Table 2 Integration of effective bio-control agents on development of anthracnose on mango fruits after artificial inoculation
Treatment no. | Treatment | Conc. (%) | Per cent disease index (PDI) | Disease control (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | Mean | ||||
T1 | T. viride + Pichia anomala | 5 + 5 | 10.82 (19.14) | 11.41 (19.70) | 11.12 | 86.98 |
T2 | T. harzianum + Pichia anomala | 5 + 5 | 5.62 (13.50) | 5.67 (13.67) | 5.65 | 93.39 |
T3 | T. viride + Bacillus subtilis | 5 + 5 | 8.79 (17.15) | 8.44 (16.83) | 8.62 | 89.91 |
T4 | T. viride + Hanseniaspora uvarum | 5 + 5 | 10.56 (18.92) | 11.52 (19.78) | 11.04 | 85.00 |
T5 | T. hamatum + Bacillus subtilis | 5 + 5 | 18.63 (25.53) | 19.45 (26.13) | 19.04 | 87.08 |
T6 | T. harzianum + Bacillus subtilis | 5 + 5 | 6.56 (14.73) | 7.58 (15.87) | 7.07 | 91.72 |
T7 | T. virens + P.fluorescens | 5 + 5 | 20.41 (26.82) | 22.90 (28.57) | 21.66 | 74.64 |
T8 | T. harzianum + Hanseniaspora uvarum | 5 + 5 | 10.63 (18.98) | 12.48 (20.64) | 11.56 | 86.47 |
T9 | T. hamatum + P. fluorescens | 5 + 5 | 19.71 (26.57) | 23.26 (28.81) | 21.49 | 74.84 |
T10 | Control | – | 85.42 (67.57) | 83.02 (65.07) | 85.42 | 0 |