Skip to main content

Table 3 Efficiency of the tested treatments against bacterial root rots in sugar-beet in pots and field at harvest

From: Impact of silver nanoparticles and two biological treatments to control soft rot disease in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L)

Treatments Pots experiment Field experiment first season Field experiment second season
Disease incidence % Efficiency% Disease incidence % Efficiency% Disease incidence % Efficiency%
Ag Nps 50 ppm 33.33 c 63.64 6.67 cde 76.46 7.27 e 76.16
Ag Nps 75 ppm 8.34 d 90.90 2.50 e 91.18 3.30 g 89.18
AgNps 100 ppm 7.59 d 91.72 1.67 e 94.11 2.27 g 92.56
Sp 50% 74.17 ab 19.10 15.00 b 47.07 15.60 b 48.85
Sp 75% 58.34 b 36.35 11.67 bc 58.82 12.37 c 59.44
Sp 100% 25.00 cd 72.73 5.00 de 82.36 5.60 f 81.64
Bs 100% 83.34 a 9.10 10.00 bcd 64.71 10.60 d 65.25
Control 91.67 a 28.34 a 30.50 a
LSD 1% = 32.790 and 5% = 24.097 1% = 7.017 and 5% = 5.153 1% = 1.882 and 5% = 1.275
  1. Sp Spirulina platensis, Bs Bacillus subtilis
  2. In a column means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 1% level by DMRT