Skip to main content
  • Scientific (Short) note
  • Open access
  • Published:

Two promising larval parasitoids, Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie and Dolichogenidea appellator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Abstract

Background

The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is one of the most important tomato pests that causes irreversible economic losses. Due to lack of effective control methods, chemical control is still the most preferred approach for management of the pest all over the world. Therefore, researches are mainly focused on implementing a sustainable pest control program against this pest through finding out effective natural enemies. For this purpose, a survey study was conducted to determine the larval parasitoids of T. absoluta in field-grown tomatoes in Adana, Turkey, in 2021–2022.

Results

Two larval parasitoids, Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie Beyarslan and Dolichogenidea appellator (Telenga) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), were identified morphologically and molecularly. The first parasitoid populations were observed in tomato fields at the end of June and were maintained until the tomato plants were cleared (Middle of July). Throughout the survey, B. didemie was determined to be the more prevalent species than D. appellator. The highest percentage of D. appellator was found in the last week of June in 2021, at 42.8%. When the parasitoid species densities were compared, B. didemie accounted for 93.2% of the total parasitoids. Despite the intensive use of insecticides, the highest parasitoid density was achieved by B. didemie as 28 individuals per 100 leaves.

Conclusions

Based on these results, it was concluded that B. didemie can be candidate as a successful biological control agent against T. absoluta in tomato field as a part of IPM programs.

Background

The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), native to South America, has been detected in Spain in 2006 and then spread to various countries in Europe, Asia and Africa (Ferracini et al. 2019). Its integrated pest management programs have been challenging in European countries where it was newly introduced. The main damage in the plant is caused by the larvae during all growing developmental stages, beginning with seedling stage. Infestation of tomato plants by the pest frequently results in a considerable decrease in yield and quality of the fruits (Biondi et al. 2018). However, due to the lack of effective natural enemies, various pest management methods have been employed to control the pest. Among these methods, pheromones, color and water traps were the most commonly used approaches, but they were insufficient to control the pest populations at a significant level (Erler and Bayram 2021).

Nevertheless, two mirid predators, Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur and Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae), which are primarily employed in biological control of whitefly in greenhouses, were reported to be successful in biological control of T. absoluta, particularly when combined with the egg parasitoids of Trichogramma species (Naselli et al. 2017). However, challenges like prey stage preferences of M. pygmaeus, phytophagous feeding behavior of N. tenuis, host preference of Trichogramma spp. and lack of an efficient larval parasitoid of the pest prevented the development of an effective biological control programs against this pest (Arno et al. 2021). Consequently, chemical control is still the fast and preferred method for management of the pest (Mama Sambo et al. 2022).

Currently, studies are focused on finding out effective larval parasitoids in order to develop a successful biological control program against T. absoluta (Arno et al. 2021). A large number of T. absoluta larval parasitoids were identified in South America, Europe and Africa, of which only few species were reported as promising for biological control (Ferracini et al. 2019). Pseudapantales dignus (Muesebeck), Dolichogenidea gelechiidivoris (Marsh). Bracon nigricans Szépligeti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood), Necremnus tutae Ribes & Bernardo, N. cosmopterix Ribes & Bernardo and Stenomesius sp. nr. japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) are among the most studied candidates that have significant potentials for use in biological control of T. absoluta (Denis et al. 2022).

Turkey is one of the most important tomato-producing countries in the world. Until 2009, whiteflies, leafminers, aphids, mites, thrips and some lepidopterous species were the pests that caused significant economic losses in tomato (Karut and Kazak 2014). However, after 2009, T. absoluta has become the most important pest that causes economic losses in tomato production in Turkey, as in many countries (Karut et al. 2011). Similar to the rest of the world, some T. absoluta larval parasitoids were reported from Turkey, but no comprehensive data on their efficiency and population development were provided (Topakcı et al. 2022).

Therefore, in this study, determinations of larval parasitoid species of T. absoluta as well as their prevalence and population development were carried out in two consecutive years 2021–2022 in Adana, one of the most important open-field tomato growing areas in Turkey.

