Skip to main content

Eco-friendly control method against invasive pest box tree moth, (Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae))



Buxus sempervirens (Boxwood) is a type of plant that has economic and cultural significance, danger of extinction due to various factors. Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), an invasive species, has an important role as a boxwood pest. The inadequacy of the pheromone trap methods recommended to control the pest or the negative effects of chemical insecticides on the environment have led to seeking alternative approaches in this regard. In this study, it was conducted to determine whether entomopathogens can be applied in pest control, the insecticidal effects of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kenyae (FDP-8), Bacillus cereus (FD-63), Brevibacillus brevis (FD-1) and Vibrio hollisae (FD-70) bacterial strains at the concentration of 1 × 108 CFU/ml and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. (Cordycipitaceae) (ET 10) fungal isolate at the concentrations of 1 × 106, 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 conidia/ml were tested under controlled conditions.


As compared the results of the bacterial strains and fungal tested, it was determined that the best results were obtained from in the fungal isolate at the concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/ml. After 192 and 216 h. of observation, the 1 × 108 CFU/ml of bacterial strains: B. cereus FD-63, B. brevis FD-1 and V. hollisae FD-70; also, 1 × 108 conidia/ml concentration of ET 10 fungal isolate of B. bassiana control C. perspectalis caused mortality rate of 100% under laboratory conditions.


Future studies of these microorganisms against this pest in the field, may be an important alternative method to control this pest.


Boxwood (Buxus sempervirens L. (Buxales: Buxaceae) is an evergreen plant that belongs to the box family, grows spontaneously in forest areas as natural vegetation, is generally found in the form of boskets, and rarely in the form of shrubs (Acartürk 2006). In addition to its functions as a landscape plant, it can also be used in alternative medicine, and since its wood does not rot easily and is resistant to insects and microorganisms, it is preferred in handicrafts (ornaments such as combs, spoons, plates), increasing the economic and cultural value of the plant (Altunışık et al. 2017). The boxwood plant has been subjected to great destruction by humans over time and has faced an alarming threat of extinction as a result of the improper forest management planning processes (Toper Kaygın and Taşdeler 2019). In addition to the foregoing, disease agents such as Cylindrocladium buxicola Henricot, 2002 (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae) and pests such as Monarthropalpus flavus (Schrank, 1776) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), Eurytetranychus buxi Garman (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae), Psylla buxi L. (Hemiptera: Psyllidea) and Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) also contributed significantly to the reduction of boxwood plants (Salioğlu 2020). Among these pests, especially invasive alien species pose as the primary threat to global biodiversity (Early et al. 2016). One of these species, C. perspectalis (box tree moth (box tree pyralid; BTM)) has been identified as the most important pest of boxwood as it causes a high damage to boxwood as an invasive species (Göttig et al. 2017). It has been reported that BTM (Billen 2007), the homeland of which is recorded as China, Japan, Korea and India, entered Europe for the first time from Germany and spread rapidly in Europe and Asia in the last 11 years (Suppo et al. 2020). The distribution of this harmful species in the world was reported by (EPPO 2022) and Turkey (Toper Kaygın and Taşdeler 2019).

It has been determined that BTM has become an invasive and destructive species over time (Zemek et al. 2020), and even though its host is boxwood. It has also been reported that BTM causes shedding of leaves (Zemek et al. 2020), drying of shoots and complete death of the plant in the following periods (Toper Kaygın and Taşdeler 2019).

It is essential to make a fast and effective control since the pest has the ability to multiply and spread rapidly. It is established that the suggested mechanical control to control the pest is not effective enough. In terms of chemical control, broad-spectrum insecticides are being used since there are no pesticides specific to the agent, and these insecticides cause undesirable effects on pollination and non-target organisms. In addition to this, pesticide use is prohibited in some European countries due to the importance of boxwood plants (EASAC 2015). In the use of pheromone traps, which is another recommended method for the pest control, only male individuals were attracted, resulting in an ineffective control (Plant et al. 2019). Furthermore, it has been reported by different researchers that BTM is not a good host for natural parasitoids, so its population cannot be suppressed using natural enemies (Martini et al. 2019).

