Skip to main content

Endophytic fungi associated with soybean plants and their antagonistic activity against Rhizoctonia solani

Abstract

Background

Fungal endophytes produce many secondary metabolites that can reduce root rot diseases. Soybean is a particularly important crop worldwide. Endophytic fungi can be isolated, identified, and incorporated into sustainable agriculture for the biological control of many diseases.

Results

The aim of this study was to isolate some endophytic fungi for controlling the most important diseases of soybean plants and to study the mechanisms underlying this biocontrol regarding the suppression of pathogens. Ten endophytic fungi were isolated from soybean plants. Among them, the 3 fungi isolates that exhibited a high percentage of antagonistic activity against Rhizoctonia solani, the causal pathogen of root rot disease of soybean plants, were identified as Trichoderma longibrachiatum S12, T. asperellum S11, and T. atroviride PHYTAT7. The 3 fungi isolates had the ability to produce pectinase and chitinase and to solubilize phosphors. Moreover, they produced siderophores and indole acetic acid (IAA), which have a strong effect on the growth of the plants. The 3 isolates reduced disease severity by 64, 60, and 55%, respectively than the infected control.

Conclusion

The results suggest that certain endophytic fungi associated with soybean plants have potential for the management of root rot diseases in soybean. Moreover, these isolates can be considered as having a growth-promoting effect in soybean plants.

Background

Endophytes are microorganisms that live in the intercellular space of healthy plant tissues without causing any disease in the plants (Abo-Elyousr et al. 2014a). They also supply nutrients to the host, stimulate plant resistance to pathogens, cold, and drought, and promote plant growth by secreting hormones or supplying nutrients to their host plant (Suryanarayanan et al. 2012). Nair and Padmavathy (2014) mentioned that the symbiosis between microorganisms and plants is well known. Plants protect and feed the endophytes, which in response produce bioactive substances that enhance the growth and resistance of plants in the environment.

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a leguminous plant of the Fabaceae family that is commonly found in many locations worldwide (Chowdhury et al. 2016). Nutritionally, soybean comprises 45% of protein and 18% of oil; thus, it is also known as a miracle crop. Diseases such as root rot, brown spot, soybean rust, downy mildew, and stem blot have been a major problem and cause losses in soybean production in many countries. Rhizoctonia solani is well known and widely dispersed in roots, plant debris, and soil, causing major diseases in a diverse range of hosts, including root rot in soybean plants (Surbhi et al. 2020). Fungicide application is the main method used for the control of such diseases. However, the use of fungicides is currently forbidden in many countries and other methods for controlling of this disease are preferred, e.g., biological control and cultural practices (Arastehfar et al. 2019).

Traditional control methods have been suggested for root rot, such as the development of resistant cultivars and short rotation and culture practices; however, these methods are not always successful as Rhizoctonia spp. can remain for a long time in the soil via infested plant debris. Recently, several studies focused on alternative biological methods for the control of plant diseases that are characterized as being environmentally friendly, long lasting, and effective (Sallam et al. 2019). The use of beneficial microorganisms has been regarded as a hopeful method for the management of soil diseases (Fenta et al. 2019). Many beneficial microbes, such as Pseudomonas putida, Bacteriophages, Trichoderma spp., Paenibacillus macerans, P. fluorescens, Streptomyces spp., Enterobacter spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Bacillus spp., have been reported as efficient biocontrol agents against Rhizoctonia spp. (Sharma et al. 2017). Studies have focused on the mycoparasitic and antagonistic ability of isolates of Trichoderma to decrease the incidence of the diseases caused by plant pathogens (Abo-Elyousr et al. 2014b).

Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate endophytic Trichoderma spp. from soybean plants and characterize their antagonistic activity against the causal pathogen of root rot disease of soybean. As well, their effect on disease reduction in pot experiments was studied.

Methods

Source of the causal pathogen of soybean root rot

The highly pathogenic isolates of Rhizoctonia solani used in this study were previously isolated and tested for pathogenicity by (Sallam Nashwa et al. 2008) who identified the isolates using the morphological features of mycelia, as described by Barnett and Hunter (1986). Pure fungal isolates were then grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants at 25±2 °C, then kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C for further studies.

