, biomass concentration could not be quantified by spectrophotometric methodologies. Microbial growth was determined from colonies formed (colony-forming unit CFU) on agar plates in NBTA media. Colonies were described based on their morphology, color, and bioluminescence for each collected sample. Each experiment was repeated three times. The bioprocess parameters duplication time (td) and specific growth rate (μ) were calculated from the experimental data (Eqs. 1–3) during the logarithmic phase of the growth (from 0 to 24 h).
The specific growth rate (μ, h−1) of the microorganism was calculated from Eq. (1).
where X is biomass at time t (h), and CFU/ml μx was calculated by integrating Eq. (1) with conditions, X = X0 at t = t0
μ was determined by plotting ln (X/X0) vs. time. Doubling time (td), is the time required for the microorganism to double its population, calculated from Eq. (3).
Bioluminescence was quantitated by assaying in FluostarOptima luminescence plate reader (BMG labtech, Germany) with a 355-nm excitation and 460-nm emission filters. To this end, 250-μl fresh culture media were placed in 96-well COSTAR plate. Results are reported as luminescence arbitrary units (LAU).
Bacterium metabolic phases
Phase I was determined for bacterium during growth kinetics. To this end, morphological characteristics in NBTA media, bioluminescence, and pathogenicity were taken into account (Table 1).
To determine biochemical characteristics at different times of P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 culture, an API 20NE (BioMerieux, Inc. Durham, NC) was used following manufacturer’s instructions.
Galleria mellonella pathogenicity assays
Bacteria colonies were obtained from NBTA cultures at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h and re-suspended in 0.85% (w/v) saline solution at 1 × 104 CFU/ml. Additionally, G. mellonella last instar larvae were previously disinfected with 1% hypoclorite and rinsed with distilled water. Larvae were then infected by 10-μl culture suspension with 1 mL BD ultra-fine syringe and incubated at 28 °C for 96 h. Mortality percentage, color, and larvae bioluminescence were registered every 24 h.
Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) with three replicates per fermentation. Mortality percentage is the average of three replicas ± SD. To determine statistical differences for mortality percentages, one-way ANOVA analysis was performed with data from bacterial infections at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h.
Results and discussion
Growth kinetics, bacterium metabolic phases, and bioluminescence
P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 growth in production media, reducing sugars consumption, and pH are presented in (Fig. 1). Up to 24 h, a logarithmic phase of the growth was observed with a respective specific growth rate of 0.21 h−1 (R2= 0.99) and duplication time (td) 3.3 h. The biomass in this phase ranged between 2.4 × 107 CFU/ml and 5.8 × 109 CFU/ml. After 24 h, it was constant up to 36 h (stationary phase), with a biomass yield obtained from glucose (Yx/s) of 2.4 ×1012 CFU/g. At this time, (77.4%) of the reducing sugars were consumed, equivalent to the available glucose in the media. Regarding the pH profile during fermentation, it has a tendency to increase towards alkalinity from the beginning to the end of the culture. Possibly, the microorganism could have used available amino acids and proteins as an energy source and, consequently, ammonium ions were produced (Belur et al. 2013). Specific growth velocity (μ) differs from previously reported (μ = 0.36 h−1 td = 2.1 h) (Singh et al. 2012; Belur et al. 2013), which could be attributed to different media composition, culture conditions, and bacterial isolates.
According to data described in (Table 1), P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 metabolic phases were determined in the following manner: phase I, from 0 to 36 h; intermediate phase, between 36 and 72 h; and phase II from 72 to 96 h (Fig. 2). Maximum bioluminescence value was at 24 h (3,436.7 LAU), with a 21% decrease until reaching a value of 2709.8 LAU at 36 h, corresponding to the stationary phase. Obtained results are in agreement for the growth phase with those reported by Belur et al. (2013), who affirmed very high bioluminescence observed in a defined medium during the early stationary phase, and it was maintained throughout the stationary phase. On the contrary, they differ from other reports, demonstrating minimal bioluminescence until cells reach late logarithmic or stationary phase (Schmitz et al. 1999).
Likewise, an intermediate and phase II gene expression were established, resulting in a more active metabolism, greater production of oxidative stress proteins, and “stock” proteins. These mechanisms are designed to facilitate adaptation to new conditions, favoring an increase in growth velocity (Turlin et al. 2006). Further, phase II reduced levels of dye absorption, pigmentation, production of antibiotic substances and degradative enzymes, occurrence of crystalline inclusion proteins, and bioluminescence (Ffrench-Constant et al. 2003). Possibly, the above can be attributed to the fact that this gave the bacteria a strategy to adapt to more than one particular environment, especially low osmotic resistance or anoxic environments.
