Skip to main content

Molecular characterization and biological activity of native Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate

Abstract

Background

Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV) is considered a promising biocontrol agent that can be used for the effective control of the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), which is an economic pest on many cultivated plants and crops in tropical and sub-tropical regions. The genome of the SpliNPV-AN1956 isolate has been fully sequenced, providing a reference strain for comparison of new isolates. In this study, identification, biological activity, and genetic characterization of a field collected SpliNPV isolate were carried out.

Results

The examination of viral occlusion bodies (OBs) by TEM showed a typical baculovirus OBs of type nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) with polyhedral structures. The phylogenetic analysis of the late expression factor- 5 (lef-5) gene as well as the restriction profile analysis confirmed the identity of SpliNPV as a variant isolate. Digestion with ScaI endonuclease showed that 4 fragments of 50, 35, 27, and 13 kb were detected but 3.2 kb was absent in SpliNPV-Cab3 pattern compared to the reference strain. Meanwhile, upon digestion with PstI and HindIII endonucleases, no differences were observed in both isolates’ pattern. Moreover, the virulence evaluation against S. littoralis 1st instar larvae indicated that LC50 value of SpliMNPV-Cab3 was higher than that estimated for the reference strain. Also, ST50 of SpliNPV-Cab3 (120 h) was significantly different with that of the reference strain (132 h).

Conclusion

The host specificity based on virulence parameters make SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate a potential candidate to be involved in the integrated pest management strategies for the control of S. littoralis population with a prospect to biopesticide development.

Background

Different bio-insecticides such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses have been used for many years for insect pest control. Among these bio-insecticides are baculoviruses (Mahendra and Avinash, 2012). Baculoviruses belong to the family Baculoviridae which constitutes large number of DNA viruses that specifically infect insects. Baculoviruses are characterized by having rod-shaped virions ranged in length of 250–400 nm and 30–70 nm in diameter. They have two different phenotypes: occlusion-derived virus (ODV) and budded virus (BV); those are responsible for initiation of infection and spreading of viral infection within the host, respectively. Virions are embedded in a protective proteinaceous matrix that forms polyhedral or occlusion bodies (OBs), the primary infectious form of the virus (Graves et al., 2019).

The Baculoviridae family taxonomically is sub-divided into four genera; Alpha- and Betabaculovirus which are specific for Lepidoptera, Deltabaculovirus specific for Diptera, and Gammabaculovirus specific for Hymenoptera (Harrison et al., 2018). Such viruses are highly specific to their hosts and thus do not cause any pollution to the environment and do not leave residues on fruits which are an important issue of most people (Wang and Hu, 2019). Therefore, Baculoviruses have been recommended by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO)/as a promising bio-pesticide for the control of different insect pests worldwide. Recently, over 50 baculoviral products have been used as an effective biocontrol agent worldwide against more than 600 insects’ species (Wang and Hu, 2019). In addition to use of baculovirus as a biocontrol agent, it was engineered as a protein expression vector. The baculovirus expression vector system is nowadays widely used for production of different recombinant protein in insect cells (Elgaied et al., 2017).

Naturally, the ingested virus OBs are dissolved in the insect midguts under the alkaline conditions to release ODVs, which initiate the infection of midgut columnar epithelial cells. Budded viruses (BVs) are then produced and released from infected midgut epithelial cells to infect other insect tissues which cause systemic infection within the body of the larva (Abbas, 2020). Baculoviruses can encode large number of genes and have adapted mechanisms to regulate the immunity, physiology, and behavior of insect hosts to favor their own distribution and propagation (Wang and Hu, 2019).

The cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered as a worldwide critical pest (Mohamed et al. 2019). In Egypt, it is a destructive phytophagous of cotton and other field crops, including vegetables, orchard trees, and ornamentals (Hatem et al., 2009). During the last few years, the uncontrollable use of chemical pesticides against S. littoralis and other lepidopterous insect pests resulted in the generation of resistance phenomena against many known pesticides, in addition to the pollution of the environment and its toxic effect on animal, human, and plants in contrast to biopesticides (Mahendra and Avinash, 2012). In order to solve these problems, developing of a new and efficient virus-based bioinsecticides is highly important for the effective control of S. littoralis. This study aimed to fully characterize a new field collected SpliNPV genotypic variant and to determine its biological activity against S. littoralis, as a candidate virus-based bioinsecticide for controlling S. littoralis population.

Methods

Virus isolates and insect

Spodoptera littoralis was obtained from the insect rearing facility of the Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt. The larvae were kept at 26±1°C with 60% relative humidity and reared on the artificial diet previously described by Ivaldi-Sender (1974). Neonates and 4th larval instar were used for bioassay experiments and virus propagation, respectively. Virus used in this study is a field collected baculovirus isolate genus nucleopolyhedrovirus from infected dead larva collected from cabbage leaves. In addition, SpliNPV-AN1956 strain was used as a reference.

Virus propagation

For virus propagation, the semi artificial diet described by Ivaldi-Sender (1974) was used. Semi-artificial diet was prepared using the following components: maize meal, Agar-Agar, brewer’s yeast, wheat germ, Ascorpic acid, and Nipagien (hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester). After preparation and diet solidification, tiny cubes of the diet were put into each well of Raster boxes (50-well plates). About 10 μl of each virus suspension was prepared and added on each cube. The S. littoralis larvae (4th instar) were placed in every well, then plates were incubated at 26±1°C. One day later, larvae were transferred to virus-free semi artificial diet and reared till observation of viral infection symptoms (about a week post infection). Virus suspension was prepared according to the polyhedral counting (OBs/ml) for each isolate.

Virus occlusion bodies’ counting

Viral OBs’ purification was carried out according to Boughton et al. (1999). Briefly, infected S. littoralis larvae were collected and homogenized using 0.1% SDS, followed by filtration using a piece of cotton and filter paper. After centrifugation of the suspension, the pellets were re-suspended in 0.5 M NaCl and the final pellet contains OBs was re-suspended in suitable volume of ddH2O. The diluted OBs were counted under the dark field, using inverted microscope with ×200 magnification (Axio-VertA1, Zeiss, Germany). Counting was performed using a Petroff-Hauser counting chamber (depth 0.01 mm, Hausser Scientific). The purified virus OBs were kept frozen at −20°C, subsequently, examined under light microscope as well as electron microscope.

EM examination

In order to examine the viral OBs under a transmission electron microscope (TEM), the purified OB suspensions was loaded on carbon coated grib, followed by staining with 2% phosphor tangistic acid before examination under TEM (JEOL model JEM-1200EX II). The sample images were visualized and photographed at different magnification illustrated. The TEM photos provided by a scale were used to measure the sizes of the OBs.

Viral DNA purification

The SpliNPV genomic DNA was isolated from the purified viral OBs according to the method described by Boughton et al. (1999). Briefly, the purified OBs were dissolved, using 1M of Na2CO3 to release virions (ODV). Subsequently, ODV were treated with 10% (w/w) SDS, followed by adding 1%. Proteinase K allow genomic DNA to be released. The nucleic acids were collected from cells debris by washing 2 times, using TE-buffer saturated phenol/chloroform 1:1 (v/v). The viral genomic DNA was precipitated using 96% ethanol and 1:10 volume of 3M NaAc pH 5.2. After washing with 70% ethanol, the purified genomic DNA was eluted in suitable amount of ddH2O.

Digestion of viral DNA

For comparison of genome pattern of the SpliNPV isolate with the reference strain, restriction digestion was performed, using HindIII, PstI, and ScaI endonucleases at 37°C for 2. Electrophoresis was performed for the digested samples overnight using 0.8 % agarose in 1X TAE buffer (Boughton et al., 1999).