In this study, bacteria strains of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kenyae (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) (FDP-8), B. cereus Frankland and Frankland 1887 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) (FD-63), Brevibacillus brevis (Migula 1900) Shida et al. 1996 (Bacillales: Paenibacillaceae) (FD-1) and Vibrio hollisae Hickman et al. 1982 (Vibrionales: Vibrionacaea) (FD-70) and Beauveria bassiana (Bals-Criv.) Vuill (Cordycipitaceae) (ET 10) fungal isolate were tested against the larvae of the pest under controlled conditions as alternatives to the recommended control of the pest.


Pest and entomopathogens

Larvae of C. perspectalis were collected from boxwood trees in areas where no chemical treatment was applied in Artvin province and brought to Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Pest Systematics Laboratory, Turkiye and stored in (30 × 45 × 30 cm) plastic cuvettes at 25 ± 2 °C under 65% ± 5 RH and 16-h light: 8-h dark conditions by providing daily fresh food and humidity check.

In the study, entomopathogenic bacterial strains kept in the Culture Collection of Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, which were tested against different pests in different studies and developed in Nutrient Agar (NA; Difco) medium, and then preserved at − 80 °C in Nutrient Broth (NB; Difco) medium containing 15% glycerol, and as entomopathogenic fungus, fungus isolate kept in tubes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; Difco) in Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Plant Protection Department Mycology Laboratory were used (Table 1).

Table 1 Bacterial strains and fungal isolate used in the study

Preparation of entomopathogens

Conidia production was achieved by incubation of B. bassiana ET 10 fungal isolate in Sabourth Dextrose Agar (SDA; Difco) medium at 25 °C, 80% humidity for 2–3 weeks. Then, a stock suspension was prepared by washing the surface of the culture into bottles containing sterile water with 0.2 ml/l Tween-80 solution (Quesada-Moraga et al. 2006) and conidia suspension was adjusted to 3 different concentrations (1 × 106, 1 × 107, 1 × 108 conidia/ml) using a hemocytometer. The tested bacterial strains were cultured in 3 phases in NA medium at 30 °C for 24 h. in order to obtain fresh cultures. A single bacterial colony taken from these cultures in sterile loops was inoculated into Erlenmeyer flasks with 300 ml of NB medium and incubated for 24 h. at 250 rpm and 27 °C in a shaker with a thermostat. The bacterial density of the resulting aqueous culture was adjusted to 1 × 108 CFU/ml using sterile NB medium by spectrophotometric method and transferred to sterile spray vials.

Insecticidal activity of entomopatogenic bacterial strains and fungal isolate

Boxwood shoots and leaves and 10 larvae of C. perspectalis were placed in (20 × 12 × 7 cm) plastic cuvettes on which blotting paper was laid and then, the determined suspensions of the previously prepared bacterial strains and fungal isolate were applied to each tub as 5 ml sprays. In the study, Cormoran (100 g/l Novaluron and 80 g/l Acetamiprid) was used as positive control and sterile NB and sterile water (sdH2O) was used as negative control. The treated cuvettes were then kept under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2 °C, 65–70% RH and a 16: 8 (light: dark) photoperiod. The final evaluation of the trial was carried out and the mortality rates were determined at 240 h. By isolating the larvae determined to be infected according to Koch Postulates, entomopathogenic bacterial strains and fungal isolate were obtained again. The experiment was carried out in 3 repetitions for each application on the same day. The number of dead larvae was recorded regularly every 24 h. and the death rates were determined by the formula below.

$${\text{Mortality}}\;{\text{rate}}\;{(}\% {)} = \frac{{{1}00 \, \times {\text{ the }}\;{\text{number}}\;{\text{ of}}\;{\text{ dead}}\;{\text{ adults }}\;{\text{in }}\;{\text{treatment}}}}{{{\text{Total }}\;{\text{adult }}\;{\text{in}}\;{\text{ treatment}}}}$$

Data analysis

The resulting data obtained under controlled conditions were statistically analyzed using the JMP 5.0.1 software program, and the differences between the applications were determined according to the ANOVA results and the “LSMeans Differences Students” multiple comparison test.


