Skip to main content

Systemic resistance induction of tomato plants against tomato mosaic virus by microalgae

Abstract

Background

Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) is a dangerous disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) that reduces dramatically the yield. To reduce ToMV infection, microalgal isolates were utilized. Microalgal species (Chlorella vulgaris, Anabaena oryzae, Spirulina platensis, Nostoc linckia and Dunaliella salina) were shown to be responsible for the stimulation of tomato resistance against ToMV.

Results

Initial signs of discoloration and mosaic in ToMV-inoculated plants were detected and identified on inoculated leaves at 6 and 12 dpi in control and treated plants, respectively, suggesting that microalgae may inhibit ToMV growth. Treatment with microalgae resulted in a significant decrease in symptoms (up to 63% reduction in disease severity) and negative ELISA readings, indicating that the microalgae induced resistance in tomato against ToMV infection. The isolates also enhanced the activity of pathogenesis-related enzymes (PPO and POX reaching to 0.033 and 0.054 in D. salina, respectively), as well as tomato growth characters in comparison with the control. Microalgal treatments demonstrated that the salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) pathways were involved in tomato plant defense responses. The relative gene expressions of PR1 and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), which are involved in the SA and JA pathways, respectively, were improved in treated plants compared to the control.

Conclusion

The findings indicated that algal-induced ToMV resistance was mediated via several defense pathways in tomato. The antiviral mechanism was described, which provides a light on the potential of algae in plant viral disease management.

Background

Plant diseases are widely regarded as one of agriculture's most damaging factors. Several viral diseases have seriously affected tomato production, resulting in significant financial losses (Balogun 2008). Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) is one of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) strains (Fernandes et al. 2006). ToMV triggers prevalent plant viral infections, causing significant crop losses all over the world. ToMV has been found to infect different plant species, including crops, flowers, and weeds. The growing leaves may be deformed, usually twisted with the leaflets becoming considerably narrower. The fruits are typically tiny and misshaped, develop irregularly and exhibit yellow discoloration, often in rings, as well as interior localized brown necrotic regions (Cerkauskas 2004). ToMV is difficult to control, because it is easily spread anywhere as it is mechanically transferred, and symptoms appear 6–14 days after infection (dpi) in susceptible plants (Ara et al. 2012). Additionally, the traditional chemical treatments are ineffective in protecting plants against ToMV infection due to the virus's great genetic variability. Furthermore, the application of non-biodegradable chemicals pollutes the environment severely. Physical barriers and reflecting mulches have traditionally been used to control viral diseases (Hilje et al. 2001). As a result, it is critical to search for new biocontrol agents against plant viral disease. Plants that have been treated with beneficial endophytes have improved their induced systemic resistance (ISR) against a variety of diseases. The molecular mechanism of their antiviral action, on the other hand, is still unclear.

Biological control agents that are effective, dependable and environmentally friendly have received a lot of attention in recent decades (Elsharkawy et al. 2012). Viral plant diseases were mostly controlled with the use of bacterial biocontrol agents such as Bacillus spp. and fungal biocontrol agents such as Trichoderma spp. (Kumar et al. 2016). Algae are old photosynthetic microorganisms that is between prokaryotic cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae (Parker et al. 2008). Algae are often categorized based on morphology and life cycle (Blaby-Haas and Merchant 2019). There are about 800,000 species of algae in the world, but only 5,000 of them have been identified until now. Only a limited number of algal species have been chosen to test their practical applicability in plant development under controlled conditions. Prokaryotic Anabaena variabilis application as a root-drench treatment decreased damping-off symptoms in tomato (Chaudhary et al. 2012).

