Evaluation of chlorpyrifos and Beauveria bassiana as a strategy in the Egyptian sugar beet fields: impact on Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) and its associated predators populations and the sugar beetroot yield
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 33, Article number: 99 (2023)
The susceptibility of pests and natural enemies to conventional insecticides is a critical element in judging the success of integrated pest management programs implementing biological control as a tactic. In this study, the susceptibility of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to an organophosphorus insecticide (chlorpyrifos) and the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana was evaluated through field applications during two successive sugar beet seasons. The populations of the coccinellid, chrysopid, and formicid predators were estimated to indicate pesticide risk assessment strategy. The root and sugar yields were compared during the whole experiment to emphasize the impact of both control strategies on the pre-harvest loss in this strategic crop.
Results indicated that over the course of the two seasons of the investigation, chlorpyrifos significantly reduced the population density of S. littoralis and its associated predators. It showed a detrimental effect on S. littoralis larval population than untreated areas, causing an overall reduction of 97 and 92% during the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. The biopesticide based on entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana caused an overall reduction of S. littoralis, reaching 96 and 65% during the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, B. bassiana slightly affects the population of predators compared to insecticide-free areas, so it was recommended for application in sugar beet fields without providing considerable risk to the associated insect predators. The sugar beetroot production and its sugar content increased significantly in both treatments during the two growing seasons compared to non-treated plots.
Chlorpyrifos is not recommended for pest control; instead, B. bassiana is considered an effective biopesticide in the Egyptian sugar beet fields infested with S. littoralis as part of an integrated pest management program. Their effect was direct through reducing pest population and indirectly increasing the sugar beetroot production and increasing its total sugar content. Hence, both the sugar beetroot quality and quantity were improved favoring the microbial agent over the chemical insecticide in application for mitigating the chemical hazards toward the associated predators.
Sugarcane and sugar beet production was accompanied by cultural and economic importance to Egyptians, especially in Upper Egypt and Delta, respectively. Concerning sugar concentration, beets have 13–18% compared to 11% in sugarcane. The sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L., Chenopodiaceae) pests are considered one of the most destructive hazards to the sugar beet industry in Egypt. To compensate for the sugar needs gap, Egypt directed to boosting an alternative crop, the sugar beet, as its water consumption is less than that of sugarcane (Mehareb et al. 2022). Sugar beet crop quality is a much more important attribute than its quantity as an indicator of yield cost (El-Zayat 2022). In this respect, even minor infestation will affect yield cost through an indirect effect on crop quality.
Insect pests of the sugar beet include wireworms, sugar beetroot maggots that cause damage to germinating seeds, seedlings, and roots. Leaf injury is also caused by webworms, grasshoppers, cutworms, armyworms, and leaf miners. All these pests can also transmit plant microbial diseases, such as fungal diseases, leading to crop destruction (Peter 2022). The cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is one of the fiercest pests infesting all growing stages starting from seedling up to crop harvest of the sugar beet causing severe surplus losses (El-Fergani 2019). In Egypt, sugar beet is cultivated in August, September, and October. Infestation of the sugar beet with S. littoralis occurs during early plantation (Khalifa 2018), while S. ocellatella (the sugar beet moth) infests late plantations (Shalaby and El-Samahy 2010). Both of them are considered an economically important sugar beet pests. Chemical control strategy relies on both conventional and non-conventional chemicals such as chlorpyrifos, emamectin benzoate, and variable insect growth regulators (Agricultural Pesticide Committee (APC) recommendation 2020). Synchronizing the predatory insect population together with the pest population is the core of the predators’ population stability in field crops to guarantee self-propagation and predator sustainability. To achieve this synchronization, insecticide side effects and pernicious impact on nontarget species of natural enemies should be lowered. Hence, optimizing the application dose in a way to lower the pest population below the economic injury level and maintaining the natural enemy population is necessary.
Predatory species associated with sugar beet pests include members of the Coleoptera (Coccinellidae, Staphylinidae), Hymenoptera (Formicidae), Neuroptera (Chrysopidae), Diptera (Stelzl and Devetak 1999). The red-flanked ladybird Scymnus interruptus Goeze (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae), the green lacewings Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and some predatory ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are important generalist predators for many insect pests including S. littoralis due to their polyphagous feeding behavior (Hegazy 2018). The reason for selecting those species in the present study is that they were recorded to be abundant during the early plantation of the sugar beet (Khalifa 2018). The susceptibility of these predators to conventional and organic pest management programs is a key element in integrated pest management. Fluctuations in both the pest and its associated predators’ numbers in sugar beet field are changing as a result of insecticide treatment regimes (El-Dessouki et al. 2014). In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for eco-friendly biological pesticides such as those based on entomopathogenic organisms such as fungi. These biopesticides are commercially available, inexpensive, and environmentally safe. Several studies have targeted the suppressive effect of both conventional insecticides and biological pesticides on both the insect pest and the natural enemy populations to conserve the associated arthropod predators in the natural fauna (Bažok et al. 2016).