According to the results obtained, all bacterial strains and fungal isolates were found to be effective on the larvae of the pest at varying rates. In the applications of both bacterial strains and fungus isolate, the highest mortality was obtained from the insecticide, which was the positive control, and it was observed that all larvae thereof died within the first 24 h. There was no death until the end of the experiment in the larvae that were treated with sterile water and NB which were the negative control. When each application was evaluated by hours, a statistical difference was found between the percent mortality rates obtained from the respective applications. (F24 hrs: 216.5727, P < 0.01; F48 hrs: 168.9877, P < 0.01; F72 hrs: 42.6591, P < 0.01; F96 hrs: 53.2449, P < 0.01; F120 hrs: 78.7155, P < 0.01; F144 hrs: 56.0496, P < 0.01; F168 hrs: 41.5195, P < 0.01; F192 hrs: 40.1506, P < 0.01; F216 hrs: 39.2107, P < 0.01; F240 hrs: 30.9245, P < 0.01). Dying of larvae started after 72 h in larvae treated with 1 × 107 (3.33%) and 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspensions (3.33%) of ET 10 fungal isolate, and after 96 h. in those treated with 1 × 106 conidia/ml suspension (3.7%). At 216 h., when 100% mortality was established in 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension, this rate was 80% in 1 × 107 conidia/ml and 63% in 1 × 106 conidia/ml. At 240 h., when the last observations were taken, the mortality rate remained unchanged at 1 × 107 conidia/ml (80%), and 66.67% at 1 × 106 conidia/ml (Table 2). In larvae treated with bacterial strains, dying of larvae started in the first 24 h in all strains except FDP-8 bacterial strain. In the FDP-8 bacterial strain, death was recorded after 48 h and the mortality rate continued to increase in other strains at this observation hours. While the mortality rate at the end of 96 h. was 73.33% in larvae treated with FD-63 bacterial strain, it was recorded as 56.67% in FD-70, 53.33% in FD-1 and 30% in FDP-8. Mortality rate was 100% in larvae treated with FD-63 bacterial strain at 192 h., 100% in FD-70 at 216 h. and in FD-1 at 240 h (Table 2). When the study is evaluated in general terms; it was observed that bacterial strains FD-63 (192 h.; 100%) of B. cereus, FD-1 (216 h.; 100%) of B. brevis and FD-70 (216 h; 100%) of V. hollisae and 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension (216 h.; 100%) of the ET 10 fungal isolate of B. bassiana have a high insecticidal effect against the invasive species C. perspectalis (Table 2).

Table 2 The pathogenic effect of fungal isolate and bacterial strains on Cydalima perspectalis

In the study, a statistical difference was observed between 1 × 106, 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspensions of B. bassiana ET 10 fungal isolates the pathogenic effects of which were tested (F: 40.5253; P < 0.01) and the highest mortality rate was obtained at 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension of ET 10 fungal isolates, followed by 1 × 107 conidia/ml and 1 × 106 conidia/ml suspensions (Fig. 1). Similarly, a statistical difference was found between the percentage mortality rates obtained from the bacterial strains applied (F: 52.3907; P < 0.01), and the highest mortality rate was recorded in the FD-63 bacterial strain of B. cereus, followed by FD-1, V. hollisae, B. thrungiensis subsp. kenyae strains of B. brevis, respectively (Fig. 1). When bacterial strains and fungal isolates were compared, it was seen that there was a statistical difference between them and the pathogenic effects of bacteria were higher against the larvae of this pest (F: 52.3907; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). The highest mortality percentage was obtained from FD-63, followed by FD-1, FD-70 bacterial strains. The pathogenic effect of 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension of ET 10 fungus isolate was higher than that of FDP-8, followed by 1 × 107 and 1 × 106 conidia/ml suspensions of ET 10 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the pathogenic effect of entomopathogens on Cydalima perspectalis

Some examples of the pathogenic effects of bacterial strains and fungal isolate used in the study on the pest are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pathogenic effect of fungal isolate (three different concentrations) and bacterial strains on Cydalima perspectalis


