Susceptibility of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Heterorhabditis sp. (Poinar), Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) and isolates of entomopathogenic fungi
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 33, Article number: 20 (2023)
The weevils Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar), Metamasius hemipterus (Linnaeus), and M. hebetatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) form a complex of important pests of plantain crops, causing crop losses of over 60%. Using synthetic insecticides to control these insects has not been efficient; for this reason, the present study searched for using entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) and nematodes (EPN) as alternative control tools.
Compatibility of 74 combinations among 30 native fungal isolates and two EPNs (Steinernema feltiae and Heterorhabditis sp.) through inhibition tests was evaluated. It was found that the bacteria carried by Heterorhabditis sp. inhibited the growth of all fungi. In the biological test with EPF and EPN simultaneously against adults of C. sordidus, antagonistic interactions were observed when Heterorhabditis sp. was applied. Only the combination of the fungus strain B14 (Beauveria bassiana) + the EPN, S. feltiae had synergistic effects with a mortality rate of (93.3%).
This study revealed that S. feltiae and B. bassiana (strain B14) showed a synergistic effect against adults of C. sordidus. This combination could be an excellent candidate for developing a highly efficient biopesticide prototype in further trials and, together with other strategies of integrated pest management has the potential to improve control of the banana weevil complex.
Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) or the black weevil, Metamasius hemipterus (Linnaeus) striped weevil, and Metamasius hebetatus (Horn) yellow weevil are the most important pests in plantain (Musa spp.) cultivation. The black weevil is the primary pest of economic importance in Colombia. It is distributed throughout the national territory, infecting suckers as its principal route of dissemination (Medina and Vallejo 2009). The larval stage causes damage when feeding on pseudostem tissue. It generates perforations, weakening the plant and allowing the entry of pathogens such as fungi and bacteria. This causes rot and prevents the emission of shoots, besides limiting the absorption of nutrients, and decreasing the life cycle of the crop. Losses due to these insects are approximately 30–90%. They reduce bunch weight by 28%, and in heavily infested areas, bunch weight is reduced by 90%, translating into losses in the millions (Gold et al. 2006).
The most frequently used control practices are healthy and good quality planting material, management of crop residues and pseudostem traps with and without baits (De Graaf et al. 2008). Another control method is the use of insecticides that can cause resistance, reduce beneficial populations, allow the emergence of other pests, and may impact the environment and human health (Gold et al. 2006). However, despite different control methods, these insects require integrated management since crops are still affected by this pest, and they are important methods of disseminating Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) (Burkholderiales: Burkholderiaceae) bacteria.
An alternative is the biological control, which is a tool of great ecological importance and is the most viable method of pest control for environment also requires a little investment of farmers (Orr 2009). To enhance biological control in case of C. sordidus, the use of combinations of biocontrol agents is an alternative for black weevil control. Entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes (EPF and EPN) successfully show additive and synergistic interactions against insect pests (Wu et al. 2014).
The present study aimed to determine the type of interactions between different EPF and EPN (Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) and Heterorhabditis sp. (Poinar)) in C. sordidus adults under controlled conditions to find the best combination and to be able to develop a biopesticide prototype that, together with integrated pest management, allows control of the banana weevil.
Adults of C. sordidus and M. hemipterus were collected from plantain fields and placed in plastic jars with soil and pieces of pseudostem, as a food source for plantain crops, in the department of Meta, Colombia. The insects were kept in a quarantine in an insect breeding room (25 °C, 50% RH and 12:12 h of light: dark) at the Entomology Laboratory, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia, Bogotá. Dead insects were discarded every three days and only use healthy insects in the bioassays. The soil and the pseudostem were changed weekly.
Soil samples and insects were collected from Puerto Lleras, Fuente de Oro, Granada, Puerto Limón, Puerto Caldas, Lejanías, and Villavicencio, municipalities located in the department of Meta, Colombia (Additional file 1, Table S1). Average temperature was 30 °C, RH between 65 and 85%, and average annual precipitation between 2200 and 3300 mm (IDEAM 2017). Soil samples at a depth of 10–20 cm and, a distance of at least 30 cm were collected from the base of the plantain stem. Each sample consisted of three subsamples. Fungi were isolated from the soil samples by using the Galleria bait technique (Zimmermann 1986) and from dead insects. Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae, purchased from the company Perkins Ltda. (Palmira, Valle), were placed with the soil samples in plastic containers and incubated at 25 °C in darkness and light (12:12) and 50% RH. Mortality rates were estimated after seven days, and the larvae were deposited with mycelial growth in humid chambers (Amador et al. 2015).
