Skip to main content

Isolation, in vitro evaluation of Bacillus spp. against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and their growth promotion activity



Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris is one of the potential threats to chickpea cultivation as it causes greater a yield loss under favorable conditions. Management of this disease is difficult because of its soil-borne nature and also existence of races. Fungicide application is not economical and not practical. Application of antagonistic bacteria like Bacillus species is one of the best approaches for its management.


Ten Bacillus isolates were collected from healthy chickpea rhizosphere soil, identified and confirmed them as Bacillus based on the results obtained in Gram staining and biochemical characterization (up to species level). They were evaluated against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris under in vitro conditions and selected two potential isolates (Bacillus-5 and Bacillus-7), screened for plant growth promotion properties and found thatBacillus-5 was able to solubilize phosphates, Bacillus-7 produced cellulases, both produced HCN and both were unable to produce IAA and chitinases. Identification of these two isolates was done by means of 16Sr DNA sequence analysis. Two universal primers such as 63F and 1387R were used which resulted in 1300 bp product. Blast analysis results indicated that they have more similarities with Bacillus cereus.


Two potential Bacillus isolates out of 10 were selected based on in vitro assay and subjected to study for plant growth promotion characters and found thatBacillus-5 solubilizes phosphates, Bacillus-7 produced cellulases and both produced HCN. Based on 16S rDNA analysis, these potential antagonists have more similar sequences of Bacillus cereus. Further, field efficacy studies need to do in future.


Chickpea is the second most important pulse crop globally and greatly valued for its nutritional qualities and improvement of soil fertility status. Fusarium wilt of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Foc) is one of the major limitation to chickpea production worldwide. Under favorable conditions, Fusarium wilt epidemics can cause up to 100% loss in highly infested fields depending on varietal susceptibility and climatic conditions. The fungus is soil and seed borne; hence, the fungicide application is not effective and difficult to implement. Among the bioagents, Bacillus spp. are one of the best antagonists, as they show effective root colonization with multiple modes of action (Kloepper et al. 2004) and form endospores and proved as effective biocontrol agents in many crop plants. Identification of potential antagonists at species level is very important. In bacteria 16S rDNA sequence analysis is a very good tool of species identification. Hence, this experiment was planned to identify potential Bacillus isolates based on their in vitro efficacy, to study the ability of the isolates for plant growth promotion characters and identification at molecular level.


This research work was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Nandyal, and molecular identification of potential antagonists was done at RARS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.

Isolation of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris

Pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Padwick) Matuo and Sato (Snyder and Hansen, 1940) was isolated from Fusarium wilt infected plants of chickpea, identified and confirmed in previous work (Venkataramanamma et al. 2022) which was utilized in the present research work.

Isolation of Bacillus from chickpea rhizosphere

Soil samples were collected during disease survey from healthy chickpea rhizosphere, composited and used for Bacillus (Domain: Bacteria, Phylum: Firmicutes, Class: Bacilli, Order: Bacillales and F: Bacillaceae) isolation. These soil samples (10 g) were heat-treated (80 °C) for 20 min to select resistant forms. Then the heat-treated soil was shifted to sterile distilled water of 90 ml and mixed completely by shaking the flask on a rotary shaker for 5 min, and 0.1 ml of each serial dilutions (10–3–10–6) was spread over nutrient agar plates (cooled) in triplicate and incubated at 30 ± 1 °C for 24–48 h. Rough colonies with waxy growth (1–4 mm dia.) and irregular spreading edge were attained and used for further bacterial identification. Microscopic observation (100x), Gram staining and biochemical characters (Hi Bacillus TM identification kit (KB013) (Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai) were used for identification and confirmation. Gram positive bacteria stain violet due to the presence of a thick layer of peptidoglycan in their cell walls. The identification kit has 12 tests such as malonate, Voges-proskauers test, citrate, ONPG, nitrate reduction, catalase, arginin, sucrose, mannitol, glucose, arabinose, and trehalose, and manufacturer’s instructions were followed for confirmation of the isolates as Bacillus.

Fungal-bacterial interactions in dual culture

After confirmation, two-day-old culture of Bacillus isolates grown on nutrient agar medium at 28 ± 2 °C was used for dual culture. A 5-mm disk of Foc (one-week-old culture) was kept at the center of PDA plate (Anjaiah et al. 1988); antagonistic bacteria were streaked individually on both sides of the pathogen at 2.5 cm distance leaving 2.0 cm from periphery in triplicate. CRD design was followed. Plates inoculated with pathogen served as control and these plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C. Mycelial percentage inhibition of test pathogen over control was calculated by using the formula given by Vincent (1927):

$${\text{Percent inhibition }}\left( {\text{I}} \right) \, = {\text{ C}} - {\text{T }} \times 100/{\text{C}}$$


I = Percentage inhibition of pathogen over control.