Disease-resistant proteins constitute the majority of the resistance pathways. In the ISR signaling pathways, salicylic acid (SA) plays a critical role. SA levels in the phloem were improved after infection (Elsharkawy et al. 2012). Transgenic plants carrying the bacterial nahG gene, which encodes naphthalene hydroxylase G, are unable to accumulate SA, and their ISR response was blocked (Delaney et al. 1994). The PAL enzyme is critical for plant defense and is one of the most extensively researched enzymes in all secondary metabolisms. It is involved in defense mechanisms and operates upstream of SA biosynthesis (Buchanan et al. 2000). PAL begins biochemical processes that lead to the production of SA. Plant proteins that are activated in pathogenic conditions are known as pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs). A variety of PRs are effective anti-pathogenic compounds (Van Loon et al. 1994). Infection with bacteria, viruses, fungi or viroids may induce the production of PRs in plants (Elsharkawy et al. 2012). Additionally, biotic inducers stimulate the production of many PR proteins, including isozymes of peroxidase and chitinase (Singh et al. 2008). The basic pathogenesis-related protein (PAL), which is grouped in JA dependent marker genes, is essential for the JA pathway. Tomato plants infected with tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) have been demonstrated to produce defense-related proteins after treatment with P. fluorescens (Kandan et al. 2005).

The study aimed to evaluate the antiviral activity of algal species; Chlorella vulgaris, Anabaena oryzae, Spirulina platensis, Nostoc linckia and Dunaliella salina against ToMV infection in tomato, as well as the potential mechanisms involved.

Methods

Leaf samples, demonstrating dark green mosaic or mottling, were collected. The tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) was detected in tomato plants by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), using antiserum specific for ToMV (Elsharkawy et al. 2012). The virus was biologically purified using a modified single local lesion method on Nicotiana glutinosa (El-Kammar et al. 2016). Symptomatology and methods of transmission were considered for virus identification.

Plant materials and growth conditions

Algal treatments of the species (C. vulgaris, A. oryzae, S. platensis, N. linckia and D. salina) were prepared before soil drench applications. In 50 ml conical tubes, 10 g of dried algae and 20 ml of solvent, such as ethanol, were mixed. The tubes were placed in a reciprocating shaker for 24 h to ensure constant agitation at 150 revolutions per minute for mixing and full clarification of bioactive components to dissolve in the appropriate solvent. The tubes were then centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min at 4000 rpm to collect the supernatants, which were then filtered using Whatman no. 1 filter paper. The solvent was extracted by vacuum evaporation at 50 °C in a water bath. The residues were then obtained and utilized in the experiments. Specific media were used for A. oryzae (watanabe medium), S. platensis (Zarrouk medium) and D. salina (modified Johnson medium).

Under greenhouse conditions (Kafr Elsheikh University), 120 tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings were carefully transplanted into plastic pots (25 cm in diameter) containing sterilized sand and clay soil mixtures (3:1, v/v). Seedlings were cultivated in a growth chamber with a 16/8 h photoperiod and fertilized as recommended once a week. Twenty infected seedlings were utilized for viral replication. Twenty seedlings (3-week-old seedlings) were utilized for each algal treatment (6.0 × 106 cells/ml and 10 ml per seedling), and the remaining 20 seedlings were used as a control treatment.

Assessment of disease severity

The severity of symptoms and the concentration of ToMV were used to determine the level of ToMV resistance. The disease severity was calculated at 2 weeks post-virus inoculation (WPI) and represented as a percentage of plants exhibiting ToMV symptoms. The severity of the disease was determined by visual observation of viral symptoms using an arbitrary scale devised by Wang et al. (2009), with 0 indicating no symptoms, 1 indicating light mottling and a few thin yellow veins, 2 indicating mottling and vein clearing unequally distributed on the leaf, 3 indicating mottling, leaf distortion and stunting and 4 indicating severe mottling, leaf curling and stunting. The severity index was calculated for each group of plants using the method given by Raupach et al. (1996).

$${\text{Disease}}\,{\text{severity}}\,{\text{index}}\,(\% ) = \sum \left( {\frac{{{\text{Disease}}\,{\text{grade}}\,{*}\,{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{plants}}\,{\text{in}}\,{\text{that}}\,{\text{grade}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\,{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{plants}}\,*\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{highest}}\,{\text{disease}}\,{\text{grade}}}}} \right)\,*\,100$$

ToMV concentration was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described by Elsharkawy et al. (2012). Plant height, shoot fresh and dry weights and fruits weight per plant were measured by the end of the experiment.

