Field efficacy of Isaria fumosorosea alone and in combination with insecticides against Aleurodicus rugioperculatus on coconut

The rugose spiraling whitefly (RSW), Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), an exotic polyphagous pest and its infestation was documented on coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) for the first time in India during 2016. RSW has attained a serious pest on many economically important crop plants due to its damage severity and rapid spread across the country in a short span of time. Hence, an attempt was made to evaluate the efficiency of the entomopathogenic fungus (EPF), Isaria fumosorosea alone as well as in combination with a reduced dose of few insecticides against RSW on coconut to devise a sustainable integrated pest management module. Thirty-two randomly selected RSW-infested coconut palms were labelled, and eight treatments with four replications were used in a randomized complete block design during the summer months (April and May) during 2021. Two sprays were performed at 15-day intervals, at a rate of 5 L/palm, and observations on infestation/palm (%), intensity (%) and mean live colonies of RSW were recorded. The results revealed that the combination of I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) @ 5 ml/l + profenophos 50 EC @ 2 ml/l spray significantly reduced per cent infestation of RSW (82.97%), per cent intensity of RSW (80.49%) and mean RSW live colonies (79.68%) followed by combination of I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) @ 5 ml/l + buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.25 ml/l spray significantly reduced per cent infestation of RSW (79.35%), intensity of RSW (74.79%) and mean RSW live colonies (74.20%) over I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) @ 5 ml/l alone and untreated control. A combination of I. fumosorosea (5 ml/l) + profenophos 50 EC (2 ml/l) spray twice at an interval of 15 days was found effective in reducing the RSW population on coconut. The present study concludes that the RSW can be controlled effectively by I. fumosorosea alone and in combination with novel insecticides at a reduced rate which showed better toxicity, ovicidal action and preserve natural enemies and reduced environmental load of chemical pesticides.


Background
Rugose spiraling whitefly (RSW), Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera:Aleyrodidae), was first reported in Miami-Dade Country, Florida, USA, as a pest of gumbo limbo Bursera simaruba (L.) in 2009. RSW was first described by Martin (2004) and based on samples collected from coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.), Arecaceae leaves in Belize. Occurrence and infestation of RSW on coconut palms was reported for the first time

Open Access
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control *Correspondence: selvaentomo@gmail.com Sandeep et al. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control (2022) 32:106 in India at Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, during 2016 (Sundararaj and Selvaraj 2017). RSW is highly polyphagous being found to feed on more than 120 plants, mainly from the families of Arecaceae, Musaceae, Anacardiaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Myrtaceae, Fabaceae and Combretaceae. In India, so far, 40 host plants have been recorded, but the pest is majorly a menace to coconut, oil palm and banana (Sundararaj et al. 2021).
In South Indian states, coconut production has been severely affected after the invasion and establishment of RSW and reached the outbreak situation during favourable weather conditions, which has led to reduction in quality of nuts and increase in input costs for cultivation (Josephrajkumar et al. 2018). Traditional pesticides are harmful to natural enemies, including predators and parasitoids, and may cause a resurgence in many sucking pests, such as whiteflies. The present incidence of RSW in India is concerning, because of its polyphagous nature and capacity to spread to new locations, and a systematic approach is necessary to manage this invasion . To manage these groups of insects, biological control methods should be incorporated into integrated pest management strategies (Skinner et al. 2014).
The efficacy of I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) in the field can be enhanced when it is used in combination with appropriate insecticides at a reduced rate for effective pest control. This technique might be an alternate choice for farmers for managing A. rugioperculatus, as pesticide usage can be reduced, resulting in less risk to the environment and resistance. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of native isolate I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) alone and in combination with selected insecticides insecticides and biopesticides at reduced rate for the management of A. rugioperculatus Martin on coconut.

