Skip to main content

In vitro screening of different Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates to study lytic enzyme production and growth inhibition during antagonism of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini, wilt causing pathogen of cumin

Abstract

Land plants exist in close association with bacterial and fungal microbes, where some associations can be pathogenic and others can be mutualistic/beneficial. One such relation exists between host plant, Cuminum cyminum L. (Cumin) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc), the causal pathogen of cumin wilt and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf), where Pf acts as a bio-agent for inhibiting Foc and promoting plant growth of cumin. In this study, antagonism by 10 different Pf isolates against Foc was studied under laboratory conditions through percent growth inhibition and biochemical mechanisms. Among these Pf isolates, Pf-5 exhibited the highest in vitro growth inhibition (82.51%). A positive correlation was observed between percent growth inhibition and specific activities of hydrolytic enzymes, chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanase, and protease, where a negative correlation was observed with cell wall degrading enzymes, cellulase and polygalacturonase. To conclude, isolate Pf-5 could be a potential biocontrol agent for Fusarium wilt disease of cumin.

Background

Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) is widely grown as an important spice crop in arid and semi-arid regions of the Indian subcontinent. India is the world’s largest producer, consumer, and exporter of cumin (Bhatnagar et al., 2013). The fungal disease wilt, caused by the soil-borne phytopathogens, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc), is one of the major threats to cumin production in India and worldwide (Özer and Bayraktar, 2015).

For proper management of Fusarium wilt, an integrated approach combining cultural, biological, and chemical means is recommended to include the use of resistant cultivars and healthy seeds, adjustment of sowing dates, crop rotation, seed treatment, fungicide application, and biocontrol agents. However, several factors influence the efficacy of these management practices, including pathogenic variability in the fungal populations as well as abiotic factors such as agro-climatic conditions (Lodha and Mawar, 2014). More specifically, management of cumin wilt disease is difficult due to limited resistance against wilt in existing germplasm throughout the world (Lodha and Mawar, 2014). Due to the soil-borne nature of Fusarium, the cultural practice of crop rotation restricts cumin cultivation for long periods as fungal spores can survive in soil for up to 6 years even in the absence of the host plant (Israel et al., 2005). Additionally, fungicides and organic compounds are widely used to control the wilt disease. Nevertheless, application of fungicides can have negative effects on crop physiology, especially on photosynthesis and pose a serious environmental threat (Petit et al., 2012).

Biological control of soil-borne diseases has been widely reported for successful crop production utilizing eco-friendly methods for several crops (Raymaekers et al., 2020). Biological control of plant diseases using antagonistic microorganisms offers a highly effective, economic, and environmentally friendly alternative to the use of synthetic pesticides (Iftikhar et al., 2020). Fungal agents such as Trichoderma spp. are continuously used by cumin growers to effectively control wilt disease (Lodha and Mawar, 2014). Three bacterial species, viz., Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf), Bacillus subtilis, and Rhizobium spp., were also tested for their ability to control wilt disease. Recently, Chawla et al. (2012) studied the antagonistic potential of 4 pathogens as a biological agent, viz., Trichoderma harzianum, T. viride, P. fluorescens, and B. subtilis, against cumin wilt pathogen Foc under laboratory conditions. Interestingly, significant growth inhibition was observed by all the 4 pathogens, while maximum mycelial inhibition was recorded in the presence of Pf (Chawla et al., 2012). From previous reports, it is evident that lytic enzymes such as chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanase, and protease are associated with the ability of Pseudomonas sp. to control plant pathogens (Bishi and Vakharia, 2015). However, the biochemical mode of action through which Pf antagonistically inhibits the mycelial growth, particularly for Foc, is still unknown.

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the antagonistic potential of 10 Pf isolates against Foc. Moreover, biochemical insight into microbe-microbe interactions of these new Pf isolates during antagonism with Foc was implemented.

Materials and methods

Isolation and maintenance of microbes

Infected cumin seedlings that exhibit clear wilt symptoms were selected from a field experiment to isolate the fungal pathogen F. oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc). The infected tissues were cut into small pieces by using the flame-sterilized scalpel blade and were transferred to sterile Petri dishes containing 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for the surface sterilization of plant tissues. Sterilized plant tissues were transferred to Potato-Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates and incubated for 96 h at 28 ± 2 °C in an incubator to obtain full growth of the fungi. The resulted fungus was purified, using the hyphal tips technique on PDA medium. Further, pure culture slants of the fungus on PDA were prepared for future studies. The fungal pathogen was identified based on the colony characteristics and spore morphology as described by Booth (1971).