Methods

Species identification

Morphological and molecular identification was carried out for the collected parasitoid species during the study. Morphological identification was done by using the identification key proposed by Beyarslan (2002) at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Thrace, Edirne, Turkey. For molecular identification, DNAs of braconid species were isolated from the third leg of 3 females stored at 96% alcohol using a PureLink® genomic DNA kit (QIAGEN Inc., Dusseldorf, Germany). PCR products were generated from a mitochondrial gene COI region. The extracted DNAs were amplified by using the COI primers, LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) (Folmer et al. 1994). The DNA samples were sequenced by MEDSANTEK (İstanbul, Turkey). Contigs were constructed by alignment of the forward and reverse sequences by using the BioEdit program (Hall 1999). Before phylogenetic analyses, the sequences were subjected to BLAST analyses (NCBI 2022). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum Neighborhoods Joining (NJ), based on the Kimura model with 1000 bootstraps, in Mega 7 (Kimura 1980; Kumar et al. 2016). The sequences of braconid species, which have already loaded to The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Accession numbers: OP939435 and OP935763 for B. didemie and D. appellator, respectively), were included in the phylogenetic analyses to improve the precision of the tree. The sequence of another braconids, Apanteles gelechiidivoris (MZ298984) and Bracon nigricans (MH733585), was included as an out-group. All molecular studies were carried out at Insect Biotechnology Laboratory.

Sampling for prevalence of parasitoids

In 2021, a hundred tomato leaflets were collected weekly from various (five to eight) tomato fields throughout five-week survey period in Adana (37°0′0.0000″N, 35°19′16.8060″E) for the purpose of determining T. absoluta parasitoids and their prevalence. In each sampling, leaflets were randomly collected from the inner parts of the field following a zigzag pattern, then placed in paper bags and transported to the laboratory in an ice container. The samples were then placed in clear transparent plastic parasite collection boxes located at room conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5%-RH, 16 L:8 D h photo phase). Afterward, the emerged parasitoids were collected using an aspirator and documented on a daily basis. Collected parasitoids were stored in 70 and 96% alcohol for morphological and molecular identification, respectively. The sampling started on 17 June 2021 and continued until 14 July 2021, the end of tomato growing season.

Sampling for population development and parasitism of Tuta absoluta

To determine the population development and parasitism of T. absoluta, two and four different tomato fields were selected and sampled periodically between 17 June and 14 July 2021 and from 22 April to 19 July in 2022, respectively. On each sampling date, a hundred fully matured leaves were collected from each field and transported to the laboratory as described above for assessment of population development and parasitism of T. absoluta. Number of T. absoluta larvae was determined by examining those sampled leaves under a stereo-binocular microscope. After counting, the leaves were transferred to parasitoid collection boxes; emerged individuals were recorded and stored as above. The survey was carried out under growers’ conditions in both years; plant protection and cultural practices were not interfered during the study. However, during the studies, the sampled fields were sprayed with chlorantraniliprole (CTRP) + abamectin active ingredient insecticide in weekly and 3 days interval in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Sampled fields ranged in size from 10 to 50 decares, and the most prevalent tomato variety was Hazera 5656.

Results

Identified Braconid species

All collected braconid species were identified morphologically as belonging to two species, Apanteles sp. and Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie (Beyarslan), from the Microgastrinae and braconid subfamilies, respectively (Fig. 1). The species identified as Apanteles sp. was revealed to be Dolichogenidea appellator (Telenga), after BLAST and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). The sequences of B. didemie did not match with any species in the BLAST analysis and located in the same branch with B. nigricans, which was previously reported among the parasitoids of T. absoluta (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

General habitus of adult females of Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie (a) and Dolichogenidea appellator (b)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree based on partial mtDNA COI of Dolichogenidea appellator

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree based on partial mtDNA COI of Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie

Prevalence of braconid parasitoid

Throughout the five-week survey, B. didemie was determined to be the more prevalent species than D. appellator. There was no parasitoid species collected in the first sampling week (17 June); however, 62 B. didemie (100%) individuals were obtained in the last week of sampling (14 July). During the survey, a total of 163 individuals were collected and 93.25% was belonging to B. didemie (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Prevalence of Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie and Dolichogenidea appellator in tomato fields of Adana in 2021. n: Total number of parasitoids

Population development and parasitism of Tuta absoluta

Tuta absoluta larval populations were higher in both tomato fields during the first two weeks of the sampling but decreased in the subsequent weeks in 2021. When two fields were compared, the mean numbers of T. absoluta per leaf were higher in Karataş than in Karagöçer. The highest mean number of T. absoluta per leaf was 2.07 and 4.21 for Karagöçer and Karataş, respectively. Only B. didemie was found in the two fields, and the trend of total number of parasitoids per hundred leaves was similar. The highest total numbers of parasitoids per hundred leaves were 22 and 28 individuals in Karagöçer and Karataş, respectively (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Population developments of Tuta absoluta (Dotted bar, Mean ± SEM) and Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie in two different tomato fields in Adana in 2021

In 2022, T. absoluta larvae population densities were low at the beginning of the season and started to increase in mid-June in Tuzla I and Karataş. In these two fields, the highest larval densities were determined as 3.07 per leaf. In the other two fields (Yüreğir and Tuzla II), the larval population densities were quite low during the growth season. In contrast to 2021, B. didemie was detected only in Karataş in 2022 among the fields in the last sampling week (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Population developments of Tuta absoluta (Dotted bar, Mean ± SEM) and Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie in different tomato fields in Adana in 2022

Discussion

Bracon didemie was first identified by Beyarslan in 2002; it was later recorded from Turkey and Iran without any details about the host (Zargar et al. 2019). Later on, B. didemie was reported by Doğanlar and Yiğit (2011) on T. absoluta larvae in Antakya, then Aksu-Altun and Çıkman (2019) reported the same species as a larval parasitoid of the pest in Şanlıurfa tomato fields. Although several studies were conducted to determine T. absoluta's natural enemies in tomatoes in Adana, no larval parasitoids of the pest were reported (Portakaldalı et al. 2013). Therefore, recent studies have shown that B. didemie has adapted and expanded as the larval parasitoid of T. absoluta in tomato fields in different parts of Turkey, despite the fact that this parasitoid was not observed in earlier studies in Adana.

Dolichogenidea appellator was the second larval parasitoid found in this study, albeit being less abundant (6.75%) than B. didemie. In this study, D. appellator was reported for the first time as a T. absoluta parasitoid in Turkey, despite being reported as native parasitoid of the pest in Sudan (Idriss et al. 2018). Similar to B. didemie, the parasitoid was reported without specification of the host from different regions of Turkey (İnanç and Beyraslan 2001). Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Scrobipalpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), Sparganothis pilleriana (Denis & Schiffermiler) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Etiella zinckenella (Tr.) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) were reported among the host of this parasitoid species (Papp 1988).

Bracon didemie was detected in two different tomato fields from the end of June to middle of July in 2021, but only in one of the four fields at the last sampling week in 2022. In Adana, field-grown tomato season begins in February with the planting of seedlings and covering them with polyethylene. After the polyethylene covers are opened in response to the rising temperature (17–19 °C) in April, tomato plants then become attractive hosts for insects. Tomato growing-season lasts until mid-July; during this period, fields were sprayed ten times on average with pesticide mixtures to control T. absoluta and other insect pests. The spring season in Adana is generally temperate, with temperatures ranging from 5 to 30 °C. However, in 2022, it was colder with temperatures dropping below zero degrees twice during March. Consequently, we speculate that a colder spring season and frequent spraying may be a reason for delayed population establishment of parasitoid.