Isolation of endophyte fungi from soybean plants

Healthy roots of soybean plants were collected, washed with tap water, and cut into small pieces, which were then surface sterilized in 2% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min and 70% ethanol for 3 min, washed with sterile distilled water 3 times, and left to dry in a laminar flow chamber. The pieces were transferred to a Petri dish containing PDA medium and incubated at 27±2 °C for 10 days. Pure cultures were transferred onto PDA slants.

Antagonistic capability of various endophytic fungi isolates against Rhizoctonia solani

The five tested endophytic fungi isolates were grown on PDA medium and incubated for 5 days at 28 °C for use as inocula. PDA Petri plates (9 cm in diameter) were inoculated at 3 cm from the edge with disks of R. solani (5 mm in diameter), followed by inoculation with the tested fungi on opposite sides of R. solani. Four replicates were used for each treatment. The control treatment consisted in plates with R. solani alone, without the inoculation of endophytic fungi. The plates were incubated for 7 days at 28 °C. When the growth of the pathogen was covered, the plate in control treatment in the linear growth of the tested pathogen was recorded in the treatments fungi (Zein El-Abdean et al. 2013). The percentage of mycelial growth inhibition was calculated using the following formula: percentage of mycelial growth inhibition = [TF/T] × 100, where T is the mycelia growth in the control and F is the mycelia growth in the tested isolate. The antagonistic fungi that afforded a high percentage of mycelial growth reduction were identified using a 28S rRNA molecular method.

Identification of Trichoderma spp. using polymerase chain reaction nucleotide sequencing (PCR-Seq)

Three isolates were used in this study. The nuclear rDNA region spanning the ITS1 ITS2 regions was used for the first amplification, which was performed in a total reaction volume of 50 μl including the following reagents: PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.01% gelatin), 200 μM of each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 0.4 μM of each primer with 10 μl of the template DNA solution, and 1 U of Tth DNA polymerase (Toyobo). The PCR mixture was overlaid with 30 μl of mineral oil. The following thermal cycling was performed on a thermal cycler (PC-700; ASTEC): an initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 30 s at 72 °C for extension; and a final extension cycle of 7 min at 72 °C. One microliter of the first amplification mixture was used for the second amplification using the nested primer set ITS1 (White et al. 1990) and P3. The components of the reaction mixture and the thermal cycling conditions used for the second amplification were the same as those used for the first one. The PCR products from the second amplification were subjected to preparative electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels in Tris acetate EDTA (TAE) buffer. All amplifications yielded a single visible DNA product. The DNA product band was excised from the ethidium-bromide-stained gel and purified using a JETSORB kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Direct sequencing of PCR products was performed on an Applied Biosystems 373A sequencer using a PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and using the ITS1 and ITS2 primers (White et al. 1990). The nucleotide sequence data of the ITS2 and ITS2 regions were subjected to pairwise alignment via the method of Lipman and Pearson (1985) using the program GENETYX-MAC (Software Development).

Evaluation of the antagonistic effect of fungi under greenhouse conditions

The inoculum was prepared in bottles containing barley grain medium using disks (5 mm) of R. solani isolates. The bottles containing barley medium were autoclaved at 121 °C and 1.5 kg/cm2 for 20 min before inoculation with the pathogen. After inoculation, the bottles were incubated at 25±2 °C for 15 days. For soil infestation, R. solani barley grains were mixed with sterilized soil at a concentration of 3%. Four replicates were used for each tested isolate (5 seedlings/pot). Pot experiments were carried out to study the effects of the 3 selected antagonistic fungi, for controlling the root rot incidence in soybean plants. Seeds of the Giza 111cv. soybean cultivar were sown in R. solani-infested soils as described above (5 seeds/pot), and the antagonistic fungi were applied as a soil treatment by adding a 3% solution to pots 7 days after infestation with R. Solani. Untreated pots served as the control. At 30 days after sowing, root rot disease severity was recorded as described previously (Abo-Elyousr et al. 2014b). The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replicates. Disease severity percentage (DS%) was estimated as follows: DS% = [ΣA/A (4T)] × 100

Where A is the disease rating on each plant, d max is the maximum disease rating possible, and 4T is the total number of plants (T) multiplied by the maximum discoloration grade 4. According to Dorrance et al. (2003), with slight modifications, the different degrees of disease in plants were classified into 4 categories: 0 = no root rot; 1 = 1 to 33% of roots with visible lesions or root rot; 2 = approximately 34 to 50% of the roots exhibited rot or damage; 3 = 51 to 80% of the roots exhibited rot; and 4 = pre-emergence damping-off and few if any roots.