Ten isolates of P. fluorescens (Pf1-10) were obtained from the culture collection of the Department of Biochemistry, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India. These bacterial strains were previously isolated from the cumin growing regions of Saurashtra, Gujarat, India. All the bacterial isolates were maintained by periodic transfers on King’s B medium under aseptic conditions to keep the cultures fresh and viable during this entire study.

In vitro inhibition of F. oxysporum f. sp. cumini by P. fluorescens

The in vitro antagonistic effect of the 10 isolates of Pf against the fungal pathogen Foc was assessed by allowing both organisms to grow on dual culture media, King’s B + PDA (1:1) in the Petri dishes. Pure and fresh cultures of Pf and Foc were obtained by culturing in King’s B for 72 h and PDA for 4–5 days, respectively. For the antagonistic study, a mycelial disc of 4 mm diameter agar plug containing Foc hyphae was placed in the center of a Petri dish containing dual media under aseptic conditions; each isolate of Pf was streaked in circular form maintaining 3 cm distance from the test fungal plug (Kandoliya and Vakharia, 2013). The Petri dishes containing only the test fungus Foc were considered as the control. The Petri dishes were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 6 days, and the observations were recorded. The experiment was replicated 3 times. Percent growth inhibition of Foc by Pf was calculated, following the method described by Fatima et al. (2009) as below:

$$ \%\mathrm{Growth}\ \mathrm{inhibition}=\left\{\left(C-T\right)/C\right\}\times 100 $$

where C = colony diameter of fungal pathogen Foc in control Petri dishes (cm), and T = colony diameter of Foc in the inhibition Petri dishes (cm).

Extraction of lytic enzymes

Crude enzyme extract was prepared from the Petri dishes containing Foc and Pf isolates (T1 to T10), and only the test fungus (T11) as a control at 6 days after inoculation (DAI). To perform, 25 ml of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 50 mM sodium chloride was added to each Petri dish, followed by transferring the mycelia mat and the bacterial growth to pre-labelled conical flasks. For enzymatic reaction, 1% of each of the following: carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC), sodium polypectate, chitin, laminarin, or casein were added into a flask containing culture, and the pH was adjusted to 5.5 (Kishore et al., 2006). Conical flasks containing the culture, buffer mixtures, were then incubated at 120 rpm and 28 °C for 6 h in an orbital shaker (Sivan and Chet, 1989). Later, the content was transferred to pre-labelled 50-ml Falcon tubes and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant was collected and stored at – 20 °C for downstream assays such as enzymatic activity quantification.

Cell wall degrading enzymes

Cellulase activity assay

To perform this reaction, 100 μl aliquot of the culture supernatant was mixed with 400 μl of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 5.2) containing 1% CMC and incubated at 55 °C for 15 min. After incubation, the released glucose was measured using the Nelson Somyogi method (Sadasivam and Manickam, 1992). The specific cellulase activity was recorded as unit.mg−1 protein, where one unit of cellulase activity was defined as the amount of cellulase required to produce 1 mg free glucose per minute per milliliter of enzyme extract.

Polygalacturonase (PG) activity assay

This assay was performed by mixing 100 μl aliquot of the culture supernatant with 400 μl of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.2) containing 0.25% sodium polypectate and incubating the mixture at 37 °C for 60 min. The released galacturonic acid was measured after the incubation period following the Nelson Somyogi method (Sadasivam and Manickam, 1992). One unit of polygalacturonase was defined as the amount of polygalacturonase required to produce 1 mg free glucose per minute per milliliter of enzyme extract for which the specific activity is expressed as unit.mg−1 protein.