As a result of climate change and lack of natural enemies in different parts of the world, the damage of invasive species C. perspectalis on boxwoods has also increased (Early et al. 2016). Studies to find effective pathogens and parasitoids to control the pest have increased in recent years. Entomopathogens, which are among the most effective factors in suppressing pest populations are used in the biological control of pests. Among the entomopathogens, bacteria are the most widely used biocontrol agent against plant pests. Species belonging to the genus Bacillus seem to be the most important group. Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner 1915 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae), B. brevis, B. cereus, B. circulans Jordan, 1890 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae), B. megaterium de Bary 1884 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) and B. subtilis (Ehrenberg, 1835) Cohn 1827 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) are used in biotechnological and industrial areas (Rooney et al. 2009). It is noted that B. thuringiensis, which has been studied the most, is a low-risk pesticide constituting 2% of the world insecticide market (Bravo et al. 2011). It is stated that this eco-friendly species causes especially intestinal and hemolymph poisoning and feeding cessation that leads to the death of the insect within few days after oral ingestion (Schmutterer and Huber 2005). In many studies conducted to date, B. thuringiensis has been found to be effective against mostly the pests belonging to the Lepidoptera order.

It is determined in some studies that C. perspectalis is also among the harmful species on which B. thuringiensis is effective (Göttig and Herz 2018). Burjanadze et al. (2019)’s study in Georgia was one of them and B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Bulla et al. 1979 (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) was found to be 60.6% successful on larvae. In another study, Salioğlu and Göktürk (2021) investigated the pathogenic effects of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis subsp. kenyae and B. brevis bacterial species against the 2nd and 5th larval instars of C. perspectalis in laboratory conditions and they found mortality rates of 70, 80, 60 and 70%, respectively. In this study, it was determined that C. perspectalis was affected by B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki FDP-8 strain with a mortality rate of 56.67% during the 240 h.

Another bacterial strain, B. cereus, is genetically very similar to B. thuringiensis (Helgason et al. 2000).

B. brevis was reported to show broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity to soil borne disease-causing pathogens has been widely used in biologic control of soil borne plant diseases (Hou et al. 2015). In this study, B. cereus, V. hollisae and B. brevis, were found to be effective in the control of the pest, should be approached with a distance regarding to using as biocontrol agent.

In addition to the foregoing, in a study where it was observed that the damage caused by the pest on the boxwood trees was reduced in the gardens, where chemicals were not applied, the intestinal micro-flora of C. perspectalis was determined, and Acinetobacter schindler Nemec et al. 2001 (Pseudomonadales: Morexellaceae), Enterococcus casseliflavus Collins et al. 1984 (Lactobacillales: Enterococcaceae), Klebsiella mobilis Bascomb et al. 1971 (Enterobacterales: Enterobacteriaceae), Paenibacillus anaericanus Horn et al. 2005 and P. popilliae Dutky 1941 (Bacillales: Paenibacillaceae) bacterial species and Metarhizium sp., Beauveria sp., Verticillium sp., Alternaria sp. and Mucor sp. species were obtained from isolations of dead larvae and among these, P. popilliae was reported to suppress the pest population (Harizanova et al. 2018). The gut microbiota is associated with many essential host physiological functions (Grenie and Leulier 2020) and it has been found that bacteria in insect guts affect the life activities of insects (Ma et al. 2021).

Fungal entomopathogens are safe and can be grown on a large scale (Mantzoukas and Eliopoulos 2020), attack insects through tissue rather than orally, infect all life-cycles of insects, and remain in the soil for several seasons while continuing to attack target insects (Rajula et al. 2020) and being resistant to abiotic stresses such as salinity (Bamisile et al. 2018) increase their importance in terms of biological control. In this respect, studies have been conducted on Ascomycetous species such as Beauveria, Metarhizium, Isaria and Lecanicillium (Jandricic et al. 2014). In these studies, it was noted that the entomopathogenic fungus species B. bassiana is among the most promising species known (Akutse et al. 2013) and is the active component of many products which are under development (Tangtrakulwanich et al. 2014).

