- Open Access
Biological activity and genome composition of a Tunisian isolate of Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV-Tun2)
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control volume 32, Article number: 71 (2022)
The baculovirus Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV) is an entomopathogenic virus utilized as a biological control agent of the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis. Several studies have focused on the identification of different SpliNPV isolates from a biological and molecular point of view, but few of them conducted in-depth analyses of the genomic composition of these isolates.
Identification of a novel isolate of SpliNPV, termed Tun2, which was purified from infected S. littoralis larvae from Tunisia was reported. This isolate was propagated in vivo and its median lethal concentration (LC50) was determined to be 1.5 × 104 occlusion bodies (OBs)/ml for third instar S. littoralis larvae at 7 days of post-infection. OB production in late fourth instar larvae was estimated to be at least 2.7 × 109 OBs/g larval weight. The completely sequenced genome of SpliNPV-Tun2 was 137,099 bp in length and contained 132 open reading frames (ORF). It showed a 98.2% nucleotide identity to the Egyptian isolate SpliMNPV-AN1956, with some striking differences; between both genomes, insertion and deletion mutations were noticed in 9 baculovirus core genes, and also in the highly conserved polyhedrin gene. The homologs of ORF 106 and ORF 107 of SpliNPV-AN1956 appeared to be fused to a single ORF 106 in SpliNPV-Tun2, similar to the homologous ORF 110 in SpltNPV-G2.
SpliNPV-Tun2 is proposed as a new variant of SpliNPV and a potential candidate for further evaluation as a biocontrol agent for S. littoralis and probably other Spodoptera species.
The Egyptian cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is considered one of the major pests of cotton, tobacco, and corn in the Mediterranean Area and Asia. Larvae of S. littoralis are polyphagous, causing substantial economic losses in both greenhouse and open field crops on a broad range of ornamental, industrial, and vegetable crops (Martins et al. 2005). Due to the severe damage to various crops, controlling this pest is an important issue for integrated pest management. Up to now, S. littoralis management has mainly focused on chemical insecticides. However, numerous studies have been carried out on the possibility of biological control of the pest. Insect viruses and entomopathogenic bacteria, fungi, and nematodes have been investigated as biological control agents of S. littoralis (Hajek and Shapiro-Ilan, 2018). The Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV) is a baculovirus that has been evaluated, registered, and applied for control of S. littoralis, as well as the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, and the tobacco cutworm Spodoptera litura in Africa, America and Japan (Abdel-Khalik et al.2017; El-Sheikh 2015; Takatsuka et al. 2016). Baculoviruses comprise a large group of double-stranded, circular DNA viruses that infect insects from the orders Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Diptera. Many of these viruses have been investigated because of their potential as biological control agents against agricultural and forest pests (Moscardi 1999). Based on phylogenetic analysis, the Baculoviridae family is separated into 4 genera: Alphabaculovirus (lepidopteran-specific nucleopolyhedroviruses, NPVs), Betabaculovirus (lepidopteran-specific granuloviruses, GVs), Gammabaculovirus (hymenopteran-specific NPVs) and Deltabaculovirus (dipteran-specific NPVs) (Jehle et al. 2006). SpliNPV belongs to the species Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus of the genus Alphabaculovirus (Harrison et al. 2018).