Depiction of secondary metabolites and antifungal activity of endophytic fungi

Solubilization of minerals

Phosphate solubilization

Pikovskaya medium was used to test the phosphate-solubilizing ability of the fungi isolates by dissolution of precipitated tricalcium phosphate Ca3 (PO4)2. The fungi isolates were inoculated on the surface of PDA medium dried plates. The plates were incubated for 7 days at 28 °C. The solubilization index (SI) was calculated according to Edi-Premono et al. (1996).

Zinc solubilization

As reported by Saravanan et al. (2003, b), the zinc-solubilizing ability of the tested fungi was detected based on the dissolution of precipitated zinc oxide on agar medium. On the surface of dried plates, a pinpoint inoculation of the fungal isolates was performed. Plates were incubated for 7 days at 28 °C. The SI was calculated as reported by Edi-Premono et al. (1996), as follows: ratio of the total diameter (colony diameter + halo zone diameter)/colony diameter.

Production of specific enzymes by the bioagent

Using the disk plate method, the enzymatic activities of potent fungal bioagent were visualized on agar plates containing specific enzyme substrates (Acuna-Arguelles et al. 1995). These pathogens were screened for multiple enzymes, such as cellulases, pectinases, proteases, and amylase, on suitable substrates. The size of the clearing zone that developed around the colonies corresponded to the enzymatic activity.

Pectinase activity

The tested fungal culture was inoculated on Czapek agar medium containing 2 NaNO3; 1.0 K2HPO4; 2 peptone; 0.5 MgSO47H2O; 0.5 KCl; and 20 agar (g/l) in 1000 ml of distilled water at pH 6.8 and enhanced with 1% citrus pectin as a substrate for pectinase. The Petri dishes containing screening agar medium were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. One percent cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide was added to observe the zone of clearance, which revealed the pectinase activity.

Cellulase activity

Medium containing carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) (1% w/v) was used to detect the cellulase activity. The Petri plates were incubated for 24 h at 27 °C. After inoculation, the plates were screened for cellulase activity by flooding the plate with 1% Congo red solution for 15 min, followed by de-staining using a 1 M NaCl solution for 15 min. The clear zones around the growth of fungi indicated cellulase activity.

Amylase activity

Medium containing starch (1% w/v) as a substrate was used to detect amylase activity. Plates were incubated at 27 °C for 24 h. The clear zones around the fungal growth were observed by staining the plate with 50 mM iodine.

Protease activity

Medium containing casein (1% w/v) as a substrate was used to test protease activity. Enzymatic activity was determined after the inoculation of the plate with the tested fungi. The formation of a clear zone around colonies after precipitation with 1 M HCl solution indicated protease activity (Rodarte et al. 2011).

Production and assay of indole acetic acid

The fungi strains were inoculated individually in 250 ml Erlenmeyer conical flasks containing 50 ml of potato dextrose broth medium supplemented with 0.4% tryptophan, as a precursor. The inoculated flasks were then incubated in agitated conditions of 150 rpm for 7 days. After incubation, the fungal growth was decanted by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and the cell-free supernatants were used as sources of indole acetic acid (IAA). The reaction mixture consisted of 1 ml of the cell-free supernatant and 2 ml of the Salkowski reagent (1 ml of 0.5 M FeCl3 in 50 ml of 35% perchloric acid). The mixture was then incubated at 28 °C for 30 min. Quantification was performed calorimetrically at 530 nm by comparison to an IAA standard curve (Gordon and Paleg 1957).

Qualitative estimation of siderophores

The production of siderophores by fungi isolates was assayed via the plate assay method, as described by Schwyn and Neilands (1987). After growth, fungal isolates (a 5-mm disk of each isolate) were potted on Chrome Azurol S blue agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 28±2 °C. The development of a yellow-orange zone around the colony was taken as a positive indication of siderophore production. The extent of siderophore biosynthesis was measured as the diameter of the colored zone (Alexander and Zeeberi 1991).