Zamani et al (2017) isolated B. bassiana from infected larvae in the survey study they conducted in Iran, and they also reported that this species, which has been recorded to be effective in lepidopteran larvae in many countries, was obtained for the first time through BTM in this study. Within this study, after 240 h. of observation, it was found that 1 × 106 conidia/ml suspension of B. bassiana was 66.67% effective, 1 × 107 conidia/ml suspension was 80% effective, and 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension was 100% effective. In another study conducted with B. bassiana, it was reported that 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension of the fungus caused 80% larval mortality against C. perspectalis in laboratory conditions and 60% in the field (Burjanadze et al. 2019).


Cydalima perspectalis, an invasive species, has started to pose a serious problem in recent years in Turkey and across the world where boxwood grows. Different solutions have been considered to combat and control this pest. However, it has been seen nowadays that these solutions alone are not effective enough. The negative effects of the broad range of remedies used for chemical control in terms of human health, environmental pollution and sustainable agriculture have led people to seek alternative methods of pest control. Among these, entomopathogens are considered as the leading alternative. As the result of this study, it has been determined that B. cereus, B. brevis, V. hollisae and B. bassiana can be used successfully as alternatives to chemicals for the control of C. perspectalis. Using entomopathogens in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs is of great importance given their environmentally friendly nature, bio-persistence, and ability to kill pests at various developmental stages of their life cycle. It is of great importance to formulate microorganisms with proven effectiveness with suitable carriers, to determine their shelf life, and to test them in field conditions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





Degrees Celsius

B. bassiana :

Beauveria bassiana

B. brevis :

Bacillus brevis

B. cereus :

Bacillus cereus

B. circulans :

Bacillus circulans

B. subtilis :

Bacillus subtilis

B. thrungiensis subsp. kenyae :

Bacillus thrungiensis Subsp. kenyae

B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki :

Bacillus thrungiensis Subsp. kurstaki

B. thuringiensis :

Bacillus thuringiensis


Box Tree Pyralid

C. perspectalis :

Cydalima perspectalis


Colony Forming Units








Integrated Pest Management


Internal Transcribed Spacer






Nutrient Agar


Nutrient Broth


Potato Dextrose Agar


Relative Humidity


Centrifugal rotation speed

S. antiqua :

Sphenoptera antiqua


Similarity Index


Sabourth Dextrose Agar


Sterile water





V. hollisae :

Vibrio hollisae


  • Acartürk R (2006) Ornamental plants and groundcovers in park and garden landscape. OGEM-VAK, Lazer Ofset, Ankara

  • Akutse KS, Maniania NK, Fiaboe KKM, Van Der Berg J, Ekesi S (2013) Endophytic colonization of Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) by fungal pathogens and their effects on the life-history parameters of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Fungal Ecol 6:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunışık A, Oskay F, Aday Kaya AG, Lehtijärvi A, Doğmuş Lehtijärvi HT (2017) A new threat to our boxwoods: Boxwood Blight. For Hunt 2(95):43–46 ((in Turkish))

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamisile BS, Dash CK, Akutse KS, Keppanan R, Wang L (2018) Fungal endophytes: beyond herbivore management. Front Microbiol 9:544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Billen W (2007) Diaphania perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Pyrallidae)-a new moth in Europe. Mitteilungen Der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 57(2/4):135–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savigna HM, Dinan TG, Bienenstock J, Cryan JF (2011) Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20(108):16050–16055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burjanadze M, Supatashvili A, Göktürk T (2019) Control strategies against invasive pest Box Tree Moth-Cydalima perspectalis in Georgia. SETSCI Conf Index Syst 4(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawle JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibanez I, Miller LP, Cascade SJB, Andrew TJ (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun 7:12485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EASAC (2015) European Academies Science Advisory Council. Ecosystem services, agriculture and neonicotinoids. EASAC policy report 26