Enzyme activity assays

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was assessed according to Zhu (1990). Homogenized leaf tissue (1 g) was centrifuged at 8000g in 250 µl of 50 mM of sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5) for 30 min at 4 °C. As an enzyme extract, 0.1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and 0.1 mM pyrogallol. There was no pyrogallol in the control mixture. Each sample's absorbance was measured as the rate of increase in absorbency at 525 nm.

Peroxidase (POD) activity was determined by Moerschbacher et al. (1998). Homogenized leaf tissue (1 g) was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm in 5 ml of buffer (pH 7.0) with 0.1% EDTA (SIGMA) and 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone (SIGMA) for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (0.1 ml) as an enzyme extract was mixed with 100 µl guaiacol 20 mM and 40 µl of 0.1% H2O2. Each sample's absorbance was monitored at 470 nm. The activities were measured as absorbance min−1 g−1 fresh weight.

Real-time (RT)-qPCR analysis of defense-related genes expression

After 2 days of virus inoculation, samples were taken from both treated and control tomato plants in triplicate. RNA-later kit (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) was utilized for RNA extraction. Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (K1621, Fermentas) was used for reverse transcription. For PCR analysis, the reverse transcription products were utilized as templates. In a final volume of 25 μl, 1X SYBR green Fluorescein Mix, 250 nM of each primer and 1 μl of cDNA were added to conduct real-time PCR. The relative expression of PR1 and PAL genes was calculated against the UBI3 (Table 1). The threshold cycles were determined using a melt curve temperature after amplification (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

Table 1 Forward and reverse primers sequence for pathogenesis-related genes

Data analysis

Analysis of variance was performed on experimental data. The experiments were carried out 3 times. Using WASP—Pro Software, Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT, P ≤ 0.05) was used to split the mean values into two groups.

Results

Effect of algae treatments on disease severity

Discoloration and mosaic symptoms were initially observed on the leaves of ToMV-infected plants at 7 dpi (days post-inoculation) in non-treated pots, whereas non-inoculated plants did not exhibit any ToMV symptoms. For the plants treated with algae, the symptoms began to appear on the leaves at 11 dpi. ToMV-inoculated plants were smaller in the absence of algae, having smaller and narrower leaves. Plants treated with algae, especially D. salina, had less severe ToMV symptoms (Fig. 1). Infected plants were typically healthier, taller, and more robust in algal treatment than those growing in non-treated pots. When compared to non-treated plants, treatments with D. salina and C. vulgaris decreased the severity of ToMV-inoculated plants by 63 and 56%, respectively (Fig. 1). Similarly, when diseased plants were treated with A. oryzae, N. linckia and S. platensis, the virus severity was decreased by 46, 35 and 32%, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Disease severity of virus-inoculated tomato plants treated with different microalgal isolates in comparison with control plants at two weeks post-inoculation

Effect of algae treatments on ToMV concentration

Two weeks after being inoculated with ToMV-infected sap, seedlings of inoculated tomato plants began to exhibit symptoms and provided a positive ELISA response. Infected plants (control) displayed the ideal severe symptoms with a fully positive ELISA reactions, whereas the plants treated algae displayed no symptoms with negative ELISA reactions. In D. salina treatment, there was a significant decrease in symptoms with complete negative ELISA readings. Infected plants treated with other algal species exhibited the same impact of significant symptom reduction with full negative ELISA readings, indicating algae's antiviral activity (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tomato mosaic virus accumulation in tomato plants treated with different microalgal isolates in comparison with control plants at two weeks post-inoculation

Plant growth, and morphological parameters

When compared to the control, the treated plants exhibited significant increases in height, fresh and dry weights and fruits weight per plant (Fig. 3). The leaves, especially the freshly emerging ones, were distorted to varying degrees. Algae had typically accelerated the development of non-infected and ToMV-inoculated plants, with the greatest impact at D. salina. In the presence of pathogen, D. salina treatment enhanced plant height to 44.7 cm than corresponding controls (29.7 cm) (Table 2). Plant fresh and dry weights increased to 44.8 and 5.1 g, respectively, in response to D. salina treatment, when compared to the corresponding controls (Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of algal treatments on tomato fruit weight per plant after tomato mosaic virus inoculation compared to non-treated infected control

Table 2 Plant height (cm), shoot fresh weight (g) and dry weight (g) of tomato plants treated with algae isolates and infected with tomato mosaic virus

Defense-related enzymes activity

When compared to the control, the activity of POX in the plants treated with algae was elevated in response to ToMV infection (10 dpi) (Table 3). In comparison with their respective controls, infected plants treated with D. salina and C. vulgaris exhibited the highest increase in POX activity (Table 3). Furthermore, when treated with at A. oryzae, N. linckia and S. platensis, ToMV-infected plants showed slight increases in POX activity than corresponding controls (Table 3).