C = Radial growth (mm) of pathogen in control plate.

T = Radial growth (mm) of pathogen in treatment plate.

Plant growth promotion characters of potential antagonists

Potential Bacillus antagonists were screened for growth promotion activities like phosphate solubilization, production of IAA, HCN, cellulases and chitinases.

IAA production

Potential Bacillus isolates were screened for IAA production as per the procedure given by Kerkar et al. (2012). A loopful of potential Bacillus isolates were inoculated separately into pre-sterilized peptone broth containing 1% tryptophan in triplicate and incubated for 48 h. at 28 °C. One ml of Kovac’s reagent (Qualigens, Mumbai) was added to all tubes including control after incubation and shacked after 15 min. Appearance of red ring at the top indicates positive of IAA production.

Phosphate solubilization

Both isolates of Bacillus were screened for phosphate solubilization on modified Pikovskaya’s agar plate (Gupta and Sharma 1995). Bacteria were inoculated as one to three spots on the medium and production of clear halos indicated their ability to solubilize phosphates.

HCN production

For qualitative determination of production of hydrogen cyanide (HCN), Bakker and Schippers (1987) method was followed. The Bacillus isolates were inoculated on nutrient agar medium supplemented with glycine at the rate of 4.4 g/l. A Whitman filter paper no.1 soaked in 2% sodium carbonate and 0.5% picric acid was placed in the lid of each Petri dish. The plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days. A change in color of the filter paper from yellow to light brown, brown or reddish-brown was recorded as weak ( +), moderate (+ +) or strong (+ + +) reaction, respectively, for the production of HCN.

Chitinase production

Chitinolytic ability of Bacillus isolates was assessed by keeping a spot of 48-h-old culture in the center on water agar incorporated with 0.2% colloidal chitin (Berger and Reynolds 1958) and incubated at room temperature for 4 days and development of a hydrolytic zone (clearing zone) is a sign for chitinase production.


Cellulolytic ability of bacteria was assessed by using Mandels and Reese medium (Mandels and Reese 1957) containing CMC salt. All the inoculated plates were stained with 1% Congo red solution for 15 min after incubation at 28 °C for 48 h, and distained with 1 M NaCl for 15 min (Teather and Wood 1982). The degradation zones around the bacteria indicated positive for cellulose production.

Molecular characterization of potential Bacillus isolates by 16S rDNA

Extraction of DNA

Bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit from M/s Medox, Chennai was used for extraction of DNA from potential Bacillus isolates. The quality and quantity of DNA were verified on 1% Agarose gel and by Nano drop spectrophotometer. The 16S rDNA sequence was employed for identification of potential Bacillus isolates. The primers 63F (CAGGCCTAACACATGCAAGTC) and 1387R (GGGCGGATGTGTACAAGGC) were used for PCR amplification (Marchesi et al., 1998). Amplified product size of 1300 bp approximately was produced by both primers in two isolates under the study as expected. PCR technique has been standardized as a part of this and the following conditions were used for the amplification of 16S rDNA.

Stage—I Initial denaturation 94 °C for 4 min
Stage—II Denaturation 94 °C for 1.0 min
Annealing 55.4 °C for 1 min
Extension 72 °C for 1.5 min
Number of cycles: 35
Stage—III Final extension 72 °C for 5 min

The amplified products were visualized in 1% agarose gel and PCR products were sent for sequencing to M/s Eurofins Genomics India private limited, Bengaluru. Both forward and reverse sequences were aligned and a consensus sequence was obtained. Then, BLAST program was used to ascertain the species identity of Bacillus isolates in NCBI GenBank.