When glucose was added to EPNs production media, it had a positive effect on phase I maintenance, which was of interest for production processes. Furthermore, constant supplementation of this carbohydrate significantly increased (up to twice as much) biomass production and antibiotic production (140% increase) in phase I (Jeffke et al. 2000). This not only hinders contamination in culture media, but also benefits recovery percentage and final IJs yield, since a greater bacterial biomass at phase I results in a higher accumulation of the “feeding signal” (Gil et al. 2002). This molecule induces IJ’s mouth and anus opening to start the feeding process. Moreover, it prompts the IJ to molt to the next stage and start its life cycle, resulting in new IJ generations (Aumann and Ehlers 2001).
Bacterium metabolic phase I is required for EPN production, particularly due to four metabolic characteristics: (1) capacity to degrade media into compounds that can be assimilated and necessary for IJs, distinctively sterols by lytic enzymes; (2) secretion of “feeding signals” to induce development and production of new IJs generations; (3) capacity to establish symbiosis or re-associate/adherence to the nematode’s intestines; and (4) secretion of antibiotic substances, avoiding contamination in the media (Ehlers 2001; Salazar-Gutiérrez et al. 2017). Consequently, it is most important to maintain phase I during in vitro EPNs production to increase recovery percentage and to obtain high IJ yield during the production process (Stock et al. 2017). Therefore, it is possible to achieve this under strictly controlled culture conditions, optimized media composition, and knowledge of isolated bacterial growth kinetics in EPN production media.
In this study, it was observed under the evaluated culture conditions (media composition, batch culture, 28 °C, 150 rpm 20% effective work volume) that glucose was a determinant factor phase I in maintenance. Thus, IJs inoculation should be performed, when glucose has not been totally consumed, i.e., up to 36 h. During this time lapse, media was degraded and it can be assimilated by EPNs. Accumulation of “feeding signaling” takes place, favoring EPN development. Moreover, bacteria present are capable of establishing symbiosis with new IJs generations (Cho et al. 2011).
Regarding P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 growth kinetics and metabolic phases, it was reported that phase I was present in late exponential phase or at the start of the stationary phase, suggesting population density was a determinant factor in phase I variation to intermediate or phase II (Aumann and Ehlers 2001; Yoo et al. 2001; Cho et al. 2011). However, in this study, it was observed that metabolic phase I was at the beginning of the exponential phase (Fig. 1). This suggests that for the media studied, the evaluated conditions, and the bacterium isolate were related to the bacterial population density and the metabolic phase, and it was primarily influenced by the media composition for in vitro H. indica SL0708 production.
P. luminescens akhurstii SL0708 pathogenicity
Regarding P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 pathogenicity obtained from cultures at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, they presented 100% of G. mellonella larvae mortality percentage during the first 24 h of exposure (Fig. 3). Insignificant differences were observed among bacterium pathogenicity from cultures at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h and infection time course, i.e., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h of exposure (F = 0.934; df = 15; p = 0.5339).
Likewise, G. mellonella observed signs were the same for all evaluated times, consistent with reports for this isolate (Saenz-Aponte et al. 2014). Moreover, independent of bacterium metabolic phase in culture media, when injected into the larva, it generated pathogenicity. This could be attributed to the bacterium capacity to revert its metabolic phase, from phase II to phase I, when it entered into a controlled condition (larva), with specific composition, favoring metabolite expression characteristic of phase I (Turlin et al. 2006).
The bacterium presented the same biochemical profiles, regardless to time of culture (24, 48, 72, and 96 h) and metabolic phase (phase I, intermediate phase, or phase II), as was evidenced by biochemical test result profile (API 20NE) (Table 2). Results are in agreement with previous reports of this isolate (Saenz-Aponte et al. 2014). Enzyme production could be induced by the substrate present in the test or bacterium did not present variations against all biochemical characteristics depending on culture conditions.
P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii was cultured in H. indica SL0708 in vitro liquid production media, allowing to establish that the growth phase had a direct relationship with the bioluminescence. On the other hand, the bacterium metabolic phase change had no effect on G. mellonella larvae pathogenicity. Based on the results, the inoculation at 36 h of culture possibly assured the highest H. indica SL0708 IJ yield and recovery percentage. Therefore, given the glucose importance as a substrate to maintain it in the metabolic phase I, future studies should evaluate high glucose concentrations or addition of a carbohydrate source during the different time points of the process to IJ H. indica SL0708 culture media to prolong or sustain this metabolic phase and plausibly obtain a greater recovery and IJ yield at the end of the process in comparison to in vivo results.
Availability of data and materials
All data of the study have been presented in the manuscript, and the materials, which are used in this study, are of high quality and grade.