  • EPPO (2022) EPPO global database. Accessed 25 Mar 2022

  • Göttig S, Herz A (2018) Susceptibility of the Box tree pyralid Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to potential biological control agents Neem (NeemAzal®-T/S) and entomopathogenic nematodes (Nemastar®) assessed in laboratory bioassays and field trials. J Plant Dis Prot 125:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göttig S, Korn S, Herz A (2017) Repellent and toxic properties of plant oils and extracts on Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 50(13–14):658–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grenie T, Leulier F (2020) How commensal microbes shape the physiology of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Opin Insect Sci 41:92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harizanova V, Naydenov M, Stoeva A, Valcheva I, Draganova D, Borısov Y, Mohamedova A (2018) Survey of the gut pathogenic microflora associated with caterpillars of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis Walker, 1859 (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Acta Entomol Serbica 23(2):15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgason E, Okstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, Hegna I, Kolsto AB (2000) Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis, one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2627–2630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Q, Wang C, Hou X, Xia Z, Ye J, Liu K, Liu H, Wang J, Guo H, Yu X, Yang Y, Du B, Ding Y (2015) Draft genome sequence of Brevibacillus brevis DZQ7, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Genome Announc 3(4):e00831-e915

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jandricic SE, Filotas M, Sanderson JP, Wraight SP (2014) Pathogenicity of conidiabased preparations of entomopathogenic fungi against the greenhouse pest aphids Myzus persicae, Aphis gossypii, and Aulacorthum solani (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Invertebr Pathol 118:34–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma M, Tu C, Luo J, Lu M, Zhang S, Xu L (2021) Metabolic and immunological effects of gut microbiota in leaf beetles at the local and systemic levels. Integr Zool 16:313–323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantzoukas S, Eliopoulos PA (2020) Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: a valuable biological control tool against plant pests. Appl Sci 10:360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini A, Di Vitantonio C, Dindo ML (2019) Acceptance and suitability of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis as host for the tachinid parasitoid Exorista larvarum. Bull Insectol 72(1):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant CW, Poole C, Salisbury A, Bird S (2019) The box-tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) in Britain: an overview of its spread and current status. Entomol Rec J Var 131:122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada-Moraga E, Ruiz-García A, Santiago-Alvarez C (2006) Laboratory evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae against puparia and adults of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 99(6):1955–1966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajula J, Rahman A, Krutmuang P (2020) Entomopathogenic fungi in Southeast Asia and Africa and their possible adoption in biological control. Biol Control 151:104399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney AP, Price NPJ, Ehrhardt C, Sewzey JL, Bannan JD (2009) Phylogeny and molecular taxonomy of the Bacillus subtilis species complex and description of Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2429–2436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salioglu S, Göktürk T (2021) Determination of the effects of some entomopathogens on Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae. Turk J Biodivers 4(1):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Salioğlu Ş (2020) Investigation of morphology, biology, damage and struggling opportunities of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (boxwood butterfly) which damaged in the boxwood fields in Artvin province. Master thesis, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey

  • Schmutterer H, Huber J (2005) Neem preparations (Neem, Nim). In: Schmutterer H, Huber J (eds) Natural pesticides, Ulmer, Stuttgart, German (in German)

  • Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suppo C, Bras A, Robinet C (2020) A temperature- and photoperiod-driven model reveals complex temporal population dynamics of the invasive box tree moth in Europe. Ecol Model 432:109229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangtrakulwanich K, Reddy GVP, Wu S, Miller JH, Ophus VL, Prewett J (2014) Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes, and low risk insectisides against wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). J Agric Sci 6(5):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Toper Kaygın A, Tasdeler C (2019) Geographic distribution, life cycle and damage of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Spilomelinae) in Turkey. J Bartin Fac for 21(3):833–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani SM, Farahani S, Farashiani ME, Salehi M, Samavat S (2017) The first record of Beauveria bassiana on box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis in Iran. Iran J for Range Prot Res 15(2):199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemek R, Konopická J, Ul Abdin Z (2020) Low Efficacy of Isaria fumosorosea against box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis: are host plant phytochemicals ınvolved in herbivore defense against fungal pathogens? J Fungi 6:342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. GT conceived the study. TG collected pest material from Artvin. GT, ET, RK, NT and FD performed laboratory experiments. ET analyzed data. ET, GT and RK produced the manuscript. All authors corrected and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Göksel Tozlu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tozlu, E., Tozlu, G., Kotan, R. et al. Eco-friendly control method against invasive pest box tree moth, (Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 96 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: