Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control

Table 4 P values of contrast analysis between treatments

From: Screening of indigenous rhizobacteria as potential biological control against faba bean (Vicia faba L.) gall disease caused by Olpidium viciae

Contrast DF Disease data DF Shoot parameter Root parameter
AUDPC Final DI Final S Length Fresh W Pods/P Dry W Length Fresh W Dry W
[P1] versus [B1; B2] 43 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
P1 versus B3 43 0.046* 0.059 0.101 0.348 0.381 0.528 0.604 0.654 0.599 0.712
P1 versus B4 43 0.017* 0.029* 0.090 0.298 0.354 0.681 0.586 0.766 0.904 0.806
P1 versus B1B2 43  < 0.001*  < 0.001*  < 0.001* 0.003* 0.019* 0.007* 0.009* 0.018* 0.045* 0.003*
P1 versus B1B3 43 < 0.001* 0.002* 0.003* 0.006* 0.102 0.042* 0.064 0.092 0.100 0.026*
[P1] versus [B1B4; B2B3] 43 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
[P1] versus [B2B4; B3B4] 43 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
B1 versus B1B2 43 0.016* 0.001* 0.094 0.022* 0.097 0.028* 0.027* 0.092 0.185 0.009*
B2 versus B1B2 43 0.053 0.032* 0.071 0.024* 0.112 0.021* 0.020* 0.048* 0.125 0.007*
B3 versus B1B2 43 0.014* 0.000* 0.017* 0.016* 0.401 0.023* 0.022* 0.194 0.235 0.051
B4 versus B1B2 43 0.038* 0.000* 0.019* 0.019* 0.103 0.015* 0.162 0.032* 0.122 0.004*
B1B2 versus B2B4 43 0.107 0.015* 0.314 0.060 0.161 0.034* 0.024* 0.033* 0.097 0.006*
B1B2 versus B3B4 43 0.069 0.003* 0.230 0.050* 0.133 0.026* 0.020* 0.030* 0.092 0.005*
FB-Obse versus FB-26869 43 0.022* 0.014* < 0.001* 0.010* < 0.001* 0.017* 0.006* 0.005* 0.001* 0.028*
Early versus Late application 43  < 0.001* 0.002* 0.010* ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
  1. DF—degrees of freedom, ND—no data, AUDPC—area under disease progress curve, DI—disease incidence, S—severity, W—weight, P—plant, P1—control (inoculated with Olpidium viciae isolate 4), B1-P. aeruginosa AAUS31, B2—P. fluorescens AAUPF62, B3—Bacillus spp. AAUAm28, B4—Bacillus spp. AAUMF42, FB- faba bean variety
  2. *A significant difference at 5% probability level
Back to article page