Different SpliNPV variants have been isolated from cotton leaf worm populations in different countries, and intra-specific variation between isolates was identified by restriction endonuclease or partial gene sequencing (Breitenbach et al. 2013; Cherry and Summers 1985; Kislev and Edelman 1982; Martins et al. 2005;). So far, only the Egyptian isolate SpliMNPV-AN1956 has been fully sequenced; its genome is 137,998 bp in length, harbours 132 ORFs, and 15 homologous repeat regions (hrs), and is closely related to the nucleopolyhedrovirus G2 (SpltNPV-G2). Comparisons of the genome sequence of SpliMNPV-AN1956 and SpltNPV-G2 revealed an average of 85% amino acid identity across all genes and high collinearity of the 2 genomes, despite the lack/gain of 16 ORFs (Pang et al. 2001). It was reported that NPVs isolated from Spodoptera spp. have a rather narrow host range (Jakubowska et al. 2010). For example, the Spodoptera exigua multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SeMNPV) infects only larvae of its host S. exigua (Jakubowska et al. 2010), whereas SpliNPV was shown to be infectious also to S. frugiperda, S. exigua, and S. litura (Takatsuka et al. 2016). Recently, a Tunisian isolate, named SpliMNPV-Tun, was detected in 2008 from infected cotton leaf worm caterpillars collected in Tunisian tomato greenhouses and identified as a SpliNPV variant based on the partial polyhedrin (polh) gene sequence (Laarif et al. 2011). Here, the identification of a further SpliNPV isolate, termed Tun2, which was obtained from a S. littoralis colony that was established from collected caterpillars from tomato fields in 2013 is reported. This isolate was tested for its activity towards third instar S. littoralis larvae, and its complete genome was determined to study its relationship to other SpliNPV variants.
Insects and virus detection
Larvae of S. littoralis were collected in 2013 from tomato fields (Monastir, Central-East, Tunisia) to establish a laboratory colony at the laboratory of entomology at Regional Research Centre in Horticulture and Organic Agriculture (CRRHAB). For colony maintenance, larvae were fed on a semi-artificial diet (Shorey and Gaston 1965) and kept at a temperature of 28 ± 2 °C and 60 ± 5% relative humidity (RH). Adults were kept in cylinders, and egg deposits were collected on filter papers. The filter papers were transferred to Petri dishes until larval hatching. A piece of artificial diet was added to the Petri dishes where larvae were kept until pupation. Occasionally, larvae from the rearing showed symptoms of nucleopolyhedrovirus infection indicating activation of a covert infection of the S. littoralis population. Diseased larvae were removed from the rearing and stored individually at − 20 °C.
Occlusion body purification
Baculoviral occlusion bodies (OB) were purified from pooled infected cadavers according to El-Salamouny et al. (2003). Briefly, the cadavers were homogenized in sterile distilled water and the homogenate was filtered through a muslin cloth. The obtained crude OB suspension was washed twice with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and pelleted by low centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8), transferred to a 2-ml Eppendorf reaction vial, and HCl (0.1 M) or Na2Co3 (0.1 M) was added to adjust its pH to 7. Then, the OB suspension was centrifuged through a sucrose gradient and resuspended in H2O. OB concentration was counted using a Neubauer Cell Counting Chamber (0.1 mm depth) and phase contrast light microscopy (Leica DMRBE, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) (Eberle et al. 2012).
For testing the biological activity of SpliNPV-Tun2, per os infection experiments were conducted with third instar larvae of S. littoralis. For this, 25 larvae were fed with 1.5–2.5 g artificial diet plugs prepared with final concentrations of 103–108 OBs/ml (Shaurub et al. 2014). Untreated control groups consisted of 75 larvae. Each treatment consisted of 3 independent replicates. The mortality data were corrected with untreated control mortality using the formula of Abbott (1925). Calculation of the median lethal concentration (LC50) at 7 days post-infection (dpi) was estimated by Probit analysis using linear regression implemented in the ToxRat 3.2.1 software package (ToxRat Solutions GmbH, Germany). From the same experiment, larval mortality was determined for each concentration at least at 5 different time points within the time range of 1–14 dpi. Statistical analysis was done with R (version 4) and RStudio (version 1.1393). Survival analysis was conducted with R packages “Survival” (version 2.38) and “Survminer” (version 0.4.3). A test of significant variance between Kaplan–Meier curves was performed by a log-rank test (level of significance, P < 0.05).
OB productivity of S. littoralis larvae
An OB dose of 104 OBs of SpliNPV-Tun2 was pipetted onto cubes of diet of 5 mm3 each and individually offered to early fourth instar larvae of S. littoralis (Grzywacz et al. 1998). When the doses were completely ingested within 2 days, a non-contaminated diet was added every second day until 12 dpi. Larvae were harvested at 14 dpi. Three different methods for OB purification were compared; low-speed centrifugation (LSC) (Harrison 2008), sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (SGU) (El-Salamouny et al. 2003), and sucrose cushion centrifugation (SCC) (Wennmann and Jehle 2014). Purified OBs were counted as described above. OB counting was performed 3 times for each treatment; the obtained concentrations were multiplied with the volume (5 ml), and then normalized with the larva weight. Results were expressed as OBs/g of larval tissue and were used to compute the arithmetic mean of OB/g of each experiment. Differences in the mean number of OB/g were statistically evaluated for a significance value of P ≤ 0.05 using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test (Tukey-HSD) comparison of means with standard R code (R version 3.3.1 in RStudio 3.4.0).
Viral DNA extraction
Viral DNA was extracted according to Bernal et al. (2013) with some modification. Occlusion derived virions (ODVs) were released from OBs by mixing 100 µl of the OB suspension (containing about 109 OBs/ml) with 100 µl Na2CO3 (0.5 M), 50 µl SDS (10%, w/v) in a final volume of 500 µl. After incubation at 60 °C for 10 min, the suspension was neutralized to pH 7 by adding 0.1 M HCl. Undissolved OBs and other debris were pelleted by centrifugation at 3800 g for 5 min. The supernatant containing the released ODVs was transferred to a fresh vial and treated with 25 µl Proteinase K (10 mg/ml) for 1 h at 50 °C. Viral DNA was extracted twice with Tris/HCl-saturated phenol and once with chloroform by using Phase Lock gel tubes (all purchased from, Carl Roth GmbH + Co., KG, Karlsruhe, Germany), followed by standard ethanol precipitation (Eberle et al. 2012). The DNA pellet was dissolved in 100 µl distilled H2O.
PCR amplification and sequencing of the polyhedrin gene
The PCR amplification of the polh gene was chosen according to the specific primers designed by Martins et al. (2005) to amplify a complete SpliNPV polh gene (750 bp): 5′-ATG TAT AGT CGC TAC AGT GCC TAC-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-TTA GTA CGC GGG ACC GGT GT-3′ (reverse primer). The PCR mix comprised 34.5 µl of water, 10 µl Green buffer (Promega), 1 µl dNTPs (10 µM each), 1.5 µl Go Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), and 1 µl of each primer (10 µM). Finally, 1 µl of DNA was added to obtain a final volume of 50 µl for each reaction. PCR was initiated at 95 °C for 1 min of denaturation followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 46 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s and the final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification product was visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis at 90 V for 40 min in 1 × TAE buffer after staining with Midori Green DNA strain (NIPPON Genetics Europe). The PCR product was purified with DNA clean and concentrator kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, and both strands were Sanger sequenced. The polh sequencing was done for different single infected larvae randomly chosen. Sequences were compiled and then aligned with the complete polh gene sequences available in GenBank.
Sequencing and raw data processing
About 50 ng purified DNA was subjected to commercial NexteraXT library preparation and Illumina NextSeq500 sequencing at StarSEQ GmbH company (Mainz, Germany). In total, more than 1.76 million reads of 151 nt in length were obtained. Raw reads were processed by adapter trimming and quality filtering excluding reads with an average phred quality score below 30 (Gueli Alletti et al. 2017). Quality filtered reads with a length shorter than 50 nt were excluded from the analysis for paired reads and 51 nt for unpaired reads. Paired and unpaired reads were kept after all steps of filtering and quality control.
Genome sequence assembly
The remaining set of reads was used for de novo sequence assembly as well as mapping against the whole genome sequence of SpliMNPV-AN1956 (GenBank accession number JX454574) (Breitenbach et al. 2013). CLC de novo assembly resulted in multiple contigs (> 1000 bp). Contigs were mapped and fit together to a single contig comprising the whole genome. This contig was considered as a first consensus (cons1). In a second approach, all reads were mapped against the SpliMNPV-AN1956 genome using BWA-MEM. From here, a second consensus (cons2) was extracted applying a majority rule (> 99%). Both consensus sequences were then aligned to each other and checked for differences, which mainly occurred in repeated as well as homologous repeat regions (hrs). The alignment was then checked manually for ambiguities and sequence discrepancies. The correction was based on the read coverage supporting one ambiguous region per contig generated by CLC. The cut-off of the adopted corrections was coverage of 20 reads per ambiguous region. One final genome sequence of SpliNPV-Tun2 was generated based on the majority of read coverage and submitted to GenBank (Accession number MG958660).