In the present study, the cotton leafworm S. littoralis field’s population was suppressed using chlorpyrifos, one of the most widely used organophosphorus insecticides and a potential biopesticide product based on entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana, through field application during two successive growing seasons (2020–2021). This study also aimed to detect the effect of these recommended pesticides on the population density of the most common associated arthropod predators, C. carnea (eggs and larvae), formicide species and Scymnus interruptus (adults) in sugar beet fields infested with S. littoralis during the early growing season. In addition, the sugar beetroot yield and the sugar content were estimated during application in the two consecutive growing seasons. As a net result, the best-recommended practice was the one that manages the pest population in a way of supporting the predators’ existence as well as preventing direct and indirect sugar beet yield loss in pest management programs in Egypt.
Chlorpyrifos: Organophosphorus compound: For O,O-Diethyl O-(3, 5, 6-trichloropyridin-2-yl) phosphorothioate, cholinesterase inhibitor, 48% E.C., China, the recommended application dose is 1l/feddan.
Beauveria bassiana: For entomopathogenic fungus, 1 × 108 CFU/gm, the recommended dose is 250 g/100 l. The bioinsecticide formulated product was obtained from the Bio-insecticide Production Unit, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
The location of the field treatments was at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate (Dafarea district, latitude 31.1089° north; longitude 30.9427° east), Egypt. At the end of September, the local sugar beet variety (PLENO) was cultivated in an experimental area of about 168 m2 using a randomized complete block design during two seasons (2020 and 2021). Equal plots were divided throughout the area (42 m2 each). For both the treated and untreated areas, four plots were assigned for each treatment. To evaluate the effect of the tested insecticides on the associated predators, two plant rows were left without spraying between plots. The spraying process was carried out once every season at sunset on October 13.
Aqueous suspensions of the recommended dose of both the insecticide and the fungal product were prepared. The applied dose is 2.5 gm/l for B. bassiana. The recommended insecticide dose of 1 l/feddan was prepared by dissolving 42 ml of chlorpyrifos (48% E.C.) in 8 l water. A total volume of 8 L was prepared from both pesticides, and the fungal suspension was kept in a fridge (4 °C till use). Water is used in control. Treatments were carried out using a motorized knapsack sprayer (20 l total capacity). Normal agricultural practices were applied using the recommended field rate for both pesticides (http://www.apc.gov.eg/ar/APCReleases.aspx). A control group was set using water only. The application dose was one for every replicate/season. A completely randomized design was followed.
Determination of pest and predators’ populations
For the determination of the pest and the predators’ numbers, the insects were collected manually by visual record inspection and using pitfall trap for ant collection according to Higgins and Lindgren (2012). Numbers of S. interruptus (adults) were estimated using sampling with the sweeping net. Numbers of S. littoralis (larvae) and C. carnea (eggs and larvae) were estimated by visual examination according to El-Dessouki et al. (2014) with some modifications. For S. littoralis sampling, 10 plants/plot/treatments were selected randomly few hours prior to the first application and after 3, 7, and 10 days of chlorpyrifos and the fungal bioinsecticide application. A total of 40 plants/replicate were examined for larval S. littoralis infestation and predator’s number determination. The collected samples were transferred to plastic jars to identification and counting process in the laboratory. Reduction percentage of the S. littoralis larvae was calculated for each treatment throughout the two seasons.
The associated predators S. interruptus, C. carnea, and formicide population densities were also estimated before treatment and after 3, 7, and 10 days of treatments.
Root and sugar yield estimation
The Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture's guidelines for standard agricultural practices were adhered to. For both treated and control plots, the roots were weighed post-harvest, the mean root yield estimate was determined as Kg/42m2, and the total production was calculated as ton/feddan. A sucrometer apparatus was used to determine the sugar yield (ton/feddan) and the sugar content (%) according to the Association of Official Analysis Chemists (1990) at the laboratory of Sugar Crops Research Department, Sakha Agricultural Research Station, ARC, Egypt.