The isolates of B. bassiana (B1-B25) and Metarhizium sp. (M1-M4) were identified using the taxonomic keys of Barnett and Hunber (1998), Glare and Inwood (1998) and Humber (1997). The fungi were cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar medium (PDA, Oxoid) at 25 °C for 15 days. Antibiotic chloramphenicol 0,1 g/l was added to the medium to keep off any bacterial contamination. Prior to the experiments, a conidia stock solution was prepared. The conidia were harvested from Petri dishes and suspended in 10 ml of Tween 80 (0.05%) until all spores had been harvested. The concentration of conidia was determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. For the mass production, rice was used and was placed in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask and sterilized at 125 °C, 15 PSI (pound per square inch) for 20 min. Subsequently, the rice was inoculated with a suspension of conidia at a concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/ml and incubated for 15 days at 25 °C (Tkaczuk et al. 2014).
The EPNs (Heterorhabditis sp. and S. feltiae) were purchased commercially from Perkins Ltda. which were stored in sponge format. The EPNs were reactivated in distilled water and were done the multiplication of the nematodes by the in-vivo method where the insect-bait technique with larvae of G. mellonella. These larvae were placed in a Petri dish with moist filter paper, inoculated with 1 ml of EPN suspension of 10.000 IJ/ml, and incubated at 25 °C (Amador et al. 2015). Three days after inoculation, the carcasses were removed and transferred to modified white traps for nematode extraction (Stock and Goodrich 2012). IJ concentration was determined by taking 1 ml of the suspension and counting infective stages using a Neubauer hemocytometer and microscope. The infective juveniles collected were stored in a sponge at room temperature and in darkness (Stock and Goodrich 2012).
Pathogenicity of EPF and EPN
Experiments performed in a Petri dish with five adults of C. sordidus and a piece of pseudostem were prepared. For the fungi, the weevils were infected by immersion into 30 ml of fungal suspension at 5 × 107 conidia/ml concentration for 30 s. In the bioassays with nematodes, 1 ml of suspension on filter paper was applied into the Petri dish at 10, 100, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 IJ/ml. In addition, a negative control, consisting of C. sordidus adults with distilled water added, was used. The experimental units were incubated at 25 °C performed the bioassay reading every day and kept a daily record of mortality. The mortality confirmation by nematodes and fungus was made through the observation of specific symptoms caused by infection with EPFs and EPNs. Bioassays were performed in completely randomized experimental design with three replicates per treatment.
Inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria
The bacterium was isolated from the hemolymph of infected G. mellonella larvae with Heterorhabditis sp. and S. feltiae. Twenty last-instar larvae of G. mellonella were infected by 1000 IJ/ml concentration from each of Heterorhabditis sp. and S. feltiae. Subsequently, ten dead larvae were selected 48 h after infection, and disinfected the dead bodies with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and rinsed them with sterile distilled water. The hemolymph extraction on each larva was performed between the 6th and 7th segments. The extraction was carried out with a 1 ml insulin needle and transferred a drop of hemolymph to Petri dishes filled with nutrient agar (Oxoid) and MacConkey agar (Oxoid), which were incubated for 48 h at 28 °C. Bacterial characterization was performed by Gram staining. Additionally, drops of hemolymph were streaked on plates of MacConkey medium (Oxoid) to observe the capacity for neutral red absorption and lactose fermentation. Subsequently, an antagonism test was performed in nutrient agar with two bacterial isolates obtained from Heterorhabditis sp. and S. feltiae against the different EPF isolates. First, the bacteria were inoculated by spreading a line 3 cm from the edge of the 9 cm plate, then a portion of EPF (0.5 cm) 3 cm from the bacterial line was inoculated. Finally, the controls were inoculated with 0.5 cm of EPF at 3 cm from the edge of the plate. This assay and incubated the plates at 25 °C were triplicated. EPF growth was recorded every three days by measuring the diameter of the fungal growth (Guerra et al. 2014).