Statistical analysis

Data were subjected to statistical analysis using the MSTATC program of variance, and means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at P ≤ 0.05, as described by Gomes and Gomes (1984). The LSD at 5% probability was used for testing the significance of the differences among the mean values of the tested treatments.

Results

Antagonistic activity of the endophytic fungi isolates against Rhizoctonia solani in vitro

Five isolates of endophytic fungi were first tested for their antagonistic capability against R. solani in vitro before identification. The results presented in Fig. 1 showed that 3 fungal isolates exhibited inhibition percentages that were >80%. Isolate S12 afforded the highest percentage of inhibition (87%), followed by the isolate PHYTAT7 (55%) and isolate S11 (42%). Isolates PHYTAT9 and S10 yielded the lowest reduction of the pathogen. Based on these results, the three isolates were selected for subsequent experiments (Fig. 2a, b, and c).

Fig. 1
figure1

In vitro study of the effect of five endophytic fungi isolates on the growth of Rhizoctonia solani. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different, as determined by the LSD test (P ≤ 0.05)

Fig. 2
figure2

Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. isolates against Rhizoctonia solani in vitro

Identification of the antagonistic fungi isolates using 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Pure cultures of the 3 fungal isolates were molecularly characterized, using 16S rRNA sequencing. Based on BLAST searches on the NCBI data libraries (Nucleotide Collection Database) for similarities of the 16S rRNA sequences, isolate S12 was the most similar to Trichoderma longibrachiatum (GenBank accession No. LT707585.1), with 98.46% identity and 95% query coverage. The next closest homolog was the T. longibrachiatum isolate MIAE00828 (GenBank accession No. KM225906.1) (Fig. 3), whereas isolate S11 was identified as Trichoderma asperellum and was the most similar to the T. asperellum strain BHU-BOT-RYRL14 (GenBank accession No. KR856220.1) and Trichoderma asperellum strain BHU-BOT-RYRL11 (GenBank accession No. KR856217.1), respectively, (Table 1 and Fig. 4). In addition, the BLAST search showed that the highest match of isolate PHYTAT7 was the Trichoderma atroviride strain KABOFT6 (GenBank accession No. MT604177.1) with 100% sequence similarity (Table 1 and Fig. 5). The 16S rRNA sequences of isolates S12, S11, and PHYTAT7 were deposited within the GenBank sequence database under the accession nos. MT409889.1, MT409888.1, and MT476964.1, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure3

Close homologs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum strain S12 (MT409889.1) shown in a phylogenic tree

Table 1 Molecular characterization of S12, S11, and PHYTAT7 by ITS analysis
Fig. 4
figure4

Close homologs of Trichoderma asperellum strain S11 (MT409888.1) shown in a phylogenic tree

Fig. 5
figure5

Close homologs of Trichoderma atroviride isolate PHYTAT7 (MT476964.1) shown in a phylogenic tree

Evaluation of the antagonistic effect of fungi under greenhouse conditions

The results presented in Table 2 showed that all the tested isolates of Trichoderma spp. reduced disease severity significantly. The addition of treatments comprising T. asperellum (S11) afforded the highest disease reduction than other treatments. It abated disease by (63.4%) compared to the infected control. T. longibrachiatum (S12) came second regarding the reduction of disease severity (57.3%), whereas T. atroviride (PHYTAT7) caused the lowest reduction in disease severity.

Table 2 In vivo study effect of three endophytic fungi isolates on growth of Rhizoctonia solani under greenhouse conditions

In vitro study of the mode of action of the endophytic fungal pathogens

Siderophore production

The results presented in Table 3 showed that all tested endophytic fungi isolates gave positive responses regarding the production of siderophores. Among the fungi isolates tested, S11 produced the maximum percentage of siderophores (2.3) compared to the control, followed by S12 and PHYTAT7, which afforded a siderophore production of 2.5.

Table 3 Production of siderophore and IAA, by the endophytic fungal pathogens

Production of IAA

The results presented in Table 3 showed that all fungal isolates tested for the ability to produce IAA yielded positive results. The highest production rate was observed at S11, followed by S12 and PHYTAT7.