Pathogenesis-related enzymes

Protease activity assay

The reaction mixture contained 100 μl culture supernatant, 500 μl of 0.36% bovine serum albumin, and 2 ml of 100 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6). Reaction mixtures were incubated for 60 min at 50 °C, and the reaction was stopped using 3 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid (Malik and Singh, 1980). The blank was treated as zero time incubation. The reaction mixtures were then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min to settle the precipitate. A known volume of supernatant (100 μl) was used for the estimation of released free amino acids using the ninhydrin method (Lee and Takahashi, 1966). The specific activity of protease was expressed as unit.mg−1 protein, and one unit of protease activity was defined as the amount of protein necessary to produce microgram free amino acids per minute per milliliter of culture supernatant.

Chitinase activity assay

This reaction mixture contained 200 μl of 0.5% chitin in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.2) and 100 μl of culture supernatant, which was incubated at 50 °C for 60 min. The formation of sugar N-acetylglucosamine was measured using the dimethylamino benzaldehyde (DMAB) method (Reissig et al., 1955). The chitinase activity was recorded as micromole of GlcNAc (monomeric unit of the polymer chitin) released per milliliter per minute. The specific activity was expressed as units of enzymes per milligram of protein in the extract.

β-1, 3 glucanase activity assay

The reaction contained 100 μl of 4% laminarin in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.2) and 100 μl of culture supernatant. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Post incubation, the glucose released by enzyme β-1, 3 glucanase was measured according to the Nelson Somyogi method (Sadasivam and Manickam, 1992). The specific activity of the β-1, 3 glucanase was expressed as unit.mg−1 protein. The unit activity was defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to produce 1 μM of corresponding reducing sugar per minute per milliliter of culture supernatant.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate with a minimum of 3 technical replicates. The data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and using GenStat 14th Edition. Post hoc Tukey test was performed to analyze the significance among the treatments. Further, the correlation among different traits was studied using the PAST v1.89 software.

Results and discussion

In vitro percent growth inhibition of Foc

The efficiency of P. fluorescens isolates Pf1-10 on inhibiting the growth of Foc on dual media in Petri dishes is illustrated in Fig. 1, while the percent growth inhibition of Foc during the in vitro interaction with bio-agent P. fluorescens isolates Pf1-10 at 6 DAI is shown in Fig. 2. Percent growth inhibition of fungal pathogen Foc was recorded the highest (82.51%) for Pf-5 isolate in treatment T5, followed by T4, T3, and T2 with 74.91, 69.12, and 66.47%, respectively, at 6 DAI. On the other hand, the inhibition growth percent for T1 and T6–10 treatments remained below 60% (Figs. 1 and 2). Thus, antagonism study showed that isolate Pf-5 was the most efficient among the 10 isolates of P. fluorescens with a maximum growth inhibition (Fig. 2). This illustrates that the interaction between fungal pathogen Foc and bio-agent Pf-5 isolate was significant than other Pf isolates tested in this study. A previous study to suppress the Foc growth by integration of organic amendments (farm yard manure, vermicompost, and mustard cake) and biological agent (Trichoderma harzianum, T. viride, P. fluorescens, and B. subtilis) reported that the maximum inhibition of Foc mycelial growth was under Pf treatment (Chawla and Gangopadhyay, 2009), which concurs with the findings of the current work. Kumar et al. (2016) tested the efficacy of different fungal and bacterial antagonists against wilt of cumin and found that Pf isolates were highly inhibitory to the pathogen under laboratory conditions. Moreover, several studies have found Pf to be an efficient bio-agent against F. oxysporum variants as pathogen of different crops including chickpea (Vidhyasekaran and Muthamilan, 1995), radish (De Boer et al., 1998), groundnut (Rini and Sulochana, 2008), banana (Mohammed et al., 2011), eggplant (Altinok et al., 2013), and tomato (Deshmukh et al., 2015).

Fig. 1
figure1

Antagonism among 10 isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc) at 6 days after inoculation in King’s B + PDA (1:1) medium. (T1 = Pf-1 × Foc; T2 = Pf-2 × Foc; T3 = Pf-3 × Foc; T4 = Pf-4 × Foc; T5 = Pf-5 × Foc; T6 = Pf-6 × Foc; T7 = Pf-7 × Foc; T8 = Pf-8 × Foc; T9 = Pf-9 × Foc; T10 = Pf-10 × Foc; T11 = Control − Foc)

