Table 4 Antagonistic and growth enhancement potentials of Pf10 and Pf14 against Rhizoctonia diseases of potato under field conditions
Treatments | Emergence (%) | Stem canker | Black scurf | Disease controlled (%) | Yield (t/ha) | Yield over control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stem canker | Black scurf | ||||||||
DI (%) | DI (%) | DS (%) | DI (%) | DI (%) | DS (%) | Â | Â | ||
Pf10 Cell suspension | 97.17 | 50.00 | 79.33 | 38.67 | 16.67 | 11.19 | 19.16 | 19.80 | 4.32 |
Pf10 Talc formulation | 95.75 | 30.00 | 62.67 | 29.83 | 50.00 | 14.67 | 25.13 | 20.85 | 9.85 |
Pf14 Cell suspension | 96.33 | 30.00 | 76.23 | 35.81 | 50.00 | 29.85 | 37.63 | 20.79 | 9.54 |
Pf14 Talc formulation | 95.17 | 20.00 | 38.00 | 15.50 | 66.67 | 57.46 | 67.59 | 21.90 | 15.38 |
Control | 84.63 | 60.00 | 89.33 | 47.83 | – | – | – | 18.98 | – |
CD (0.05) | 0.68 | 4.28 | 10.08 | 3.94 | – | – | – | 1.77 | – |
SE(m) | 0.21 | 1.30 | 3.04 | 1.19 | – | – | – | 0.53 | – |