Zinc and phosphate solubilization by fungal isolates

The zinc and phosphate solubilization ability of fungal isolates (S11, S12, and PHYTAT7) were tested in vitro. The data presented in Table 4 exhibited that S11 and S12 had positive effects on zinc solubilization and scored a strong solubilization index (SI) of (2.1), while PHYTAT7 scored a moderate SI of (1.8). Moreover, S11 and S12 had positive effects on phosphate solubilization, with an SI of (2.74), while the PHYTAT7 had an SI of (1.89).

Table 4 Solubilization phosphate index measurement of S11 and S12 and PHYTAT7 after 7 days at 28 °C

Production of lytic enzymes

The data presented in Table 5 revealed that all tested isolates exhibited protease- and cellulase-producing ability and that they produced amylase and pectinase, with the exception of the isolate PHYTAT7, which did not produce the latter two enzymes.

Table 5 Production of amylase, protease, chitinase, and pectinase enzymes by the fungal pathogens

Discussion

Rhizoctonia root rot of soybean is one of the most important diseases in the world. This disease is caused by Rhizoctonia solani (Kohn), which affects seed germination and seedling emergence, causing great losses in soybean yield (Abo-Elyousr et al. 2014b). Five endophytic fungi were isolated from soybean plants. The results revealed that all the tested Trichoderma spp. isolates were able to inhibit the mycelial growth of the pathogen with different degrees of antagonistic capability. Obtained data indicated that T. asperellum afforded the strongest antagonistic effect against the pathogen, followed by other isolates. The results are in accordance with the data of Singh and Chand (2006). Trichoderma spp. are known to have a strong antifungal effect partly because of their production of extracellular chitinase, amylase, and protease enzymes, which hydrolyze the main constituent of the fungal cell wall (Abo-Elyousr et al., 2014b). This can be explained in light of the results reported by Benhamou et al. (1998) who suggested that T. harzianum is affected through direct penetration of host hyphae. Trichoderma harzianum grows toward the hyphae of pathogenic fungi and degrades the cell walls of the pathogens via the activity of enzymes, which could be associated with physical penetration of the cell walls of the pathogens. Endophytes may stimulate plant growth and increase yield directly or indirectly (Khare et al. 2018).

The siderophores produced by fungi can repossess the limited iron, thus reducing its availability for the growth of phyto-pathogens. Thus, they promote plant growth indirectly (Alexander and Zeeberi 1991). Obtained results showed that the isolate S11 produced the maximum percentage of siderophores, followed by S12 and then PHYTAT7. These results agree with those reported by Rabbee et al. (2019), who found that Trichoderma spp. produce high concentrations of siderophores, which in turn inhibit fungal growth via deprivation of essential iron. Some endophytic fungi have the ability to synthesize IAA, which may explain the increase in the growth of some plants after their colonization with endophytic fungi (Shi et al. 2009). In the present study, the 3 isolates tested for the ability to produce IAA yielded positive results. These results agree with those of Palazzini et al. (2018), and Bereika et al. (2020). Chitinases are receiving increased attention because of their broad range of applications. Many of these chitinase-producing microorganisms have been used recently as an important biocontrol agent against fungal phytopathogens, by degrading the chitin component of the fungal cell wall (Nguyen et al. 2015). Obtained results agree with those reported by Myo et al. (2019).

In the present study, all isolates had ability to solubilize zinc and phosphate with different degrees. These agree with those reported by Wani et al. (2007). Altomare et al. (1999) found that a strain of T. harzianum produces many chemicals that solubilize rock phosphate, Zn, Mn4+, Fe3+, and Cu2+, increases iron availability, and enhances iron uptake in vitro. Wakatsuki (1995) reported that microbes are potential alternatives that could cater plant zinc requirements by solubilizing the complex zinc in soil. Lytic enzyme production by pathogens has been postulated to play an important role in the biological control of pathogens (Myo et al. 2019). In the present study, the ability of fungal isolates to produce lytic enzymes was tested. All tested pathogens yielded production of lytic enzymes, which act as inducers of plant resistance. Lytic enzyme production by pathogens has been reported by Myo et al. (2019). Bhale and Rajkonda (2012) reported that the activities of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes exhibited different rates according to Trichoderma species, such as the cellulase and pectinase produced by a fungal biocontrol agent, and are responsible for the inhibition of plant pathogenic fungi.