The 38 core genes of SpliNPV-Tun2 were translated to amino acid sequence, then aligned with core gene amino acid sequences from 88 group II NPVs, 39 group I NPVs, and from CpGV-M and SpliGV-K1 as outgroups using MUSCLE alignment tool v3.8.425 as implemented in Geneious Prime® v11 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) (Edgar 2004). The concatenated alignments of the amino acid sequences of the 38 baculovirus core genes (Wennmann et al. 2018) were then used to infer a phylogenetic tree using the Minimum Evolution method implemented in MEGA.7 (Kumar et al. 2016).
Comparison of the SpliNPV-Tun2 genome to other NPVs
All of the 132 SpliNPV-Tun2 ORFs were tested for sequence similarity using BlastX. A detailed comparison of the similarity with genomes of SpliNPV-AB1956 and SpltNPV-G2 was made. The genome characteristics were compared in terms of length, GC%, ORF number, presence of genes.
In 2013, a laboratory colony of S. littoralis collected from tomato fields in Monastir (Tunisia) was established. In the reared colony, an occasional occurrence of moribund larvae with symptoms of a nucleopolyhedrosis infection was observed. The purification of viral OBs and DNA, PCR amplification using polh specific primers and sequence analysis (data not shown) indicated that the infective agent was a SpliNPV isolate, which was eventually termed SpliNPV-Tun2.
Virulence and OB yield of SpliNPV-Tun2
Concentration mortality bioassays with third instar larvae were performed to determine the virulence of SpliNPV-Tun2. The LC50 value at 7 dpi was estimated to 1.5 × 104 OB/ml with a 95% confidence interval of 0.2–5.6 × 104 OB/ml (n = 525, slope probit line = 0.42, Chi2 = 8.81). The survival rates determined at various time points after infection were inversely proportional to the applied OB concentration of 103–108 OB/ml (Fig. 1). In the uninfected control, a slight decrease in the survival probability with 84% was observed at 14 dpi [95% Cl (76.1–92.7%)]. A concentration-dependent decrease in the survival probability was observed in the treatment groups starting from 4 dpi with 96.7% [95% Cl (96.0–97.4%)] and reached 7.81% [95% Cl (6.48–9.40%)] at 14 dpi. The median mortality was obtained between 7 dpi for applied concentrations of 107 and 108 OB/ml and 10 dpi for the lowest concentrations103 and 106 OB/ml of SpliNPV-Tun2. To estimate the survival covariance by time and by treatment, the survival was presented by percentage and survival data were normalized with lambda = 0.57 (Table 1). The survival time was statistically different depending on the applied virus concentrations. By using the different concentrations of SpliNPV-Tun2 OBs, all treatments produced different survival percentages depending on the time (F = 7.78, P value < 0.01).
OB productivity of late fourth and fifth instar larvae was quantified. The mean weight of larvae with virus infection symptoms was 1548 mg with a standard deviation (s.d.) of 82.5 mg. The OBs were harvested at 14 dpi when infected larvae were seen as highly moribund. Three different standard methods for OB purification were compared, i.e. LSC, SCC, and SGU (Wennmann and Jehle 2014). OB yield was found to be significantly different among LSC, SCC and SGU purification methods (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) [F(2,6) = 88.11, p < 0.001]. LSC yielded 2.7 × 109 OB/g larvae weight, followed by SCC 1.3 × 109 OB/g larvae weight, whereas SGU yielded only 5 × 108 OB/g larvae weight. (Fig. 2).