The reduction percentage of infestation was calculated by Henderson and Tilton (1955) formula, as follows:
where n is the insect population, C control, and T treated.
Data were statistically compared using Students t-test for paired samples and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05). A multiple comparison test was applied to test the significance using Minitab statistical package (v.16) (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK).
The efficacy of the organophosphorus compound chlorpyrifos (48% E.C.) and the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana in suppressing early infestation of S. littoralis in sugar beet field was studied over the two successive seasons (2020–2021). Simultaneously, the ability of the most associated insect predators, S. interruptus, C. carnea, and formicide ants, to withstand the effect of both treatments throughout the experiment was indirectly determined by following up the predators’ population density in response to insecticide treatment. The population density of S. littoralis larvae and the predators was determined before and after treatments, and percentage of the population reduction was determined (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Reduction of S. littoralis infestation
The daily reduction percentage in S. littoralis larval population density was determined in sugar beet fields, following the application of chlorpyrifos and B. bassiana throughout the growing season of 2020 (Fig. 1). Before any treatment, the larval population increased by 1.4-fold in a natural infestation pattern. Just one day after treatment, the recommended dose of chlorpyrifos was observed to be highly efficient against S. littoralis larvae compared to the control group, causing an 88% reduction in pest infestation. Moreover, chlorpyrifos treatment recorded more than 90% pest population reduction 3 days post-treatment indicating a potent effect. After three and seven days of treatments, a significant increase in pest reduction percentage was recorded (P ≤ 0.05), in comparison with the untreated area, ranging from 92.25 to 97.38%, respectively. A high residual effect was inferred as chlorpyrifos caused 100% reduction in pest infestation up to 10 days post-treatment. On the other hand, a gradual decline in population size was recorded after B. bassiana application reaching 40.96, 63.38, and 75.43% after three, seven, and ten days, respectively, compared to the untreated region (Fig. 1).
During the second growing season (2021), the normal infestation pattern in the non-treated areas was insignificantly different from those during the first growing season (2020) during the whole study days (P ≥ 0.05, Fig. 1). Chlorpyrifos caused 81% initial reduction in S. littoralis larval population. A gradual increase in population reduction was achieved reaching 86.36, 92.36, and 97.18% three, seven, and ten days post-treatment, respectively.
On the other hand, B. bassiana reduced S. littoralis larval population by 45.19, 70.36, and 84.17% at three, seven, and ten days post-treatment, respectively, compared to the untreated area (Fig. 1). In comparison with season 2021, the overall reduction of S. littoralis larvae was lower than that recorded in 2020. The overall (cumulative) reduction of the S. littoralis larval population upon treatment with chlorpyrifos and B. bassiana was 96.54 and 59.92%, respectively, during the first season (2020). The reduction in pest population decreased to 91.96% upon chlorpyrifos application while it reached 66.57% upon application of B. bassiana (dF = 3, F = 5.36, P = 0.026, Fig. 2).
Associated predators population reduction
Studying the effect of insecticides on the pest-associated predators’ number in sugar beet fields is a deterministic parameter of insecticide safety to nontarget pests. Regarding the impact of treatment on the number of related arthropod predators (S. interruptus, C. carnea and formicide ants), the actual predators’ numbers were recorded during season 2020 (Fig. 3) and season 2021(Fig. 4).
Surprisingly, during the first season (2020) a complete reduction in C. carnea and formicide ants’ population density was recorded just one day post-treatment indicating a detrimental effect of the recommended chlorpyrifos dose against those predators. However, by day 10, post-treatment, only 5% of C. carnea population was able to compensate for the insecticide toxic effect (Fig. 3). In contrast, treatment with B. bassiana reduced the predators’ number, but it did not eradicate them; however, it supported the existence of the predators to an extent that guaranteed their sustainable role in pest population control. After only 3 days of treatment, a complete eradication effect of almost all the associated predators was observed during the first season, which is considered as a negative back withdraw for chlorpyrifos application.
The same pattern of the dramatic reduction happened in the next season (2021) with a complete reduction in C. carnea and formicide ants upon treatment with chlorpyrifos (Fig. 4). Moreover, B. bassiana treatment supported the previous hypothesis in slightly affecting the predators’ numbers, thus maintaining a continuous population in a dynamically stable profile.
Considering the overall predators population reduction, S. interruptus population was reduced by 41.83 and 59.96% upon treatment with B. bassiana during the first and second seasons, respectively (Fig. 5). In contrast, chlorpyrifos application reduced its population by 96.25 and 98.7% during the first and second seasons, respectively (dF = 3, F = 26.0 P = 0.03).
During the two seasons, B. bassiana significantly reduced C. carnea populations by 38.06 and 56.11% during the first and second growing seasons, respectively, than the non-treated plots. On the other hand, chlorpyrifos drastically suppressed its population with 98.14 and 100% overall reduction in first and second seasons, respectively. Both treatments differed significantly over the two growing seasons (dF = 3, F = 32.83, P = 0.03).
Formicide ants were the most susceptible to the chlorpyrifos recommended dose; the population reduction reached 100%. In contrast, B. bassiana reduced the ant population by 65.1 and 36.15% during the first and second seasons, respectively (dF = 3, F = 11.64, P = 0.05, Fig. 5).
Sugar beetroot yield and sugar content
Both the conventional chemical insecticide (chlorpyrifos) and the entomopathogenic fungus (B. bassiana) significantly increased beetroot weight (P ≤ 0.05) (Ton/feddan) than the control during both growing seasons (2020–2021). However, there was insignificant difference in root yield between the two treatments during the same season as well as when comparing the first and second season (P ≥ 0.05, Table 1). Quantitatively, there were about 2.2-fold increase in beetroot weight in terms of tons produced per feddan and kilograms produced per replicate during the first and second growing seasons comparing treatments to control.
Considering the total sugar content (Kg/feddan), both treatments significantly increased the sugar yield by about 2.9-fold than the control during both the first and second growing seasons (P ≤ 0.05), with a nonsignificant difference between sugar productions per feddan during the two seasons upon chlorpyrifos treatment (P ≥ 0.05, Table 2). The sugar concentrations also significantly increased by 1.3-fold upon treatment during the two growing seasons (P ≤ 0.05).
Sugar beet crop protection, through applying chemical pesticides, is an element in its integrated pest management program. However, environmental impact assessments of this strategy emphasize the detrimental effects on human health, environmental pollution, biodiversity including pests and nontarget natural enemies (Hafeez et al. 2022).
Polyphagous plant defoliators like the cotton leaf worm (S. littoralis) cause considerable damage during the initial stages of the vegetation season (Shalaby et al. 2011). Larvae start their feeding superficially yet others enter the root for feeding on the latest instar larvae. Both feeding habits are considered detrimental to the net root yield, especially in the case of sugar beetroot production. Loss due to secondary infections by plant pathogenic microbes is also a cause of impaired yield production through decreasing the physiological process of sugar storage in the root (Hegyi et al. 2007). Thus, proper pest monitoring and management are mandatory in maximizing yield together with other integrated pest management practices.
Herein, the comparative impact of chlorpyrifos insecticide and B. bassiana on S. littoralis pest population reduction and their impact on the sugar beetroot yield as an indirect effect of pest reduction were studied. The data analysis revealed that the recommended dose of chlorpyrifos should be lowered due to its high potency, severe population reduction within only 3 days as well as its long-lasting residual effect. In all the previous treatments, the total number of S. littoralis larvae decreased up to 10 days post-treatments, an effect that is not favored for an insecticide in order not to disrupt the normal balance of pest–natural enemy population that should be synchronized as the natural enemy depends on the pest population in building his population.
The entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana is an effective tool in biological control programs against infestation with S. littoralis, along with chlorpyrifos insecticide under field conditions. In case the initial degree of infestation was modest, biological management programs using fungal-based biopesticide, in particular, were more successful in stopping pest damage. The effectiveness of fungal-based bioinsecticides depends on the environmental conditions at the time of application, fungal strain, the application method, and the initial pest population density. Recent studies showed a variable fungal potency and hence median lethal times and concentrations in different fungal isolates. A progressive increase in S. litura larval mortality, starting from day 3 of treatment, with B. bassiana was recorded recently assuring its effect (Islam et al. 2023). The fungal-based bioproducts are usually fast in their action as they contain toxins together with fungus spores and conidia. In the present study, the field application of B. bassiana fungal-based bioinsecticide reduced the S. littoralis infestation in sugar beet fields. There was a gradual decline in larval population after 3–7 days. This indicates that the selected product was efficient enough in significantly reducing the pest population, and the biopesticide is a promising tool for acquiring a sustainable pest management in sugar beet cultivation. This was in line with El-Fergani (1999) who mentioned that selected insecticide groups can be used in IPM programs along with biopesticides, which provide good and safe biocontrol strategies for early infestation of S. littoralis in the field of sugar beet plants.