Table 3 Activities of peroxidase (POX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes in tomato plants treated with microalgal isolates and infected with Tomato mosaic virus

Tomato plants treated with D. salina and infected with ToMV had a greater impact on PPO enzyme activity than other treatments, including treatment with C. vulgaris. The PPO activities reached 0.033 and 0.028 in D. salina and C. vulgaris, respectively. Treatment by N. linckia achieved the lowest activity of PPO, reaching 0.022 (Table 3).

Effect of algae on defense-related gene expression

PAL and PR1 transcription levels significantly increased in the treated plants than in the non-treatment plants at 2 dpi (Fig. 4). D. salina- and C. vulgaris-treated plants showed 5.7- and 4.6-fold increases in the relative expression of PAL, respectively, as compared to the control plants. PR1, like the PAL expression, was considerably elevated, with relative transcription levels in the D. salina- and C. vulgaris-treated tomato plants being 7.3- and 5.9-fold higher than the control, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The transcription levels of PAL and PR1 genes in tomato plants in control and treated plants using real-time quantitative PCR analysis at 2 days post-inoculation

Discussion

Viral plant disease management using useful microorganisms has gained a lot of attention, since it is a safe and environmentally friendly method of managing viruses (Elsharkawy et al. 2013). Bacteria and fungi constitute the majority of the biocontrol agents employed to control viral plant diseases (Elsharkawy et al. 2012). The use of algae for biocontrol of viral plant diseases is still limited, and their potential actions against viral diseases are not understandable. High activities of certain important enzymes, such as peroxidase (POX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), the first enzymes to react and provide rapid defense against plant diseases, are usually linked with increased lignification (Sulman et al. 2001). POX activity was substantially increased in algae-treated and ToMV-inoculated plants with the impact being much more pronounced in ToMV-inoculated plants treated with D. salina. Induction of POXs in response to pathogen inoculation has been observed in many pathosystems, with resistant plants showing a greater rise than susceptible plants (Houterman et al. 2007). POX activity was also enhanced in plant–virus interactions in beans—white clover mosaic potexvirus (Clarke et al. 2002), and pumpkin—cucumber mosaic virus and zucchini yellow mosaic virus (Clarke et al. 2002). During the defensive response, POXs are known to engage in a variety of processes including polysaccharide bonding, phenol oxidation, suberization and lignification of cell walls (Carvalho et al. 2006). As a result, the increased activity of POX in algae-treated plants reported in this research may contribute to the lignification process, which is thought to be a pathogen resistance mechanism.

Algae have just recently been used as biocontrol agents for plant diseases. The antiviral activity of algae against ToMV on tomato plants was investigated in this research. Furthermore, the POX and PPO activities in leaves of treated plants at 10 dpi have been identified. The effects of algae on ToMV-CP accumulation and expression of two defense-related genes (PAL and PR1) at 2 dpi, on the other hand, were analyzed. The transcription levels were sharply raised in tomato plants infected with ToMV in the research model. Algal treatments improved plant growth parameters, reduced disease symptoms and lowered viral accumulation levels in greenhouse studies as compared to infected control tomato plants. ToMV-infected tomato plants cultivated with algae grew faster and better than virus-infected tomato control plants. The shoot fresh and dry weights were greatly increased in tomato plants treated with algae and inoculated with ToMV, but decreased dramatically in tomato plants infected with ToMV only. Increased plant development may be a result of algae's potential to promote the production of a variety of phytohormones and their ability to generate a variety of substances.