PCR amplification and sequencing of lef-5 gene

In order to partially amplify lef-5 gene, one set of specific primer pair were used. Primers used denoted LEF-5 (ssr1) 5′-AGTCATAAAATCATCGTCGGCG-3′ and LEF-5 (ssr1) 5′-GATTCTCACACGGCGCTCTC-3′. The PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing the following components: 12.5 μl of EmeraldAmp® GT PCR Master Mix - Takara Bio, 1 μl of each forward and reverse primers, 2 μl of viral genomic DNA template (500ng). Volume was completed to 25 μl using autoclaved ddH2O. The PCR program was initiated at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min and primer extension at 72°C for 45 s. The primer extension was completed at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR-amplicon was electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel prepared in 1X TAE buffer. The PCR amplicon was visualized using UV-transilluminator. The PCR fragments were purified from agarose gel using Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagene, Germany). Sequence of the purified fragments was performed using Sanger sequence.

Phylogenetic analysis

The partial lef-5 gene sequence was subjected for alignment with the published ones, using Blast search data base of the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence was carried out, using EditSeq-DNAstar Inc., sequence analysis software, Windows 32 Edit Seq 4.00 (1989–1999). The multiple sequence alignment analysis and the phylogenetic tree were achieved, using Clustal Omega for multiple alignment analysis (The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019).

Bioassay

The virulence of both examined and reference isolates was determined, using median lethal concentration (LC50) and median survival time (ST50). LC50 was determined by exposure of the 1st instar S. littoralis larvae to serial dilutions of virus OBs suspensions of 1 × 103, 5 × 103, 1 × 104, 5 × 104, 1 × 105, and 5 × 105 (OBs/ml), in addition to diet mixed with ddH2O instead of virus suspension as a negative control. Each concentration from both isolates was replicated 5 times where each replicate contained 20 larvae. For estimation of LC50, the total dead larvae after 7 days of infection were counted. In order to determine viruses’ speed of kill, the ST50 was estimated.by inoculating 30 individuals of S. littoralis (5 days old) with 3 replicates and calculated LC85 for each tested viral isolate. Control plates were mixed with water instead of virus suspension. Mortality was observed 12-h intervals starting at the 3rd after infection till the 10th day or larval death.

Statistical analysis

The LC50 and slopes of tested viral isolates were estimated using EPA Probit analysis program (Version 1.5) (Robertson and Preisler, 1992). Also, the ST50 was estimated. Data analysis was performed, using the Kaplan-Meier survival time estimator analysis (Kaplan-Meier, 1958).

Results

SpliNPV-Cab3 OBs EM examination

Typical viral infection symptoms were detected 5–7 days post infection, using purified viral OBs suggested the specificity of the collected isolate to S. littoralis larvae. The viral OBs were examined under a light and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Microscopic examination revealed clear polyhedra in all surfaces. Furthermore, transmission electron microscopic analysis revealed that the examined viral OBs are a typical baculovirus OBs of type nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) with polyhedral structures (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Electron micrographs of Spodoptera littoralis SpliMNPV-Cab3 OBs. a Light microscope examination showing the SpliNPV-Cab3 occlusion bodies. b Transmission electron micrograph showing the SpliNPV-Cab3 occlusion bodies as indicated by red arrows. Bar = 2 μm. c Viral occlusion body showing typical NPV polyhedral shape. Bar = 100 nm

Restriction analysis of SpliNPV-Cab3

The analysis was carried out by comparing additional fragments present in relation to number of common fragments of examined isolates generated by restriction endonucleases. The results showed some differences among the restriction patterns of the SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate analyzed by digestion, using ScaI endonuclease (Fig. 2). Besides 15 ScaI fragments common in both isolates, there were one more fragment of approximate molecular weight of 50 kb and three different fragments of about 35 kb, 27 kb, and 13 kb were detected in SpliNPV-Cab3 pattern. However, a fragment of about 3.2 kb was absent in SpliNPV-Cab3 compared to the reference strain ScaI-pattern. Upon digestion using PstI and HindIII endonucleases, no differences were observed in both isolates pattern.

Fig. 2
figure2

Restriction fragment pattern of SpltNPV-Cab3 and SpltNPV-AN1956 DNA using HindIII, PstI, and ScaI endonucleases. Restriction pattern of both SpliMNPV-Cab3 (Cab-3) and SpliMNPV-AN1956 (R). M1 represents lambda HindIII ladder. M2 represents 1kb DNA ladder. Fragments are indicated by kilo base (kb)

Phylogenetic analysis

The partial coding sequence of the lef-5 as a baculovirus core gene was obtained for SpliNPV-Cap3 (Accession No: MW713059) and compared with the reference strain, SpliMNPV-AN1956 (Accession No: NC_038369) and other NPVs located in GenBank database using the lef-5 deduced amino acids. The phylogenic tree was constructed from the deduced amino acids via the Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011), using the mBed algorithm (Blackshields et al., 2010).

As shown in Fig. 3, the SpliNPV-Cap3 deduced amino acids sequence of lef-5 was closed and had a common ancestor to the sequence of SpliMNPV-Tun2 (Identity: 95%) (Accession No.AYU75273), as well as SpliMNPV-AN1956 (Identity: 95%) previously published by Breitenbach et al. (2013) (Accession No. YP_009505893), which belongs to Group II NPVs. Based on the distance to these viruses, SpliNPV-Cab3 may be regarded as a variant virus isolate of SpliNPV-AN1956.

Fig. 3
figure3

Phylogenetic analysis of lef-5 deduced amino acids of SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate and the reference strain (R-strain) compared to published sequences. Multiple sequences alignment and phylogenetic tree were generated using Clustal Omega multiple sequence alignment program. Astrics indicated the SpliMNPV-Cab3 (Accession No: MW713059) and the reference strain SpliMNPV-AN1956 (Accession No: NC_038369)

Median lethal concentration (LC50)

Biological activity of SpliMNPV-Cab3 isolate was tested via measuring their median lethal concentration (LC50) against S. littoralis 1st instar larvae. The LC50 values and slopes are given in Table 1. All Wald chi-square (χ2) tests (df=1) were significant at P <0.0001 according to Robertson and Preisler (1992). Analysis showed that LC50 value of SpliMNPV-Cab3 was 1.1 × 105 OBs/ml, which was significantly higher than that estimated for the reference strain (1.6 × 104 OBs/ml) (t=8.403; df=1,8; P <0.001).

Table 1 Median lethal concentration (LC50) values for 1st larval instar of Spodoptera littoralis infected with OBs derived from SpliMNPV isolates 7 days post infection.

Median survival time (ST50)

The ST50 of tested isolate SpliNPV-Cab3 (120 h) was significantly different than the reference strain (132 h). The calculated ST50 value was 120 h for SpliMNP-Cab3, which was lower speed of kill than the reference strain (132 h) (t =3.211; df =1,4; P <0.033) (Table 2). There was no obvious difference in the disease symptoms on the infected S. littoralis larvae either with SpliNPV-Cab3 or the reference strain during the bioassay.

Table 2 Kaplan-Meier estimation of ST50 for Spodoptera littoralis larvae infected with OBs derived from two SpliNPV strains in a single infection

Discussion

Development of effective biopesticides for the sustainable control of S. littoralis is highly important to control such insect pest which is considered as one of the most economic phytophagous insect pests (Wang and Hu 2019). The wild types of baculovirus isolates with high infectivity (low LC50), high virulence (low ST50), and high OBs production could be an ideal component for pest management in an approach to control the S. littoralis population. In this study, a new field collected SpliNPV isolate was characterized by means of restriction endonuclease digestion, phylogenic analysis, and biologically in terms of LC50 and ST50. The light microscopic and TEM study of the examined isolate revealed typical baculovirus occlusion bodies of nucleopolyhedrovirus with polyhedral structure shape and sizes ranging from 900 to 1500 nm (Blissard and Rohrmann, 1990).