Genome sequence of SpliNPV-Tun2
A total of 1,597,175 filtered reads amounting to (90.6%) of the total raw reads were used for the analysis. From the total of the filtered reads, 1,508,620 paired reads and 88,555 unpaired reads could be mapped to the reference genome of SpliNPV-AN1956, whereas about 13,500 reads did not map to SpliNPV-AN1956 but gave BLAST hits with insect or bacterial DNA sequences.
The obtained genome consensus sequence of SpliNPV-Tun2 (MG958660) was supported by an average of 720-fold sequencing depth (s.d. = 316). It had a length of 137,099 bp and a GC content of 44.7% (Table 2). It contained 132 open reading frames (ORF) and 15 homologous repeat regions (hrs). Based on the nucleotide sequences, the genomes of SpliNPV-Tun2 and SpliMNPV-AN1956 were 98.2% identical and the hrs in both genomes were at the same location. The genome of SpliNPV-Tun2 was 899 bp shorter than that of SpliMNPV-AN1956 through alignment of the 2 genomes revealed the same number of ORFs, but with some differences. Sixty-nine ORF had a 100% predicted amino acid identity to SpliMNPV-AN1956 ORFs. The rest of the ORFs' amino acid identities ranged between 90 and 99%, whereas ORF 37 had only 97% amino acid (aa) sequence identity (Table 2). The sequences encoding putative proteins accounted for 88.4% for SpliNPV-Tun2, while the coding density was 87.9% in SpliMNPV-AN1956. The number of intergenic regions is 101 for SpliNPV-Tun2 and 102 in SpliMNPV-AN1956, with mean distances of 124 bp and 121 bp, respectively. Some of the intergenic regions consisted of palindromic sequences; both isolates contained 15 hrs at the same genome location (Table 2).
Phylogenetic reconstruction and genetic distance
A minimum evolution phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated amino acid sequences of 38 baculovirus core genes of group I and group II NPVs was inferred (Fig. 3). It corroborated the close relationship between SpliNPV-Tun2 and -AN1956. The next neighbour to both isolates was SpltNPV-G2. The SpliNPV isolates and SpltNPV-G2 are only distantly related to other Spodoptera-specific NPVs, such as SeMNPV, SpltNPV-II and Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV) (Fig. 3).
For baculovirus species demarcation, the Kimura-2-Parameter (K2P) distance of the 38 baculovirus core genes can be used as criterion, according to which, 2 isolates are considered to belong to the same species if their K2P distance is smaller < 0.021 and to different species if the K2P distance is > 0.072 (Wennmann et al. 2018). With a K2P distance of 0.001, SpliNPV-Tun2 and -AN1956 are 2 isolates belonging to the same species Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus. In contrast, SpltNPV-G2 is distant enough (0.099 from the two viruses to constitute a separate species Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (Wennmann et al. 2018). The other known Spodoptera-specific NPV isolates constitute several other discrete species (Fig. 3).
Main genome differences between SpliNPV-Tun2 and -AN1956
Compared to SpliNPV-AN1956, the new isolate SpliNPV-Tun2 showed insertion and deletion mutations in 62 ORFs, of which 37 ORFs are with predicted function. ORFs with significant changes caused by deletions and insertions are illustrated in (Fig. 4). These differences affect ORFs coding for predicted virus proteins related to virus structure, such as the structural protein PP78/81, the capsid-associated protein VP80 and VP1054, the OB matrix protein (Polyhedrin, POLH), the nucleotide metabolism (Ribonucleotide Reductase, RR1), proteins involved in viral DNA replication (Late Expression Factor 2 (LEF-2) and LEF-10, Protein kinase 1 (PK-1), LEF-5, and the group II Alphabaculovirus-specific HOAR and the BRO-a. Furthermore, a considerable number of amino acid changes were found but will not be further detailed here.
A notable difference is the presence of a tyrosine residue close to the N-terminus fifth amino acid position of the predicted POLH of SpliNPV-Tun2, a residue which is missing in the POLH of SpliNPV-AN1956 (Fig. 4). Another difference between the genome sequences of SpliNPV-Tun2 and -AN1956 is related to ORFs 106 and 107. Whereas in SpliNPV-AN1956 two ORF 106 and ORF 107 were located from genome position 110,884 < 111,843 (319 aa) and 111,873 < 112,064 (63 aa), respectively, these two ORFs were identified as one single ORF in SpliNPV-Tun2 (ORF 106, genome position 109,998 < 111,161, (387 aa)). The split of the ORF 106 homolog of SpliNPV-Tun2 into two ORFs 106 and 107 in SpliNPV-AN1956 is caused by a missing thymidine residue at genome position 110,991 of SpliNPV-AN1956, causing a frameshift and separation into two ORFs (Fig. 5). Interestingly, a similar homologous ORF 110 (genome position 107,915 < 109,045, 376 aa) is present in the narrowly related SpltNPV-G2, which may suggest a variation in SpliNPV-AN1956 or a sequencing error at this position in the original sequence of SpliNPV-AN1956. Compared to SpliNPV-AN1956, SpliNPV-Tun2 encodes an additional ORF 107 (111,207 > 111,408, 67 aa), which 5′ region overlaps with the 5′ region of the adjacent ORF 108. In SpltNPV-G2, the 5′ region of ORF 111 (109,007 > 109,165, 52 aa) would be homologous to the 3′ region of ORF 107 of –Tun2 (Fig. 5).
A new variant of SpliNPV, termed Tun2, was isolated and characterized by bioassays and genome sequencing. SpliNPV-Tun2 was found in a S. littoralis colony that was derived from larvae collected in tomato fields in Central-East Tunisia, in 2013. Another natural SpliNPV-Tun isolate was found in 2008 from tomato field in Chott-Mariem (Sousse) (Laarif et al. 2011), suggesting that SpliNPV is present in wild populations of S. littoralis in Tunisia. Though the conditions of bioassays performed with SpliNPV-Tun2 were not fully identical to the bioassays carried out with SpliNPV-Tun, both the LC50 and the ST50 values were similar, suggesting that both isolates may not have significant biological differences.
OB productivity was quantified in the fourth instar larvae, as this instar was identified to be optimal for virus production (Grzywacz et al. 1998). Three different methods for OB purification were tested, of which the low-speed centrifugation (LSC) method (Harrison 2008) producing the highest yields of polyhedral OBs, which corresponded to an OB yield of about 4.2 × 109 OB/larvae. The superiority of LSC for polyhedral OB purification compared to sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (SGU) and sucrose cushion centrifugation (SCC) was previously noted for isolation of Agrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus by Wennmann and Jehle (2014). LSC and SCC are methods typically used for OB purification from NPVs (Harrison 2008), whereas SGU appears to counter-select for NPV polyhedra but favours purification of GV granules yielding about five times less NPV OBs than the other 2 methods (Wennmann and Jehle 2014).
Whole genome sequencing of SpliNPV-Tun2 revealed its close relationship to SpliNPV-AN1956 (Breitenbach et al. 2013), another isolate of SpliNPV from North Africa, which originated from Egypt and was first described by Abul Nasr (1956). Other isolates of SpliNPV from North Africa and the Mediterranean area were reported by Laarif et al. (2011). Only a few differences between the genome sequence of SpliNPV-Tun2 SpliNPV-AN1956 were noted: (i) the genome of SpliNPV-Tun2 is little shorter, (ii) both genomes contain the same number of ORFs and hrs and are fully collinear to each other, (iii) minor indel mutations could be identified in 34 ORFs as well as in intergenic regions, (iv) genetic changes were noticed in nine baculovirus core genes, and also in the highly conserved polh gene, and (v) the ORFs 106 and 107 of SpliNPV-AN1956 appeared to be fused to a single ORF 106 in SpliNPV-Tun2 but an additional ORF 107 was identified.
Phylogenetic analyses based on the 38 baculovirus core genes have been shown to reflect isolate and species phylogeny of baculovirus evolution and are considered as the most reliable method to infer the phylogenetic position of a given baculovirus (Wennmann et al. 2018). Our Minimum Evolution phylogenetic analysis revealed SpliNPV-AN156 and SpltNPV-G2 as closest neighbours of SpliNPV-Tun2. SpltNPV-G2 is an in vivo cloned genotype of an isolate separated from cadavers of S. litura, cotton leaf worm, in the area of Guangzhou, China (Pang et al.2001). Breitenbach et al. (2013) found that SplitNPV-AN1956 and SpltNPV-G2 share a highly collinear genome and form a distantly related clade to other NPVs specific for Spodoptera species, such as SeMNPV, SfMNPV, and SpltNPV-II. Our phylogenetic analyses confirm that SplitNPV-Tun2, -AN1956, and SpltNPV-G2 form a clade of Spodoptera-specific NPVs which is separate from other group II alphabaculoviruses isolated from Spodoptera species, such as SeMNPV, SpltNPV-II, and SfMNPV. K2P distances of the 38 core genes clearly indicate that SpliNPV-Tun2 and -AN1956 should be considered as isolates from the same species, whereas SpltNPV-G2 belongs to a separate alphabaculovirus species, as well as all other even more distant NPVs isolated from Spodoptera sp. (Wennmann et al. 2018; Escasa et al.2019).
Identification and genome sequence of the new isolate SpliNPV-Tun2 originating from Tunisia extended the present knowledge related to the genetic diversity of SpliNPV. With the detailed characterization of its genome, SpliNPV-Tun2 is proposed to be further evaluated as a biological agent for control of S. littoralis and potentially for the fall armyworm, S. frugiperda, and tobacco cutworm S. litura.
Availability of data and materials
On request from authors.
Homologous repeat regions
Occlusion derived virion
Open reading frame
Polymerase chain reaction
- LC50 :
Median lethal concentration
Sucrose cushion centrifugation
Sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation
- ST50 :
Median survival time
Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267
Abdel-Khalik LE, El-Sheikh E, Ragheb D, Ashour M (2017) Efficacy and virulence of Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus on S littoralis larval feeding and susceptibility. Zagazig J Agricult Res 44:261–271. https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2017.53955
Abul Nasr S (1956) Polyhedrosis virus disease on cotton leafworm prodenia litura F. Bull Entomol Soc Egypt 40:321–332
Bernal A, Williams T, Hernández-Suárez E, Carnero A, Caballero P, Simón O (2013) A native variant of Chrysodeixis chalcites nucleopolyhedrovirus: the basis for a promising bioinsecticide for control of C. chalcites on Canary Islands’ banana crops. Biol Control 67:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.08.006
Breitenbach JE, el El-Sheikh SA, Harrison RL, Rowley DL, Sparks ME, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Popham HJ (2013) Determination and analysis of the genome sequence of Spodoptera littoralis multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Res 171:194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.11.016
Cherry CL, Summers MD (1985) Genotypic variation among wild isolates of two nuclear polyhedrosis viruses isolated from Spodoptera littoralis. J Invertebr Pathol 46:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(85)90071-0
Eberle KE, Wennmann JT, Kleespies RG, Jehle JA (2012) Chapter II-basic techniques in insect virology. In: Lacey LA (ed) Manual of techniques in invertebrate pathology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 15–74
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform 5:113
El-Salamouny S, Lange M, Jutzi M, Huber J, Jehle JA (2003) Comparative study on the susceptibility of cutworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Agrotis segetum nucleopolyhedrovirus and Agrotis ipsilon nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Invertebr Pathol 84:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2003.08.005
El-Sheikh E (2015) Efficacy of Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus on Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) and Spodoptera exigua (Hübner): virulence biological effects and inhibition of juvenile hormone esterase. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 25(3):587–595
Escasa SR, Harrison RL, Mowery JD, Bauchan GR, Cory JS (2019) The complete genome sequence of an alphabaculovirus from Spodoptera exempta, an agricultural pest of major economic significance in Africa. PLoS ONE 14(2):e0209937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170510
Grzywacz D, Jones KA, Moawad G, Cherry A (1998) The in vivo production of Spodoptera littoralis nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Virol Meth 71:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0934(97)00209-7
Gueli Alletti G, Sauer AJ, Weihrauch B, Fritsch E, Undorf-Spahn K, Wennmann JT, Jehle JA (2017) Using next generation sequencing to identify and quantify the genetic composition of resistance-breaking commercial isolates of Cydia pomonella granulovirus. Viruses 9(9):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9090250
Hajek AE, Shapiro-Ilan DI (2018) Ecology of invertebrate diseases. Wiley, Hoboken
Harrison RL (2008) Genomic sequence analysis of the Illinois strain of the Agrotis ipsilon multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Genes 38:155–170
Harrison RL, Herniou EA, Jehle JA, Theilmann DA, Burand JP, Becnel JJ, Krell PJ, van Oers MM, Mowery JD, Bauchan GR (2018) Virus taxonomy profile: baculoviridae. J Gen Virol 99:1185–1186. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001107
Jakubowska AK, Lynn DE, Herrero S, Vlak JM, van Oers MM (2010) Host-range expansion of Spodoptera exigua multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus to Agrotis segetum larvae when the midgut is bypassed. J Gen Virol 91:898–906. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.015842-0
Jehle JA, Blissard G, Bonning W, BC, Cory JS, Herniou EA, Rohrmann GF, Theilmann DA, Thiem SM, Vlak JM, (2006) On the classification and nomenclature of baculoviruses: a proposal for revision. Arch Virol 151:1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-006-0763-6
Kislev N, Edelman M (1982) DNA restriction-pattern differences from geographic isolates of Spodoptera littoralis nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology 119:219–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(82)90081-2
Kumar S, Stecher G, Koichiro T (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 70 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33(7):1870–1874
Laarif A, Salhi E, Fattouch S, Hammouda MHB (2011) Molecular detection and biological characterization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate (Tun-SlNPV) from Spodoptera littoralis in Tunisian tomato greenhouses. Annals Biolog Res 2(4):180–191
Martins T, Montiel R, Medeiros J, Oliveira L, Simoes N (2005) Occurrence and characterization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus from Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) isolated in the azores. J Invertebr Pathol 89:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2005.06.012
Moscardi F (1999) Assessment of the application of baculoviruses for control of Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 44:257–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.257
Pang Y, Yu J, Wang L, Hu X, Bao W, Li G, Chen C, Han H, Hu S, Yang H (2001) Sequence analysis of the Spodoptera litura multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus genome. Virology 287:391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-005-5840-5
Shaurub ESH, Abd El-Meguid A, Abd El-Aziz NM (2014) Quantitative and ultrastructural changes in the haemocytes of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) treated individually or in combination with Spodoptera littoralis multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliMNPV) and azadirachtin. Micron 65:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2014.04.010
Shorey HH, Gaston LK (1965) Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. V. Circadian rhythm of pheromone-responsiveness in males of Autographa californica, Heliothis virescens, Spodoptera exigua and Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 58:597–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/58.5.597
Takatsuka J, Okuno S, Nakai M, Kunimi Y (2016) Genetic and phenotypic comparisons of viral genotypes from two nucleopolyhedroviruses interacting with a common host species Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Invertebr Pathol 139:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2016.07.009
Wennmann JT, Jehle JA (2014) Detection and quantitation of Agrotis baculoviruses in mixed infections. J Virol Methods 197:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.11.010
Wennmann JT, Keilwagen J, Jehle JA (2018) Baculovirus Kimura two-parameter species demarcation criterion is confirmed by the distances of 38 core gene nucleotide sequences. J Gen Virol 99:1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001100
Andreas Larem (JKI) is acknowledged for reviewing early versions of the manuscript.
The Programme d’Appui au Système de Recherche et d’Innovation, financé par l’Union Européenne (PASRI) and the Agence Nationale de Promotion de la Recherche Scientifique (ANPR) are acknowledged for supporting parts of this research.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ben Tiba, S., Laarif, A., Wennmann, J.T. et al. Biological activity and genome composition of a Tunisian isolate of Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV-Tun2). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00568-w
- Egyptian cotton leaf worm
- Spodoptera littoralis
- Survival time analysis
- Illumina sequencing
- Genome annotation
- Biological control