Efficacy of native entomopathogenic nematodes from Turkey against the alder leaf beetle, Agelastica alni L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), under laboratory conditions
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 27 June 2017
Accepted: 6 December 2017
Published: 8 February 2018
The alder leaf beetle, Agelastica alni L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is one of the most defoliator pests of oak and alder trees. In the present study, the efficacies of three native strains of entomopathogenic nematodes, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (ZET35), Steinernema feltiae (ZET31), and Steinernema websteri (AS-1), were tested against pre-pupae and adults of A. alni. Experiments were conducted by four concentrations under laboratory conditions in 2015. Four different temperature regimes were tested at concentration of 1000 infective juveniles (IJs)/ml under laboratory conditions. It was observed that pre-pupae were more sensitive than adults in all tests. Based on screening tests, S. websteri was the most effective isolate on both pre-pupae and adults of A. alni at concentration of 1000 IJs/ml with 79.17 and 71.11% mortality, respectively. It caused the highest mortality values at all temperatures, except for 30 °C against pre-pupae and adults. Results of the present study suggested that S. websteri and H. bacteriophora had significant potentials against A. alni.
The alder leaf beetle, Agelastica alni L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is widely distributed in the Europe, Caucasus, Siberia, North-Eastern Kazakhstan, and the USA (Sezen et al. 2004). A. alni feeds on variety of broadleaf species including hazelnut (Corylus spp.) and alder (Alnus spp.) during spring and summer seasons and occasionally damages other plant species and genera such as Betula pendula (Fagales: Betulaceae), Salix caprea (Malpighiales: Salicaceae), Populus spp. (Malpighiales: Salicaceae), and Tilia spp. (Malvales: Malvaceae) (Medvedev 1983). Since the pest has high reproductive rate, it causes severe defoliation to host plants in native habitats. Adults and larvae of A. alni attack host plant or its products with significant commercial value and cause mortality or predispose host to infestation by other pests. They cause loss of markets due to quarantine status. The final damage of the pest is unsightly and repeated heavy defoliation and can cause growth loss in large trees and mortality of young plants. In addition, foliar injury can be unsightly in residential areas, parks, and forest recreation sites.
Pests are generally controlled by chemical pesticides that may lead to developing resistance by the target pest in addition to causing harms to human and environment (Ffrench-Constant et al. 2004). Therefore, researchers have been studying to develop alternatives for pesticides. An alternative method to chemical pesticides is biocontrol and the microbial biocontrol agents with no harmful effects on human health and environment. The common microbial biocontrol agents are viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes (Vega and Kaya 2012).
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) from the families Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae are among such alternatives as biological control agents against insect pests, especially the ones inhabiting soil or in the cryptic habitats (Kaya and Gaugler 1993). EPNs have been tested successfully as potential biological control agents of insect pests in Turkey (Kepenekci and Susurluk 2006; Yilmaz et al. 2009; Gokce et al. 2013; Erbas et al. 2014; Kepenekci et al. 2015).
Up to now, control strategies applied for A. alni are still insufficient to prevent its damage. However, increasing interest in developing environmentally safe pest control methods has inspired us to study the potential of different biological agents against the pest.
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three EPNs isolated from Turkey against pre-pupae and adults of A. alni under laboratory conditions.
Materials and methods
Collection of insects
A. alni adults and larvae were collected from infested Alnus glutinosa trees in the vicinity of Trabzon, Turkey, between March and June, 2015. The larvae were carefully handpicked from undersides of leaves by a soft fine-tipped paintbrush, and the adults were caught by a sweep net. Insect samples were placed into plastic boxes (20 cm deep and 20 cm diameter) with ventilated lids and freshly collected plane leaves as food. Afterwards, the collection was transported to the laboratory. Healthy adults and pre-pupae were acclimated for 2 days to the laboratory conditions then healthy ones were used for bioassays.
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (ZET35), Steinernema feltiae (ZET31), and Steinernema websteri (AS-1) isolates, used in the experiments, were maintained in the collection of the entomopathogens, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science at Karadeniz Technical University (Erbas et al. 2014; Gokce et al. 2015). Nematode cultures were maintained in last instar greater wax moth larvae, Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) (Woodring and Kaya 1988), and infective juveniles were stored in distilled water at 10 °C. Before starting the experiments, the nematodes were kept at 25 °C.