Also, chlorpyrifos significantly reduced Spodoptera exigua larval populations in sugar beet fields causing an 88 to 92% pest reduction during the growing seasons (2019/20 and 2020/21), respectively (Mansour and Abou-Elkassem 2022). The sugar beet moth (Scrobipalpa ocellatella) population was reduced in sugar beet fields upon application of chlorpyrifos and B. bassiana (Fergani et al. 2022). The detrimental effect of chlorpyrifos in sugar beet fields extended to cause about 85% population reduction in the tortoise beetle (Cassida vittata) and an 89% reduction in its associated predator population (Coccinella undecimpunctata) at Kafr El-Sheikh governorate (Anter et al. 2020).
Pest management strategies depend on factors, such as the pest type and its associated predators, farming practices, environmental conditions, and ecological components. Fungal-based bioinsecticides proved to be more potent than various microbial pesticides against many lepidopterous insects such as S. littoralis, S. exigua, and aphids (Zaki and Abdel-Raheem 2010). It may lead to increasing pest mortality and morphogenetic abnormalities in various life stages. It is an efficient substitute for conventional insecticides. It is eco-friendly with minimal side effects on pest-associated arthropods (Fergani and Refaei 2021). Lacewing populations treated with conventional insecticides do not usually exhibit prominent levels of tolerance due to some physiological, morphological, and behavioral characteristics (Cordeiro et al. 2010). A significant advantage of these fungal-based biopesticides is their ability to control pests with minimal side effects on their natural enemies. Therefore, they are recommended to be included in IPM programs.
The indirect impact of the beetroot pest control strategies (conventional and non-conventional) on the root yield and the sugar content was promising. Earlier, the Egyptian agricultural pesticide committee (APC 2020) issued a periodical guide of the recommended insecticides for beetroot pests’ management (www.APC.gov.eg). An array of insecticides was recommended for application including chlorpyrifos. Treatments include seed treatments and foliar application. Seed and foliar applications of neonicotinoids reduced sugar beet crop loss due to defoliators feeding activity and curly top disease that is responsible for major crop loss. The root yield and the sucrose content increased by 55–95 and 6.5–7.2%, respectively (Strausbaugh et al. 2012).
Herein, both chlorpyrifos and B. bassiana treatments significantly increased the pest population reduction. As an indirect result, the beetroot production and the sugar content (%) were increased than the control with insignificant differences between both treatments. In addition, chlorpyrifos and the bacterial biopesticide proved their role in providing crop protection of the sugar beet fields infested with S. exigua and hence increasing the beetroot and sugar yield (Mansour and Abou-Elkassem 2022).
Although conventional pesticides like chlorpyrifos have a significant lethal impact on the sugar beet pest, S. littoralis, they also have a significant lethal impact on their associated predators. Both chlorpyrifos and B. bassiana reduced the pest-caused beetroot damage, and the total crop and sugar yield was increased. Thus, if used in accordance with the recommended dose and timing of application with standard agricultural practices, fungal-based bioinsecticides should be considered in pest management programs as a safe alternative to suppress the cotton leafworm in Egyptian sugar beet fields. Achieving the sustainable development goals by crop protection for zero hunger, stopping the use of hazardous chemical insecticides for mitigating climate change, and finally the use of eco-friendly biopesticides for protecting the biodiversity in terrestrial life are all outcomes of the present work.