Abd-Elgawad MM, Askary TH, Coupland J (2017) Biocontrol agents: entomopathogenic and slug parasitic nematodes. Research Inc, Canada: CAB International, Wallingford
Aumann J, Ehlers RU (2001) Physico-chemical properties and mode of action of a signal from the symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens inducing dauer juvenile recovery in the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Nematology 3(8):849–853. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101753625344
Belur PD, Floyd LI, Leonard DH (2013) Determination of specific oxygen uptake rate of Photorhabdus luminescens during submerged culture in lab scale bioreactor. Biocontrol Sci Tech 23(12):1458–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.840361
Cho CH, Kyung SW, Gaugler R, Sun KY (2011) Submerged monoxenic culture medium development for Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens: protein sources. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21(8):869–873. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1010.10055
Devi G, Dhrubajyoti N (2017) Entomopathogenic nematodes: a tool in biocontrol of insect pests of vegetables-a review. Agric Rev 38(02). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.v38i02.7945
Ehlers RU (2001) Mass production of entomopathogenic nematodes for plant protection. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56(5–6):623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100711
Ffrench-Constant R, Waterfield N, Daborn P, Joyce S, Bennett H, Au C, Dowling D, Boundy S, Reynolds S, Clarke D. 2003. Photorhabdus: towards a functional genomic analysis of a symbiont and pathogen. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 26 (5): 433–456, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00625.x.
Gil GH, Choo HY, Gaugler BR (2002) Enhancement of entomopathogenic nematode production in in-vitro liquid culture of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora by fed-batch culture with glucose supplementation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58(6):751–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-0956-1
Han R, Ehlers RU (2001) Effect of Photorhabdus luminescens phase variants on the in vivo and in vitro development and reproduction of the entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35:239–247
Hu K, Webster JM (2000) Antibiotic production in relation to bacterial growth and nematode development in Photorhabdus-Heterorhabditis infected Galleria mellonella larvae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 189(2):219–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09234.x
Inman FL, Sunita S, Holmes LD (2012) Mass production of the beneficial nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its bacterial symbiont Photorhabdus luminescens. Indian J Microbiol 52(3):316–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0270-2
Jeffke T, Jende D, Mätje C, Ehlers RU, Berthe-Corti L (2000) Growth of Photorhabdus luminescens in batch and glucose fed-batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54(3):326–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000399
Johnigk SA, Ecke F, Poehling M, Ehlers RU (2004) Liquid culture mass production of biocontrol nematodes, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematoda: Rhabditida): improved timing of dauer juvenile inoculation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64(5):651–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1519-9
Lang AE (2010) Photorhabdus luminescens toxins. Science 327(February):1139–1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184557
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3):426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Nouh GM, Hussein M (2015) Pathogenicity of Photorhabdus luminescens , a symbiotic bacterium of an entomopathogenic nematode against Galleria mellonella L. and Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Egypt J Zool 63:91–97. https://doi.org/10.12816/0014493
Saenz-Aponte A, Pulido OF, Jaramillo C (2014) Isolation and characterization of bacterial symbiont Photorhabdus luminescens SL0708 (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae). Afr J Microbiol Res 8(33):3123–3130
Salazar-Gutiérrez JD, Castelblanco A, Rodríguez-Bocanegra MX, Teran W, Sáenz-Aponte A (2017) Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708 pathogenicity in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Asia Pac Entomol 20(4):1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.08.001
San-Blas E, Campos-Herrera R, Dolinski C, Monteiro C, Andaló V, Leite LG, Rodríguez MG (2019) Entomopathogenic nematology in Latin America: a brief history, current research and future prospects. J Invertebr Pathol 165:22–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIP.2019.03.010
Schmitz RPH, Kretkowski C, Eisenträger A, Wolfgang D (1999) Ecotoxicological testing with new kinetic Photorhabdus luminescens growth and luminescence inhibition assays in microtitration scale. Chemosphere 38(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00174-X
Sezonov G, Joseleau-Petit D, Richard D (2007) Escherichia coli physiology in Luria-Bertani broth. J Bacteriol 189:8746–8749. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01368-07
Singh S, Moreau E, Inman F, Holmes DL (2012) Characterization of Photorhabdus luminescens growth for the rearing of the beneficial nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Indian J Microbiol 52(3):325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0238-7
Stock S, Kusakabe A, Orozco RA (2017) Secondary metabolites produced by Heterorhabditis symbionts and their application in agriculture: what we know and what to do next. J Nematol 49(4):373–383 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770283/pdf/373.pdf
Turlin E, Pascal G, Rousselle JC, Lenormand P, Ngo S, Danchin A, Derzelle S (2006) Proteome analysis of the phenotypic variation process in Photorhabdus luminescens. Proteomics 6(9):2705–2725. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500646
Yoo SK, Brown I, Cohen N, Gaugler R (2001) Medium concentration influencing growth of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its symbiotic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. J Microbiol Biotechnol 11(4):644–648
The authors thank Pontificia Universidad Javeriana for financing this study as part of “In vitro production and cryopreservation of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis sp. SL0708 (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae)” project grant No. ID 6649 and grant No. 7190 for English editing and translation services.
This study is part of the project “Producción in vitro y criopreservación del nematodo entomopatógeno Heterorhabditis sp. SL0708 (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae)”.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable for this section.
Consent for publication
Not applicable for this section.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Orozco-Hidalgo, M.T., Quevedo-Hidalgo, B. & Sáenz-Aponte, A. Growth kinetics and pathogenicity of Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii SL0708. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29, 71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0172-2