For the genetic variation between SpliMNPV-Cab3 and the reference strain SpliMNPV-AN 1956 with Sca1 enzyme, different sub-molar bands were observed in SpliMNPV-Cab3, which were missing in SpliMNPV-AN1956. However, upon digestion with PstI and HindIII endonucleases, both isolates’ profiles were identical. The combination resulting of the DNA analyses with the 3 restriction enzymes indicates that this isolate may comprised genotypic variant of the Egyptian isolate SpliMNPV-AN1956. These data suggested that the characterized SpliMNPV-Cab3 isolate belongs to the Egyptian SpliNPV-B that was studied and identified based on the genetic variation of NPVs infecting S. littoralis (Takatsuka et al., 2003).

In addition, and in order to track the evolution pattern of the SpliMNPV-Cab3 isolate, the partial coding sequence of the lef-5 gene was obtained and compared to other lef-5 genes from NPVs, using the lef-5 deduced amino acids. The deduced amino acid sequences of Lef 5 protein showed that SpliMNPV-Cab3 is closed to the isolate SpliNPV-1956 as well as SpliNPV-Tun2, suggested that it is a member of the group Nucleopolyhedrovirus group II (NPV II) (Herniou and Jehle, 2007). The NPVs were classed into groups I and II based on the building of the phylogenetic relationships of polyhedrin genes. However, the Polh gene probably has suffered horizontal transfer between different NPVs and therefore is suboptimal for phylogenetic reconstructions (Herniou et al., 2001). Therefore, partial coding sequence of lef-5 core gene was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of lef-5 genes. According to our reconstruction, SpliMNPV-Cab3 could be placed in Group II, which is in accordance with the findings of Bulach et al. (1999) obtained for other isolates of SpliMNPV.

In regard to the biological activity of the examined isolates, the obtained LC50 for SpliNPV-Cab3 was slightly higher than that estimated LC50 for other 2 field collected SpliNPV isolates; those were 3 × 104 OBs/ml and 9.5 × 104 OBs/ml for isolates Spli-6 and Spli-7, respectively (Elmenofy et al., 2020). As well as Spodoptera litura NPV isolate, which was 1 × 103 OBs/ml against S. litura against 1st larval instar (Trang and Chaudhari, 2002). However, it was very close to Kumar et al. (2011) results who found that the LC50 of two different SpltNPV virus-specific isolates were 3.5 × 104 and 2.4 × 105 (OBs/ml) against 2nd and 3rd larval instars of S. litura, respectively. In the same context, the estimated LC50 for SpliNPV-Cap3 isolate was higher than that obtained by Seufi (2008), who examined the activity of SpliMNPV, an Egyptian isolate, against S. littoralis 2nd larvae (1.2 × 103 OBs/ml). On the other hand, the LC50 of an Egyptian isolate of S. littoralis NPV denoted Egy-SlNPV against S. littoralis larvae were 1.28 × 106 (OBs/ml) and 2.53 × 107 (OBs/ml) for the 2nd and 4th larval instars of S. littoralis, respectively (Ahmed et al., 2016). These results confirmed that the earlier larval instar of S. littoralis larvae were more sensitive to Egy-SlNPV than the elder ones. These differences in susceptibilities may be due to the variation in the number of virions included in occlusion bodies, method of surface treatment, larval age, and the feeding habit of the insect (Seufi, 2008).

The calculated ST50 for SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate was 120h compared to the reference strain, which was 132h. This observation elucidated that the SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate significantly had a speed of kill slightly faster than SpliNPV-AN1956. On the same context, the obtained ST50 showed that SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate speed of kill was lower than the ST50 of other SpliMNPV isolates estimated by Toprak et al. (2005), which varied between 72 and 84 h. Also, the calculated ST50 value of isolate SpliNPV-Cab3 was 120 h, which was higher than the ST50 of SpltNPV-Pak-BNG that was 84 h. This was compared with Japanese SpltNPV-G1 isolate originated from S. littoralis in which the ST50 was 108 h for 3rd larval instar of S. litura (Ali et al. 2018). These findings suggested that the speed of kill of the tested isolates against S. littoralis larvae may vary according to the collected location and instars of the target insect host.