Isolation and identification of Bacillus isolates

A total of 10 Bacillus isolates were collected from different parts of Andhra Pradesh. The colonies which exhibited rough, waxy growth and irregular spreading margin on nutrient agar media were selected and purified by re-streaking on same medium. Ten isolates (Fig. 1) out of 12 showed positive reaction upon Gram staining (Fig. 2). The results obtained in biochemical test (Hi Bacillus TM identification kit (KB013)) confirmed them as genus Bacillus (Fig. 3) and based on the results obtained, Bacillus-2 and 9 were identified as B. thuringiensis, Bacillus-6 and Bacillus-8 as B. megaterium, Bacillus-5 and Bacillus-7 as B. cereus, Bacillus-1, Bacillus-10 and Bacillus-4 as B. pumilis and Bacillus-3 as B. subtilis, but molecular confirmation was done only for potential antagonists.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pure cultures of Bacillus isolates

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gram positive reaction of Bacillus isolates

Fig. 3
figure 3

Biochemical tests for identification of Bacillus isolates

Bacillus against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.ciceris

The in vitro evaluation test results revealed significant differences in inhibition growth of pathogen with different isolates of Bacillus and varied from 2.3 to 74.36%. Bacillus-7 isolate exhibited highest inhibition of pathogen growth to an extent of 74.36% (Table 1 and Fig. 4), and it was followed by Bacillus-5, Bacillus-6, Bacillus-4 which showed inhibition percentage of 71.63, 57.73 and 52.89% respectively, over control. Bacillus-7 and Bacillus-5 were non-significant with each other in inhibition percentage. Bacillus-3 recorded inhibition percentage of 51.85 and it was non-significant with Bacillus-4. The lowest percentage of inhibition was observed in the isolate Bacillus-2 (2.3), followed by Bacillus-9 (6.2) which were non-significant with each other. Bacillus-8 also reduced pathogen growth to the extent of 47.66%.

Table 1 In vitro antagonistic potential of Bacillus isolates against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris
Fig. 4
figure 4

In vitro evaluation of Bacillus isolates against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris

Overgrowth of pathogen on Bacillus was observed in Bacillus-1, Bacillus-2, Bacillus-9 and Bacillus-10. Among the tested Bacillus isolates Bacillus-5 exhibited highest inhibition zone of 14 mm, followed by Bacillus-3 and Bacillus-6 formed an inhibition zone of 8 mm and the least inhibition zone of 5 mm was formed by Bacillus-4 and Bacillus-8. Pigmentation was produced by Foc in dual cultures of Bacillus-3, Bacillus-6, Bacillus-7, Bacillus-8 and changed in the mycelium color was also observed in some dual cultures. It might be due to the fungistatic metabolites secreted by Bacillus isolates.

Plant growth promoting characters of bacterial antagonists

The potential Bacillus isolates studied for plant growth promotion properties are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Screening of potential Bacillus antagonists for plant growth promotion characters

The results indicated that only Bacillus-5 was able to solubilize phosphates, Bacillus-7 produced cellulases and both produced HCN. But none of them produced IAA and chitinases.

Molecular identification of Bacillus isolates

Amplification of the 16S rDNA region from isolates of Bacillus-5 and Bacillus-7 with primers 63F and 1367R yielded products of approximately 1300 bp (Fig. 5) and sequenced the PCR products of both isolates. The sequences of two Bacillus isolates were compared (BLAST analysis) with other sequences available in the GenBank data (Table 3) base to identify the organism.

Fig. 5
figure 5

PCR amplification of 16S rDNA from two potential isolates

Table 3 BLAST analysis of 16S r DNA region of Bacillus isolates with other sequences in data base

Results obtained in sequence analysis revealed that both potential Bacillus isolates had more sequence similarities as Bacillus cereus Frankland&Frankland 1887 strains.


Isolation and identification of native Bacillus spp. is an important step to have effective biocontrol against soil-borne pathogens like Fusarium. In the present experiment, 10 Bacillus species were isolated. Similarly, Smitha et al. (2015) isolated 30 Bacillus spp. from chickpea rhizosphere and screened against Foc and Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler. (Synonym: Macrophomina phaseolina (Maubl.) Ashby.) under in vitro conditions. Pankajkumar et al. (2012) used Hi25TM Enterobacteriaceae Identification Kit and HiCarbohydrateTM Kit (Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai)for physiological and biochemical characterization of selected Bacillus isolates.

Different inhibition percentage was observed between Bacillus isolates and Foc under in vitro conditions. Our results are in accordance with Zaim et al. (2013) who tested 29 potential rhizobacteria isolates against Foc, found five Bacillus isolates were potential and recorded inhibition percentage in the range of 25.63 to 71.11 and also observed inhibition zone in Bacillus and Foc interactions. Similarly, Anusha et al. (2019) isolated a total of 40 bacterial isolates from chickpea rhizosphere, tested against Foc and out of which 5 isolates of each were identified as Streptomyces spp and Bacillus spp based on morphological, biochemical and 16S rDNA analysis.