Conclusion

The results suggest that Trichoderma spp. can be used for controlling rhizoctonia root rot in soybean plants caused by R. solani under greenhouse conditions. Enzymes successfully suppressed the fungal pathogen in vitro and in vivo. Further research is needed to identify an appropriate formulation and approve the application of a new strain for the control of the wide range of plant diseases.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

IAA:

Indole acetic acid

S11:

T. asperellum

S11:

T. longibrachiatum

PHYTAT7:

T. atroviride

SI:

Solubilization index

LSD:

Least significant difference

PDA:

Potato dextrose agar

ZSB:

Zinc solubilizing bacterial

References

  1. Abo-Elyousr KAM, Sobhy IIA, Abdel-Rahim IR (2014a) Isolation of Trichoderma and evaluation their antagonistic potentiality against Alternaria porri. J Phytopathol 162(9):567–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abo-Elyousr KAM, Zein El-Abdean W, Hassan MHA, El-Sheakh MM (2014b) Enhance suppressive effect of compost on soybean Rhizoctonia root rot by soil treatment with Trichoderma harzianum. J Plant Physiol Pathol 2(02):2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-955X.1000122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Acuña-Argüelles ME, Gutierrez-Rojas M, Viniegra-González G, Favela-Torres E (1995) Production and properties of three pectinolytic activities produced by Aspergillus niger in submerged and solidstate fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43(5):808–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02431912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander BD, Zeeberi DA (1991) Use of chromazurol S to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 2:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altomare C, Norvell WA, Björkman T, Harman GE (1999) Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant- growth promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(7):2926–2933. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.7.2926-2933.1999

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Arastehfar A, Cornelia L, Rocio G, Farnaz D, Macit I, Teun B, Toni G, David SP (2019) The quiet and underappreciated rise of drug-resistant invasive fungal pathogens. J Fungi 6(3):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6030138

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett HL, Hunter BB (1986) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi, 4th edn. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benhamou N, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1998) Induction of resistance against Fusarium wilt of tomato by combination of chitosan with an endophytic bacterial strain: ultrastructure and cytochemistry of the host response. Planta 204(2):153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050242

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bereika FFM, Sallam NMA, Alamri SAM, Abo-Elyousr KAM, Hashem M, Mostafa YS (2020) Approving the biocontrol strategy of potato wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum on field scale using Enterobacter cloacae PS14 and Trichoderma asperellum T34. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhale UN, Rajkonda JN (2012) Enzymatic activity of Trichoderma species. Novus Nat Sci Res 1:4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chowdhury JA, Karim MA, Khaliq QA, Solaiman ARM, Ahmed JU (2016) Screening of soybean (Glycine max l.) genotypes under water stress condition. Bangladesh J Agril Res 41:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorrance AE, Kleinhenz MD, Mcclure SA, Tuttle NT (2003) Temperature, moisture, and seed treatment effects on Rhizoctonia solani root rot of soybean. Plant Dis 87(5):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.5.533

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edi-Premono M, Moawad AM, Vlek PLG (1996) Effect of phosphate solubilizing pseudomonas putida on growth of maize and its survival in the rhizosphere. Indonesian J Crop Sci 11:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fenta L, Habtamu M, Tsegaye G (2019) Biocontrol potential of trichoderma and yeast against post-harvest fruit fungal diseases: a review. World News Nat Sci 27:153–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon SA, Paleg LG (1957) Observations on the quantitative determination of indoleacetic acid. Physiol Plant 10(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1957.tb07608.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khare E, Mishra J, Arora NK (2018) Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Front Microbiol 9:2732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lipman DJ, Pearson WR (1985) Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science 227(4693):1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2983426

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Myo EM, Liu B, Ma J, Shi L, Jiang M, Zhang K, Ge B (2019) Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis NKG-2 for bio-control activities against fungal diseases and potential plant growth promotion. Biol Control 134:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nair DN, Padmavathy S (2014) Impact of endophytic microorganisms on plants, environment and humans. Scient World J 250693