Conclusion

The restriction pattern and the phylogenetic analysis showed that SpliNPV-Cab3 indigenous isolate may be regarded as a variant isolate of SpliNPV-AN1956. The SpliNPV-Cab3 isolate achieved significantly higher LC50 value than that of the reference strain. Meanwhile, ST50 of SpliNPV-Cab3 (120h) was significantly lower with that of the reference strain (132 h). Therefore, this indigenous strain could be involved in integrated pest management programs for the control of S. littoralis larvae. Furthermore, addition of some reagents to the virus-based formula such as optical brightener could be a useful tool to reduce the quantity of viral inoculum OBs required to achieve a high degree of S. littoralis control, in addition to reduce the effects of UV-Irradiation on virus OBs. Other investigations regarding virus-host interaction could help to examine the effect of introduction of multiple isolates on the control of such insect pest.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are available in this published manuscript.

Abbreviations

SpliNPV:

Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus

OBs:

Occlusion bodies

LC50 :

Median lethal concentration

ST50 :

Median survival time

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

References

  1. Abbas MST (2020) Interactions between baculoviruses and entomophagous insects. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30: 107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00306-0

  2. Ahmed YE, Desoky SM, El-Sabagh MM, Sofy AR (2016) Molecular and biological characterization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate (Egy-SlNPV) from Spodoptera littoralis in Egypt. Int J Virol Mol Biol 5(2):34–45. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijvmb.20160502.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali G, Abma-Henkens MHC, van der Werf W, Hemerik L, Vlak JM (2018) Genotype assembly, biological activity and adaptation of spatially separated isolates of Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Invertebr Pathol 153:20–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.01.009

  4. Blackshields G, Sievers F, Shi W, Wilm A, Higgins DG (2010) Sequence embedding for fast construction of guide trees for multiple sequence alignment. Algorithms Mol Biol 5(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-5-21

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Blissard GW, Rohrmann GF (1990) Baculovirus diversity and molecular biology. Annu Rev Entomol 35(1):127–155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001015

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boughton AJ, Harrison RL, Lewis LC, Bonning BC (1999) Characterization of a nucleopolyhedrovirus from the black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Invertebr Pathol 74(3):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1999.4901

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Breitenbach JE, El-Sheikh E-SA, Harrison RL, Rowley DL, Sparks ME, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Popham HJR (2013) Determination and analysis of the genome sequence of Spodoptera littoralis multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virus Research 171(1):194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.11.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulach DM, Kumar CA, Zaia A, Liang B, Tribe DE (1999) Group II nucleopolyhedrovirus subgroups revealed by phylogenetic analysis of polyhedrin and DNA polymerase gene sequences. J Invertebr Pathol 73(1):59–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1998.4797

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elgaied L, Salem R, Elmenofy W (2017) Expression of tomato yellow leaf curl virus coat protein using baculovirus expression system and evaluation of its utility as a viral antigen. 3 Biotech 7(4). 7(4):269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0893-4

  10. Elmenofy W, Salem R, Osman E, Yasser N, Abdelmawgod A, Saleh M, Zaki A, Hanafy E, Tamim S, Amin S, El-Bakry A, El-Sayed A, El-Gaied L (2020) Evaluation of two viral isolates as a potential biocontrol agent against the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera Littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:75.