Experiments were carried out for all isolates to determine their pathogenicity against A. alni. Plastic boxes (4 cm deep and 3.4 cm diameter) were used for the experiments. Each box was filled with 40 g sterilized sandy soil and adjusted to 7% (w/v) moisture by adding distilled water.
The efficacy of EPNs was tested at three concentrations: 200, 500, and 1000 infective juveniles (IJs) in 1 ml of water per plastic box (10, 25, and 50 IJs per individual in 50 μl of distilled water). For the control groups, only 50 μl of water was added to each box. The treated boxes were kept at room temperature for 1 h, and then a single pre-pupa or an adult were placed on the sand surface in the boxes capped with a lid. Screening tests were conducted at 25 °C, and mortality rates were assessed on 7 days after treatment. Dead insects were dissected under the stereomicroscope to ascertain that mortality resulted from nematodes’ infection.
To determine the effect of increasing temperature, 1000 IJs ml−1 were applied to the boxes, which were then placed in incubators at 15, 20, 25, or 30 °C. Seven days after nematode treatments, the sandy soil in each box was poured out and mortality rate of the tested insects was recorded. Experiments were performed with 30 pre-pupae or adults for each nematode concentration and temperature regimes. The experiments were repeated three times on different dates.
Mortality data were corrected by Abbott’s formula (Abbott 1925). The data were subjected to ANOVA and subsequently to Duncan multiple range tests (p < 0.001) to compare isolates with each other and the control group. Lethal concentrations (LC50) for EPNs against pre-pupae or adults of A. alni were calculated by probit analysis. All analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 statistical software (IBM Corporation, Armonk).
Results and discussion
Calculated LC50 values for pre-pupae and adults of A. alni treated with three EPN isolates, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (ZET35), Steinernema feltiae (ZET31), and Steinernema websteri (AS-1)
LC50 (IJ ml−1)
Adults exhibited less sensitivity at all tested temperatures. Mortality ratio by H. bacteriophopra increased with increasing of temperature and reached 40% at 30 °C (F = 1588, 08; df = 3, 35; p < 0.001). As in the pre-pupae, mortality rates of adults by S. feltiae decreased as the temperature increased. The highest mortality by S. websteri was provided at 25 °C on adults (68.54%) (F = 11, 35, 10; df = 3, 35; p < 0.001).
The highest pathogenic effect was recorded by S. feltiae on pre-pupae at 15 °C, while the mortality caused by S. feltiae on both pre-pupae and adults decreased by increasing the temperature. This exhibits that S. feltiae is more active and effective at lower temperatures. An optimal biological activity of S. feltiae was detected in the temperature at 25 °C (Belair et al. 2003). Besides these two situations, the pathogenic effect of S. websteri increased to 16% on pre-pupae and changed from 70.4 to 86.66% mortalities by increasing the temperature. S. websteri caused high mortality of pre-pupae of A. alni at different temperatures. Some groups also investigated the efficacy of some EPN species/strains on A. alni. Doucet et al. (1996) reported that H. bacteriophora was found to be effective at temperature between 18 and 30 °C with an optimum range of 22–26 °C. Tomalak (2004) tested the infectivity and biocontrol potential of H. megidis and S. feltiae on A. alni under the laboratory and semi-field experiment conditions and reported that H. megidis caused a significant mortality against last instar larvae of A. alni. He also demonstrated that 50 IJs of S. feltiae (ScP) strain against last instar larvae of A. alni caused 56–66% mortality. Our results reported that S. feltiae caused the highest mortality (69.6%) at 15 °C. Also, H. bacteriophora and S. websteri had 98.51 and 86.66% mortality on pre-pupae of A. alni at 30 °C at the same period, respectively. Also, Choo et al. (2002) demonstrated that S. carpocapsae and H. bacteriophora were found to be highly virulent against different larval stages (first, second, and third larval instars) of Agelastica coerulea, where the both isolates had high mortality rates, while H. bacteriopohora caused 100% mortality on all larval stages. In agreement with other groups, our results showed that 15 °C recorded lower mortality than 20 or 25 °C (Choo et al. 2002; Belair et al. 2003; Trdan et al. 2009).