Interaction between fungi and entomopathogenic nematodes
The interactions between EPF and nematodes in adults of black weevil were studied. In this experiment, the adults were exposed to nematodes and fungus at the same time and each pathogen was applied alone or in combination with the other. Adults of C. sordidus were immersed in a conidia suspension at a concentration of 5 × 107 conidia/ml and transferred to Petri dishes with filter paper inoculated with a suspension of Heterorhabditis sp. or S. feltiae (1000 IJ/ml). The experimental unit consisted of one Petri dish with five individuals (adults) with three replicates, and the experiment was repeated twice. A negative control of C. sordidus adults with distilled water added was used. The experimental units were incubated at 25 °C and took daily bioassay readings and kept a mortality record.
Pathogenicity of EPF and EPN was determined by using the percentage mortality. To determine the inhibition among EPN and EPF, the percent inhibition of radial growth (PICR), using the formula of Ezziyyani et al. (2004) was used. PICR = (R1 − R2)/R1 × 100, where: R1 is the radius of the control pathogen and R2 the radius of the pathogen in confrontation. The results were analyzed using R (Version 1.4, 2021). The normality of the data was verified with the Shapiro–Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk 1965), the homogeneity of variances was analyzed with the Levene test (Levene 1960), and finally, the determination of significant differences was carried out using the Kruskal–Wallis (Kruskal and Wallis 1952) and Conover test (Conover 1999).
A Chi-square test (X2) was used to determine the interaction of EPF isolates and the two EPNs (Finney 1964 and modified by McVay et al. (1977). The expected mortality (ME), the mortality caused by the combination of EPF and EPN were calculated by the formula: ME = MN + MF (1 − MN), where MN is the observed mortality caused by the nematode and MF the mortality caused by the fungus (Finney 1964; McVay et al. 1977). For the Chi-square test, the formula: X2 = (MNF − ME)2/ME, where: MNF represents the observed mortality for the combination. The calculated value of the Chi-square test was compared to the Chi-square table value for one degree of freedom. If the calculated values are more significant than the table value (X2 1, 0.05 = 3.84), they are non-additive interactions, synergistic or antagonistic (Wakil et al. 2017). If MNF − ME = D had a positive value, the interaction was considered synergistic. On the contrary, if the value was negative, the interaction is antagonistic.
Pathogenicity of EPF and EPN
The isolates B5 and B13 presented the highest mortality (86.76%), followed by B1 (73.33%) and B14 (60%), highlighting that all these isolates belong to the genus Beauveria sp. (Fig. 1). In contrast, isolates of Metarhizium sp. were among the lowest mortality rates, with percentages between 20 and 33%. By comparing the percentage of infected insects per isolates, significant differences (P < 0.05 Conover's test) between 11 isolates of B. bassiana and the control were observed. Moreover, the four isolates of the genus Metarhizium sp. had non-significant differences than the control treatment or the other isolates (Fig. 1).
The percentage of mortality in C. sordidus adults showed significant differences (P < 0.05, Conover's test) between the highest concentrations of the two EPNs and the control treatment. The highest mortality rate (46%) was obtained by Heterorhabditis sp. at the concentration of 2000 IJ/ml, followed by H1500 IJ/ml (40%), H1000 IJ/ml S. feltiae at 2000 IJ/ml with a mortality rate of 33.3%, emphasizing that these concentrations were the only ones that differ than the control treatment (Fig. 2). Heterorhabditis sp. registered a greater consistency in its pathogenicity since the mortality percentages fluctuated between 6 and 46%, while S. feltiae obtained values were between 0 and 33.3% (Fig. 2).
Inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria
The two isolates were Gram-negative bacillus, a characteristic shared by Photorhabdus sp. and Xenorhabdus sp. These bacteria were located inside the EPN used. In addition, in MacConkey agar (Oxoid), the fermentation of lactose and absorption of neutral red by the reddish coloration of the colonies was found and the change of the color medium confirmed that they were the bacteria of interest.
The bacterium isolated from Heterorhabditis sp. inhibited the growth of all the fungi evaluated with percentages ranged from 40 to 70%. However, in the case of the evaluation with the bacterium obtained from S. feltiae, it was found non-antagonistic effect, when showing inhibition percentages from 0 to 11.1% (Fig. 3).