Indole acetic acid (IAA) plays a central role in plant growth and development. But in the present study none of them produced IAA, one isolate (Bacillus-5) solubilizes phosphates. The two bacterial isolates produced HCN. Rouag et al. (2019) conducted a study on plant growth promoting characters of six potential Bacillus isolates against Foc and found that all produced IAA, four isolates of each produced chitinases, cellulases, and one isolate solubilizes phosphates. Phosphate solubilization property of bacteria helps to promote plant growth. HCN produced by bacteria isolated from chickpea rhizosphere promotes plant growth directly, indirectly and synergistically (Joseph et al. 2007). Kremer and Souissi (2001) reported that approximately 32% of bacteria from a collection of over 2000 isolates were cyanogenic, produced HCN from trace concentration to > 30 n moles/mg cellular protein. Usually, the host plant is not affected by HCN generated by bacteria. Bacillus can operate as a bioagent, whereas cyanide acts as a metabolic inhibitor to discourage competition predation or acts as a safeguard from phytopathogenic fungi. Ghodsalavi et al. (2013) reported that approximately 90% of Bacillus spp. are able to produce HCN. Similarly, in the present experiment, HCN produced by two isolates might be played an important role in pathogen suppression by Bacillus.

In the present experiment chitinase enzyme activity was not detected and cellulose activity was found only in one bacterial isolate, i.e., Bacillus-7 (Table 2). Cellulase play a major role in disease suppression but also promotes plant growth and organic matter decomposition. Similarly, Ahmad et al. (2008) found that 72 bacterial isolates belonging to genera of Azotobacter, fluorescent Pseudomonas, Mesorhizobium and Bacillus when tested for plant growth promoting characters, all showed the production of IAA, ammonia, solubilization of phosphates and none of them was able to hydrolyzed chitin. Vijaya et al. (2011) evaluated Bacillus strain MBI 600 for plant growth promotion characters and observed that it was unable to produce chitinases, cellulases and produced only siderophores. Datta et al.(2011) suggested that growth promotion usually takes place by synthesis of some phytohormones, production of siderophores and disease control by antibiotics, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is an added advantage of these bacteria. In the present experiment, the two potential bacterial isolates produced HCN, one isolate solubilize phosphates and one produced cellulases and both were not produced IAA, chitinases.

Molecular analysis of ITS region of 16S r DNA was used for identification of potential Bacillus species, from the results, it was known that two isolates have close similarities with B.cereus strains. Kumbar et al. (2017) suggested that 16S rDNA sequencing was used for identification of 13 Bacillus isolates from Karnataka as Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg 1835, Cohn 1872). Wahyudi et al. (2010) studied the inhibition activity of 22 species of Bacillus on F.oxysporum (Schlecht as emended by Snyder and Hansen), Rhizoctonia solani (Kuhn 1858), Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. and six efficient strains were selected and identified three strains as B.cereus, two as B. subtilis and one as Lysinibacillus fusiformis (Priest et al. 1988) based on 16S r DNA analysis and obtained 1300 bp product by using the primers 63F and 1867R. The efficacy of Bacillus on Fusarium was reported by Thangavelu and Gopi (2015) who evaluated different combinations of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria including Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas putida (Trevisan 1889, Migula 1895) on Fusarium wilt of Banana and found all the treatments were effective. Raminez et al. (2021) reported the efficacy of Bacillus cereus MH 778,713 isolate on suppression of F. oxysporum growth under in vitro and in vivo (green house) conditions.


Two Bacillus isolates out of 10 were selected against Foc and studied plant growth promotion characters and identified that both isolates produced HCN, one produced cellulases and one solubilizes phosphates. Both the isolates were identified as Bacillus cereus based on 16S rDNA gene sequence analysis. Further, the potentiality of these two isolates should be evaluated under field conditions in future.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Fusarium oxysporum F.sp. ciceris


  • Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anjaiah V, Koedam N, Thompson BN, Loper JE, Hofte M, Tambong JT, Cornelis P (1988) Involvement of phenazines and anthranilate in the antagonism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 and Tn5 derivitaves toward Fusarium spp. and Pythium spp. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11(9):847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anusha BG, Gopalakrishnan S, Naik MK, Sharma M (2019) Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. and Bacillus spp. for biocontrol of Fusarium wilt in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Arch Phytopathol Pflanzenschutz 52(5–6):417–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker AW, Schippers B (1987) Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction and Pseudomonas spp. mediated plant growth stimulation. Soil Biol Biochem 19:451–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger LR, Reynolds DM (1958) The chitinase system of a strain of Streptomyces griseus. Biochim Biophys Acta 29:522–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Datta M, Palit R, Sengupta C, Pandit MK, Banerjee S (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum) under field conditions. Aust J Crop Sci 5:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghodsalavi B, Ahmadzadeh M, Soleimani M, Madloo PB, Taghizad-Farid R (2013) Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria and their effects on root extracts of Valeriana officinalis. Aust J Crop Sci 7(3):338–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta OM, Sharma ND (1995) Effect of fungal metabolites on seed germination and root length of black gram (Phaseolus mango L.). Legume Res 18:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph B, Patra RR, Lawrence R (2007) Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Plant Prod 1:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkar S, Raiker L, Tiwari A, Mayilraj S, Dastager S (2012) Biofilm-associated indole acetic acid producing bacteria and their impact in the proliferation of biofilm mats in solar salterns. Biologia 67(3):454–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer RJ, Souissi T (2001) Cyanide production by rhizobacteria and potential for suppression of weed seedling growth. Curr Microbiol 43:182–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbar B, Mahmood R, Narasimhappa NS (2017) Identification and molecular diversity analysis of Bacillus subtilis from soils of Western Ghats of Karnataka using 16S rRNA bacterial universal primers. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 5(2):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandels M, Reese ET (1957) Induction of cellulose in Trichoderma viride as influenced by carbon sources and metals. J Bacteriol 73(2):269–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi JR, Sato T, Weightman AR, Martin TA, Fry JC, Hiom SJ, Wade WG (1998) Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(2):795–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pankajkumar DRC, Maheshwar DK (2012) Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere showed plant growth promoting and antagonistic activity against phytopathogens. Microbiol Res 167(8):493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest FG, Goodfellow M, Todd C (1988) A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus. J Gen Microbiol 134:1847–1882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez V, Martinez J, Bustillos-Cristales MDR, Cataneda-Antonio D, Muvine JA, BaerzA A (2021) Bacillus cereus MH778713 elicits tomato plant protection against Fusarium oxysporum. J Appl Microbiol 132(1):470–482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rouag N, Abed H, Moutassam D, Mehmah S, Benabid S (2019) Antifungal activity of isolated Bacillus species against chickpea Fusarium wilt. J Crop Prot 8(4):449–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Smitha KP, Mohan R, Devadason A, Raguchander T (2015) Exploiting novel rhizosphere Bacillus species to suppress the root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea. Afr J Microbiol Res 9(15):1098–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WC, Hansen HN (1940) The species concept in Fusarium. Am J Bot 27(2):64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teather RM, Wood PJ (1982) Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(4):777–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thangavelu R, Gopi M (2015) Field suppression of Fusarium wilt disease in banana by the combined application of native endophytic and rhizospheric bacterial isolates possessing multiple functions. Phytopathol Mediterr 54(2):241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramanamma K, Reddy BVB, Sarada Jayalakshmi R, Jayalakshmi V, Hariprasad KV (2022) Exploring the potentiality of Trichoderma sp. against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and their growth promotion activity. Indian Phytopathol 75(3):807–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay KKK, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Yellareddygari SKR, Lawrence KS, Zhou XG, Sudini H, Miller ME, Podile AR, Reddy SNEC, Niranjana SR, Nayaka SC (2011) Plant growth-promoting activities of Bacillus subtilis MBI 600 (Integral®) and its compatibility with commonly used fungicides in rice sheath blight management. Int J Microbiol Res 3(2):120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JM (1927) Distribution of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature 159:239–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahyudi A, Prasojo BJ, Mubarik NR (2010) Diversity of antifungal compounds-Bacillus spp. isolated from rhizosphere of soybean plant based on ARDRA and 16S rRNA. HAYATI J Biosci 17(3):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaim S, Belabi L, Bellahcene M (2013) Biocontrol of chickpea Fusarium wilt by Bacillus spp. rhizobacteria. J Plant Prot Res 53(2):177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


I am highly thankful to the Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University authorities for providing me all the facilities to successful completion of this research work.


There was no funding for this research article. Kindly see that funding source for publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



KVR performed the experiments. BVBR guided to perform the experiment accurately. RSJ, guided in calculation of B:C ratio in this research article. VJL provided seed material to carry out this research. LRJ helped in writing this research article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Venkataramanamma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interest in publication of this research article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkataramanamma, K., Reddy, B.V.B., Jayalakshmi, R.S. et al. Isolation, in vitro evaluation of Bacillus spp. against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and their growth promotion activity. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 123 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Chickpea
  • Rhizosphere
  • Growth promotion
  • Bacillus spp.
  • Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris
  • 6S r DNA