Skip to main content

Table 2 Population densities of Tetranychus urticae (N) on hydroponic cucumber and effectiveness of biopesticides

From: Efficiency of botanical pesticides against some pests infesting hydroponic cucumber, cultivated under greenhouse conditions

Treatments

Before spray

After 24 h

After 72 h

After 168 h

After 336 h

N

CPD (%)

EF (%)

N

CPD (%)

EF (%)

N

CPD (%)

EF (%)

N

CPD (%)

EF (%)

Matrine

28.6a

11.3a

− 60.4

76

23.0a

− 19.7

62

8.0a

− 72.0

69

2.3a

− 91.8

88

Spintoram

26.3a

25.3a

− 3.7

41

27.6ab

5.0

53

6.3a

− 75.9

78

2.3a

− 91.1

86

Azadirachtin

30.0a

25.0a

− 16.6

47

13.6a

− 54.4

79

22.0b

− 26.6

31

14.6b

− 51.1

31

Custard apple

33.3a

33.3a

− 1.0

33

6.0a

− 82.0

91

3.3a

− 90.0

89

2.6a

− 92.0

85

Control

40.3a

67.6b

67.7

 

88.3b

119

 

45.6c

13.2

 

55.0c

36.3

 

Significance level

F = 0.61; df = 4; P ≥ 0.05

F = 19.6; df = 4; P ≤ 0.01

  

F = 5.52; df = 4; P ≤ 0.01

  

F = 95.9; df = 4; P ≤ 0.01

  

F = 12.5; df = 4; P ≤ 0.01

  
  1. The mean number (N) of mites/leaf (30 leaves per plot); within a column, the means pursued by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, α = 0.05)
  2. CPD (%) change in population density, EF (%) percent efficacy (Henderson-Tilton formula)