The most significant percentage of inhibition was 77.7%, with the isolation of B. bassiana plus Heterorhabditis sp. The statistical analysis showed significant differences between the treatments with the bacteria isolated from Heterorhabditis sp. and the control treatment. In addition, differences were found in the tests with the isolated bacteria from S. feltiae plus B6, B13, B14, B12, B5, B3, B1, M1, M2, M4, B7, B9, B17, B18, B19, B23 and B24, and the other inhibition tests.
Interaction between fungi and entomopathogenic nematodes
The interaction between Heterorhabditis sp and fungi isolates consisted only of antagonistic effects after simultaneous application on adults of C. sordidus) (Additional file 1, Table S2). When S. feltiae was applied simultaneously, the interaction between M1 and M2 was additive. In contrast for M3 and M4, the interaction was antagonistic. When applied B4, B6, B8, B10, B12, B3, B11, B15, B16, and B18 combined with S. feltiae generated an additive effect. The isolates B1 and B5, regardless of the concentration, had antagonistic effects on the two nematodes evaluated. Surprisingly, B14 had a synergistic impact with S. feltiae. Therefore, the latter combination would be the most promising candidate for developing the biopesticide prototype (Table 1).
This study evaluated the combined effect of EPNs and EPFs on adults of C. sordidus under laboratory conditions. Obtained results showed the mortality rates of adults of the black weevil with pathogenicity caused by EPF that ranged between 20 and 86.8%, with more virulence of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae on the black weevil. Several studies confirmed this effect (Membang et al. 2020). In contrast, Prestes et al. (2006) obtained mortality rates between 15 and 25%, 15 days post-inoculation with four isolates of B. bassiana at the concentration of 2 × 108 conidia/ml. It is important to understand that the mortality rate could be acceptable when biological control agents reduce the pest population by 50% or more (Omukoko et al. 2014). Previous studies showed that large amounts of EPF are required to produce mortalities over 90% in adults of black banana weevil. Kayaa et al. (1993) carried out a test on larval stage with strains of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae, and they found mortalities between 90 and 100% on the third instar larvae. Membang et al. (2020) also evaluated B. bassiana strains and M. anisopliae on larvae, and they obtain mortalities between 68 and 100%. It is not surprising that other studies suggest that sensitivity in adults was low for attacks by microorganisms because of the composition and structure of their bodies (Treverrow and Bedding 1993).
Heterorhabditis sp. registered a consistency in its pathogenicity since the mortality percentages fluctuated between 20 and 46%, while for S. feltiae register values ranged between 0 and 33.3%. These differences between the two species were according to the case of how Heterorhabditis sp. entered the insect via cuticle or natural openings or the active way EPNs search their food. However, there are also studies where EPNs could not enter the body of the weevil (Ndiritu et al. 2016). These authors tested different nematodes such as new Steinernema spp., S. carpocapsae (all strains), S. weiseri, and S. yirgalemense on adults of C. sordidus and find that these host was not susceptible to the tested EPNs (Ndiritu et al. 2016). The nematode cannot enter because the black weevil is one of the most resistant insects since their access routes are restricted for the following reasons: Firstly, they have a very thick chitin layer. Secondly, the mouthparts are too narrow, and thirdly, the elytra close the abdomen reduces the possibility of reaching the spiracles. Finally, the insect keeps the anus closed, preventing entry (Ndiritu et al. 2016). Another reason could be an immune response of the insect, in which the host encapsulates the nematode as a humoral or cellular defense mechanism (Liu et al. 2020).
The growth of the EPFs stopped when they encountered bacteria isolated from Heterorhabditis sp., presenting percentages of inhibition up to 77.8%. This mechanism could be parasitism, direct competition, or antibiosis. However, this behavior occurs because of the bacterial effect on antimicrobial substances towards the fungus rather than by direct competition. Previous studies showed that the bacteria, Xenorhabdus nematophilus, X. bovenii, and Photorhabdus luminescens, found inside EPNs were EPFs antagonists such as B. bassiana and M. anisopliae (Ansari et al. 2005).
In contrast, bacteria isolated from S. feltiae did not inhibit the growth of the EPF and showed a growth diameter like that of the control (9 cm). In addition, the growth of the fungus on the bacterium and the production of conidia indicated that this bacterium did not produce antimicrobial substances that inhibited fungal growth. A similar case was observed by those who isolated Xenorhabdus poinarii from Steinernema glaseri. They found no inhibitory effect on M. anisopliae, B. bassiana, B. brongniartii, Isaria fumosoroseus (Medina and Vallejo 2009).