  21. Nguyen HQ, Quyen DT, Nguyen SLT, Van Hanh VU (2015) An extracellular antifungal chitinase from Lecanicillium lecanii: purification, properties, and application in biocontrol against plant pathogenic fungi. Turk J Biol 39:6–14. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1402-28

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palazzini J, Roncallo P, Cantoro R, Chiotta M, Yerkovich N, Palacios S, Echenique V, Torres A, Ramirez M, Karlovsky P, Chulze S (2018) Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearums ensus tricto, reduction of deoxynivalenol accumulation and phytohormone induction by two selected antagonists. Toxins 10:88. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10020088.

  23. Rabbee MF, Ali MS, Choi J, Hwang BS, Jeong SC, Baek KH (2019) Bacillus velezensis: a valuable member of bioactive molecules within plant microbiomes. Molecules 24(6):1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061046

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodarte MP, Dias DR, Vilela DM, Schwan RF (2011) Proteolytic activities of bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi isolated from coffee fruit (Coffea arabica L.). Acta Scient Agronomy 33:457–464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sallam NMA, Eraky AM, Sallam A (2019) Effect of Trichoderma spp. on fusarium wilt disease of tomato. Mol Biol Rep 46(4):4463–4470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04901-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sallam Nashwa A, Abo-Elyousr KAM, Hassan MA (2008) Evaluation of Trichoderma species as biocontrol agents for damping-off and wilt diseases of Phaseolus vulgaris L and efficacy of suggested formula. Egypt J Phytopathol 36:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saravanan VS, Subramoniam SR, Raj SA (2003) Assessing in vitro solubilization potential of different zinc solubilizing bacterial (ZSB) isolates. Braz J Microbiol 35:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma M, Tarafdar A, Ghosh R, Gopalakrishanan S (2017) Biological control as a tool for eco-friendly management of plant pathogens. In: Adhya T, Mishra B, Annapurna K, Verma D, Kumar U (eds) Advances in soil microbiology: recent trends and future prospects. Microorganisms for Sustainability, pp 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7380-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi Y, Lou K, Li C (2009) Promotion of plant growth by phytohormone-producing endophytic microbes of sugar beet. Biol Fertil Soils 45(6):645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0376-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh S, Chand H (2006) Screening of bioagents against root rot of mung bean caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18:710–721

    Google Scholar 

  32. Surbhi K, Krishna PS, Narendra KS, Aravind T (2020) Assessment of genetic diversity among soybean genotypes differing in response to aerial blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn) using SSR markers. J Phytopathol 169:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12956

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suryanarayanan TS, Thirunavukkarasu N, Govindarajulu MB, Gopalan V (2012) Fungal endophytes: an untapped source of biocatalysts. Fungal Divers 54(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0168-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wakatsuki T (1995) Metal oxidoreduction by microbial cells. J Food Ind Microbiol 14(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569900

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2007) Chromium reduction, plant growth promoting potentials and metal solubilization by Bacillus sp. isolated from alluvial soil. Curr Microbiol 54(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-006-0451-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal genes for phylogenetics. In: lnnis MA, Gelfrand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zein El-Abdean W, Abo-Elyousr KAM, Hassan MHA, El-Sheikh MM (2013) Molecular characterization of Rhizoctonia solani isolates the incitant of soybean root rot. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 46(9):1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2012.759407

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/65), Taif University.

Funding

Authors are thankful to Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/65), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia, for providing the financial support and research facilities.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally in the manuscript.

N.M. S. suggested the idea of the work and contributed to data curation and their validation as well as writing original draft. EFA contributed to the formal analysis of the data., M.H. and M.S. contributed to the reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nashwa Sallam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This manuscript is in accordance with the guide for authors available on the journal’s website. Also, this work has not been published previously and is approved by all authors and host authorities.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sallam, N., Ali, E.F., Seleim, M.A.A. et al. Endophytic fungi associated with soybean plants and their antagonistic activity against Rhizoctonia solani. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31, 54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00402-9

Download citation

Keyword

  • Endophytic fungi
  • Root rot
  • Soybean
  • Trichoderma spp. biocontrol