Skip to main content

Table 5 Evaluation of simultaneous exposure and interaction among chemical nematicide, bacteria, botanicals, and fungi against the root-knot development of Meloidogyne incognita in tomato plants under greenhouse conditions

From: Integrated management of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato using combinations of abamectin, Purpureocillium lilacinum, rhizobacteria, and botanicals compared with nematicide

Treatments

Root parameters

Soil parameters

No. of galls

No. of egg masses

Root gall index (RGI)

Nematode population density (J2) 100 g soils/plant/pot

   

Final population (% reduction)

Reproduction factor (RF = Pf/Pi)

Infected tomato plants

48.20a

53.80a

4.00

456.00

2.28

Rhizobacteria + Purpureocillium lilacinum

21.20e

34.80cd

3

304.20cd (33.28)

1.52

Citrullus colocynthis + Moringa oleifera + Tagetes erecta

38.40b

46.00b

4

339.60b (25.52)

1.69

Treated plants with chemical nematicides: abamectin + emmectin benzoate

32.80c

39.40c

2.6

344.00b (24.56)

1.72

Abamectin + Purpureocillium lilacinum

6.60g

18.20e

2.00

116.60 h (74.42)

0.58

Emmectin benzoate + Purpureocillium lilacinum

11.40fg

20.40e

2.40

326.00bc (28.50)

1.63

Abamectin + Rhizobacteria

15.60f

23.80e

2.40

209.00f (54.16)

1.04

Emmectin benzoate + Rhizobacteria

25.60de

31.80d

3.00

246.00e (46.05)

1.23

Botanical extracts (Citrullus colocynthis + Moringa oleifera + Tagetes erecta) + Rhizobacteria

31.40cd

42.60c

3.60

354.00b (22.36)

1.78

Botanical extracts (Citrullus colocynthis + Moringa oleifera + Tagetes erecta) + Purpureocillium lilacinum

29.20cd

37.80c

3.20

246.00e (46.05)

1.23

  1. Each value is the mean of five replicates
  2. Means in each column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple range tests
  3. \( \mathsf{Reduction}\%=\frac{\mathsf{Control}-\mathsf{treatment}\kern0.5em }{\mathsf{Control}}\times \mathsf{100} \)