The combinations of EPNs and EPFs could present different types of interactions. In the case of S. feltiae and B14, they worked synergistically on adults of C. sordidus. Similarly, results Ansari et al., (2008) observed the same thing when S. kraussei and M. anisopliae were applied simultaneously on third-instar larvae of Otiorhynchus sulcatus. The positive interaction in these studies was the product of a simultaneous and not sequential application. In Colombia, a study found that mixing the entomopathogenic nematodes with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae, epizootics increased mortality rates of the borer and thus reduces damage to healthy fruits (López-Núñez, 2006). Better mortalities with B4, B6, B8, B10, B12, B3, M1, M2, B11, B15, B16, and B18 were observed when combined with S. feltiae applied individually. This effect was comparable to that observed when mixing S. feltiae and M. anisopliae, as they register an additive effect (Ansari et al. 2008).
Antagonistic interactions presented by Heterorhabditis sp. and all the isolates of EPFs were showed. Other research reports similar results, finding that combining B. bassiana and S. carpocapsae or H. indica or M. anisopliae and S. carpocapsae did not surpass mortality when the pathogens were applied individually (Wakil et al. 2017). This type of interaction is possible because EPF secretes different metabolites with antibiotic, fungicidal, or insecticidal properties or substances secreted by the bacteria Xenorhabdus sp. and Photorhabdus sp. (Ansari et al. 2008). The different results observed in studies the different pathogens suggested that the interactions depend on the type of host, the combined pathogens, and the time of application, either simultaneously or sequentially (Wakil et al. 2017).
The present study showed the biocontrol potential of EPFs and EPNs isolates on adults of C. sordidus. By mixing several pathogens, different interactions will depend on the type of host, the time of application, and the nature of the bio controller. The present study showed that the combination of two highly virulent pathogens did not result in the greatest number of dead insects, and the combination of a moderately virulent fungus with a moderately virulent nematode caused the highest host death. The combination of B14 and S. feltiae had a synergistic effect on adults of C. sordidus causing high mortality under laboratory conditions and can be used as an active ingredient for a prototype biopesticide that may offer a tactic for insect control.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Amador M, Molina D, Guillen C, Parajeles E, Jiménez K, Uribe L (2015) Utilización del nematodo entomopatógeno Heterorhabditis atacamensis CIA-NE07en el control del picudo del banano Cosmopolites sordidus en condiciones in vitro. [Use of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis atacamensis CIA- NE07 in the control of banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus in vitro]. Agronomía Costarricense 39(3):47–60
Ansari MA, Tirry L, Moens M (2005) Antagonism between entomopathogenic fungi and bacterial symbionts of entomopathogenic nematodes. Biocontrol 50:465–475
Ansari MA, Shah FA, Butt TM (2008) Combined use of entomopathogenic nematodes and Metarhizium anisopliae as a new approach for black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, control. Entomol Exp Appl 129:340–347
Barnett H, Hunter B (1998) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. 4th edn. American Phytopathological Society, pp 218
Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley
De Graaf J, Govender P, Schoeman AS, Viljoen A (2008) Efficacy of cultural control measures against the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar), in South Africa. J Appl Entomol 132:36–44
Ezziyyani M, Pérez-Sánchez C, Ahmed A, Requena M, Candela M (2004) Trichoderma harzianum como biofungicida para el biocontrol de Phytophthora capsici en plantas de pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.). [Trichoderma harzianum as biofungicide in the control of Phytophthora capsici in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants]. Anales de biologia 26:35–45
Finney D (1964) Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Press, London
Glare TR, Inwood A (1998) Morphological and genetic characterization of Beauveria spp. from New Zealand. Mycol Res 102:250–256
Gold CS, Okech SH, McIntyre BD, Kagezi G, Ragama PE, Night G (2006) Effects of mulch on banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) populations and damage in Uganda. Crop Prot 25:1153–1160
Guerra B, Chacón J, Muñoz J, Caicedo A (2014) Evaluación de la patogenicidad de Xenorhabdus spp. nativos en Colombia. [Evaluation of pathogenicity Xenorhabdus spp. natives in Colombia]. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología 16:111–118
Humber R (1997) Fungi identification. In: Manual of techniques in insect pathology. Academic Press, pp 153–185.