Fig. 2
figure2

Percent growth inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc) in in vitro antagonism with Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf) isolates at 6 days after inoculation (DAI). (T1 = Pf-1 × Foc; T2 = Pf-2 × Foc; T3 = Pf-3 × Foc; T4 = Pf-4 × Foc; T5 = Pf-5 × Foc; T6 = Pf-6 × Foc; T7 = Pf-7 × Foc; T8 = Pf-8 × Foc; T9 = Pf-9 × Foc; T10 = Pf-10 × Foc; T11 = Control − Foc)

Production of cell wall degrading enzymes by pathogen Foc during antagonism

The fungal pathogen produces lytic enzymes that degrade the host cell wall, while the presence of biological agent inhibits the production of these enzymes (Bishi and Vakharia, 2015). Therefore, the production of cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) was conducted during antagonism in this study. Specific activity of cellulase (expressed as U.mg−1 protein) was significantly increased at control treatment T11 (25.98) (Foc alone), followed by the treatments T10 (18.62), T7 (18.03), T1 (15.17), T6 (13.65), T9 (12.73), T8 (11.55), and T2 (8.47) at 6 DAI (Fig. 3a), while decreased cellulase activity was observed at the treatments T5 (2.54), followed by T4 (3.51) and T3 (5.12). Furthermore, the lowest PG activity was detected in treatment T5 (3.91), and the highest value of 24.68 was recorded at T10 among the treatments T1–10, while increased PG activity (35.22) was observed at treatment T11 (Fig. 3a). The cell wall degrading enzymatic activities decreased in the culture medium as the growth of Foc was inhibited during antagonism with Pf and vice versa. The reduction of these enzymatic activities in treatments T1–10 compared to control treatment T11 may indicate the capacity of respective Pf1-10 isolates to neutralize/suppress the CWDEs produced by Foc during its insertion/penetration mechanism.

Fig. 3
figure3

In vitro production of a cell wall degrading enzymes and b pathogenesis-related enzymes in the culture medium at 6 days after inoculation (DAI). (T1 = Pf-1 × Foc; T2 = Pf-2 × Foc; T3 = Pf-3 × Foc; T4 = Pf-4 × Foc; T5 = Pf-5 × Foc; T6 = Pf-6 × Foc; T7 = Pf-7 × Foc; T8 = Pf-8 × Foc; T9 = Pf-9 × Foc; T10 = Pf-10 × Foc; T11 = Control − Foc)

The cell wall of pathogens that act as biological agent or host plants serves as the first physical barrier that confines the entry of most phytopathogens (Deshmukh et al., 2015). Thus, for the successful entry of the fungal hyphae and subsequent tissue colonization requires cell wall degradation by enzymatic processes. Most necrotrophic fungal pathogens produce CWDEs such as cellulase and PG to facilitate their entry into the host cells (van Kan, 2006). In response, the host plants and/or related Pf bio-agent produce enzymes such as chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanase, and protease (collectively referred as pathogenesis-related enzymes) to prevent the entry of the fungal pathogens. Treatment T5 showed a significant reduction of cellulase (89.83%) and PG (88.89%) enzyme production, demonstrating that the metabolites produced by isolate Pf-5 were more effective than other Pf isolates used in this study. Correspondingly, Kishore et al. (2006) found that cell free culture filtrate of Pseudomonas spp. at 25% dilutions inhibited the in vitro production of fungal CWDEs such as cellulase and PG, which are in agreement with the findings of this research where live cell cultures of Pf were tested. Production of such lytic enzymes is commonly found among antagonistic microorganisms (Adesina et al., 2007). Moreover, lytic enzymes produced by Pseudomonas solanacearum target virulence factors of F. oxysporum, thereby facilitating induced resistance to tomato plants against wilt disease (Toyoda et al., 1988).

Production of pathogenesis related enzymes by bio-agent isolates Pf1-10

In the present study, the activity of hydrolytic enzymes was carried out during antagonism of Pf isolates with Foc (Fig. 3b). The in vitro protease activity (recorded as U.mg−1 protein) was significantly increased for treatment T5 (32.14), which was ~ 11 times higher than the control treatment T11 (2.94). While treatment T5 showed the maximum activity of chitinase (4.84) among the treatments (T1–10), the β-1, 3 glucanase activity was approximately similar for treatments T4 and T5 (9.25 and 9.17), which was higher than other treatments (Fig. 3b). The isolate Pf-5, which produced the highest protease and chitinase, but resulted in the lowest cellulase and polygalacturonase enzyme activity by Foc during antagonism experiments also showed the maximum in vitro growth inhibition of the fungus Foc. More interestingly, specific activity for β-1, 3 glucanase for treatments T2, T3, T4, T5, T8, and T9 was at par (7.27 to 9.25), which denotes the equal potential of respective Pf isolates in β-1, 3 glucanase production against Foc.