Obtained findings were consistent with those of the previous research on the utilization of plant secondary metabolites to control plant viral diseases such as ToMV. Actinomycetes, fungi and bacteria are among the microorganisms employed in the treatment against plant disease (Elsharkawy et al. 2013). Plant pathogens such as ToMV and cucumber mosaic virus treated with elicitors produced from microorganisms, improved plant's resistance to these pathogens (Elsharkawy et al. 2013).

Antiviral action of algae against ToMV was demonstrated in this research. This research is the first to look into how algae work against plant viruses. The suppressive impact of algae may be due to induced systemic resistance (indicated by higher POX and PPO activities and transcription levels of PAL and PR1 in the leaves of tomato plants treated with algae). In this study, algae's antiviral and stimulant abilities were shown by reducing ToMV virus symptoms and activating the expression of 2 genes, PR1 and PAL, which are involved in the SA and JA pathways, respectively. The expression levels of both treated and control tomato plants were assessed, 2 days following ToMV inoculation. PR1 and PAL expression levels were greater in algae-treated tomato seedlings than in untreated seedlings. Treated tomato plants and challenged with ToMV showed increasing PAL and PR1 levels, with relative expression levels representing sixfold and eightfold changes, respectively, which were higher than control samples. Interestingly, both treatments, i.e., D. salina and C. vulgaris + virus-treated plants, exhibited an induction and overexpression of PAL and PR1. The D. salina + virus-treated plants showed the highest expression levels of PR1 and PAL, with a relative expression level representing a 7.3- and 5.7-fold change higher than the control plants. Consequently, it is suggested that D. salina may work as an elicitor molecule that induced the immune defense system, which may result in ISR activation. In this context, tomato plants pre-treated with Streptomyces pactum Act12 exhibited an induction of PR1 and enhanced POX and PAL activities in tomato leaves, resulting in the development of SAR against TYLCV (Li et al. 2019). Plant resistance was regulated by PR2 gene, which is a common marker gene involved in the SA biosynthesis pathway, and their expressions were observed after infection in tomato (El-Shafeey et al. 2019).

Conclusions

In addition to all their other activities in the environment and agriculture, algae should be examined more in the areas of plant resistance induction and biocontrol. The findings revealed that algae promoted tomato resistance to ToMV infection by activating various plant defense systems. When compared to the untreated control, the treated plants showed much higher levels of defensive enzyme activities. Finally, this research may represent a step forward in the use of useful algae as a potential environmentally friendly disease control strategy. However, further research is required to determine the specific pathways behind algae-induced systemic resistance in other phytopathosystems.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are available.

Abbreviations

ToMV:

Tomato mosaic virus

SA:

Salicylic acid

JA:

Jasmonic acid

PAL:

Phenylalanine ammonia lyase

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

PPO:

Polyphenol oxidase

POD:

Peroxidase

References

  • Ara I, Bukhari NA, Aref NM, Shinwari MMA, Bakir MA (2012) Antiviral activities of streptomycetes against tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in Datura plant: evaluation of different organic compounds in their metabolites. Afr J Biotechnol 11:2130–2138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun OS (2008) Seedlings age at inoculation and infection sequence affect disease and growth responses in tomato mixed infected with Potato virus X and Tomato mosaic virus. Int J Agric Biol 10:145–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaby-Haas CE, Merchant SS (2019) Comparative and functional algal genomics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 70:605–638

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants, 2nd edn. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho D, Anastacio Q, Luciana M (2006) Proteins and isozymes electrophoresis in seeds of Desti (Leguminosae caesalpinioidea) artificially aged. Rev Arv 30:19–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerkauskas R (2004) Tobacco mosaic virus, tomato mosaic virus. In: Kalb T (ed) Pepper diseases. AVRDC – The World Vegetable Center, Taiwan, ROC, Fact Sheet 04-594. http://www.avrdc.org/LC/pepper/TMV

  • Chaudhary V, Prasanna R, Nain L, Dubey S, Gupta V, Singh R et al (2012) Bioefficacy of novel cyanobacteria-amended formulations in suppressing damping off disease in tomato seedlings. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:3301–3310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1141-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SF, Guy PL, Burritt DJ, Jameson PE (2002) Changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes in response to virus infection and hormone treatment. Physiol Plant 114:157–164

