Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean (± SE) consumption of three predatory mites at different densities of different stages of P. citri

From: Selection of suitable predatory mites against, Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) using relative control potential metrics and functional response

Prey Stage

Prey density

Neoseiulus californicus

Scapulaseius newsami

Neoseiulus cucumeris

ANOVA

Adults

5

2.3 ± 0.260 dB

1.4 ± 0.163eC

3.2 ± 0.249eA

df = 2,29; F-value = 15.51; P-value = 0.000

 

10

2.9 ± 0.233 dB

3.3 ± 0.213 dB

6.5 ± 0.269dA

df = 2,29; F-value = 67.82; P-value = 0.000

 

20

4.6 ± 0.306cB

4.8 ± 0.291cB

9.5 ± 0.401cA

df = 2,29; F-value = 68.08; P-value = 0.000

 

40

6 ± 0.298bB

6.3 ± 0.300bB

12.8 ± 0.533bA

df = 2,29; F-value = 95.59; P-value = 0.000

 

80

8.8 ± 0.249aB

8.3 ± 0.335aB

16.2 ± 0.327aA

df = 2,29; F-value = 208.85; P-value = 0.000

 

160

7.1 ± 0.277bB

7.1 ± 0.379abB

14.3 ± 0.367bA

df =2,29; F-value = 146.26; P-value = 0.000

  

df = 5,59; F-value = 84.53; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 77.99; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 178.98; P-value = 0.000

 

Eggs

5

2.9 ± 0.277dA

3.6 ± 0.340dA

3 ± 0.258eA

df = 2,29; F-value = 1.66; P-value = 0.209

 

10

5.7 ± 0.335cAB

5 ± 0.333 dB

6.5 ± 0.307dA

df = 2,29; F-value = 5.32; P-value = 0.011

 

20

7.7 ± 0.367bB

7.4 ± 0.670cB

13.7 ± 0.496cA

df = 2,29; F-value = 45.71; P-value = 0.000

 

40

10.7 ± 0.517aB

11.9 ± 0.586abB

16.3 ± 0.300bA

df = 2,29; F-value = 37.20; P-value = 0.000

 

80

10.8 ± 0.512aC

13.9 ± 0.526aB

19.3 ± 0.300aA

df = 2,29; F-value = 88.27; P-value = 0.000

 

160

8.3 ± 0.300bC

10.8 ± 0.727bB

15.2 ± 0.249bA

df = 2,29; F-value = 53.75; P-value = 0.000

  

df = 5,59; F-value = 58.53; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 54.63; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 361.53; P-value = 0.000

 

Immatures

5

1.9 ± 0.277eB

1.9 ± 0.233 dB

3.6 ± 0.340eA

df = 2,29; F-value = 11.72; P-value = 0.000

 

10

4.5 ± 0.373 dB

4.4 ± 0.267cB

6 ± 0.298dA

df = 2,29; F-value = 8.06; P-value = 0.002

 

20

5.8 ± 0.249cdB

5.4 ± 0.400cB

8.8 ± 0.416cA

df = 2,29; F-value = 26.19; P-value = 0.000

 

40

6.5 ± 0.619cB

7.2 ± 0.359bB

13 ± 0.365bA

df = 2,29; F-value = 59.16; P-value = 0.000

 

80

10.5 ± 0.500aB

8.9 ± 0.482aB

15.3 ± 0.517aA

df = 2,29; F-value = 44.37; P-value = 0.000

 

160

8.6 ± 0.340bB

8.2 ± 0.573abB

13.9 ± 0.314abA

df = 2,29; F-value = 55.90; P-value = 0.000

  

df = 5,59; F-value = 53.56; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 24.34; P-value = 0.000

df = 5,59; F-value = 151.25; P-value = 0.000

 
  1. The means followed by different small letters in the table are significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test) in the same column, the values followed by different capital letters in the table are significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test) in the same line. The values are presented as mean ± SE