Availability of data and materials
- S. littoralis :
- B. bassiana :
- C. carnea :
- S. interruptus :
- S. exigua :
Food and Agriculture Organization
Agricultural Research Centre
Anter MA, Mahmoud MM, El-Hassawy; S. A. Abou-Donia and A.E. Abdelmonem, (2020) Comparison between the effectiveness of certain insecticides and entomopathogenic nematodes against tortoise beetle, Cassida vittata (Vill.) in sugar beet fields and their side effects on Coccinella undecimpunctata. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 12(2):277–287
APC (2020) Agricultural Pesticide Committee. http://www.apc.gov.eg/ar/APCReleases.aspx
Association of Official Analysis Chemists (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. AOAC, Washington
Bažok R, Šatvar M, Radoš I, Drmić Z, Lemić D, Čačija M, Virić Gašparić H (2016) Comparative efficacy of classical and biorational insecticides on sugar beet weevil, Bothynoderes punctiventris Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Plant Protec Sci 52:134–141
Cordeiro EMG, Corrêa AS, Venzon M, Guedes RNC (2010) Insecticide survival and behavioral avoidance in the lacewings Chrysoperla externa and Ceraeochrysa cubana. Chemosphere 81:1352–1357
El-Dessouki AA, El-awady SM, Elkhawass KAMH, El-Dessouki WAA (2014) Population fluctuation of some insect pests infesting sugar beet and the associated predatory insects at Kafr El-Sheikh governorate. Ann Agric Sci 59(1):119–123
El-Fergani YA (2019) Field Evaluation of Selected Oxadiazine Insecticide and Bacterial bio-Insecticides against Cotton Leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) infesting Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris l). Egypt J Agric Res 97(1):137. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2019.68571
El-Zayat H (2022) Agriculture study on sugar beet in Egypt. Acta Sci Agric 6(1):17–26
Fergani YA, Refaei EA (2021) Pathogenicity induced by indigenous Beauveria bassiana isolate in different life stages of the cotton leafworm, (Boisduval) Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under laboratory conditions. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00411-8
Fergani YA, El Sayed YA, Rafaei EA (2022) Field evaluation of organophosphorus insecticides, chlorpyrifos, and fungal Bio-pesticides, Beauveria bassiana towards the sugar beet moth Scrobipalpa ocellatella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and studying their effect on the population size of the associated arthropod predators in the Egyptian Sugar beet fields. J Plant Protect Pathol 13(8):191–194
Hafeez M, Ullah F, Khan MM, Li X, Zhang Z, Shah S, Imran M, Assiri MA, Fernández-Grandon GM, Desneux N, Rehman M, Fahad S, Lu Y (2022) Metabolic-based insecticide resistance mechanism and ecofriendly approaches for controlling of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:1746–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16974-w
Hegazy FH (2018) Role of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) release in the biocontrolling of Cassida vittata Vill. and Scrobipalpa ocellatella Boyd. larvae as well as enhancing the associated arthropod predator populations in comparison with conventional insecticides applications in Sugar beet fields. Zagazig J Agric Res. https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2018.47878
Hegyi Z, Pók I, Szőke C, Pintér J (2007) Chemical quality parameters of maize hybrids in various FAO maturity groups as correlated with yield and yield components. Acta Agron Hung 55(2):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.55.2007.2.9
Henderson CF, Tilton EW (1955) Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J Econ Entomol 48:157–161
Higgins RJ, Lindgren BS (2012) An evaluation of methods for sampling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in British Columbia, Canada. Can Entomol 144:491–507
Islam SMN, Chowdhury MZH, Mim MF, Momtaz MB, Islam T (2023) Biocontrol potential of native isolates of Beauveria bassiana against cotton leafworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Sci Rep 13:8331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35415-x
Khalifa AA (2018) Natural enemies of certain insect pests attacking sugar beet plants at Kafr El-Sheikh governorate. J Plant Protec Pathol Mansoura Univ 9(8):507–510
Mansour MRK, Abou-Elkassem AB (2022) Ecological Studies on Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) and its biological control by the novel parasitoid Cotesia ruficrus (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Sugar beet. Middle East J Agric Res 11(4):1193–1200
Mehareb EM, El-Shafai AMA, AboElenen FM (2022) History and current status of sugarcane breeding in Egypt. Sugar Tech 24(1):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01010-5
Peter AE (2022) Arthropod pests of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). In: Field crop arthropod pests of economic importance. Academic Press, pp 862–913
Shalaby GA, El-Samahy MFM (2010) Sugar beet plant stand in August cultivation as influenced by cotton leafworm infestation and role of arthropod predators in insect management. J Plant Protec Pathol Mansoura Univ 1(10):807–813
Shalaby GA, Kassem SA, Bazazo KG (2011) Efficacy of microbial biocides in controlling cotton leafworm attacking early sugar beet plantations, and side effects on natural enemies. J Agric Res Kafr El-Sheikh Univ 37(4):658–667
Stelzl M, Devetak D (1999) Neuroptera in agricultural ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:305–321
Strausbaugh CA, Wenninger EJ, Eujayl IA (2012) Management of severe curly top in sugar beet with insecticides. Plant Dis 96(8):1159–1166
Zaki FN, Abdel-Raheem MA (2010) Use of entomopathogenic fungi and insecticide against some insect pests attacking peanuts and sugar beet in Egypt. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 43(18):1819–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400902830838
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fergani, Y.A., Refaei, E.A.E., Faiz, N.M. et al. Evaluation of chlorpyrifos and Beauveria bassiana as a strategy in the Egyptian sugar beet fields: impact on Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) and its associated predators populations and the sugar beetroot yield. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 33, 99 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-023-00744-6