Plant resistance to pathogenic fungi involves multiple reaction pathways including the accumulation of hydrolytic enzymes such as protease, chitinase, and β-1, 3 glucanase (Andersen et al., 2018). The highest activities of chitinase, protease, and possibly for β-1, 3 glucanase in the antagonistic treatment T5 (i.e., interaction between Pf-5 and pathogen Foc) than other treatments and untreated control further supported the finding of percent growth inhibition (Fig. 1) and the potentials of isolate Pf-5 to control Foc in vitro. The filamentous fungal cell wall also contains lipids and proteins (Riquelme et al., 2018). It was, therefore, expected that the antagonistic bacteria like P. fluorescens synthesized proteases, which may act on the cell wall of fungal pathogens. Also, P. fluorescence strain CV6 isolated from cucumber rhizosphere showed positive reactions for catalase, protease, and phosphatase and negative for the production of pectinase, lipase, and cellulase (Maleki et al., 2010) suggesting their potential as biocontrol agent. The biological control activity of P. fluorescens against certain soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi and their potential to produce proteases that result in antagonistic activity against Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica, Pythium spp., and Fusarium spp. by degrading cellulolytic enzymes produced by such pathogenic fungi has been previously reported (Ahmadzadeh et al., 2006).

Pseudomonas spp. were also known to produce chitinase in culture medium, and this production of chitinase was further increased when the growth medium was supplemented with chitin source or even with the fungal cell wall (Dev and Dawande, 2010). Saikia et al. (2005) reported that the production of lytic enzymes, i.e., chitinase and β-1, 3 glucanase, by several PGPR strains of P. fluorescens is considered as a major antagonistic property of these strains. Another study revealed that β-1, 3 glucanase produced by Pseudomonads decreased the incidence of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Pythium ultimum by 85, 48, and 71%, respectively (Fridlender et al., 1993). This further supports the findings of the present study that Pf isolates, more specifically Pf-5, can be potentially used as a biological agent against Foc causing wilt disease in cumin.

Correlation between percent growth inhibition of fungal pathogen and lytic enzymes

The correlation study among specific lytic enzyme activity and percent growth inhibition showed a significant (p = 0.01) but negative association (Table 1). This suggested that percentage growth inhibition decreased with increased concentration of cellulase and PG in the culture medium at 6 DAI. A significant positive correlation (p = 0.01) between percent growth inhibition of Foc and the activity of chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanase, and protease enzymes in the culture medium of antagonist established a relationship to inhibit the growth of fungal pathogen by increasing the levels of these lytic enzymes. However, CWDE cellulase and PG were negatively correlated with pathogenesis-related enzymes mainly chitinase and β-1, 3 glucanase. While positive correlation was established among the protease and pathogenesis-related enzymes—chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanase (Table 1)—moreover, correlation analysis indicated a positive relation between percent growth inhibition and enzymes, i.e., chitinase, β-1, 3 glucanase, and protease, produced by bio-agent Pf, while a negative relation was observed for enzymes, viz., cellulase and polygalacturonase, produced by fungal pathogen Foc during antagonism. A phenomenon explaining the positive impact of the combination of two enzymes (chitinase and β-1, 3 glucanase) on strong inhibition of fungal growth has been earlier reported (Saikia et al., 2005). Moreover, Pf isolates used for in vitro inhibition of A. niger, causal agent of groundnut collar rot, showed a similar correlation pattern during antagonism between P. fluorescens and A. niger (Deshmukh et al., 2015).

Table 1 Correlation matrix between growth inhibitions of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini (Foc) and production of lytic enzymes during in vitro antagonism with Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf) isolates in the culture medium at 6 days after inoculation (DAI)

The damage caused by F. oxysporum f. sp. cumini is of economic importance for cumin growing regions of the world. Hence, integrated pest management strategies are in high demand to control this devastating fungus, especially in an eco-friendly and inexpensive way. Several pathogens as biocontrol agents have previously been reported to fight against cumin wilt. However, the efficacy of these pathogens as bio-agent varies depending on the fungal variant, region, plant host, and agro-climatic conditions.

Conclusion

Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf) has been widely used as a biocontrol agent against many fungal pathogens. Among the tested isolates, Pf-5 was the most suitable candidate as it exhibited the capacity to inhibit maximum growth of fungal pathogen. The findings are strongly supported by bio-chemical analyses during the antagonism (Pf x Foc) experimentation. This study may enhance the existing knowledge of Pf × Foc interactions and assist in identifying the potential isolate(s) for future use as a biocontrol agent against wilt disease of cumin. In future, it would be of interest to further investigate the potential of Pf-5 isolate under controlled and/or field conditions as a biocontrol agent against cumin wilt.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material used can be availed from corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

Foc :

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini

Pf :

Pseudomonas fluorescens

PDA:

Potato-Dextrose Agar

DAI:

Days after inoculation

CMC:

Carboxy methyl cellulose

CWDEs:

Cell wall degrading enzymes

PG:

Polygalacturonase

References

  1. Adesina MF, Lembke A, Costa R, Speksnijder A, Smalla K (2007) Screening of bacterial isolates from various European soils for in vitro antagonistic activity towards Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum: site-dependent composition and diversity revealed. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2818–2828

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadzadeh M, Afsharmanesh H, Javan-Nikkhah M, Sharifi-Tehrani A (2006) Identification of some molecular traits in fluorescent pseudomonads with antifungal activity. Iran J Biotechnol 4:245–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Altinok HH, Dikilitas M, Yildiz HN (2013) Potential of Pseudomonas and Bacillus isolates as biocontrol agents against fusarium wilt of eggplant. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 27:3952–3958

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen EJ, Ali S, Byamukama E, Yen Y, Nepal MP (2018) Disease resistance mechanisms in plants. Genes 9(7):339–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatnagar K, Tak S, Sharma R, Majumdar V, Meena R (2013) Management of cumin wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini through chemical and biological agents. Indian Phytopathol 66:101–102

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bishi S, Vakharia D (2015) Secondary metabolites and lytic enzymes produced by fluorescent pseudomonads determine in-vitro antagonistic potential against Sclerotium rolfsii in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Pure Appl Microbiol 9:3283–3293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Booth C (1971) The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth mycological institute, Kew, Surrey (England) pp-237.

  8. Chawla N, Gangopadhyay S (2009) Integration of organic amendments and bioagents in suppressing cumin wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini. Indian Phytopathol 62:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chawla N, Gangopadhyay S, Dhaka B (2012) Eco-friendly approach for suppressing Fusarium wilt of cumin. Plant Dis Res (Ludhiana) 27:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Boer M, Van Der Sluis I, Van Loon L, Bakker P (1998) In-vitro compatibility between fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. strains can increase effectivity of Fusarium wilt control by combinations of these strains. IOBC WPRS Bull 21:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deshmukh S, Bishi S, Vakharia D (2015) Pseudomonas fluorescens modulate in-vitro lytic enzyme production and inhibit the growth of collar rot pathogen (Aspergillus niger) in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Pure Appl Microbiol 9:1531–1538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dev N, Dawande A (2010) Biocontrol of soil borne plant pathogen Rhiozoctonia solani using Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Asiatic J Biotech Res 1:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fatima Z, Saleemi M, Zia M, Sultan T, Aslam M, Rehman R, Chaudhary M (2009) Antifungal activity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolates against Rhizoctonia solani in wheat. Afr J Biotechnol 8:219–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fridlender M, Inbar J, Chet I (1993) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens by a β-1, 3 glucanase-producing Pseudomonas cepacia. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1211–1221

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iftikhar Y, Sajid A, Shakeel Q, Ahmad Z, Haq ZU (2020) Biological antagonism: a safe and sustainable way to manage plant diseases. In Plant disease management strategies for sustainable agriculture through traditional and modern approaches Springer:83–109