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney TP, Uknes S, Vernooij B, Friedrich L, Weymann K, Negrotto D, Gaffiney T, Gut-Rella M, Kessmann H, Ward E, Ryals JA (1994) Central role of salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Science 266:1247–1250

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kammar HF, El-Banna OM, Hamed AH, Abbas MS, El-Attar AK (2016) Serological, molecular and ultrastructural studies on tobacco rattle virus-infected potato plants in Egypt. J Plant Pathol 98(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Shafeey IE, El-Khateeb NMM, Elsharkawy MM, Elsary GS, Homayed SH (2019) Induction of systemic resistance against Meloidogyne incognita by different chemical and biological inducers in tomato plants. Fresenius Environ Bull 28:6692–6700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsharkawy MM, Shimizu M, Takahashi H, Hyakumachi M (2012) Induction of systemic resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus by Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Pathol 61:964–976

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsharkawy MM, Shimizu M, Takahashi H, Ozaki K, Hyakumachi M (2013) Induction of systemic resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus in Arabidopsis thaliana by Trichoderma asperellum SKT-1. Plant Pathol J 29:193–200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes JJ, Carvalho MG, Andrade EC, Brommonschenkel SH, Fontes EPB, Zerbini FM (2006) Biological and molecular properties of Tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV), a new tomato-infecting begomovirus from Brazil. Plant Pathol 55(4):513–522

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilje L, Costa HS, Stansly PA (2001) Cultural practices for managing Bemisia tabaci and associated viral diseases. Crop Prot 20:801–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houterman PM, Speijer D, Dekker HL, Koster DE, CG, Cornelissen BJC, Rep M. (2007) The mixed xylem sap proteome of Fusarium oxysporum-infected tomato plants. Mol Plant Pathol 8:215–221

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandan A, Ramiah M, Vasanthi VJ, Radjacommare R, Nandakumar R, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R (2005) Use of Pseudomonas fluorescens-based formulations for management of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and enhanced yield in tomato. Biocontrol Sci Technol 15:553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Mishra S, Dixit V, Kumar M, Agarwal L, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS (2016) Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Signal Behav 11:e1071004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Guo Q, Li Y, Sun Y, Xue Q, Lai H (2019) Streptomyces pactum Act12 controls tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease and alters rhizosphere microbial communities. Biol Fertil Soils 55:149–169

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−CT method. Meth 25:402–408

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbacher BM, Noll UM, Flott BE (1998) Lignin biosynthetic enzymes in stem rust infected, resistance and susceptible nearisogenic wheat lines. Ann Mol Pathol 33(1):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker MS, Mock T, Armbrust EV (2008) Genomic insights into marine microalgae. Annu Rev Genet 42:619–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.091417

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach GS, Liu L, Murphy JF, Tuzun S, Kloepper JW (1996) Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant Dis 80:91–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Pandey P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2008) Biological control of root rot fungus Macrophomina phaseolina and growth enhancement of Pinus roxburghii (Sarg.) by rhizosphere competent Bacillus subtilis BN1. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulman M, Fox G, Osman A, Inkerman A, Williams P, Michalowitz M (2001) Relationship between total peroxidase activity and susceptibility to black point in mature grain of some barley cultivars. In: Proceeding of the 10th Australian barley technical symposium

  • Van Loon LC, Pierpoint WS, Boller TH, Conejero V (1994) Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wu H, Qiao J, Ma L, Liu J, Xia Y, Gao X (2009) Molecular mechanism of plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance to tobacco mosaic virus by Bacillus spp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:1250–1258

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu GL, Zhong HW, Zhang AQ (1990) Plant physiological experimentation. Peking University Press, Beijing, pp 37–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University for funding current work by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP—2020/142), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

The authors were appreciated Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP—2020/142), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EMM and HA carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. EMK, GKE, SIB, AA, SH and AMKM revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Mohamed Elsharkawy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsharkawy, M.M., El-Okkiah, S., Elsadany, A.Y. et al. Systemic resistance induction of tomato plants against tomato mosaic virus by microalgae. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 32, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00538-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00538-2

Keywords

  • Algae
  • Tomato mosaic virus
  • Tomato
  • Jasmonic acid
  • Salicylic acid
  • Defense response