[IDEAM]. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (2017) Boletín climático. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Colombia
Kaaya GP, Seshu-Reddy KV, Kokwaro ED, Munyinyi DM (1993) Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Serratia marcescens to the banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus. Biocontrol Sci Tech 3:177–187
Kruskal WH, Wallis A (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621
Levene H (1960) In contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold hoteling. In: Olkin I et al. (Ed) Stanford University Pres, pp 278–29
Liu WT, Chen TL, Hou RF, Chen CC, Tu WC (2020) The Invasion and Encapsulation of the Entomopathogenic Nematode, Steinernema abbasi, in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Larvae. Insects 11:832
López Núñez J (2006) Avances en el uso de nematodos entomopatógenos para control de la Broca del café. [Advances in the use of entomopathogenic nematodes to control the coffee berry borer]. In: En Memoria del IV Congreso Internacional de Control Biológico, pp 20. Colombia. Spanish
McVay JR, Gudauskas RT, Harper JD (1997) Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis nuclear-polyhedrosis virus mixtures on Trichoplusia ni larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 29:367–372
Medina C, Vallejo LF (2009) Métodos de muestreo para evaluar poblaciones de picudos del plátano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Dryophthorinae) en el departamento de Caldas, Colombia. [Sampling methods for borer weevil assessing populations Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Dryophthorinae) in Dominico Harton in the department of Caldas, Colombia]. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Caldas. Spanish
Membang G, Ambang Z, Mahot HC, Kuate AF, Fiaboe KKM, Hanna R (2020) Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) susceptibility to indigenous Cameroonian Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) isolates. J Appl Entomol 144:468–480
Ndiritu MM, Kilalo D, Kimenju JW, Waruguru SM (2016) Pathogenicity of selected Kenyan entomopathogenic nematodes of genus steinernema against Banana Weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus). Agric Food Sci Res 3:29–36
Omukoko CA, Wesonga JM, Maniania KN, Kahangi EM, Wamocho LS (2014) Screening of Beauveria bassiana isolates to the banana weevil and horizontal transmission under laboratory conditions. J Agric Sci Technol 16:1–12
Orr D (2009) Biological control and integrated pest management. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK (Eds.) Integrated pest management: innovation-development. Springer Dordrecht, pp 207–239
Prestes TMV, Zanini A, Alves LFA, Batista FA, Rohde C (2006) Aspectos ecológicos da populaco de Cosmopolites sordidus, (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) em Sao miguel do Iguacu, PR. [Ecological aspects of a Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) population in São Miguel do Iguaçu, PR]. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias 27: 333–350. Portuguese
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Stock P, Goodrich H (2012) Nematode parasites, pathogens and associates of insects and invertebrates of economic importance. In: Lacey LA (ed) Manual of techniques in invertebrate pathology. Academic Press, pp 373–426
Tkaczuk C, Król A, Majchrowska-Safaryan A, Nicewicz L (2014) The occurrence of entomopathogenic fungi in soils from fields cultivated in a conventional and organic system. J Ecol Eng 15:137–144
Trdan S, Vidrih M, Valič V, Laznik Z (2008) Impact of entomopathogenic nematodes on adults of Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) under laboratory conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 58:169–175
Treverrow NL, Bedding R (1993) Development of a system for the control of the banana weevil borer, Cosmopolites sordidus with entomopathogenic nematodes. In: Bedding R, Akhurst R, Kaya H (eds) Nematodes and the biological control of insect pests. Book Review, pp 41–47
Wakil W, Yasin M, Shapiro-Ilan D (2017) Effects of single and combined applications of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier). Sci Rep 7:5971
Wu S, Youngman RR, Kok LT, Laub CA, Pfeiffer DG (2014) Interaction between entomopathogenic nematodes and entomopathogenic fungi applied to third instar southern masked chafer white grubs, Cyclocephala lurida (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Biol Control 76:65–73
Zimmermann G (1986) The Galleria bait method for detection of entomopathogenic fungi in soil. J Appl Entomol 102:213–215
The first author is grateful to FSES of Meta Department for the doctoral scholarship, and the authors wish to thank the reviewers for their technical review and suggestion for improving the manuscript.
The work was funded by National University of Colombia.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Tabima, L., Silva Gómez, E. & Gaigl, A. Susceptibility of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Heterorhabditis sp. (Poinar), Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) and isolates of entomopathogenic fungi. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 33, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-023-00662-7