Although two T. absoluta larval parasitoids were found in this study, B. didemie was detected more frequently. This showed that B. didemie has adapted to T. absoluta, which is the most significant pest in field-grown tomato in Adana and whose management relies solely on chemical control. The capacity of endo- or ecto-parasitoid braconid species to parasitize T. absoluta in field conditions has received very little attention. Doğanlar and Yiğit (2011) reported 7% parasitism of B. didemie in the samples collected from the semi-open greenhouses and fields where organic farming was practiced without the use of pesticides in Antakya, Turkey. Luna et al. (2010) revealed that endo-parasitoid P. dignus parasitized 23.34% of T. absoluta larvae in an organic field-grown tomato in Argentina. Similar parasitism rates (23.8 and 20.5%) were reported by Garrido et al. (2017) for P. dignus in tomato crops at Alto Valle de Río Negro, Argentina. Abbes et al. (2015) found 10.23% parasitism rate for Bracon sp. on sentinel plants in the Ragueda (Kiarouan) site, Tunisia.

All tomato fields in the study area were sprayed with an insecticide containing the active ingredients CTPR + abamectin at three days interval, often in excess of the recommended dosage, except the fungicides. Therefore, it is considered that intensive pesticide application prevented B. didemie from establishing population in tomato. Nozad-Bonab et al. (2021) reported that CTPR alone was highly toxic to the parasitoid Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Similarly, Pereira et al. (2019) found that CTPR alone caused negative impact on the emergence and progeny size of Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare and LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a generalist gregarious pupal parasitoid of caterpillars. In addition, CTPR + abamectin resulted in 79% mortality and classified as harmful against predatory mirid N. tenuis in autumn season (Kaya and Keçeci 2021).

In organic tomato production, where the use of synthetic pesticides was limited, the pest species and their densities were lower and the population density of natural enemies was substantially higher than in conventional production (Bettiol et al. 2004). In addition, while there was no difference in insect damage intensities in organic and conventional tomato growing areas in California, arthropod biodiversity was one-third greater in organic farms than in conventional farms (Letourneau and Goldstein 2001).

Conclusions

Since B. didemie is a new species detected on T. absoluta, laboratory studies should be conducted on biological characteristics, parasitism and mass-rearing possibilities. Further studies on the role of natural enemies under field conditions are essentially needed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbes K, Biondi A, Kurtulus A, Ricupero M, Russo A, Siscaro G, Chermiti B, Zappala L (2015) Combined non-target effects of insecticide and high temperature on the parasitoid Bracon nigricans. PLoS ONE 10:10138411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arno J, Molina P, Aparicio Y, Denis C, Gabarra R, Riudavets J (2021) Natural enemies associated with Tuta absoluta and functional biodiversity in vegetable crops. Biocontrol 66:613–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10097-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettiol W, Ghini R, Galvao JAH, Siloto RC (2004) Organic and conventional tomato cropping systems. Sci Agric 61:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyarslan A (2002) Five new species of Braconinae from Turkey (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Entomofauna 23(16):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi A, Guedes RNC, Wan FH, Desneux N (2018) Ecology, worldwide spread, and management of the invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: Past, present, and future. Annu Rev Entomol 63:239–258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-034933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denis C, Riudavets J, Alomar O, Agusti N, Gonzalez-Valero H, Cubi M, Matas M, Rodriguez D, van Achterberg K, Arno J (2022) Naturalized Dolichogenidea gelechiidivoris complement the resident parasitoid complex of Tuta absoluta in North-eastern Spain. J Appl Entomol 146:461–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğanlar M, Yiğit A (2011) Parasitoid complex of the Tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917), (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Hatay, Turkey. KSU J Natl Sci 14:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler F, Bayram Y (2021) Efficacy of mass trapping of tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), using a new-designed light trap in reducing leaf and fruit damages in greenhouse-grown tomatoes. J Plant Dis Prot 128:1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00473-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferracini C, Bueno VHP, Dindo ML, Ingegno BL, Luna MG, Salas Gervassio NG, Sanchez NE, Siscaro G, van Lenteren JC, Zappala L, Tavella L (2019) Natural enemies of Tuta absoluta in the Mediterranean basin, Europe and South America. Biocontrol Sci Technol 29:578–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1572711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mar Biotechnol 3:294–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido SA, Cichon LI, Lago JD, Aquino DA, Vallina C, Luna MG (2017) First record of Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as aparasitoid of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Alto Valle de Rio Negro, Argentina. Rev Soc Entomol Argent 76:46–49. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.761206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss GEA, Mohameda SA, Khamisa F, Du Plessis H, Ekesi S (2018) Biology and performance of two indigenous larval parasitoids on Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Sudan. Biocontrol Sci Technol 28:614–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2018.1477117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İnanç F, Beyraslan A (2001) A study on Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) species in Gökçeada and Bozcaada. Turk J Zool 25:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Karut K, Kazak C, Döker İ, Ulusoy MR (2011) Pest status and prevalence of Tomato moth Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in tomato growing greenhouses of Mersin. Turk Entomol Derg 35:339–347 (In Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karut K, Kazak C (2014). Important tomato pests in Turkey and their control. Proceedings of Symposium on Integrated Crop Management in Tomato Production, 20–22 November 2014, Kumluca, Antalya, Turkey, p 15. (in Turkish).