  16. Israel S, Mawar R, Lodha S (2005) Soil solarisation, amendments and bio-control agents for the control of Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini in aridisols. Ann Appl Biol 146:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kandoliya U, Vakharia D (2013) Antagonistic effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri causing wilt in chickpea. Legum Res 36:569–575

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kishore G, Pande S, Podile A (2006) Pseudomonas aeruginosa GSE 18 inhibits the cell wall degrading enzymes of Aspergillus niger and activates defence-related enzymes of groundnut in control of collar rot disease. Australas Plant Pathol 35:259–263

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar S, Gangopadhyay S, Godara S (2016) Antagonistic potentiality of bioagents against wilt of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini. Indian J Agric Sci 86(10):1350–1356

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee YP, Takahashi T (1966) An improved colorimetric determination of amino acids with the use of ninhydrin. Anal Biochem 14:71–77

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lodha S, Mawar R (2014) Cumin wilt management: a review. J Spice Aromat Crop 23:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maleki M, Mostafaee S, Mokhtarnejad L, Farzaneh M (2010) Characterization of' Pseudomonas fluorescens’ strain CV6 isolated from cucumber rhizosphere in Varamin as a potential biocontrol agent. Aust J Crop Sci 4(9):676–683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik CP, Singh MB (1980) Plant enzymology and histo-enzymology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, p-9.

  24. Mohammed AM, Al-Ani LK, Bekbayeva L, Salleh B (2011) Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense by Pseudomonas fluorescens and BABA in vitro. World Appl Sci J 15:189–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Özer G, Bayraktar H (2015) Determination of fungal pathogens associated with Cuminum cyminum in Turkey. Plant Prot Sci 51:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petit AN, Fontaine F, Vatsa P, Clément C, Vaillant-Gaveau N (2012) Fungicide impacts on photosynthesis in crop plants. Photosynth Res 111:315–326

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raymaekers K, Ponet L, Holtappels D, Berckmans B, Cammue BPA (2020) Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – a review. Biol Control 104240

  28. Reissig JL, Strominger JL, Leloir LF (1955) A modified colorimetric method for the estimation of N-acetylamino sugars. J Biol Chem 217:959–966

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rini C, Sulochana K (2008) Usefulness of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum infecting tomato. J Trop Agric 45:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riquelme M, Aguirre J, Bartnicki-García S, Braus GH, Feldbrügge M, Fleig U, Hansberg W, Herrera-Estrella A, Kämper J, Kück U (2018) Fungal morphogenesis, from the polarized growth of hyphae to complex reproduction and infection structures. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 82:e00068–e00017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadasivam S, Manickam A (1992) Phenolics. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences, Wiley eastern limited:187–188

  32. Saikia R, Singh B, Kumar R, Arora D (2005) Detection of pathogenesis-related proteins–chitinase and β-1, 3 glucanase in induced chickpea. Curr Sci 89(4):659–663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sivan A, Chet I (1989) Degradation of fungal cell walls by lytic enzymes of Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiology 135:675–682

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toyoda H, Hashimoto H, Utsumi R, Kobayashi H, Ouchi S (1988) Detoxification of fusaric acid by a fusaric acid-resistant mutant of Pseudomonas solanacearum and its application to biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato. Phytopathol (USA) 78:1307–1311

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Kan JAL (2006) Licensed to kill: the lifestyle of a necrotrophic plant pathogen. Trends Plant Sci 11:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vidhyasekaran P, Muthamilan M (1995) Development of formulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens for control of chickpea wilt. Plant Disease (USA) 79:782–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. U. K. Kandoliya, Asst. Professor, Dept. of Biochemistry, Junagadh Agricultural University, India, for providing the Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates used in the present study. The authors also extend their appreciation to the Head of Dept. Dr. B. A. Golakiya for his support during this research work.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the department of biochemistry at the university.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RR designed and performed all the experimental work under supervision of DNV and advised by DSR. All authors have contributed to the manuscript preparation, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dheeraj Singh Rathore.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rathore, R., Vakharia, D.N. & Rathore, D.S. In vitro screening of different Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates to study lytic enzyme production and growth inhibition during antagonism of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini, wilt causing pathogen of cumin. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30, 57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00259-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Growth inhibition
  • Cumin wilt
  • Lytic enzymes
  • Microbe-microbe interaction
  • Pseudomonas
  • Fusarium