Trdan et al. (2009) performed laboratory studies to determine the effectiveness of S. feltiae, S. carpocapsae, H. bacteriophora, and H. megidis on Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) which is another member of Chrysomelidae family at three different temperatures (15, 20, and 25 °C). Although his studies showed that the lowest efficacy against all stages of the insect was at 15 °C, in the present tests, S. feltiae (ZET31) gave 70.11 and 64.44% mortality on pre-pupae of A. alni at 15 and 20 °C, respectively. Also, our study showed that the highest mortality on pre-pupae of A. alni provided as 98.51% mortality for H. bacteriophora at 30 °C.
Obtained results may suggest that H. bacteriophora (ZET35) and S. websteri (AS-1) can be used as biological control agents against pre-pupae and adults of A. alni. Future field studies are recommended with the aim of finding a better biological control agent against A. alni and for using these nematode isolates as biopesticides.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Belair G, Fournier Y, Dauphinais N (2003) Efficacy of steinernematid nematodes against three insect pests of crucifers in Quebec. J Nematol 35:259–265PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Choo HY, Lee DW, Yoon HS, Lee SM, Hang DT (2002) Effects of temperature and nematode concentration on pathogenicity and reproduction of entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae Pocheon strain (Nematoda: Steinernmeatidae). Korean J Appl Entomol 41:269–277View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doucet MMA, de Miranda MB, Bertolotti MA, Caro KA (1996) Efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (strain Oli) in relation to temperature, concentration and origin of the infective juvenile. Nematropica 26:129–133Google Scholar
- Erbas Z, Gokce C, Hazir S, Demirbag Z, Demir I (2014) Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic nematodes (Nematoda: Rhabditida) from the Eastern Black Sea region and their biocontrol potential against Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae. Turk J Agric For 38:187–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ffrench-Constant RH, Daborn PJ, Le Goff G (2004) The genetics and genomics of insecticide resistance. Trends Genet 20:163–170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gokce C, Erbas Z, Yilmaz H, Demirbag Z, Demir I (2015) A new entomopathogenic nematode species from Turkey, Steinernema websteri (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and its virulence. Turk J Biol 39:167–174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gokce C, Yilmaz H, Erbas Z, Demirbag Z, Demir I (2013) First record of Steinernema kraussei (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) from Turkey and its virulence against Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Nematol 45:253–259PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaya HK, Gaugler R (1993) Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annu Rev Entomol 38:181–206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kepenekci I, Hazir S, Ozdem A (2015) Evaluation of native entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi L Diptera Tephritidae larvae in soil. Turk J Agri For 39:74–79View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kepenekci, I. And A. Susurluk 2006. Infectivity of two Turkish isolates of Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) against Rhagoletis cerasi and Ceratitis capitata. Nematol Mediterr, 34: 95-97Google Scholar
- Medvedev LN (1983) Chrysomelidae from Iran (Insecta: Coleoptera). Senckenberg Biol 64:133–140Google Scholar
- Sezen K, Demir I, Demirbag Z (2004) Study of the bacterial flora as a biological control agent of Agelastica alni L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biologia 59:327–331Google Scholar
- Tomalak M (2004) Infectivity of entomopathogenic nematodes to soil-dwelling developmental stages of the tree leaf beetles Altica quercetorum and Agelastica alni. Entomol Exp Appl 110:125–133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trdan S, Vidrih M, Andjus L, Laznik Z (2009) Activity of four entomopathogenic nematode species against different developmental of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Helminthologia 46:14–20View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vega E, Kaya HK (2012) Insect pathology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p 490Google Scholar
- Woodring JL, Kaya HK (1988) Steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes: a handbook of biology and techniques. In: Southern cooperative series bulletin 331. Arkansas, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
- Yilmaz H, Waeyenberge L, Demir I, Moens M, Demirbag Z (2009) A new entomopathogenic nematode species for Turkey, Heterorhabditis megidis Poinar, Jackson & Klein 1987 (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae). Turk J Agric For 33:385–391Google Scholar