  • Kaya HY, Keçeci M (2021) Non-target effects of insecticides commonly used against lepidopteran pests on the predator, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter, 1895) (Hemiptera: Miridae), under greenhouse conditions. Turk Entomol Derg 45:115–124. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.766331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau DK, Goldstein B (2001) Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in California. J Appl Ecol 38:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna MG, Wada VI, Sanchez NE (2010) Biology of Dineulophus phtorimaeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and field interaction with Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), larval parasitoids of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in tomato. Ann Entomol Soc Am 103:936–942. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mama Sambo S, Ndlela S, du Plessis H, Obala F, Mohamed SA (2022) Identification, microhabitat, and ecological niche prediction of two promising native parasitoids of Tuta absoluta in Kenya. InSects 13:496. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13060496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naselli M, Biondi A, Garzia GT, Desneux N, Russo A, Siscaroa G, Zappala L (2017) Insights into food webs associated with the South American tomato pinworm. Pest Manag Sci 73:1352–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NCBI (2022) National center for biotechnology information. Retrieved November 22, 2022, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Nozad-Bonab Z, Hejazi MJ, Iranipour S, Arzanlou M, Biondi A (2021) Lethal and sublethal effects of synthetic and bio-insecticides on Trichogramma brassicae parasitizing Tuta absoluta. PLoS ONE 16:e0243334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Papp J (1988) A survey of the European species of Apanteles Forst. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Microgastrinae) X I. “Homologization” of the species-groups of Apanteles s. 1. with Mason’s generic taxa. Checklist of genera. Parasitoid / host list 1. Ann Hist Nat Mus Nat Hung 80:145–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira KS, Chediak M, Zanuncio JC, Guedes RNC (2019) Chlorantraniliprole impact on survival and progeny quality of the pupa of the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Can Entomol 151:94–100. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2018.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portakaldalı M, Öztemiz S, Kütük H (2013) Population monitoring of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and its natural enemies in open field tomatoes cultivation in Adana. J Tekirdag Agric Fac 27:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Topakcı N, Yukselbaba U, Gocmen H (2022) Determination of the natural enemies and population fluctuation of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in highland greenhouses in Antalya, Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull 31:5451–5462

    Google Scholar 

  • Zargar M, Talebi AA, Farahani S (2019) Faunistic study of the genus Habrobracon Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Iran. J Insect Biodivers Syst 5:159–169. https://doi.org/10.52547/jibs.5.3.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank: Dr. Ahmet Beyarslan (University of Thrace, Edirne, Turkey) for morphological identification of Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie and Apanteles sp.; Dr. Mohammed A. Mohammed (Syngenta, Turkey) for editing the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Cukurova University Scientific Project Foundation Units (CU-BAP) (Grant Numbers FBA-2021-13405 and FBA-2021-10377).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KK, CK, MMK and İD. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KK and CK, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Karut.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karut, K., Karaca, M.M., Döker, İ. et al. Two promising larval parasitoids, Bracon (Habrobracon) didemie and Dolichogenidea appellator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 33, 49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-023-00697-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-023-00697-w

Keywords