  11. Graves LP, Hughes LC, Irons SL, Possee RD, King LA (2019) In cultured cells the baculovirus P10 protein forms two independent intracellular structures that play separate roles in occlusion body maturation and their release by nuclear disintegration. PLOS Pathog 15(6). e1007827. 15(6):e1007827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007827

  12. Harrison RL, Herniou EA, Jehle JA, Theilmann DA, Burand JP, Becnel JJ, Krell PJ, van Oers MM, Mowery JD, Bauchan GR (2018) ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Baculoviridae. J Gen Virol 99(9):1185–1186. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001107

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatem AE, Abdel-Samad SS, Saleh HA, Soliman MH, Hussien AI (2009) Toxicological and physiological activity of plant extracts against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Bol San Veg Plagas 35:517–531

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herniou E, Jehle J (2007) Baculovirus phylogeny and evolution. Curr Drug Targets 8(10):1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945007782151306

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herniou EA, Luque T, Chen X, Vlak JM, Winstanley D, Cory JS, O’Reilly DR (2001) Use of whole genome sequence data to infer baculovirus phylogeny. J Virol 75(17):8117–8126. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.75.17.8117-8126.2001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivaldi-Sender C (1974) Techniques simples pour élévage permanent de la tordeuse orientale, Grapholita molesta (Lep., Tortricidae), sur milieu artificiel. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 6:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar CS, Ranga Rao GV, Sireesha K, Kumar PL (2011) Isolation and characterization of baculoviruses from three major lepidopteran pests in the semi-arid tropics of India. Indian J Virol 22(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-011-0029-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahendra R, Avinash I (2012) Role of nanotechnology in agriculture with special reference to management of insect pests. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohamed HA, Alkordy MW, Atta AA (2019) Effect of host plants on biology of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Egypt Acad J Biol Sci. A, Entomol 12(6):65–73. https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2019.64144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robertson JL, Preisler HK (1992) Pesticide bioassay with arthropods. CRC, Press, Boca Raton Florida

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seufi AM (2008) Characterization of an Egyptian Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus and a possible use of a highly conserved region from polyhedrin gene for nucleopolyhedrovirus detection. Virol J 5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422x-5-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7(1):539. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Takatsuka J, Okuno S, Nakai M, Kunimi Y (2003) Genetic and biological comparisons of ten geographic isolates of a nucleopolyhedrovirus that infects Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control 26(1):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-9644(02)00113-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Toprak U, Bayram Ş, Gürkan MO (2005) Gross pathology of SpliNPVs and alterations in Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) morphology due to baculoviral infection. Tarım Bilim Derg 11(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1501/tarimbil_0000000495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trang TT, Chaudhari S (2002) Bioassay of nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) and in combination with insecticide on Spodoptera litura (Fab). Omonrice 10:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang M, Hu Z (2019) Cross-talking between baculoviruses and host insects towards a successful infection. Philos T R Soc B: Biol Sci 374(1767):20180324. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0324

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to express their thanks to Prof. Dr. Said Elsalamouny, Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt, for providing the reference virus strain used in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Academy of Scientific Research & Technology (Project ID: 1490).

This funder covered expenses used for insect rearing and virus propagation, bioassays, nucleotide sequencing, and oligos synthesis used for PCR. Also, this study was financed by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP -2020/92), Taif university, Taif, Saudi Arabia. This funder provided chemicals and reagents used in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WE designed the study and performed the statistical analysis. EO collected the field infected insect samples and did the virus pre-propagation experiments and purification. LA did the virus purification, virus examination under light microscope and electron microscope, and wrote the original draft. NY and RA did the molecular biology work as well as the bioassay experiments. EN reared S. littoralis larvae under directed supervision of AA; in addition, they shared in virus isolates’ propagation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. WE and SS proofread the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael Elmenofy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

This study does not contain any individual person’s data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elmenofy, W., El-Gaied, L., Yasser, N. et al. Molecular characterization and biological activity of native Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus isolate. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31, 88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00433-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spodoptera littoralis
  • Nucleopolyhedrovirus
  • Transmission electron microscope
  • Biological activity
  • Restriction patterns