Methods
Efficacy of I. fumosorosea (ICAR NBAIR Pfu-5) was studied alone and in combination with various insecticides and biopesticides against A. rugioperculatus on coconut palms in Kommanalu village (14° 3′ 32.56″ N 75° 32′ 47.4″ E, 610 m), Shivamogga, Karnataka, India, in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) during summer months (April and May) in 2021. Complete treatment details are presented in Table 1. For screening, I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) blastopore oil formulation was procured from the ICAR-NBAIR fungal repository. Pongamia soap was obtained from the ICAR-IIHR, Bangalore. Buprofezin 25% SC, profenophos 50 EC, fish oil rosin soap and azadirachtin10000 ppm were obtained from local pesticides dealer in Shivamogga, Karnataka. Thirty-two randomly selected infested coconut palms (age: 3 years, variety: Arsikere tall, height: 2.0 m) were labelled, and eight treatments with four replications were used. Two sprays were performed at 15-day intervals. Fortune Agro batteryoperated Knapsack high-volume sprayer with a capacity of 16 l was used. Water was used to calibrate the sprayer before each application. During the evening hrs (4-6 PM), spray solutions were sprayed at a rate of 5 l/palm.
Observations on the RSW population were taken on three parameters, infestation/palm (%), intensity of RSW (%) and mean live colonies.

Infestation of RSW per Palm (%)
Infestation of RSW made before and after spraying was determined using the formula suggested by (Visalakshi et al. 2021).

Intensity of RSW infestation (%)
Intensity of pest damage was taken from four infested fronds per palm from the outer and middle whorl representing the four directions. Per cent intensity of RSW was made using the formula (Visalakshi et al. 2021).

Mean live colonies of RSW/leaflet
Live colonies count was taken from 10 randomly selected leaflets from each palm before and after spraying (Visalakshi et al. 2021).
Observations on the RSW population were made one day before spraying, 7 and 15 days after spraying for each treatment. The leaf samples were brought to the laboratory and examined I. fumosorosea mycelium growth and ascertain the mortality RSW using a stereo binocular microscope at 10 × to 40 × magnification. Efficacy was computed based on a reduction in the number of RSW live colonies compared to the untreated check.

Statistical analysis
The data were analysed using the analysis of variance technique (ANOVA) of RCBD in SPSS software, and the results were interpreted at a 5% level of significance. For comparing treatment means, the Duncan multiple range test (DMRT) was used (Duncan 1955).

Results
The present study revealed that the EPF, I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5), had significant virulence and fungal mycelia development on RSW eggs, nymphs and adults. I. fumosorosea infection affects egg hatching, and nymphal mortality especially fourth-instar nymph (pupae), which led to a severe reduction in adult emergence and further perpetuation of RSW population. Substantial mycosis and deformation were seen in newly emerging adults from I. fumosorosea-treated nymphs, which led to a drastic reduction of adult emergence that may result in less perpetuation of the pest in the coconut ecosystem (Fig. 1). Further, the combination of I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) @ 5 ml /l sublethal dose of profenophos 50 EC@ 2 ml/l was superior to all other treatments after 7 and 15 days, with significantly lower RSW population on coconut palms.

Discussion
In pest management, the use of mixtures of botanical and microbial insecticides is more stable and cost-effective with less non-target effects (Yi et al. 2012). Even though microbial organisms and chemical insecticides can be used together, they must be compatible. In general, fungicides are found to harm myco-insecticides, while insecticides do not have any impact on EPF, when the chemicals are used at the appropriate levels (Chen and Feng 2003). It is well known that I. fumosorosea and chemical insecticides have different modes of action. The fungal pathogen infection process is dependent on many biological events, including the adhesion of fungi to insect cuticles, spore germination and hyphal growth. In order to penetrate the insect cuticle, the fungal appressorium exerts mechanical pressure and excretes enzymes to degrade the cuticle (Altre et al. 1999).
The present findings are in agreement with Visalakshi et al. (2021), who reported a significant reduction of mean coconut rugose spiraling whitefly (RSW) live colonies, ranged from (40.76 to 67.57%). However, Kumar et al. (2018) observed that I. fumosorosea significantly suppressed A. rugioperculatus eggs (90.00%) than the control at various sampling intervals two and eight DAT in Florida. Sanchez and Castillo (2008) reported that I. fumosorosea reduced egg hatching by 50% in a similarly related whitefly species, A. dispersus. Boopathi et al. (2013) reported Metarhizium anisopliae (M2 strain) and P. fumosoroseus (P1 strain) caused 37.3 and 22.6% of egg mortality at 8 days after treatment (DAT). One of the most significant characteristics of EPF is the ability to control pests during the initial stage. As a result, following insect population growth and crop damage will be reduced.
Profenophos 50 EC belongs to the organophosphate insecticides group, which inhibits the acetylcholinesterase enzyme, leading to paralysis and death of pest organisms (Elbert et al. 2008). Profenophos showed a significant ovicidal effect on A. rugioperculatus five days after treatment as the colour of eggs changed to dark brown (Pradhan et al. 2020).
Buprofezin 25 SC was the first selective insect growth regulator developed to control B. tabaci on cotton (Horowitz and Ishaaya 1992). It is a chitin synthesis inhibitor that interferes with cuticle formation during Fig. 4 Efficacy of Isaria fumosorosea alone and in combination with selected insecticides and biopesticides on mean live colonies of RSW on coconut in summer (first and second spray pooled data). Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly by DMRT (P = 0.05); DBS = day before spray; DAS = day after spray; RSW = rugose spiraling whitefly; mean number of whitefly live colonies/leaflet: (ten leaflets from each palm) immature developmental stages leading to pest mortality (Palumbo et al. 2001). However, field studies showed that the efficacy of buprofezin treatments (alone or mixed with I. fumosorosea) was higher than I. fumosorosea alone. A significant reduction in the RSW population was reported for more than five weeks in buprofezin alone and more than seven weeks in the combination treatments (Kumar et al. 2018). However, azadirahtin, a primary active ingredient obtained from the seeds of the plant Azadirachta indica, acts as a growth regulator, antifeedant and repellent against insects from different genera including species that feed by sucking plant juices (Copping and Duke 2007). A combination of azadirachtin and I. fumosorosea against the whitefly Bemisia argentifolii in laboratory bioassays resulted in up to 90% nymphal mortality. However, the combined effects were less than additive and azadirachtin had a moderate inhibitory effect on germination and growth of I. fumosorosea (James 2003). Hence, the present findings supplement the efficacy of neem against other species of whiteflies. Huang et al. (2006) reported that combinations of I. fumosorosea with imidacloprid exhibited a strong synergistic effect against B. tabaci. Oil-based emulsifiable formulations of I. fumosorosea alone and combined with imidacloprid were applied against T. vaporariorum on lettuce grown in the greenhouse. Feng et al. (2004) found that the fungus was highly effective alone and combined with imidacloprid at around 15% of its recommended rate.
The different modes of action might contribute to the synergistic effects of insecticide mixtures. It is probably that the slower pest killing speed of EPF in combination with the faster pest-killing chemical insecticides might also contribute to the synergistic interaction. However, among the different chemical insecticides and biopesticides tested, profenophos, buprofezin and azadirachtin were significantly effective in the RSW population.
This finding is consistent with that of other researchers who have studied similar pathogens and pesticides with fungal entomopathogens such as I. fumosorosea and aleyrodid pests (Huang et al. 2010). According to the obtained findings, there are positive interactions between I. fumosorosea and profenophos 50 EC and these interactions may serve as an effective control strategy for A. rugioperculatus in the coconut orchards.

Conclusion
The present study revealed that a combination of I. fumosorosea (ICAR-NBAIR Pfu-5) @ 5 ml/l + profenophos 50 EC @ 2 ml/l had the potential to manage A. rugioperculatus. Spraying twice in 15-day interval significantly reduced RSW infestation (82.97%), intensity (80.49%) and mean live colonies (79.68%). It is necessary to investigate the negative effects of this combination on parasitoids and predators under field conditions to develop the biointensive integrated pest management of RSW in coconut.